johnm33 wrote:I'm thinking it's moving rather like in this animation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rx42lrkYgmo&t=169s
Younger Dryas wrote:Its my understanding Precession of the equinox does not apply to the era before 747 BC
Sco4444 wrote:Younger Dryas wrote:Its my understanding Precession of the equinox does not apply to the era before 747 BC
That's interesting, I've not heard of that before, what would that be based on?
johnm33 wrote:I'm thinking it's moving rather like in this animation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rx42lrkYgmo&t=169s
Sco4444 wrote:Follow on to main thread: The Sun’s orbit of the Galaxy has similar properties to the Solar system planetary orbits around the Sun and the complex patterns made. It would appear that whatever energy field maintains Galactic and Solar orbits it is focused through an objects equator. The sheer complexity of the orbits raises questions of the controlling mechanism and how the Sun rotates around the Galaxy with a sinusoidal forward motion, while a similar process is repeated in the Planetary orbits.
Planetary declination cycles around the Solar equator are more complex than just completing a circular or elliptical orbit. It may have been this level of complexity that forced Einstein to “invent” space/time “grooves” for planets to orbit the Sun as the only way to explain a planets ability to instantaneously coordinate its orbit with the Sun’s forward motion around the Galaxy, while at the same time carving out a sinusoidal elliptical orbit within a channel of approx 56º. Unfortunately he didn’t explain why the groove had a “wave” in it.
The Earths Solar Orbital Channel is roughly 300,000 Km wide and 300 million Km long (Aphelion 153 Mkm + Perihelion 147 Mkm). (diag didn't load)
As the Sun moves forward around Galactic center North pole first, the planets are contained in a
“channel” 28º (approx.) N/S of Solar equator which acts like a “wall” not only maximising amplitude but also appearing to influence Aphelion and Perihelion turning points. This seems very complex for just a gravity attraction and would suggest an EM field influence. The “channel” covers a band approx. one third of the Sun’s diameter, North (+) and South (-) of the Sun’s equator. Planetary orbits therefore change polarity as they cross the Sun’s equator in a sinusoidal orbital ellipse. Arguably it is the forward motion of our Sun that causes elliptical orbits as planets re-orient at Aphelion and Perihelion with the Sun’s new position. Perhaps planetary orbits would be circular if the Sun was static in space?
A look at the Heliocentric declination data for the Earth, Mercury and Venus, show the same specific patterns emerge with respect to planets “bouncing” off the North/South channel boundary at maximum amplitude just before or after reaching Aphelion or Perihelion.
For example, it is common knowledge that due to its distance from the Sun, the Earth experiences Perihelion in January and Aphelion in July each year. However, on December 22nd the Earth reaches +23º 26’ (North) its maximum Heliocentric declination and begins to move South, two weeks later reaching Perihelion. On approx 22nd June it reaches maximum amplitude -23º 45’ (South), reaching Aphelion approx 12 days later. This suggests a clear connection between orbit maximums, Aphelion and Perihelion and North / South declination maximums.
As Mercury and Venus are closer to the Sun, they exhibit the same pattern but more often. Mercury orbiting every 88 days differs from other planets in as far as it reaches a maximum declination North, at (+28º) and Perihelion (25º) 4 days later. Mercury reaches maximum declination South (- 28º) followed 8 days later by Aphelion (-25º). Venus orbits every 225 days, but the South declination maximum occurs at -24º (approx) first, followed by Aphelion (-20 º) approx 21 days later and the North declination at +24º (approx) followed by Perihelion (+20 º).
With Earth, Mercury and Venus, Aphelion occurs at South declination maximums, while Perihelion occurs at North declination maximums. Mars on the other hand orbits every 687 days and reverses this, South declination occurring at -24º South, (approx). 19 days before Perihelion with North declination at +24º (approx) occurring 25 days before Aphelion. Mars and the outer planets differ from the inner planets by making several declination maximums each orbit before reaching Aphelion and Perihelion. Mars has two each orbit.
Planetary motion is clearly constrained within the 56º declination “channel” with Aphelion and Perihelion appearing to have a functional relationship to the North / South declination boundary for the inner planets, raising questions about the channel’s nature. Can gravity alone produce this effect or are we looking at an E-M field phenomenon? As mentioned previously there has been speculation that Birkland currents (Don Scott) or a charge field (Miles Mathis) flow in at the Sun’s poles and out at equator arguably creating the mechanism for a channel, producing the observed orbits.
johnm33 wrote:Looking at images of the galaxy it appears that the central part is a forced vortex, maybe a result of opposite, or perhaps even the same, rotational energy meeting almost head on. The outer galaxy appears almost to be an unwinding of a rope, that is, the exact opposite of a rope/cable winding with the threads of the birkland currents being the individual fibres of the rope/cable. Within the individual fibres it seems there are centrifugal and centripetal forces flowing in opposite directions something like ying/yang symbal but with the black/white cores expanding to fill their containing other, each flowing through each other. So no orbit just complex helical motion, foreshortening the time frame for geology/life by a serious amount.
Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests