Electricity is Free and Gravity Doesn’t Exist

[Cargo]

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/09/1 ... eff-smith/

Now please, if you never been far from the mainstream, or never looked an alt news sight, please don't get overwhelmed by the shock of reading VT. This is a long article, but here are some tasty bits to wet the plate.

1. Gravity is non-rotational. It has no spin or rotation; therefore it is not a wave of any type and never can be. Only transverse waves have rotation or curl as it is called. Light spins. Gravity is static and does not possess spin. This is because it is a vector force field only. Vector fields do not posses spin, rotation or curl.

2. Gravity is a static vector field of force. I.E. a flow of current from the sky towards the center of the Earth. You can also say it is a difference in potential or a voltage drop. Therefore it is static and flows in one direction only. It is not scalar and has no spin, rotation or curl. This is why gravity is always attractive and never repulsive on Earth.

3. It is not Scalar but it is a type of Scalar field. I.E. the field varies from zero in outer space to 100% at sea level but the field always has a constant vector amplitude and direction. I.E. its field intensity or force is always in the same direction and level, everywhere, when measured in a closed space. Like Einstein’s elevator.

4. Its Gradient is negative. Anti-gravity has a positive Gradient or what is called an “Over Gradient”.

5. According to J.J. Thomas and T.T. Brown, electrostatic levitation is a form of anti-gravity because it uses an electrical over-gradient to cancel the effect of gravity by pushing out the magnetic lines of force, creating a form of magnetic buoyancy.

[paladin17]

The author of the quoted statements doesn't seem to know what he's talking about and also seems to have problems just basic logic.

A few examples:
1)

Vector fields do not posses spin, rotation or curl.

- This is simply wrong on a factual level. Only potential vector fields do not possess curl.
2) Let's assume that indeed

Gravity is non-rotational. It has no spin or rotation

and

Only transverse waves have rotation or curl as it is called

(whatever the heck the author means by that). How does then this follows from it?

therefore it is not a wave of any type

He just stated that only transverse waves have spin (whatever he means by that, let's just go with the flow). But if gravity doesn't, it means it's not a transverse wave. Well, OK. Then it might be some other type of wave, right? No "of any type" follows from all that.
3) Gravity is indeed a scalar field, but it doesn't have "constant vector amplitude and direction". In fact, scalar fields don't have any direction at all. Only their gradients might. And in case of gravity even the gradient is not constant - otherwise Newton's law would be impossible.
Etc.