More NWO (split from "What is Real?")

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by junglelord » Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:04 pm

Birkeland wrote:
junglelord wrote:That conspiracy crap has saved me and my friend quite a bit of money.
Well, if you in contrast had been studying free market economics, instead of religious nonsensical kumbayah, you could have earned some money. In any case: the ludicrous conspiracy blamegame of pure ignorance is priceless - keep it up.
I love how you know what I have studied.
I have made more then double my investment.
I have also saved myself the loss that has hit.
I pulled when it was peaked.

Infact its big news today about the TSX.
I told my friends and even my own financial advisor that there was no immunity.
I still saved $5000 this month, and you tell me I need to study.
Thats a joke.

If had only known the first half, your half, I would be $5000 decreased in the last month.
Its clear your basis of decision would serve me no good, without the second half.
Hence the second half is worth $5000 more to me then the first half, just last month alone.
I intend to keep it out and see how much I do not lose. I did however call the entire deal based on insider information.
:lol:

Now tell me who knows what is going on? The guy who saw all this coming and prepared and was not hit by the crap that hit the fan, or those that laugh at any conspiracy theory. I am laughing at my $5000 I saved right now. I am also laughing at how my financial advisor last year said this could NOT happen. Oh reallY>? I must be real lucky then. Or well informed.
I believe informed is much more reliable then luck. So far the Conspiracy Theoriest are batting dam close to 100%.
Thats quite amazing for something so miligned.
The Toronto stock market was down more than 500 points Thursday afternoon as investors were weighed down by bad news from the mining and banking industries.


The S&P/TSX composite index was at 7,940.57 at mid-afternoon, down 549.99 points from Wednesday's close and the second time Thursday that the wildly swinging benchmark fell below 8,000 points.


It's nearly five years since Canada's most-watched stock index has been 8,000, in December 2003, and represented a drop of 47 per cent from the TSX peak just five months ago at 15,073.


The Canadian dollar was down 1.93 cents to 77.90 cents US, after dropping to an intraday low of 77.28.


Toronto financial stocks were down 8.7 per cent after TD Bank (TSX:TD) disclosed $350 million in quarterly credit trading losses. Its stock lost $4.96 to $44.97, and all the other big Canadian banks were also sharply lower. Royal Bank (TSX:RY) lost 10 per cent to $37.10 and CIBC (TSX:CM) fell 12 per cent to $42.65.


Metal stocks slid 9.5 per cent. Teck Cominco Ltd. (TSX:TCK.B) was down 18 per cent to $4.27 after it suspended dividends on its common shares to help cut debt taken on for the US$14-billion takeover of the Fording Canadian Coal Trust.


Kinross Gold Corp. (TSX:K) rose 55 cents to $14.49 on word it is paying US$250 million to buy the Lobo-Marte gold site in Chile from Teck Cominco and Anglo American PLC.


The TSX energy sector fell 9.1 per cent as crude oil dipped under the US$50-a-barrel mark for the first time since January 2007. The price was down $4.77 to $48.85 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.


Gold stocks were the lone gainer, up 4.5 per cent, as the December bullion contract rose $12.70 to close at $748.70 an ounce.


On Wall Street, the Dow Jones industrial average gave up on a midday rally, and dropped 115.49 points to 7,882. The Nasdaq composite was down 17.48 points at 1,369 and the S&P 500 shed 19.16 to 787.


Democratic leaders in Congress sidetracked legislation to bail out the auto industry Thursday and demanded the Big Three develop a plan assuring the money would make them economically viable.


A jump in weekly U.S. unemployment claims to a 16-year high was the latest piece of depressing economic data. The Labour Department said applications for jobless benefits rose to a seasonally adjusted 542,000 last week, from a downwardly revised 515,000 in the previous week.


In other movers, Nortel Networks (TSX:NT) shares fell 11 per cent to hit a new low of 55 cents.


March Networks (TSX:MN) says a bank in Latin America signed a $6 million deal to provide networked video recording systems and investigation software for use at more than 1,900 bank branches and automated teller machines. Shares were down 13 per cent, or 24 cents, to $1.63.


Overseas, Japan's main stock index plummeted 6.9 per cent and other markets were also solidly in the red.
Meanwhile Atlas Shrugged. The Bloodless Coup of Wallstreet on Washington is almost complete.
Naomi Klein: Bailout is ‘multi-trillion-dollar crime scene’

David Edwards and Muriel Kane
Raw Story
Wednesday, Nov 19, 2008

The Bush administration has already handed out almost half of the $700 billion in bank bailout money authorized by Congress but has not even filled the mandated oversight positions to review how it is being used.

Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, has described the handling of the bailout as “borderline criminal” because of this and other problems. Klein spoke to Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! on Monday to explain her accusations.

“We were all reassured that there was going to be transparency, accountability, legality,” Klein stated. “But now we’re finding out that, in fact, Henry Paulson has achieved his original goal by stealth, because there is no accountability, and lawmakers are very hesitant to challenge this. … Essentially, what the Bush administration has done is said, ‘We dare you to challenge us and be responsible for the Great Depression.’”

Klein sees three areas of borderline illegality. The first is that rather than being used to get banks lending again, the bailout money “is instead going to bonuses, is instead going to dividends, going to salaries, going to mergers.”

The second is that, without Congressional authorization, “the Treasury Department pushed through a tax windfall for the banks, a piece of legislation that allows the banks to save a huge amount of money when they merge with each other. And the estimate is that this represents a loss of $140 billion worth of tax revenue for the US government.”

The third problem, which dwarfs the $700 billion bailout itself, is that “there’s another $2 trillion that’s been handed out by the Federal Reserve in emergency loans to financial institutions, to banks, that actually we don’t really know who they’re handing the money out to, because, apparently, it’s a secret.”

“If the Fed has accepted distressed assets as collateral in exchange for these loans,” stated Klein, “there’s a very good chance the taxpayers aren’t going to be getting this money back. … So that’s why we’re calling this the ‘trillion-dollar crime scene’ or the ‘multi-trillion-dollar crime scene.’”

Klein argued that Congress should be challenging violations of the bailout legislation, but instead “what they’re saying is, we can’t afford to enforce the law … that somehow, because there’s an economic crisis, legality is a luxury that Congress can’t afford.”

“I’m quite concerned,” Klein stated, “that what we’re seeing from Obama’s team is an accepting of this logic that they need to give the market what it wants, which is continuity, smooth transition, which is really just code for more of the same. … I think we should question all of it. Across the board, I think the assumptions are faulty.”

Klein is also concerned that rather than using the crisis as a mandate to fix the underlying problems, the world leaders at the recent G20 summit were talking about propping up the old system.

“Think about what these leaders could do if they really wanted to,” Klein suggested. “When you have a crisis like this, which so clearly shows the need for those types of regulations, when you have an election like there just was in the United States, where people have said clearly that this is a priority, the leaders have an opportunity to act. … But they blew that opportunity, and they actually called for less regulation.”

“This crisis isn’t over,” Klein warned, “and the same people who justified this bailout, who clamored for this bailout, are the very people who are going to turn around and say to Barack Obama, ‘We can’t afford for you to make good on your election promises. We can’t afford universal healthcare.’”

“The money has been given to the people who needed it least, and it’s going to be used to justify austerity measures imposed against those who need it most,” Klein concluded. “It’s going to be used to justify cuts to food stamps. It’s going to be used to justify cuts to Social Security, to health care, let alone being used to justify why more ambitious plans for a national health care program, for green energy are not affordable. So people have to be ready for this. You know, the next shock is yet to come.”
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
Birkeland
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:02 am

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by Birkeland » Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:57 pm

junglelord wrote:I love how you know what I have studied.
You told me: That conspiracy crap has saved me and my friend quite a bit of money. Maybe I am crazy to believe it...
I have made more then double my investment.
I'm glad to hear that. Have you adjusted for inflation?
I have also saved myself the loss that has hit.
You can't save a loss, you can only prevent it.
I pulled when it was peaked.
Why didn't you go short if you knew what was comming?
I told my friends and even my own financial advisor that there was no immunity.
This is not rocket science - the illuminated Austrian School of Economics had predicted this years ahead.
I still saved $5000 this month, and you tell me I need to study.
Yes.
Thats a joke.
No it's not. You're not able to explain why the market had to fall. The only thing you have to cling to is the illuminati did it.
If had only known the first half, your half, I would be $5000 decreased in the last month. Its clear your basis of decision would serve me no good, without the second half.
There is no "first" or "second half" of economics.
Hence the second half is worth $5000 more to me then the first half, just last month alone. I intend to keep it out and see how much I do not lose. I did however call the entire deal based on insider information. Now tell me who knows what is going on? The guy who saw all this coming and prepared and was not hit by the crap that hit the fan, or those that laugh at any conspiracy theory. I am laughing at my $5000 I saved right now. I am also laughing at how my financial advisor last year said this could NOT happen. Oh reallY>? I must be real lucky then. Or well informed. I believe informed is much more reliable then luck. So far the Conspiracy Theoriest are batting dam close to 100%.
Thats quite amazing for something so miligned.
Study Austrian Cyclical Economic Theory and you will understand how embarassing your statements are. Let me recomend Professor Krassimir Petrov's lectures in macroeconomics. Religion has its limitations, and you should never base your investments on such mumbojumbo - luck is not everlasting.
"The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see" - Ayn Rand

altonhare
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:54 am
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by altonhare » Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:34 pm

Birkeland wrote:
Junglelord wrote:Thats a joke.
No it's not. You're not able to explain why the market had to fall. The only thing you have to cling to is the illuminati did it.
Exactly. Science is about *explaining why*. Math just describes how.
Antone wrote:Yes, in part, that is exactly my point. We must carefully distinguish between a concept (or entity) and an object. This, however, is not something that is optional for two reasons:

1. An object and an entity are opposites in some ways. Thus, talking about one is distinctly different form talking about the other. Many paradoxes occur precisely because this is what has happened.
2. Objects have no meaning without concepts.
1) You have things a bit mixed up. Entity and object are synonyms. An object/entity is that which has shape or a specific arrangement of shapes. A concept is a relationship between two or more objects/entities. Distance is a concept because it involves TWO objects. Motion is a concept because an object must move in comparison to another object. A tree is not a concept. It's a tree. Concepts have opposites, up is the opposite of down, mass is the opposite of mass-less, and push is the opposite of pull. But tree is not the opposite of "no tree". Do you understand?

2) This is exactly backwards. A tree is there whether I point to it or not. A concept has no meaning without the object. What meaning can motion have without some THING (object) moving??? What meaning can distance have without two objects??? What meaning can jump have without an object jumping? Concepts have no meaning without objects. I don't know where you got such a misguided notion from. There is no concept with meaning without objects.

Lets make sure we have these two points straight before we go talking about the rest of your post.
Physicist: This is a pen

Mathematician: It's pi*r2*h

lizzie
Guest

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by lizzie » Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:44 pm

Birkeland said:

Well, if you in contrast had been studying free market economics, instead of religious nonsensical kumbayah, you could have earned some money. In any case: the ludicrous conspiracy blamegame of pure ignorance is priceless - keep it up.
LOL. That’s must be your problem, Junglelord. If you had studied a real science like economics you would not be pursuing such "fairy dust" scientific theories as the aether. You would see that economics is the only truly preditcable and quantifiable science.

http://hubpages.com/hub/APOCALYPSE-PRODUCTIONS
Over many decades devoted to greed and corruption the worshipers of Mammon have created a twisted labyrinth of cryptic devices and specious principles that have become a depraved religion of avarice with a prelacy that is evil incarnate. :o

User avatar
Birkeland
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:02 am

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by Birkeland » Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:59 pm

lizzie wrote:If you had studied a real science like economics you would not be pursuing such "fairy dust" scientific theories as the aether.
You're way out of context.
"The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see" - Ayn Rand

lizzie
Guest

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by lizzie » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:02 pm

Birkeland said: You're way out of context.
Define "context."

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by junglelord » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:12 pm

Context of $5000 I saved last month.
:D
Crisis, what crisis?
:roll:
Special: The Economic Downturn
In a special program on the economy, various financial experts and commentators offered analysis of the downturn. Documentary filmmaker Alex Jones kicked off the show, declaring that the "world government" was staging an economic collapse so they can consolidate assets and then issue a new world currency directed by private banks. The silver lining, said Jones, was that the bailout plan might backfire on the New World Order.

In the second hour, financial advisor Mish Shedlock commented we were in an economic "freefall" and that a lot of it was warranted because banks had been leveraged 12:1. He spoke against the US automotive bailout plan, as the money would only be a temporary fix for them. Analyst Aubie Baltin predicted we'll see a depression by 2010. We've encroached on freedom to such an extent that capitalism is breaking down, he further asserted.

Author and radio host Andre Eggelletion, appearing in the third hour, said we are already seeing a depression in many parts of the U.S. The market will drop to 7200, and it'll be a 10-year minimum before order is restored, he added. Trends researcher Gerald Celente noted that most businesses are going to take big hits, particularly retail-- we'll start to see more closures and downsizing in February. But, he pointed out, entrepreneurs can benefit in the downturn, as the collapse of Wall St. brings new opportunities to Main St.
Before you go mouthing off Plasmatic or Birkeland, this comes directly from the same program that introduced me to the EU last Nov. So its acceptable advertising for the EU, then its good enough for CT. Wal and Dave were both interviewed last year at this time on this national show. Therefore they are as kooky as the rest of the guest.

So bad, too sad, your logic works both ways. Usually against you.
LOLOLOLOLOL.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

Plasmatic
Posts: 800
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:14 pm

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by Plasmatic » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:33 pm

Before you go mouthing off Plasmatic or Birkeland, this comes directly from the same program that introduced me to the EU last Nov. So its acceptable advertising for the EU, then its good enough for CT. Wal and Dave were both interviewed last year at this time on this national show. Therefore they are as kooky as the rest of the guest.
One of these days youll learn what affirming the consequent is.Or maybe not.
"Logic is the art of non-contradictory identification"......" I am therefore Ill think"
Ayn Rand
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
Aristotle

User avatar
Birkeland
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:02 am

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by Birkeland » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:33 pm

lizzie wrote:Define "context."
I can illustrate it with reference to your comment: I was commenting on economic issues - economic context. Your reply related to aether - which has nothing to do with economics. Your reply is therefore nonsensical and invalid.

Context
"The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see" - Ayn Rand

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by junglelord » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:38 pm

Guilt by association.
:D
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
Birkeland
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:02 am

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by Birkeland » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:52 pm

junglelord wrote:Guilt by association.
Description of Guilt By Association

Logic: The art of non-contradictory identification - our main tool to understand the objective reality. The father of logic: Aristotle, gave us this magnificent tool. Here is a great resource one can use to get rid of fallacious, erroneous and self-contradictory thinking.
"The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see" - Ayn Rand

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by junglelord » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:42 pm

Perhaps you could work some numbers for the EU.
You seem to know everything.

Plasmatic could be Secretary and Alton could be President.
You could be what ever it is, you are. Secretary of Finance I guess.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
Birkeland
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:02 am

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by Birkeland » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:04 pm

junglelord wrote:Perhaps you could work some numbers for the EU.
I'm more into philosophy and economic theory, not numbers as such.
You seem to know everything.
I don't.
Plasmatic could be Secretary and Alton could be President. You could be what ever it is, you are. Secretary of Finance I guess.
And you could be the musician playing a sad tune on your saxophone just to remind us of that we still haven't figured out how to manipulate gravity.
"The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see" - Ayn Rand

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by junglelord » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:42 am

The Government says a 757 melted the Twin Towers but supposedly the same aircraft could not even burn the grass on the Pentagon lawn ?
:?
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: What is Real?

Unread post by junglelord » Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:45 am

Anton Nails Alton on the head.
Nice Hammer.
:D
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests