Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

lizzie
Guest

Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by lizzie » Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:40 am

Did Relativity ever have a place in the Electric Universe or is it time to “restore” Aether Theory?

A Ridiculously Brief History of Electricity and Magnetism
http://maxwell.byu.edu/~spencerr/phys442/node4.html

Aether Theory
http://www.anti-relativity.com/aether.htm
“The one person I believe to have come the closest to truly understanding the electromagnetic universe was Nikola Tesla.”

The Detection of Ether
http://www.teslaphysics.com

Dark Energy – Tesla’s “Black Box”
http://www.fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/ ... energy.php

Tesla’s Radiant (Dark) Energy System
http://www.fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/ ... system.php

Who had more “hands on” experience” with electricity? Tesla or Einstein?

Tesla’s Patents
http://www.fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/ ... nts-US.php

Einstein’s Patents
http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/~o-pat/english2.htm

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by junglelord » Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:44 am

iTS THE AETHER, YEAH BABY YEAH!
(best austin powers I can pull off, LOL)
But seriously your correct.
8-)
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

lizzie
Guest

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by lizzie » Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:57 am

A 1996 Batmobile? Not Tesla's electric car?

http://www.fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/ ... r-1931.php


User avatar
Solar
Posts: 1372
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by Solar » Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:55 am

The aether wins.
"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden

User avatar
StefanR
Posts: 1371
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:31 pm
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by StefanR » Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:48 am

I thought relativity might have it's application when V=C , but that an aether can contain all V's (as in V<C / V>C)?
So relativity can describe some subset, but is not valid for all that takes place inside the Cosmos.
Still confused.
Think I will just put my head in the wind to clear up my thoughts. ;)
The illusion from which we are seeking to extricate ourselves is not that constituted by the realm of space and time, but that which comes from failing to know that realm from the standpoint of a higher vision. -L.H.

User avatar
Solar
Posts: 1372
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:05 am

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by Solar » Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:10 am

StefanR wrote:I thought relativity might have it's application when V=C , but that an aether can contain all V's (as in V<C / V>C)?
So relativity can describe some subset, but is not valid for all that takes place inside the Cosmos.
Seems you've basically summed it up actually.
"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by junglelord » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:08 pm

lizzie wrote:A 1996 Batmobile? Not Tesla's electric car?

http://www.fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/ ... r-1931.php
I may make it electric.
;)
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

lizzie
Guest

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by lizzie » Mon Apr 07, 2008 5:55 pm

Just what is ether anyway?

What is the Electromagnetic Spectrum
http://www.spacetoday.org/DeepSpace/Tel ... ctrum.html

It's all about waves. A wave is a disturbance traveling through space, transferring energy from one point to the next without permanently changing space itself.

What is in Space?
http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/project ... hatis.html

“Most of the universe is empty space, called a vacuum, but it is an imperfect vacuum.”

What is a Vacuum?
http://education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html

“A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it.”

Vacuum Energy Density, or How Can Nothing Weigh Something?
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_constant.html

The Elastic Continuum Theory
http://www.geocities.com/gssandhu_1943/index.html

What is Aether?

The Vacuum as Aether in the Last Century
http://www.springerlink.com/content/k6132771j3510809/

Classic Aether vs. the Modern Vacuum
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=187117

“We know now that the "medium" of the aether is non-existent. But is it really? Maybe it isn't a gaseous fluid such as early thinkers thought, but is it any less real?

Space, The Aether, and Nothingness
http://www.iscid.org/boards/ubb-get_top ... 00324.html

“Electromagnetic fields should not appear as ultimate, irreducible
realities.”

The Aether is the Universe
http://www.siddeutsch.org/essay8.html

“The ether has what corresponds to density (it is called permeability) and elasticity (which is the reciprocal of permittivity). The same equation used for sound velocity yields the EMF velocity in any medium, including a vacuum.”

Aether and Dogmatic Thinking
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspa ... gmatic.htm

“Light propagates through vacuum, thus what appears as vacuum, the whole cosmic space must be full of Aether from apparent vacuum to "material substances" such as glass or air, through which light propagates as well. Mechanistic view suggests that Aether should present resistance to movements of stellar bodies, but no such effect has been observed and they keep on moving undisturbed through interstellar space.”

Ether Physics and Philosophy
http://www.evert.de/ap04e.htm

Unique theory assuming ether to be real substance and real plasma-continuum

“Ether is unique real existing matter. All ether of universe is in steady swinging Universal Ethermovement at quant-small spiralic tracks.”

Mathematical Model of Quasielastic Ether
http://ethertheory.chat.ru/epart5.htm

“Now let us imagine a ‘quasi-elastic’ body, which is unreceptive to compression-tensile strains, but reacts to torsional strain relative to absolute space.”

Foamy Ether
http://www3.telus.net/foamyether/#The_Big_Bang

“The new ether model, proposed in this article, replaces the vacuum of empty space with foamy ether. Conventional atomic particles (whatever they are) are replaced with distortions in the foamy ether. Now this is the key difference! There is no matter in ether - but rather, matter is ether and so is space.”

lizzie
Guest

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by lizzie » Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:49 pm

The Dynamic Ether Vortex
http://www.softcom.net/users/greebo/vortex.htm

The Quantum Vortex Theory of Matter
http://www.astrosciences.info/QV.htm

lizzie
Guest

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by lizzie » Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:58 pm

Towards a New Electromagnetism
http://www.cheniere.org/books/part3/4vectors.htm

"Conceptually (and from a systems viewpoint), the four types of vectors are (1) the chargeless, massless spatial system vector (geometer's vector), (2) the uncharged mass system vector (mechanic's vector), (3) the charged mass system vector (electrician's vector), and (4) the charged space system vector (advanced electrician's vector)."

User avatar
StevenO
Posts: 894
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:08 pm

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by StevenO » Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:35 pm

All forces in the universe apply through matter, so my opinion is we don't need an aether to model it.

Steven
First, God decided he was lonely. Then it got out of hand. Now we have this mess called life...
The past is out of date. Start living your future. Align with your dreams. Now execute.

lizzie
Guest

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by lizzie » Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:55 am

"All forces in the universe apply through matter"

Perhaps there is no difference between ether and matter. Do you think one could be the expression of the other? Or is ether the medium through which matter is expressed?

Heftruck
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:12 am

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by Heftruck » Wed Apr 09, 2008 5:04 am

Why do we need an aether, if I may be so free to ask? :?:

User avatar
StevenO
Posts: 894
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:08 pm

Re: Relativity vs. Aether Theory

Unread post by StevenO » Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:21 pm

Heftruck wrote:Why do we need an aether, if I may be so free to ask? :?:
Normally an elastic medium is needed to propagate waves, e.g. sound only propagates through air, not in a vacuum. The idea is that ether is needed to propagate electromagnetic waves.
First, God decided he was lonely. Then it got out of hand. Now we have this mess called life...
The past is out of date. Start living your future. Align with your dreams. Now execute.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests