Let me also try to point out that "astrophysical jet" is also a problem. And I'd start with the first word, astrophysics.
This field is filled with high-end nonsense. It's almost like an complex of mysticism, psychics, and extreme theory fantasy land. No human can experiment with the physics of the astronomical physical reality. It is simple outside our bubble. You can not touch it, or test it, or drop it on a table, or put it on a scale, or boil it in acid, or grow it in a pot, or make it have babies to see genetic changes. It is not Physics because we can not manipulate or sample it physically.
Except!, as you so astutely point out, you may "need to become expert in plasma physics", because 99% of the physically reality of Space and the Universe, is Plasma. So unless an AstroPhysicist talks in terms of Plasma. They are talking nonsense.
And so, the "jet" is no better then saying "wind" when discussing or even thinking about Space.
How about an Ultra Nova? Why is it only 'Big'? Should it be Hyper Bang and Big Novas?
I believe with enough zeros and math, an astrophysicists could theorize and publish a paper to support a Mega Hyper Bang or Trans-Dimensional Super Novas.
The Big Bang Hypernova Hypothesis
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:02 pm
Re: The Big Bang Hypernova Hypothesis
interstellar filaments conducted electricity having currents as high as 10 thousand billion amperes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests