I will present you a math composed of only two basis (natural and realistic basis)

Current mathematics (CM.)

Natural Base

-natural straight line the main axiom, its beginning or end point and natural straight line a defined length and with two points

NOTATION - natural straight line (lower case), points (capital letters or numbers (when specified point uploads metric (such as the number line)))

-natural gaps negation natural straight line , natural emptiness and emptiness is defined with two points

NOTATION - natural gaps (small underlined letter)

-basic rule merger - natural straight line and natural gaps are connected only points

-basic set - all possibilities defined theorem

(CM.)does not know the natural straight line , point is not defined, knows no natural gap, is not defined by basic set

Current mathematics (CM.)

Natural Base

-natural straight line the main axiom, its beginning or end point and natural straight line a defined length and with two points

NOTATION - natural straight line (lower case), points (capital letters or numbers (when specified point uploads metric (such as the number line)))

-natural gaps negation natural straight line , natural emptiness and emptiness is defined with two points

NOTATION - natural gaps (small underlined letter)

-basic rule merger - natural straight line and natural gaps are connected only points

-basic set - all possibilities defined theorem

(CM.)does not know the natural straight line , point is not defined, knows no natural gap, is not defined by basic set

- msbiljanica
**Posts:**22**Joined:**Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

Theorem - Natural straight line (natural gap) are connected in the direction of the points AB (0.1)

PROOF - straight line (gaps) b (\underline{b}) -defined AC (0,2)

- straight line (gaps) c (\underline{c}) -defined AD (0,3)

...

infinite one way straight line (one way infinite gaps) \infty(\underline{\infty}) defined A\infty(0, \infty)

(CM.) - straight line (not from the natural basis), there is gaps, a one-way infinite straight line the (semi-line (not from natural base)), one-way infinite gaps does not exist

http://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php - latex read , red letters

PROOF - straight line (gaps) b (\underline{b}) -defined AC (0,2)

- straight line (gaps) c (\underline{c}) -defined AD (0,3)

...

infinite one way straight line (one way infinite gaps) \infty(\underline{\infty}) defined A\infty(0, \infty)

(CM.) - straight line (not from the natural basis), there is gaps, a one-way infinite straight line the (semi-line (not from natural base)), one-way infinite gaps does not exist

http://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php - latex read , red letters

- msbiljanica
**Posts:**22**Joined:**Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

Theorem - there is a relationship between the points 0 and all points one-way infinite straight line(one-way infinite gaps) including points 0

PROOF - relationship points 0 points 0 and the number 0

-relationship points 0 points 1 and the number 1 (\underline{1})

-relationship points 0 points 2 and the number 2 (\underline{2})

...

basic set of natural numbers N^o=\{0 , 1 , 2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,...\}

basic set of natural numbers gaps N_p^o=\{0 , \underline{1} ,\underline{2} ,\underline{3} ,\underline{4} ,\underline{5} ,...\}

(CM.) - natural numbers are given as an axiom, there is no natural gaps numbers (there is this form, but do not call numbers (\{0,0\}\cup\{a,a\} a\in N)

PROOF - relationship points 0 points 0 and the number 0

-relationship points 0 points 1 and the number 1 (\underline{1})

-relationship points 0 points 2 and the number 2 (\underline{2})

...

basic set of natural numbers N^o=\{0 , 1 , 2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,...\}

basic set of natural numbers gaps N_p^o=\{0 , \underline{1} ,\underline{2} ,\underline{3} ,\underline{4} ,\underline{5} ,...\}

(CM.) - natural numbers are given as an axiom, there is no natural gaps numbers (there is this form, but do not call numbers (\{0,0\}\cup\{a,a\} a\in N)

- msbiljanica
**Posts:**22**Joined:**Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

Theorem - natural numbers and natural numbers gaps can be connected in the direction AB (0.1)

PROOF - Number 1 and number \ underline {1} receives the combined number of 1\ underline {1} or dup (]duž , praznina )

-Number \ underline {1} and number 1 [/color] receives the combined number of \ underline {1}1 or dup

-Number 1 and number \ underline {2} receives the combined number of 1\ underline {2} or dup

- A basic set of combined natural numbers K^o=(a_n,\underline{b}_n,a_n\in{N^o},\underline{b}_n\in{N_p^o},(a_n,\underline{b}_n)>0)

[color=#FF0000]a_1\underline{b}_1

a_1\underline{b}_1

\underline{b}_1a_1

a_1\underline{b}_1a_1

\underline{b}_1a_1\underline{b}_2

...

(CM.) - Dup do not know, not know the combined numbers (there is this form, but not numbers \{0,a\}\cup\{c,c\},\{0,0\}\cup\{a,b\},\{0,b\}\cup\{c,d\},\{0,0\}\cup\{a,b\}\cup\{c,c\},...

PROOF - Number 1 and number \ underline {1} receives the combined number of 1\ underline {1} or dup (]duž , praznina )

-Number \ underline {1} and number 1 [/color] receives the combined number of \ underline {1}1 or dup

-Number 1 and number \ underline {2} receives the combined number of 1\ underline {2} or dup

- A basic set of combined natural numbers K^o=(a_n,\underline{b}_n,a_n\in{N^o},\underline{b}_n\in{N_p^o},(a_n,\underline{b}_n)>0)

[color=#FF0000]a_1\underline{b}_1

a_1\underline{b}_1

\underline{b}_1a_1

a_1\underline{b}_1a_1

\underline{b}_1a_1\underline{b}_2

...

(CM.) - Dup do not know, not know the combined numbers (there is this form, but not numbers \{0,a\}\cup\{c,c\},\{0,0\}\cup\{a,b\},\{0,b\}\cup\{c,d\},\{0,0\}\cup\{a,b\}\cup\{c,c\},...

- msbiljanica
**Posts:**22**Joined:**Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

SRDAN Math

msbijanica, what does it do ?

Could you please solve a sample problem with it here, that current math can't solve ?

thank you, s

msbijanica, what does it do ?

Could you please solve a sample problem with it here, that current math can't solve ?

thank you, s

- seasmith
**Posts:**2792**Joined:**Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

seasmith wrote:SRDAN Math

msbijanica, what does it do ?

Could you please solve a sample problem with it here, that current math can't solve ?

thank you, s

3 ? 5=5

3 ? 5=6

3 ? 5=7

3 ?5 =8

that the calculation operations between 3 and 5 ?

current math would say that it can not except 3+5=8 , , because there are different forms of addition , so go slowly to see how things are connected (not by the axioms)

- msbiljanica
**Posts:**22**Joined:**Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

Theorem - Two numbers have contact, their condition is described counts of first number

PROOF - number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 0

3^{\underline{0}}2

- number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 1

3^{\underline{1}}2

- number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 2

3^{\underline{2}}2

- number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 3

3^{\underline{3}}2

(CM.) - Knows no contact numbers

PROOF - number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 0

3^{\underline{0}}2

- number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 1

3^{\underline{1}}2

- number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 2

3^{\underline{2}}2

- number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 3

3^{\underline{3}}2

(CM.) - Knows no contact numbers

- msbiljanica
**Posts:**22**Joined:**Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

Theorem - The contact numbers is sorted horizontally to be the only one natural straight line that gives a natural straight line

PROOF - 1\rightarrow 1

4{+_1^{\underline0}}2=2

4{+_1^{\underline1}}2=(1,1)

4{+_1^{\underline2}}2=2

4{+_1^{\underline3}}2=(3,1)

4{+_1^{\underline4}}2=6 or 4+2=6

+1 - addition rule 1

(CM.) - There are no "addition rule 1" only when the contact point number, the axiom

PROOF - 1\rightarrow 1

4{+_1^{\underline0}}2=2

4{+_1^{\underline1}}2=(1,1)

4{+_1^{\underline2}}2=2

4{+_1^{\underline3}}2=(3,1)

4{+_1^{\underline4}}2=6 or 4+2=6

+1 - addition rule 1

(CM.) - There are no "addition rule 1" only when the contact point number, the axiom

- msbiljanica
**Posts:**22**Joined:**Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

Theorem - The contact numbers is sorted horizontally to be the only one natural straight line that gives a natural straight line , when there are two (more) results between them becomes a gap.

PROOF -[tex]1\rightarrow1(\underline{1})[/tex]

4{+_2^{\underline0}}2=2

4{+_2^{\underline1}}2=1\underline{2}1

4{+_2^{\underline2}}2=2

4{+_2^{\underline3}}2=3\underline{1}1

4{+_2^{\underline4}}2=6

+2 - addition rule 2

(CM.) - No "addition rule 2"

PROOF -[tex]1\rightarrow1(\underline{1})[/tex]

4{+_2^{\underline0}}2=2

4{+_2^{\underline1}}2=1\underline{2}1

4{+_2^{\underline2}}2=2

4{+_2^{\underline3}}2=3\underline{1}1

4{+_2^{\underline4}}2=6

+2 - addition rule 2

(CM.) - No "addition rule 2"

- msbiljanica
**Posts:**22**Joined:**Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

~

Will there be also vertical and 'thru-screen' lines, to come in this extended proof ?

Do your "natural lines" eventually prescribe a whole space ?

~

msbiljanica » Mon Apr 27

Theorem - The contact numbers is sorted horizontally to be the only one natural straight line that gives a natural straight line , ...

Will there be also vertical and 'thru-screen' lines, to come in this extended proof ?

Do your "natural lines" eventually prescribe a whole space ?

~

- seasmith
**Posts:**2792**Joined:**Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

What does SRDAN mathematics have to do with plasma cosmology? (serious question, I'm not dismissing your ideas).

- willendure
**Posts:**605**Joined:**Fri Nov 28, 2014 8:29 am

seasmith wrote:Will there be also vertical and 'thru-screen' lines, to come in this extended proof ?

Do your "natural lines" eventually prescribe a whole space ?

~

no vertical , not natural but real (when we get to them) describe space

willendure wrote:What does SRDAN mathematics have to do with plasma cosmology? (serious question, I'm not dismissing your ideas).

mathematics and physics are the basic science, mathematics should only intelligence (I believe that the current mathematics is limited, a consequence of the large number of axioms) except for Physics intelligence requires great amounts of money, has to do with plasma cosmology

- msbiljanica
**Posts:**22**Joined:**Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am

msbiljanica wrote:seasmith wrote:Will there be also vertical and 'thru-screen' lines, to come in this extended proof ?

Do your "natural lines" eventually prescribe a whole space ?

~

no vertical , not natural but real (when we get to them) describe spacewillendure wrote:What does SRDAN mathematics have to do with plasma cosmology? (serious question, I'm not dismissing your ideas).

mathematics and physics are the basic science, mathematics should only intelligence (I believe that the current mathematics is limited, a consequence of the large number of axioms) except for Physics intelligence requires great amounts of money, has to do with plasma cosmology

Are you saying that physics would be more natural if it were based on a different mathematics?

I've heard of Quaternions being useful in some areas of physics.

- willendure
**Posts:**605**Joined:**Fri Nov 28, 2014 8:29 am

I've heard of Quaternions being useful in some areas of physics.

Do you know of anybody who actually uses that byzantine math ?

Now that the "imaginary" [sq. rt. -1] of Maxwell/Heaviside equations is commonly recognized to represent actual electric space,

a versor algebra is being developed to much more easily handle electric power transitions.

`

- seasmith
**Posts:**2792**Joined:**Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

21 posts
• Page **1** of **2** • **1**, 2

Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests