Exponential Inverse Square law.

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
xionIII
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 4:16 am

Exponential Inverse Square law.

Unread post by xionIII » Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:21 pm

Greetings

A couple of years ago I posted here
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16320&hilit=xionIII

This year it's youtube videos. It would appear that the proportional ratios expressed in the crop circle designs are a direct expression of the exponential version of the inverse square law.

Crop cicle ratios 13: Gurston Ashes, Nr Fovant, Wiltshire. Reported 23rd July.
https://youtu.be/bDOOK3CU_4s

More to come.

Best regards

xionIII
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 4:16 am

Re: Exponential Inverse Square law.

Unread post by xionIII » Mon Jul 30, 2018 2:22 am

Okay.

If you do an internet search of "planetary orbital charts" or anything around those terms, you may be hard pressed to find anything. It wasn't always like that. Used to be, you'd run that search and there would be a plethora of charts proudly displayed as the latest advance in exoplanetray orbit measurements.

The science consensus states that there is nothing between the orbits, that the distances are random, nothing to see here, move along.

Then I started measuring the charts, which I regard as the data, when they were not censored, and soon it became obvious that nothing could be further from the truth and the same ratios are to be found, precisely indicated, within the designs we know as the crop circles.

Of course, all ufo matters are subject to "national security" but even so, that's a whole lot of enlightenment to keep the human race, including you, ignorant about.

So let me ask you, what do you think should be done about that?

kevin
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:17 am

Re: Exponential Inverse Square law.

Unread post by kevin » Mon Jul 30, 2018 6:41 am

Just looked through Your 2016 thread...brilliant.

Knowledge of the true nature of universe will transmit to all , keep inputting the information.
http://www.spirasolaris.ca/

Kevin

xionIII
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 4:16 am

Re: Exponential Inverse Square law.

Unread post by xionIII » Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:06 am

Thanks Kevin

I'm just going over the principle here.
I start with the inverse square law and convert to percentages so that at 10d from the center
The radiant strength is .01
and
The radiant strength is .0123 at 9d.
I want a split between those two so I multiply 10d by .9487. ( .9487 x.9487 = .9 )
The radiant strength at .9487d is .01111
So, proportionally, I get these three numbers

123
111
100

The square of 111 is 123 but 123 x .9 is 111 and 111 x .9 is 100

123 x .9 = 111
111 x .9 = 100

So I can reduce by a distance of.9 with the mathematical knowledge that I am following the inverse square law just as I can increase by 1.11.

I can extrapolate the .9 reducing ratio to

1
.9
.81
.729
.6561
.5904
.531441
.478
.43
.387

From here to the sun

1 Earth
.9
.81
.729 Venus
.6561
.5904
.531441
.478
.43
.387 Mercury

It has been imagined that the planetary orbits are subject to the inverse square law but when the numerical calibration is employed, the distances don't match. When the percentage version is employed, they do. Always.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests