Bill McDonald's General Composite of the Roswell Spacecraft

[lizzie]

The Atonists Divide
http://www.irishoriginsofcivilization.c ... gins1.html

In Jewish studies it is important to realize the distinction between the ten tribes of Israel (the "Israelites") and the two tribes of Judah (the "Jews"). The two groups were rarely friends or closely knit. Once the twelve tribes had settled in Palestine they divided themselves into two separate regions or kingdoms ruled by two separate kings. The ten Israelite tribes settled in the lands to the north of "Israel" and the two tribes of Benjamin and Levi (the Judites, Jews, or Levites) inhabited an area south of Israel known as Judah. The Tribe of Judah (from Yahud) is reported to have had its capital at Jerusalem. Kings David and Solomon belonged to the Kingdom of Judah. It is this Tribe of Judah that was, in our estimation, Atonist. They were, as the Targum (Aramaic bible) tells us, great and powerful priests in Egypt. It is from them that the Messianic tradition comes

Modern "Jews" believe themselves descended from the Tribe of Judah since the ten other tribes of the northern kingdom of Israel are considered "lost." Allegedly, they were scattered after being taken into captivity by King Sargon II's Assyrian army in the year 722 BC. Later, around the year 586 BC, the House of Judah was attacked by the Babylonians who allegedly took the Judites and Levites (and many Israelites who had attempted to take refuge in Judah) into captivity. From this point on the twelve tribes were never again to be united.

After the Babylonians were themselves conquered by the Persian king Cyrus, the Jews of the House of Judah were released and allowed to return home. By this time the tribes of Israel had already been scattered. We suggest that the major rifts between the "Tribes" (if they existed in the way portrayed) had a great deal to do with Akhenaton and his destiny. In our mind there is no difference between the Judites and the Atonists.

The former are not "Jews," in the sense known today. They were Egyptians and were worshippers of the sun. They were descendants of the priesthood of the many solar temples. This is the true definition of a "Levite." The Atonism of these cults is before us still in the guise of modern Judeo-Christianity. It is purveyed by the Vatican, by Freemasonry, by Templarism, and by many other related societies and institutions.

Today, this cult does not care how their devices and designs might negatively affect "Jews" since they know that most Jews are not the same people as the bible makes mention of and because they, being of Egyptian origin, have no reason to spare "Jews" from tragedy or loss.

To the Atonists ordinary Jews are a class below, and not worthy of distinction. Their existence merely serves as useful camouflage and as a way to lead attention away from the ruling quorum.

When the so-called "United Monarchy" allegedly existed under Benjaminite Saul, the Levites had their first king outside Egypt. We can deduce the nature of the god and the cult that this first official monarch of the Jews ruled for, given that his name was Saul - from Sol (the sun). His successor was the famous King "David." But this word did not denote a personal name, for it was only a title given to the military commanders of the Solar Cult. The emblem for this title was the dove - from dovid or david.

The genocidal exploits of these first two commanders of the Houses of Israel and Judah were strangely recorded in the Old Testament. The Levites and their masters wanted the power, might, and ruthlessness of their god understood by all. As all tyrants and demagogues know, it is fear not love that ensures power and privilege.

Moreover, psychopathic people do not regard their own deeds as being deranged. On the contrary, they think them quite sane and right. And so, in light of this, the recording of heinous acts of unimaginable cruelty would not seem abnormal or obscene to Atonist editors.

Jewish history states that the Israelites of the Northern kingdom did not accept the tyrant King David from the House of Judah in the south. They knew that his rule was arranged in order to gain control over their territory. From this point onward the two houses of Jews (Judah) and Israelites (Israel) parted company. We can surmise that it was at this point that the main body of the Israelites did not agree with the Atonist plan for world domination. Or it may have been a disagreement between the priests over the celestial change of the sun from the House of Taurus into Aries that precipitated the rift.

The scenes at Sinai tend to indicate that it was this astrological phenomenon that caused problems for the Atonists and their followers. Akhenaton had probably perished at Tanis or at Sinai soon after the final expulsion from Egypt by Seti I. His descendants - the "Davids" who ruled in his name - wanted nothing less than to build another power state to rival all others. They conceived of a grand plan to establish a New World Order that would, if need be, be erected upon the ruins and wreckage of the world's infidel nations.

They had absolutely no care or respect for the inhabitants of other lands and had no problem plotting their subjugation. After all, the Atonists had been royalty. In their minds they still were. Their leader was pharaoh not only of Egypt but of the entire world. Between the belligerent, super-racist Atonist ideology motivating the tyrants of bygone days and that of today's imperialistic royal houses and governments, there is not a jot of difference.

Biblical tradition tells us that the "chosen people" lived together in Israel for about 500 years. After 250 years they chose to divide themselves into two "Houses." Eventually, we are told that Israel was attacked and large portions of both Houses were taken into captivity by the Assyrians. The House of Judah (Aton) was particularly vulnerable since they were, unlike the Israelites, few in number.

Allegedly, after their release by the Assyrians, the Judites and Israelites again suffered invasion and captivity at the hands of the Babylonians. After this period of bondage, the ten tribes of "Israel" decided not to return to their homes and Temple in Palestine but to emigrate Westward across the Caucasus Mountains and into the lands beyond.

Only two tribes were still fanatical enough to allegedly make a return to Jerusalem, the "Tribe of Benjamin" and "Tribe of Levi." It is from these tribes that Levitical Judaism arose. From this tradition came the Gaonim, the Sadducees, Zadokites, Khazars, and Kabalistic colleges that were instrumental in creating the smokescreens behind which the Cult of Aton would operate to prevent the truth about their true destinations from being discovered.

There is little doubt in our mind that the accounts of the settlement in Israel, the building of the temple at Jerusalem, the development of the united monarchy, and the attack of hostile forces from Assyria and Babylon are largely concoctions. They were necessary fictions giving the impression that the books of the bible were composed and compiled in Babylon instead of Rome.

Once we connect the dots we find that both the Yahuds (Judites, Levites) and the Israelites from Egypt would have swiftly found new homes with their Hyksos kin who had been expelled a few centuries previously and who would have, by that time, found themselves new homes in the many lands around Egypt.

We do not believe the Judites and Israelites to have been wanderers through any "wildernesses" for forty years. We do believe that there was a schism between the factions after the expulsion. The Judites or Levites (Yahuds) were closely allied with Akhenaton's Cult of Aton and have been a front for them down through the ages until the present day. When this fanatical sect of Atonists realized the rest of their nation (the Israelites) did not care to continue with the plan and were disgruntled and vengeful they simply rejected and cursed them, and were cursed in return.

According to the Old Testament, one of the reasons why the House of Israel chose to spurn the House of Judah was due to the latter's vile obsession not only with war but with human and animal sacrifice. One can split the Old Testament prophets into camps based upon whether they speak for the Judites or whether they remonstrate against them and their heinous practices. The Israelite prophets Amos, Hosea, and Jeremiah, were the staunchest opponents of the House of Judah (David) and throughout their narratives they cajole the Judites, imploring them to abandon their godless practices, particularly the sacrifice of their firstborn sons.

The rivalry of the tribes alerts us to the fraudulence behind the naming of the modern "State of Israel." Israel as an entity has, according to every authentic and legitimate authority, long assimilated into the world's nations and has, as a result, long ceased to exist (if it ever did to begin with). The usage of such a term today especially to name a homeland for "Jews" is the height of historical nonsense. The vast majority of Jews living in this "Israel," like the majority of Jews anywhere in the world, are Jewish by simple religious conversion and not by ethnic or racial descent.

The Levites began the compilation of their suggestively named "Law of Moses" in the period following the alleged Assyrian captivity, but before the Babylonian arrest, during the 7th century BC. Moses, of course, had long since passed from the scene and knew nothing of this Levitical Law composed in his name.

From this point onward, what lord god Jehovah said was whatever the Levites said he said. No one could argue the point since, before the "Law" and the Levites Book of Deuteronomy existed, nothing was written down. Nevertheless, the Levites declared themselves to be exceptional because Moses had handed down to them an oral tradition that remained undisclosed to the uninitiated. This fact alerts us since it is the perfect ruse by which the Atonists could disguise their identity from both Jews and Christians.

The oral law was a secret law and so no outsider could have a clue what it said. This oral law dates from the time of Moses' ascent of Mount Sinai. The Book of Deuteronomy ("Second Law") concerns the oral tradition's precepts, and clearly shows an objective reader that the Levites were interested in only one thing, that is condemning and murdering everyone who stood against them.

It is in this horrendous book of Mosaic Law that we find the proof of the relationship between Jehovah (Aton), and his Levitical his servants and in the Book of Exodus (composed after Deuteronomy and Torah) we read of the covenant of blood that held the Levites together

During the alleged Babylonian arrest under Nebuchadnezzar the Levites compiled and added four more books to Deuteronomy. These four books became known as the Torah (from the Gaelic Tara - meaning "Law"). It is suggestive, and of great historical significance, that the Aton cult (and the majority of their Levite followers) decided, after their "release" from Babylon by Cyrus the Great (in 537 BC), to not return to their beloved Jerusalem. Having wined and dined in Babylon, and having been exposed to yet another exotic and cosmopolitan civilization, the "chosen people" were reluctant to make a return to the dust bowl in Canaan.

In any case, it was only the elite who decided not to return to the "beloved" homeland in the desert. This decision tells us a great deal given our thesis of the actual identity of the so-called “Twelve Tribes.” The great Atonists, the high priests of the sun, were not going to be overly attracted by the idea of returning to dusty Judea. The separatist tendency and difference of this super-racist "Tribe of Judah" has been frequently noted by biblical experts and we can declare their peculiarity and penchant for elitism to be a symptom of their identification with Akhenaton and their own Hyksos ancestors.

Pharisaism arises from the Mosaic-Levitical tradition. The very word pharisee means "those set apart." The Pharisees were, like their elite rivals the Sadducees, descended from the Levite priests in Jerusalem holding up the Mosaic Law. Interestingly, it was from the Pharisaic tradition that the idea of a living Messiah came.

After the Romans, under Emperor Titus Vespasian, leveled the city of Jerusalem and decimated Judea, the Levitical-Pharisees returned temporarily to Palestine and Babylon and set up their Talmudic colleges. From Pumbedita and Sura (meaning "sun") they established their priestly order known as the Gaonim.

The Gaonim referred to themselves as the "Princes of Knowledge" and in our estimation it was these Gaonim, among other sects, who were privy to the Atonist mandate and who set themselves up as executors of the will of Akhenaton.

The masonic "G" is, in our belief, an insignia of this Babylonian Gaonim. It is usually surrounded by the masonic "compass and rule" that are themselves fashioned to represent the capital letter "A" for Akhenaton and his god Aton. Later they changed their title to “Freemason” as a ruse to hide their true identity.

The Freemasonic Lodges (particularly the Grand Orient Lodges, but also the Scottish Rite branches) originate from Atonist Gaonate colleges. The term "mason" simply refers to the pyramids, the Temple of Solomon, the solar churches of Egypt, and their builders. The word Freemason comes from the French Phre (sun) Mas (child) connoting the "Children of the Sun," or the "Brothers of the Sun."

With the assistance of the author Ralph Ellis, we can clear away a lot of cobwebs and throw back a lot of drapes to get a clearer picture as to why the twelve tribes really decided to divide into separate groups and eventually part company.

According to Ralph Ellis the division probably occurred due to the Cult of Aton's priestarchy who knew that a significant astrological change was taking place. This change or phase-shift concerned the sun's rise on the vernal equinox and the constellations that were seen just before sunrise on the first sign of the zodiac. For over 2,000 years, until the point of Joseph's arrival into Egypt, the sun had occupied the sign of Taurus - The Bull. This means that every year during the spring equinox, when the sun rises in the morning, it did so with the stars of Taurus behind it. Naturally, as the sun rises in the morning the stars fast fade from physical sight. But this did not matter to the Egyptian astrologers who knew what celestial (astrological) "time" it was. Now, as astronomers and astrologers know, the sun moves backwards through the twelve signs of the zodiac, in a long cycle that is referred to as the "Precession of the Equinoxes."

It moves very gradually, about 1 degree of arc every 72 years. Therefore, it takes over 2,160 years for the sun to pass backwards through a single sign of the zodiac. These signs or houses bear the familiar names: Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces. Pisces is the sign that the sun "occupies" at this time. In the days of Akhenaton, the sun had moved from the sign or house of Taurus (the Bull) into the sign or house of Aries (the Ram or Lamb). These changes of sign were of extreme importance to the Magi of old for various reasons outside the scope of the present text.

When the change occurred it signaled necessary ritualistic and even attitudinal changes below on Earth. The civilized races of antiquity observed these astrological changes and acted accordingly. Symbolism and mythology, as well as attitudes and beliefs morphed, and the heavenly changes of orientation were considered to be of vital importance

However, as the work of Ralph Ellis reveals, the priesthoods of Egypt were not all in agreement as to the position of the sun. Ellis claims that the Egyptians of the Northern or Lower part of Egypt, specifically at Heliopolis (under Hyksos dominion), were all for the celestial change. Since they were martially disposed, they ceased the worship of "Taurean" archetypes and switched to the worship of "Arian" ones instead. The bible is full of references to this solar phase-shift.

The very term "Passover," originally referred to this action of the sun literally passing over the hypothetical boundaries of the signs of the zodiac. The most important biblical rendition of the astrological story and dilemma concerns the time of the exiled Children of Israel at Mount Sinai. It was here that the people returned to the worship of the "golden calf," that is of Taurus. As the Book of Exodus relates, Moses was furious with his people's recalcitrance and smashed the tablets with his Yahwistic (Atonist) commandments on them.

Another interpretation concerning this revelry states that the Children of Israel were rebelling against Moses and his Atonist Cult. They were venerating the golden calf in order to honor Pharaoh Heremheb whose name means "Powerful Bull." By paying respect to this Heremheb and the Egyptian Amunists, the Children of Israel were hoping to gain favor and perhaps be allowed to make a return to Egypt. Both the Aramaic and Hebrew bibles do make mention of the conflict at Sinai between Moses and the exiled people.

The Hyksos kings and their people honored the astrological precession and began reverencing the traits and proclivities associated with the sign of Aries, whereas the priests of Thebes in Southern (or Upper Egypt) decided that the time was not right for new gods to be venerated. They wished to theologically remain loyal to the Taurean principles.

This intriguing scenario allows us to hazard more than a guess as to why there was a schism between the tribes of "Israel." The ten tribes decided that the old paradigm was still in, whereas the two tribes of Judah decided to honor their king Akhenaton and venerate the new Astro-Theological order.

We find Arian symbolism incorporated throughout the bible and also encoded into the architecture of the religious and civic world. Indeed, Arian symbolism continued to be employed by the descendants of the Atonists even after 2,160 years elapsed and the sun moved into the sign of Pisces (the last house of the zodiac). The falling out and schism resulted in animosity between the Houses of Israel and Judah. The propagandists of Judah believe the House of Israel to be accursed by Jehovah, and out of favor.

[lizzie]

WERE THE NEPHILIM MERE LEGENDARY HUMANOIDS ?
http://paraspiracy.com/home/?p=2914

The word or term ‘Nephilim’ appears twice in the Hebrew Bible, both in the Torah. The first is Genesis 6:1-4, immediately before the Noah’s ark story: When men began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit will not contend with man forever, for he is mortal; his days will be a hundred and twenty years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.

The second is Numbers 13:32-33, where the Hebrews have seen giants in Canaan: And they spread among the Israelites a bad report about the land they had explored. They said, “The land we explored devours those living in it. All the people we saw there are of great size. We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.”

‘Nephilim’ is rendered fallen, or possibly feller: a tyrant or bully. Several English translations rendered the word “giants”, but of late translators seem to prefer leave it untranslated. The “giants” translation may have come from the Greek old testament where “nephilim” was “gegantes” which looks like “giant” but in modern Greek would be “titans”. In Greek mythos, the titans were the supernaturally powerful offspring of gods and humans.

Some biblical researchers contend that the “Sons of God” were fallen angels who mated with human females and/or possessed human males and then mated with human females. These unions resulted in offspring, the Nephilim, that were “heroes of old, men of renown”. It is also most important to note that they are mentioned almost simultaneous to God’s statement that He would destroy the earth by flood, and it seems from this association that their effect upon mankind was one of the primary justifications that brought the destruction.

I read a commentary that stated that if this were fact that the Nephilim had mated with a variety of species, then we would now have a variety non-humans among us. Each has their own special traits. One example is Vampires. They were created when Nephilim fused their DNA with vampire bats. Vampire bats come out at night when the sunlight is dim as sun hurts their eyes. Like the Vampire bat, human vampires are adversely affected by sunlight and crave blood. Many true vampires crave blood from the time of their birth. Many have donors that give blood to them and keep them well supplied. Blood often restores them to full health and well being.

Another example given was Reptilians that are non-humans that can shapeshift. This means that they can alter their DNA electrically to transform from a human form to one that is reptilian. They have to concentrate to keep their human shape, if not they turn into reptilian humanoid.

These were not the only examples given. Some involved malformation, birth defects, races, genetic differences, etc. For this reason, it is understandable why the Nazis made determined efforts to find evidence of Nephilims in order to twist the legends to conform with their barbaric beliefs.

We have all seen the photos of giant skeletons being unearthed as well as the urban legends told in regards to superhumans. But there was a strange incident that was disclosed a few years ago that just seemed to fade off without any explanation or followup.

In 2005, there were reports that a Giant Man was killed in the Afghanistan mountains. This man was described as pale white, 15 foot tall, 1100 pound, six fingered and six toed who was feeding on human parts. It was reported that the Giant Man was killed by US Military after he reportedly attacked by throwing large rocks at them. The corpse of this Giant Man was flown to Germany for autopsy according to witnesses. Apparently the information was presented on the Coast to Coast AM show and discussed by George Noory and Steve Quayle. Since that time there has been little mention of this incident.

Could this Giant Man have been a real being and/or had any relation to a Nephilim? Are there Nephilim living, thriving and breeding among us? Is there any connection with 2012 and the supposed ‘end times’ theories?
In the H.G. Wells book The Time Traveler, he describes a race of monsters that live in the earth and maintain a secret society that was technologically far more advanced than the surface people. As well, these underground humanoids fed on the surface dwellers. There is a story by a Native American woman who stated her tribe was plagued by “giant” people that would steal their dead to eat them. They were red haired and lived in caves. In the end the tribe burned these giants to death.

There are many stories in many cultures that refer to colossal beings in their midst. For us, it’s simply a matter of what to believe.

[lizzie]

Akhenaton, the Cult of Aton, and the Dark Side of the Sun
http://www.irishoriginsofcivilization.c ... 0of%20mono

The religions of Christianity and Judaism originate from the same source, and that source is Egypt. Egyptian culture and religion had its source also, and that source is Ireland. Ireland's Druidic and proto-Druidic traditions, likewise, had their source in the pre-diluvian civilizations of Atlantis and Lemuria.

The bible is a compilation of numerous occidental and oriental pagan doctrines. Its compilation was commissioned by the chiefs of the Solar Cult (Atonists) situated in Tanis, Alexandria, Jerusalem, and Rome, in order to galvanize their empire and maintain control over the minds of the mass of illiterate and superstition-ridden human beings under their dominion.

Indeed there were secrets behind Christianity reserved for the initiated. One of the most important and extraordinary of these secrets concerns the Astro-Theological interpretation of the scriptures. Astrology (and its kindred meta-sciences of Numerology and Sacred Geometry, etc) was the heuristic device revealed to the initiates enabling them to decode convoluted scriptures impenetrable to laymen. It was the sacred principles of Druidry that were to be studied by the senior Templars, Masons, Cardinals, Priests, and Kabalists of old.

In our estimation the term "Jesus" was not a name but a title. It was a title given to the highest initiate of the Solar Cult in Egypt, although its actual origins lie in Ireland. A "Jesus Christ" was a high ranking priest of the temples of the sun. He was a priest of Aton, the sun god worshipped at cities of Heliopolis, Avaris, Tanis, Amarna, and Alexandria.

The Egyptian revisionist historian Ahmed Osman traces the gospel Jesus back hundreds of years prior to the official dates given for his life. During his researches into the Dead Sea Scrolls and other taboo documents, Osman discovered that the Essenes did not speak of Jesus at all, nor of the places, events, and characters that are found in the codified New Testament.

Osman discovered that the Essenes (who may not have been a "Jewish" sect at all) believed their "Teacher" to have lived at least one thousand years earlier and that he was probably the same person mentioned in the Old Testament under the name of Joshua, the Son of Nun.

The earlier Joshua (Son of Nun) took over the leadership of the Israelites after Moses died and was one of the “Davids,” that is, a commander of the Israelites (Atonists). There were commanders both before and after his time.

Nevertheless, when researcher Ahmed Osman declares he has proven the Old Testament character known as "King David" to be none other than the eighteenth dynasty Pharaoh Tuthmosis III, and a succeeding pharaoh, Amenhotep III, to be the “Jewish” King Solomon, one would think the revelations should not only raise the proverbial eye-brow but should cause worldwide discussion. When author Laurence Gardner states that the prophet Enoch was a character based on the Sumerian Enki; and when Tony Bushby declares Roman Emperor Tiberius to be the true father of Jesus, we should take notice. And when revisionist author Moustafa Gadalla labors to prove that Jesus Christ was a character based on Pharaoh Tutankhamen, the world should surely grind to a halt to listen.

The Egyptian revisionist historians Moustafa Gadalla and Ahmed Osman have been revealing facts that dramatically alter what we know about Jesus - the Man. Gadalla and Osman have separately declared in their works that the Old Testament patriarch Abraham, Jacob, Isaac, and Joseph were members of a powerful dynasty of Egyptian pharaohs known as the Hyksos.

Osman declares these Hyksos to be the same people as the Israelites. He argues that the Hyksos Kings of the Egyptian 13th dynasty, who ruled for approximately 300 years, are the ancestors of those referred to as Israelites and Levites. During the eighteenth dynasty, their leader was Pharaoh Akhenaton, who was himself either a physical or ideological descendant of the Hyksos.

Author Ralph Ellis insists that Abraham did not come into Egypt from elsewhere. He claims that Abraham was always resident in Egypt and that he was a powerful Hyksos king and rival to the pharaoh of Upper Egypt resident at Thebes. The city of Ur was not in Mesopotamia at all. It was not near the Euphrates and Tigris, as most believe, but on the Nile. All is made clear, regarding Abraham and Sarah's traversal into Egypt, when we realize what biblicists meant by the term "Egypt."

As Ralph Ellis so brilliantly points out, the name Egypt was employed by the composers of the Old Testament to denote Thebes in Lower Egypt. This was the city and region controlled by the adversaries of the Hyksos. It was considered a separate region, with different rulers, gods, customs, and politics. So, it was not the country of Egypt that Abraham visited, but Thebes within Egypt.

Official history tells us that the oppressive Hyksos were eventually expelled from the country by the Pharaoh Ahmose I (1575-1550 BC) who led the Egyptian people in rebellion against the tyrannical invader dynasty. However, we believe the upper classes of the Hyksos invaders were not expelled but maintained senior positions at the pharaoh's court and great temples of the sun at Gizeh, Tanis, Heliopolis, Amarna, Avaris, and Alexandria.

The upper strata of the Hyksos people had clearly married in with the native Egyptian line, since even Tuthmosis IV and his son Amenhotep III were of mixed blood. Some Egyptologists believe that Amenhotep III was the father of both Smenkhare and Tutankhamun, and given that this is true, it would have mean that these two Atonist pharaohs were also of mixed blood.

The authors Ahmed Osman and Moustafa Gadalla both insist that the biblical Moses was the Pharaoh Akhenaton and that the expulsion of Moses from Egypt during the later eighteenth dynasty was, in fact, the expulsion of the "broken king" Akhenaton. The scene at Sinai, the subsequent move to Jerusalem, and the eventual splitting of the twelve tribes, were events that occurred not to humble oppressed captives but to an arrogant and wealthy royal clan, followers of a pharaoh considered the father of monotheism.

Soon after arrival at Sinai legend has it that Moses died. His place as leader of the Levites (Atonists) was taken by a mysterious man called Joshua. Osman believes this character to have been the true Jesus. If Osman is correct it means that Jesus lived over 1000 years before the official dates given by Paul and by the four spurious gospels. It also means that Jesus was an Egyptian.

It is even likely that Paul, the employee of the elusive descendants of the Egyptian Levites operating out of Rome also knew about the story of Joshua. He may have based his Jesus upon Joshua, Moses, Aaron, and other earlier leaders of the Levites.

If it be true that Jesus lived at the time of Moses and if, in post-exilic times, he ruled as a king over the Levites and Houses of Israel and Judah, then perhaps we should spend some time examining this era. The "Messiah" of the Jews was considered to be of the Davidic line, a descendant of the House of Judah (Yahud).

In 1939 Sigmund Freud, published one of his least known and least well-received books, entitled Moses and Monotheism. Taking the lead from his friend Dr. Karl Abraham, Freud long pondered why the Egyptian identity of Moses had been obscured. Had it not been for Freud's tenacious inquisitiveness and, later, that of his friend and student Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky, our attention may never have been drawn to its significance.

One of the problems that intrigued Freud was why Moses, an Egyptian prince raised in the houses of the pharaoh, would go on to reinvent himself as the autocratic leader of a ragbag bunch of slaves and foreigners.

The people that "Moses" led out of Egypt were, as Freud and others have speculated, nothing less than a powerful pharaonic dynasty. And more controversially, their leader Moses was none other than Akhenaton, pharaoh of the eighteenth dynasty and true originator of their brand of monotheism.

Monotheism was not the creation of Moses (Akhenaton). Still less was it the original religion of the people later to be known as "Israelites," those strange followers of Moses. Monotheism was the concoction of the Solar Cult priests of Heliopolis and Avaris, the same men who chose which dignitary would become their country's new pharaoh.

We see little to convince us that Akhenaton's Atonist Solar Cult just vanished from the face of the Earth after the fall of their champion Akhenaton. We tend to believe that this same powerful cult from Heliopolis, Amarna, Giza, Tanis, and Avaris, was behind the churches and colleges of Alexandria during the era of the Greek pharaohs and also behind the Christian religion established in Rome.

We insist that this Atonist doctrine was a key pylon in the foundation of both Judaism and Christianity. Although the earliest "Christian" sects sought to live humble spirit-focused lives as taught by their savior, and although they honored the apostolic tradition of poverty, the leviathan of the later Roman Church took a suggestively different course. The shameless decadence and arch-materialism of the Vatican stands out as further proof for their Atonist origins.

The Apollonian religions of light known today have their origins in Atonism. It is chiefly from Atonism that the three present day solar religions took birth. Aton and Allah, Aton and Jehovah - there is barely an ounce of difference. The gods and saviors of most religions are personifications of light.

Apollonian religions, such as Judeo-Christianity, have forced the consciousness of human beings into a polarized and unhealthy state.

In Moses and Monotheism, Freud discloses a theory for the belief in a Messiah, and in the second coming of such a being. He emphasized that it was a consequence of the violent demise of the Jewish Moses after the time of the exile. Most biblical researchers and commentators agree that Moses died soon after reaching Sinai and that the leadership of the exiled peoples fell to his brother Aaron.

Freud understood that the early books of the bible were not composed at the time of Moses. He also understood that there were at least two schools at work composing variants of the stories that appear. He knew that the Jahwistic interpretation is not consistent with the Elohistic.

Elohim implies a plurality of "gods," and referred to the Egyptian (and Phoenician-Sumerian) kings and pharaohs who were considered nothing less than living gods. These kings of the Euphrates and the Nile not only styled themselves on the gods of ancient pantheons, but were regarded as actual embodiments of and channels for the will of those gods and goddesses. They were the "Keepers," the "Watchers," the "Elders," the "Kadosh."

Secondary permutations of the words, Elohim, Nephilim, and Annunaki, refer to these living incarnate gods, the pharaohs of Egypt, and the various stellar, solar, and lunar priestarchies they headed. The Ankh is a symbol of the Nephilim, or Annunaki, and their primordial knowledge and royal status. Indeed, the very word ankh is a loose rendering of the word Anakim (meaning “great kings” or “giants”) and perhaps of Annunaki, meaning "heavenly serpents" or "those who came down from heaven to earth.”

In any case, Freud's words lead us to the heart of the Moses-Akhenaton problem. We know that the god of the latter figure was Aton, god of light. This is the same god worshipped by the Israelites under the name Adon. But Adon was a name used in place of the word Jehovah. So Aton and Adon (or Aton and Jehovah) are one and the same being.

We now know Paul modeled his “Christ” on several mythical and historical personages who had already risen to prominence and notoriety in the world. Paul's Jesus was heavily based upon the Cappadocian seer and mystic Apollonius of Tyana who had once studied and operated from the city of Tarsus where Paul himself was born and raised.

Author Tony Bushby, primarily working from rather spurious and convoluted Jewish sources such as the Talmud and Toldoth Jeshu or "Life of Jesus," is convinced that Paul’s hero is based on a legitimate historical rebel leader known as Judas Khrestus and on his twin Yeshua Ben Panthera. This is the name used for Jesus Christ in the Rabbinical literature and tradition. In Bushby’s estimation Paul’s hero is a fusion of these twins; one a rather Messianic loud-mouthed rebel, the other a gentler and more forgiving sort.

Bushby finds that Mary, the mother of the twins, was a member of the infamous but super-wealthy and influential Herod family who ruled Judea at the behest of the Roman emperor. Bushby claims that Mary was good friends with the Roman Emperor Augustus. Her family probably came from the ancient city of Petra since her mother, Bernice, was a Nabotean of Arabic stock. Interestingly, for our thesis, the ancestors of Mary were Benjaminite priest kings of the House of Judah (Aton). Mary’s mother Bernice was the sister of Salome who appears as an important character in the story of John the Baptist. Bushby goes on to state that the father of the twin boys was none other than the Emperor Tiberius who forced his attentions on Mary when she lived in Rome. This would explain the many traditions that deem Jesus to have been illegitimate.

So, if we are to believe the latest evidence, the physical Jesus was not the son of god, as Christians and Jews may or may not accept, but the descendant of Roman emperors and heir to their throne.

We believe Rome was chosen as a new headquarters by Akhenaton's Atonists.

Judaism had arisen from Atonism and another branch would develop from the same trunk. That branch was Christianity. Paul of Tarsus, whom Ralph Ellis believes was none other than Josephus Flavius Piso (the historian), was hard at work doing the bidding of his imperious masters.

Behind the official form of Judaism lay the secret Mosaic (Atonist) doctrine transmitted to an elect group of mysterious Levites who had followed Moses out of Egypt across the desert to Mount Sinai and who had not assimilated into the Western lands after the periods of alleged captivity. This famous “oral tradition” is believed to have been finally set down in writing in 200 AD. It is the content of the tome known as the Babylonian Talmud that contains the Mishnah and the Gemara.

The term Nasorean was used to describe the priests and members of the Gnostic Mandeans who repudiated the teachings of Jesus in favor of those of John the Baptist. Jesus had, they believed, been a disciple of John but had corrupted his teachings.

In truth, the successor of John the Baptist was the Gentile prophet Simon Magus who cryptically turns up in the Christian New Testament as Simon the Zealot, Simon Cananaios, and Lazarus of Bethany. The cults of John and Simon are believed to have carried on in secret through many Gnostic sects and orders, particularly the Knights Templar, Knights of St. John, and powerful Order of Sion. The Church of Rome considers the John cults heretical and even satanic since they condemn the Pauline Jesus as an imposter and opportunist.

The Levites and Gaonim were of the House of Judah (Yahud) and not Israel. The majority of those "Israelite" tribes that had left Egypt had chosen not to follow Akhenaton and his extremist Atonist priests. As a result of their blasphemy they and their descendants were considered degenerate outcasts by the elite Atonists. In their minds, the Levites were true "Jews" and not the renegades who chose to disperse and assimilate into the West. The two tribes of Levites, under Akhenaton, would see to it that the "Children of Israel" would be banished in the sight of their Lord, condemned and considered "lost tribes."

It is our personal belief that a relationship existed between Roman and Sadducee elites and that these two forces conspired together to invent the Christ myth. We also know that the Herods were one of Rome's most illustrious and prestigious families and it was they who were from approximately 36 BC given charge of Judea by the Roman emperors. The Herodians, before they came to Rome, were Edomites, that is, they were connected with the Hyksos dynasty of Egypt. The Herod family was both Jewish and Roman.

The nobility of Rome were closely affiliated with the Cult of Aton from Egypt and may have been descended from them by blood as well as by ideology. The Atonists had left Egypt in the company of their Israelite brethren.

As the centuries passed the elite Atonist Levites had less and less to do with their erstwhile lower class brethren, the Israelites. Ten tribes had assimilated into the Western lands and only the so-called Tribes of Benjamin and Levi (The Levites) had stayed true to the oral tradition handed down to them at Sinai. These hardliners knew themselves to be heirs of the pharaohs.

Official Jewish history indicates that the Sadducees and Pharisees were rivals but the division between these kindred sects occurred relatively late in their history. It occurred during a Jewish civil war that broke out during the so-called "Hasmonean Period" under the rule of Maccabean King John Hyrcanus II. The conflict finally abated and history books tell us that the Sadducees finally ceased to exist after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD

The Sadducees were also known as Zadokites after the high priest Zadok who had anointed King Solomon (Sol, Sun). This Zadokite order has now been discovered to be very ancient. The Qumran community responsible for the so-called "Damascus Document," and the Dead Sea Scrolls, were affiliated with it, and its members included Jesus, John the Baptist, Simon Magus, Judas Maccabeus, and Ezra.

The Sadducee bloodline connection to the first of the Zadokite high priests reveals their Egyptian origins since this "Solomon" who established the "Zadokite" order was none other than the eighteenth dynasty Pharaoh Amenhotep III, the father of Akhenaton.

After the destruction of the Temple by the Roman Emperor Titus Vespasian, in AD 70, the Talmudist elders re-grouped in Babylon and opened many secret colleges there in order to preserve their traditions. At least this is the official story. It is more likely that the Gaonim of Babylon were, like the Sadducees, in league with the elite Romans, and that these colleges were convened not by Jewish enemies of Rome but by Romanized Jews seeking to preserve the secret Egyptian traditions of kabala, sacred geometry, hermetic magic, and so on.

This punitive, intolerant, self-important, and renegade dynasty, lionized by modern historians were, as investigator William Bramley rightly advocates, senior priests of the pre-diluvian Dragon Court, or "Brotherhood of the Snake." These lords, and their senior ministers and priests, symbolized their long genealogies by a tree and a serpent. The serpent was appropriate because it represented not only the movement of time but the secret tradition preserved by these families through the ages. This sacred tradition came down from the pre-diluvian epochs and those who were initiated into it employed the symbol of the serpent. The image of the serpent or dragon signified kingship, civic authority, and spiritual mastery.

Although Laurence Gardner places the time of the Israelite Abraham excessively far back in time (to Pharaoh Senusret I of the 12th Dynasty) he does recognize the existence of a Royal Hyksos "Dragon Court" and the bloodline that he rightly states continues to rule the world. He says that the eighteenth dynasty pharaohs were of the same "Dragon" lineage.

The "Dragon Court" can also be named the "Brotherhood of the Snake." This term denoted the bloodline that had existed from the time of the pre-diluvian civilizations of Atlantis and Lemuria. At that time, human DNA was crossed genetically with that of alien visitors from other worlds, those referred to in the scriptures and myths as the Annunaki, the Nephilim, the Sons of God, or the Fallen Angels. The hybrid created from these transgenic experiments may be referred to as "Homo Atlantis" and also as the "Son of the Serpent." From this first race of "Adams" all the races of the world have been "begotten." Some humans cleave to the alien strain and some to the original human strain.

From the Atlantean strain the kings of the world have been chosen and carefully recorded genealogies ensure that only the appropriately endowed individuals rule from the thrones of the world. The "Dragon Bloodline" has conflicts within their own ranks as well as adversaries from without. Nevertheless, they have maintained their hegemony and privilege through the centuries.

Some investigators track the Bloodline back to Cain the elder brother of Abel and son of Adam and Eve. There are hints in the Book of Genesis that Cain was not the son of Adam but of the Annunaki, or heavenly "fallen angels." The tyrant kings of the world are thought to descend from Cain who was slanderously labeled a murderer.

The error is thought to have occurred due to the mistranslation of the word yaqam that did not mean "slew" but "elevated." In other words, according to the occult interpretation, Abel was a lowly human while Cain was the son of the gods. Accordingly, the "Mark of Cain" was merely his symbol for royalty.

One of the major insignias of the Basque people of Northern Spain is a serpent entwined about a rod. Basques are most assuredly Celtic. It is an Astro-Theological device, a rendering of the polar axis of the Earth and the constellation Draco, the enormous constellation which like an encircling serpent "protects" the circumpolar region. This region was known as Hesperides by the Greeks, Paradiso by the Sophics, and the Field of Aaru by the Egyptians, and was the original Elysian Fields.

The stars of the Northern polar region neither rise nor set and were, therefore, regarded as symbols of eternity. These special stars were the souls of the perfected and enlightened, now beyond time. This word implied "Enlightened Ones."

The dragon was the emblem of the Dragon Court of Egypt, the Brotherhood of the Snake, headed by the Hyksos pharaohs and later by the renegade Akhenaton (Moses). This so-called "Dragon Bloodline" still exists. It was preserved in the Merovingian, Carolingian, Plantagenet, Tudor, Stuart, Hapsburg, Hanoverian, Savoy, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Battenberg, Bowes Lyon, Guelph, and Windsor dynasties (and others).

Upon the death of the mighty Heremheb the brazen renegade Akhenaton (Moses), then 60 years of age, attempted to return to and claim the throne of Egypt for himself and his banished clan. However, the majority rose up against him for a second time. This rejection embarrassed the Atonists and from this resentment and rage they secretly vowed in times to come would play down their connection of the land, people, and customs of Egypt.

According to Ralph Ellis the patriarch known as Abraham was the first pharaoh of these despised Hyksos people. His sister and wife Sarah eventually married the pharaoh of Southern Egypt forming a union with that rival and more native house.

Recent Investigations have revealed the biblical exodus story to be a veiled and doctored reference to two events that occurred centuries apart. It refers to the mass expulsion of the Hyksos people under the reign of Ahmose I (1575-1550 BC) and also to the removal of the renegade Pharaoh Akhenaton at the end of the 18th dynasty.

It is generally reckoned that the Hyksos Pharaoh Apepi II (Apophis) was the last hereditary Dragon King in Egypt, but it would appear that the heritage was perpetuated through the female line into the new dynasty.

The reference to a "Serpent Lord" not only refers to the solar and stellar priesthoods of Egypt but of Ireland. To the Druids the dragon or serpent was the ultimate symbol of both royalty and divinity. Author Laurence Gardner speculates that the original god of the Semitic Levites (El) goes back through the "Dragon Court" of the Hyksos to the Sumerian Enlil, and to the Annunaki, the "Heavenly Serpents" or "those who from heaven came down."

Even after the expulsion of the masses, enough upper-class Hyksos remained to continue serving the new pharaohs of the eighteenth dynasty. Indeed, we conclude that the Israelite strain within the Tuthmosside dynasty was that of the Hyksos "Dragon Court" and that the two houses had long been intertwined.

Researcher Ralph Ellis does not buy into the migration of Abraham and Sarah story. He believes that Abraham and Sarah did not come from Sumeria into Egypt in the manner commonly described. Ellis, like the great revisionist Comyns Beaumont before him, believes that Abraham was the first pharaoh of the Hyksos dynasty.

According to Ellis it was during this journey that the Theban king fell in love with Sarai and took her for his wife. The Southern pharaoh in question was none other than Tuthmosis III. So it was he, and not Abraham, who was the true father Isaac and of the so-called Twelve Tribes of Israel. They were in fact the Twelve Tribes of Aton.

[lizzie]

Shemsu-Heru
http://translation.babylon.com/english/ ... emsu-Heru/

Shemsu-Heru or Heru-Shemsu (Egyptian) Followers of Horus, commonly called the children of Horus; four minor deities represented as the helpers of Horus (Heru), especially in regard to the embalming of the deceased. Hapi, dog-headed, and Tuamutef, jackal-headed, had charge of the two arms of the deceased; Mestha or Amset, a bearded man, and Qebhsennuf, hawk-headed, had charge of the two legs. These four deities also had surveillance of the four cardinal points: north, east, south, and west respectively.

Followers of Horus also applied to those early invaders and conquerors of Egypt who built up the great dynastic Egyptian civilization; over a number of centuries there was an inroad or influx from the Far East, possibly Southern India and Ceylon, or possibly even from the last remnants of the ancient Lanka of the Hindus, of immigrants who mingled with the then natives of Egypt -- Atlanto-Aryans from Poseidonis -- thus forming what became known in later days as the Egyptian people or race.

Horus
http://www.pantheon.org/articles/h/horus.html

The oldest of the Horus gods is appropriately named Horus the Elder (Heru-ur), and was especially venerated in pre-Dynastic Upper Egypt along with Hathor. In this very ancient form, Horus is also a creator god, the falcon who flew up at the beginning of time.

The pre-Pharaohnic rulers of Upper Egypt were considered "shemsu-Heru" or "followers of Horus", and the original Horus is himself considered in some myths to be the brother of Seth and Osiris, second-born of the five children of Geb and Nut (Osiris, Horus, Seth, Isis, Nephthys).

Horus the Elder's city was Letopolis, and his eyes were thought to be the sun and moon. When these two heavenly bodies are invisible (as on the night of the new moon) he goes blind and takes the name Mekhenty-er-irty, "He who has no eyes". When he recovers them, he becomes Khenty-irty, "He who has eyes". A warrior-god armed with a sword, Horus could be especially dangerous to those around him in his vision-deprived state, and during one battle in particular he managed to not only knock off the heads of his enemies but of the other deities fighting alongside him, thus plunging the world into immediate confusion that was only relieved when his eyes returned.

Other notable Horus gods are the previously mentioned Harseisis, as well as Horus of Behdet (sometimes called simply Behdety) who was represented as a winged sun disk, Anhur (a form of Horus the Elder and Shu), Horakhety (Ra-Heru-akhety) who was a syncretism of Ra and Horus, and Harpokrates (Heru-pa-khered) or Horus the Child. In the form of Harpokrates, Horus is the danger-beset son of Isis with one finger to his lips, signifying his childish nature (also evident in his princely sidelock and naked status). Harpokrates represented not only the royal heir, but also the newborn sun.

Horus deities are frequently depicted as hawks or hawk-headed men, though some are represented as fully human. The pharaoh was considered to be the Living Horus, the temporal stand-in for Horus in the earthly domain. As the opponent of Seth (who, though initially an Upper Egyptian deity himself, later came to represent not only Lower Egypt but the desert surrounding Egypt), Horus is alternately a brother vying for the throne and unification of Egypt (Horus the Elder), or a royal heir come to reclaim his inheritance (Horus the Younger).

Horus can be seen at the top of the serekh of early kings, though in very rare cases his place was usurped by Set (Peribsen, Dynasty 2) or even shared with him (Khasekhemwy, Dynasty 2). Horus is also depicted on the famous Narmer palette along with Bat, an earlier form of Hathor.

Astronaut Theology: Following the Followers
http://secretsun.blogspot.com/2008/04/a ... owers.html

Terry Melanson of ConspiracyArchive.com raised this very important issue in the comments to yesterday's posting.

So what you seem to be saying, as far as I can tell, is that these "Followers of Horus," the secret priests of the secret society of Shemsu Hor which, according to Egyptian records, existed before time was recorded, are the real string-pullers even today. They have constructed all the competing hermetic and kabbalistic occult doctrines and have been the real "Unknown Superiors" alluded by the Elus Cohen, the Strict Observance, the Golden and Rosy Cross, and Theosophy. And further, that it is these Shemsu Hor who are behind the pervasiveness of sun symbolism?

My answer is yes, I believe it's certainly a thesis that bears investigating. I had the pleasure to meet Graham Hancock a couple years back and we talked about the Shemsu Hor briefly. Graham is a man who's done more research into the Shemsu Hor and the history of secret societies and historical mysteries than anyone, and he emphatically and unambiguously told me that he believes the Shemsu Hor still exist. I have no way to confirm whether that is true, I can only look at their symbols and their beliefs and see how they are manifesting themselves in the culture today (which they are doing everywhere). As to all of the competing doctrines, it's possible, but I don't think that's necessary. There's always imitation and corruption and schism to explain that.

But let me just draw on this passage from the original manuscript of Our Gods Wear Spandex to show how one group can be behind the formation of other movements. In this passage I talk about how Freemasonry seemed to be the figure behind the curtain with a number of alternative religious movements (and several other civic and fraternal groups that we'll be looking at in the future). Terry himself delves into the role of Freemasons in the creation of Theosophy.

It's my opinion that the Freemasons were very, very busy in the 19th Century creating any number of movements for purposes I can only speculate on.

The 19th Century also saw the rise of major alternative religious movements, particularly in America. New England seemed to be a particular hotspot for these movements. Three of the most important movements of that time - Christian Science, Transcendentalism and Mormonism - trace their roots there. And all three had important links to Freemasonry.

The Christian Science Church was based on the doctrines presented in Mary Baker Eddy's 1875 opus, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures. Eddy (1821-1919) taught the virtues of healing through faith, preaching that illness was an illusion.. Christian Science was essentially mystical, and unlike many denominations allowed their adherents to become Freemasons.

The Church of Latter-Day Saints, more commonly known as the Mormons, have their origins in hidden scriptures known as 'The Golden Plates,' allegedly revealed by angel named 'Moroni' to Mormon founder Joseph Smith. The Golden Plates claimed that Jewish tribes emigrated to America following the fall of Jerusalem and that Jesus reappeared to them. Though The Book of Mormon is formatted like the Bible, it's contents bear a strange similarity to the 'boy’s adventure' stories of the time. Mormonism is considered to be a pseudo-Christian cult by most Christian denominations, and preaches a cosmology more akin to Gnosticism. Mormon doctrine teaches that God was once a mortal and that men have the potential to become God's themselves. It was also infamous in its time for encouraging polygamy for its male adherents. The Mormons were extremely unpopular in their early days and traveled west to flee persecution. They settled on the great Salt Lake in Utah and began to spread their faith. Mormons are generally conservative and active in Republican party politics. They tend to abstain from vice and have large families. Every young adult Mormon is required to serve two years as a missionary.

Joseph Smith was initiated as a Master Mason in 1842, and many claim that Mormon rituals are based in Freemasonry. It is also believed that Smith had an Occult teacher named Dr. Luman Walter who tutored him in the rites of ceremonial magic and alchemy. Interestingly, Egyptian themed symbols are common in Salt Lake City, including a statue of the Great Sphinx bearing Joseph Smith's likeness.

Transcendentalism was essentially blend of Christianity and Eastern thought, which had a strong influence on Theosophy and is generally regarded as the foundation of today's New Age Movement. Emerson read texts like The Bhagavad Gita and Buddhist scripture, as well as the writers of Christian mystic Emanuel Swedenborg, and from them developed a philosophy that taught the unity of Creation, and the virtues of mysticism over rationality and logic.

If that's not enough, I just found evidence of a link between Masonry and Rastafarianism.

It has been suggested that the Rastafarian word for God, Jah, comes from the term Jahbulon. William David Spencer, in his book Dread Jesus, proposes that Archibald Dunkley and Joseph Nathaniel Hibbert were among the preachers that inspired the Rastafari movement, and that both were members of the "Ancient Mystic Order of Ethiopia", a fraternal order derived from Prince Hall Freemasonry. Spencer believes that several features of the Rastafari movement derive from this lodge, including the name "Jah", from the word Jah-Bul-On.

But back to Terry's question, could an impossibly ancient society be behind any number of other groups? If so, what power do they have to control so many other powerful individuals and groups? That's really the crux of the matter, isn't it?

The question of compelling force is why so many other conspiracy "master theories" fall apart for me. If 9/11 really was meant as a pretext to institute an American Imperium, why is the dollar dying, why is the Army falling apart and why are huge swathes of the American economy being snapped up at fire sale prices by the Europeans and the Russians and the Chinese? What power do small groups like the Jews or the Jesuits or the British have over a billion plus Chinese, or oil-rich Russia, or the rising powers in the Persian Gulf or industrial giants like Japan? For that matter, what possible power would Freemasonry have? What could be compelling all of these countries to join in this emerging "global community?"

There's something else at work here. Abstractions like nature worship or occultism or fancy aprons cannot possibly be the driving force behind all of this, they just can't. And for me, that's where the work of researchers like Richard Hoagland and Peter Levenda comes in...

Freemasonry: Midwife to an Occult Empire
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Freemasonry.htm

The negative experiences far outweigh the positive. The members who regularly post to forums and send out emails display the traits of having been thoroughly brainwashed by a first-class cult. Some are far more clever and are undoubtedly part of a concerted effort by the Brotherhood.

Historically, Freemasonry has been charged with corruption of public officials because of the oaths and promises they swear to keep amongst themselves, above all else. At the very least, joining a secret society, or a "society with secrets," creates a glaring conflict of interest.

The following document doesn't go into corruption or masonic favoritism. A secret society, by its very nature - and one as widespread and established as masonry - would naturally enable such intrigue. My only intention here is to outline its influence, and guiding hand on a unique phenomenon that occurred at the crossroads of the 19th and 20th century.

The rites and rituals of Freemasonry are directly derived from ancient occult mysteries. An Entered Apprentice is deceived from the beginning, as Pike has openly admitted; at the same time revealing its likeness with the "Mysteries, Hermeticism and Alchemy."

“When a mason learns the key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the mystery of his craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply energy.” - Manly P. Hall, 33°, The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, p. 48

The latter quote, in particular, may be surprising to some but occultists have a clear concept of what Manly P. Hall was conveying. To them, the true definition of occultism is the science of energy flow and energy relationships. Occult meditation is a means of consciously and purposefully directing energy from a recognized source to the creation of some specific effect. This is the task of the initiate in all Occult groups. The initiator shows the candidate his latent faculties, his dormant powers, and initiates him into their use. He explains or demonstrates how the candidate may awaken the static energy into dynamic power.

Freemasonry has always, admittedly, held deep occult secrets which it hides from the "profane" and unworthy. One person who believed this to be true was Alice Ann Bailey. Her praise and admiration - she appeared to be almost in awe of the craft - was evident throughout all her works. A typical flattery can be found on p. 511 of The Externalization of the Hierarchy:

"The Masonic Movement is the custodian of the law; it is the home of the Mysteries and the seat of initiation. It is a far more occult organization than can be realized, and is intended to be the training school for the coming advanced occultists. In its ceremonials lies hid the wielding of the forces connected with the growth and life of the kingdoms of nature and the unfoldment of the divine aspects of man."

“Satanic Ritual is a blend of Gnostic, Cabbalistic, Hermetic, and Masonic elements, incorporating nomenclature and vibratory words of power from virtually every mythos .... Masonic orders have contained the most influential men in many governments, and virtually every occult order has many Masonic roots.” - Anton Szandor LaVey, The Satanic Rituals — Companion to the Satanic Bible, pp. 21, 78

The occult revival of the 20th century can be directly attributed to Freemasonry and its peripheral entourage of acolytes: Theosophy, the New Age Movement, Satanism, Cabalistic Black Magic, Enochian Magic, Gerardian Wicca, Alexandrian Wicca and Sex Magic.

The O.T.O. founded at the beginning of the 20th century represents a reunification attempt to incorporate the traditions of the Freemasonic, Rosicrucian and Illuminist movements of the 18th and 19th centuries, the crusading Knights Templars of the middle ages and early Christian Gnosticism and the Pagan Mystery Schools.

The O.T.O. has also claimed, "Our Order possesses the KEY which opens up all Masonic and Hermetic secrets, namely, the teaching of sexual magic, and this teaching explains, without exception, all the secrets of nature, all the symbolism of FREEMASONRY and all systems of religion." (Ibid. p. 181)

Many Freemasons throughout history have contributed immensely to our society; I would be remiss having not mentioned it. However, for all the good that has been done there is still only one occult revival that has occurred on such a grand scale (taken together as a phenomenon) which I thoroughly believe warrants the appellation of an empire.

[lizzie]

Zep-Tepi
http://alternativearchaeology.jigsy.com/zep-tepi

Buried within the texts of Ancient Egypt and its esoteric religion, the hidden vestiges of an even earlier time, or a remote golden age before the Kings became mortal and men and women experienced the hardships of death, the Egyptians refer to a time called Zep Tepi, or the "first occasion" of Egypt -- a time ancient to the Ancient Egyptians themselves.

Having influenced and captivated western culture for centuries, from the affairs of Caesar and Marc Antony with Cleopatra, to the famous Hollywood blockbuster "StarGate", a controversial debate exists whether the Zep Tepi myth of the Ancient Egyptians was actually a popular story among their religion for most of the civilizations long life.

The most apparent and direct references to this mythical golden age are mentioned on the walls of the Temple Complex at Edfu, in upper Egypt, built by the Greek Ptolemaic rulers of Alexanders Empire c. 250 BC. Other sources consist of the Turin Papyrus written contemporary with Ramesses the Great, of the Hebrew Exodus c. 1250BC, and on the Palermo Stone from the 5th dynasty Old Kingdom (2500BC).

Within the overall canon, the times of the gods are laid alongside the historical references of real mortal kings of dynastic Egypt, spanning over 36,620 years. On the remains of the Turin papyrus, perhaps the best source, the epoch is further divided into separate periods or "dynasties" of rulers. One register lists the Neteru spirits, who took on anthropomorphic forms (possessing human bodies but heads of animals), each inscribed with an individual cartouche next to each Neteru, and a number of years of each one's reign in an adjacent column, numbers which have since crumbled into dust.

In the next few columns, the "Venerables of Memphis" are added, as are the "Venerables of the North", and the Shemsu Hor, or otherwise called the companions or followers of Horus, who are perhaps semi-divine or semi mortal. In total, an inventory column is then inscribed in the papyrus which reads: "Venerables of Shemsu Hor, 13,420 years, and reigns before the Shemsu-Hor, 23,200 years; Total 36,620 years."

As far back as the Palermo Stone, proof is seen that the Egyptians believed in the existence of a much earlier time when gods ruled, and was cataloged with serious precision alongside real historical ones. Manetho's own records are considered the literary foundation by which scholars officially reconstruct the majority of the historical royal lineage and chronology of dynasties in Pharaohnic Egypt, but at the same time, they completely reject all of the other carefully detailed inscriptions and cartouches of the earlier time of Zep Tepi cherished by the Egyptians.

The accounts of Zep Tepi by the Egyptian priests at Edfu describe a time of the gods before the time of Menes, the actual historical founder of Egypt.

On the walls of the Edfu Temple, the story of Zep Tepi displays the rule of a real historic people, according to the Egyptians, who came to Egypt escaping the destruction of their homeland, and proceeded to gift the people of the Nile with fruits of civilization and agriculture.

The intermediaries of this great progenitor culture were called the Urshu, who appeared in human form and often took on part of the shape of animals called Neteru.

According to the Egyptians these great beings could even die or become sick under certain circumstances, most notably the Shemsu Hor, who ruled in a second long period of prehistory. Within the texts, the Egyptians refer to the Neteru as the sacred people who built the pyramids of Giza and the Great Sphinx.

Carved upon the walls of the Ptolemaic temple of Edfu, an island surrounded by water are expressed in words and symbols denoting a primeval mound, the iconic pyramidal shape, the place of creation that rose from the primordial oceans of Zep Tepi. The concept is found at many cult centers throughout ancient Egypt; the Edfu texts mention the existence within the sacred island of a subterranean realm known as the duat n ba, the "Underworld of the Soul".

This sacred domain was reached via an actual construction named the "Place of the Well" said to exist at Giza, where the 'embryo', or 'seed' of creation resided, called also the "Great Lotus", or "Throne". It exuded a divine radiance which is said to be responsible for what is called “the primordial scission” in Egyptian mythology, where from one central cosmic entity, the physical world blossomed upon many petals, the father god Atum, like a biological cell in mitosis, separating into the grand ennead of the gods, numbering 8: Shu, Tefnut, Nut, Geb, Osiris, Isis, Nephtys, and Set.

Sokar numbered one of the later Neteru beings that spawned from the ennead pantheon and remained the eternal guardian of Rostau (The Giza Plateau). Under the Giza plateau, a shrine to Sokar called the Shetayet, quite literally the "tomb of god" was hidden. Although its location has never been determined, a possible location may lie in the vicinity of Gebel Gibli, a rock outcropping near the Great Sphinx.

Sokar’s realm was considered simultaneously a real physical subterranean world and a metaphysical one, appearing in the form of the Egyptian night sky. The deceased had to navigate through the Duat underworld in order to reach an afterlife among the stars, undergoing a dark journey, a period reflected in the sun's movement through the hours of darkness below the horizon.

Sokar’s dominion encompassed the fourth and fifth hours of that Duat, the midnight hour of the Pharaohs journey to the eternal afterlife. A physical representation of the duat-underworld may actually exist at Giza, especially since pictorial images at Edfu of the Fourth and Fifth Hours mirrored the angle in which the Giza plateau slopes down from northwest to southeast.

Not even the sun-god could penetrate Sokar's secret chamber during his nocturnal journey. Instead, the soul of the deceased is pulled along on a night-barge over the top of a conical pyramid-mound drawn above the realm of Sokar. The Great pyramid of Khafre, also representative of that original mound, was a symbolic time keeper, each step of the pyramid measuring the passing hours of the Duat journey.

Ever since the age of the Pharaohs, Egyptian myths and legends spoke of a cave underworld at Giza. Such stories were told by Roman and Arab travelers, and by locals around the Giza plateau. One man took it upon himself to find it.

In 1817, Sir Henry Salt, British Diplomat to Egypt, along with the Italian explorer Giovanni Caviglia, undertook an expedition to explore an unusual tomb west of the Great Pyramid. After finding a crack in the rock of the tomb hall, Salt and Caviglia peered inside a chamber, partly artificial and natural, opening up into a maze of subterranean passages. After traveling a distance of several hundred yards, the two men chanced upon a sepulcher room linked to three other chambers equal in size, from which a web of labyrinthine passages spread out into the darkness. Salt left Caviglia to explore the other chambers. The Italian followed a passage for a distance of 300 feet before giving up, leaving the labyrinth empty handed.

Another legend preserved among the inhabitants of Nazlet es-Samman, the modern village nearby the pyramid field, spoke of a holy well, guarded by a holy man named Hammed es-Samman. His duty was to guard its entrance, for beneath it was a stone passage that led directly to what was remembered as an underground "city" or "palace".

Ground penetrating radar instruments have additionally detected a long passage traversing all the way into the pyramid of Khafre. The entrance to that cave system is called the Tomb of Birds, in which a group of Arab explorers found a shrine littered with mummified birds. Were the birds falcons representing the Sokar deity, or perhaps an ibis, an icon associated with the coveted Thoth, divine guardian of wisdom?

In the traditions of Hermeticism, a cult of intellectuals dating as far back as Hellenic Greece, its iconic symbol survives to this day in the modern science of medicine, (a twisting of two snakes around a staff capped with wings), Hermes was worshiped as a divine messenger of wisdom (Greek version of the Egyptian Ibis headed god Thoth). The group believed the actual tomb of Hermes existed beneath the pyramid of Khafre, housing the secret knowledge of the Universe and the key to primordial matter. An emerald tablet, said to contain that knowledge would be found along with the ancient King Thoth, one of the mythic rulers of Zep Tepi underneath the pyramid.

A similar school or "religion" of ancient Greece, Pythagorism, may actually be the contents inscribed upon the tablet (a kind of Einstein's "special relativity" for the ancient world). Pythagoras, the famous geometry mathematician, created a whole religion based on numerology and a mathematical cosmological order composed of octaves and harmonic unities inherit behind the symbolic meanings of numbers. During his youth, it was known by Plato and Aristotle that Pythagoras learned the secrets of geometry from the Egyptians c.550BC, and formed the religion of Pythagorism out of the esoteric mysticism of that country's traditional religions.

The great pyramids of Giza are the most mathematically precise edifices ever constructed in ancient Egypt dated to 2550BC. Amazingly, right at the very beginning of the civilization, the Egyptians used a sophisticated form of geometry that produced the greatest monuments, which knew no rivals thereafter.

The secrets of the knowledge that helped build the pyramids was kept by the priests, who hid it deep within the temples of Egypt, a sanctuary in which only very high ranking priests could access. When the Edfu priests say, “the Neteru and Shemsu Hor built the pyramids and Sphinx”, perhaps it only means: “with the aid of secrets passed down to us from the ancient ones, the monuments were built.” Could the mysticism of Pythagorism come from a very early epoch in Egyptian history?

Rumors place a hall of records underneath the paws of the Sphinx, which could contain the secrets of a lost civilization. Seismic detection located a cavity beneath the right paw of the Sphinx, which is only one of many passages and corridors known to run all throughout the Giza underworld. A small ventilation shaft lies along the belly of the Sphinx, believed to provide air circulation to chambers below.

Incidentally, Rostua, the ancient name of Giza, literally means "mouth of many passages" in hieroglyphics.

The Sphinx itself bears the heavy marks of water erosional patterns that could only come from the Ice Age over 8000 years before Egyptian civilization was suppose to have begun. It is possible that who ever originally built the Sphinx, in light of a coming dark age, thought it necessary to bury the knowledge of the primordial cosmology of Pythagorism underneath the Sphinx for future generations to find. Later the Egyptians discovered the records and used the sacred knowledge to build the pyramids, recarving the head of the Sphinx to represent one of the Pharaohs.

Later, the tablets may have been moved to a tomb located within the maze under Khafre's pyramid after the pyramids were completed. Or perhaps such a tomb existed long before the Egyptians, or was built later by the Hellenistic Egyptian priests seeking a safe place to store the Pythagorean and Hermetic tablets so that their sacred contents could remain secret to the uninitiated.

In September 1997, a documentary film maker Boris Said appeared on Bell's radio show to talk about his recent work at Giza. One evening in 1992, Boris was taking a stroll on the Giza plateau when a plateau guard offered to show Boris a secret for twenty dollars.

In April/May 1996 ground-penetrating radar detected a tunnel approximately two metres wide and about three meters below the surface emerging from the tail of the Sphinx, heading in a westerly direction under the causeway towards Khafre's pyramid.

A shaft midway between the pyramid and Sphinx descended into the plateau, which strangely contained some of the same precipitous erosional patterns of the Sphinx, dating the shaft to the same epoch the Sphinx was shaped. The shaft descended into a spacious court, appearing empty. In the center of that court lay a second shaft falling 26 meters into an intermediary chamber where seven side chambers lay, two disturbed stone sarcophagi over 18 feet high residing in two of those a cloves. Apparently a water pump was necessary to remove the high water table at the greater depths, revealing yet another shaft descending 15 meters to a large chamber further down.

Returning to the site in February 1997, Boris along with his film crew scraped some dirt away from the floor to sit his tripod. Suddenly, it quickly became apparent to Boris that a smooth hard surface was becoming exposed.

Eventually the team uncovered a complete sarcophagus lid, containing an octagonal cross section, a design foreign amongst common Egyptian motifs. Could the 8 sided shape represent the geometric icon of the 8 gods of the Ennead pantheon, the cosmological scission of creation, the divine geometrical hierarchies of Pythagoras?

Boris and his team decided to use ground-penetrating radar to reveal what lay underneath the lid. The lid was around thirty inches thick; two and a half metres below the lid, the radar detected a two and a half meter wide anomaly with a domed ceiling. The anomaly descended at a twenty five degree angle in an easterly direction headed toward the Sphinx two hundred and seventy five yards away. The alleged tunnel emerging from the tail of the Sphinx under the causeway probably links up with this passage.

What the final chamber is supposed to represent is not known. Zahi Hawass, former director of the Giza plateau has claimed it to be a symbolic tomb of King Osiris, the ancient god of Zep Tepi. The passage below the lid suggests that the coffin merely functions as a gateway, the well of creation described in the Edfu texts that enters the farthest extent of Sokar's duat underworld at Giza.

[lizzie]

The Royal Order of the Dragon
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienc ... digo11.htm

The magnificent civilizing era of the Shemsu Hor in Egypt appears to have ended circa 2250 BCE when a necrophilic priesthood known as the Royal Order of the Dragon became the overlords of the Egyptian populace. From that time on, the Egypt of antiquity lost the technology necessary for constructing buildings incorporating massive stone blocks.

The Order of the Dragon cult still exists at the present time. Membership has included Vlad the Impaler (Count Dracula) and the 17th Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere, who wrote a poem entitled “Romeus and Juliette” at the age of eleven for Queen Elizabeth 1st and who almost certainly was the principal author of the Shakespearian corpus, not Shakespeare nor Sir Francis Bacon.

When the Shemsu Hor disappeared from the pages of early Egyptian and Maltese history, some of the local inhabitants began the custom of binding the skulls of their babies between two flat boards, in order to simulate the elongated skulls of the Shemsu Hor overlords who had re-introduced civilization in the wake of the global flood.

At approximately the same time period that the era of the Shemsu Hor ended in Egypt, the Olmec people of Central America were still primitive jungle farmers until, according to Mesoamerican history, the Olmecs were visited by a tall white-skinned individual possessing fair hair, blue eyes, a white beard and an incredibly elongated head—a perfect description of a Shemsu Hor. In a remarkably short time period, the Olmecs developed a very sophisticated culture and skills which enabled them to construct the first pyramids in Mesoamerica.

With the knowledge imparted them by this mysterious stranger whom they revered, the Olmecs constructed a fortress incorporating cyclopean stone blocks at La Venta. Near the site, American archaeologist Mathew Stirling discovered a large rock sculpture bearing the image of a Shemsu Hor, replete with elongated head and sporting a long beard (full-blooded Mesoamericans were unable to grow beards).

The Olmec empire mysteriously collapsed circa 100 BCE, some of the Olmecs relocating to Belize and the Yucatan Peninsula to become known as the Maya, while other Olmecs travelled west to Central Mexico, where they founded the Toltec Empire. The elongated skulls of the Shemsu Hor have been discovered in both of these areas.

The Irish Origins of Civilization
http://www.scribd.com/doc/54243074/The- ... vilization

The Levitical scholars and later historians knew that the real meaning of the title Hebrew (like that of "David," "Israel," "Judah," and "Aaron," etc) had to be obscured. The word's original meaning would best be concealed if it was linked to another similar sounding word that did denote racial types and groups. It was noted that the word was similar to Apiru which referred to thieves, wanderers, and vagabonds, or to simple shepherds seeking refuge in Egypt due to droughts. Such refugees did exist and were bound to sustain themselves in Egypt by performing menial tasks. With the letter "H" added we have Hapiru, making a word that could easily be mistaken for Hebrew. But the Apiru or Hapiru were not the same people as the Hebrews or Ibaru, the wise-ones and counselors to pharaoh. The Irish (Aryan) Magi had journeyed far and wide and had established mystery schools throughout the far-flung corners of the globe, in every empire and major city. The early Egyptians knew them as the Shemsu Hor or "Disciples of Horus."

Intelligent and creative men aspired to attend their colleges and learn their secrets pertaining to astronomy, biology, horticulture, metaphysics, law, divination, and other subjects. The fact that almost every overt reference to these colleges has been deliberately excised from the world's history texts does not change this fact. In a similar fashion as the later Christian missionary monks, the Druids had taken their knowledge and symbolism with them wherever they roved. As a result, Druid Elders were exalted counselors at major courts. As Merlin was to King Arthur, the Druid Magi tutored the many princes and kings who sought them out. They were especially esteemed in Egypt, the land that had benefited from their knowledge of architecture and astronomy. The Druids (the Shemsu Hor) were counselors to, and perhaps even initiators of, the pharaohs of Egypt.

The word Hebrew can also be traced to the Gaelic Heber meaning "fire" or "sun." A "Hebrew" (Ibaru) was a priest of the sun. The word did not refer to a race or nation, as we have been told by duplicitous "historians."

It actually referred to the caste of Druidic Elders and to their gnosis. It also referred to their sacred language and alphabet. A "Hebrew" then, was one conversant with the sacred knowledge; to be precise, the knowledge of the stars. Those monsters who later appropriated this term did not have the right to do so. Those renegades were hardly qualified to use these illustrious terms or to have appropriated them surreptitiously from those true Hebrews of the world. We have believed the lunacy because it is the descendants of the Cult of Aton who have been funding their own history’s composition. The antique oral tradition was swept aside by the men of words and writing. The ancient seers were systematically massacred and annihilated en masse by the cruel and blood-thirsty legions of Rome, funded by the Cult of Aton to eradicate any sect, cult, or church that preserved the truth.

A Very Sirius Election: Bringing it All Back Home
http://secretsun.blogspot.com/2008/11/v ... t-all.html

Following in the footsteps of the Horus Kings were the Shemsu Hor, or "Followers of Horus," a priesthood-slash-secret society based in Heliopolis that sought to return to the Zep Tepi - a term meaning "First Time," the time of the rule of the gods. Their religion is encoded into the great monuments of Egypt, most notably the Necropolis at Giza. Much of the Shemsu Hor's symbolism deals with Horus retracing the steps Osiris took through the cosmos, which in turn they themselves would follow to the Zep Tepi.

The Shemsu Hor counted among their member many of the country's greatest architects, and soon similar groups such as the Dionysian Artificers (dedicated like the Shemsu Hor to Osiris-Dionysus) and later the Mithraic Cults (made up of soldiers, much like the Horus warrior cults) carried on with the work of the Shemsu Hor, creating a lineage that floruished in the first half of the 20th Century and still continues on to this day. The various Freemasonic orders, Skull & Bones and the other senior societies, political groups like the CFR, civic groups like the Rotarians- there is a whole host of interconnected groups that in some way have their roots in the Shemsu Hor.

What is stunning is that Thomas Paine wrote of this lineage in the early 18th Century, drawing upon connections he had in London and Paris with high ranking Freemasons.

What's more, Paine revealed that the Shemsu Hor had spread out all over Europe in the centuries before Christ and created a network of groups that included the Druids:

The religion of the Druids, as before said, was the same as the religion of the ancient Egyptians. The priests of Egypt were the professors and teachers of science, and were styled priests of Heliopolis, that is, of the City of the Sun. The Druids in Europe, who were the same order of men, have their name from the Teutonic or ancient German language; the German being anciently called Teutones.

Now here is the truly mind-blowing connection -- almost two centuries before Hancock and Bauval -- the Druids venerated the "First Cause," nearly identical to the "First Time" of the Shemsu Hor:

To come then at once to the point, Masonry (as I shall show from the customs, ceremonies, hieroglyphics, and chronology of Masonry) is derived and is the remains of the religion of the ancient Druids; who, like the Magi of Persia and the Priests of Heliopolis in Egypt, were Priests of the Sun. They paid worship to this great luminary, as the great visible agent of a great invisible first cause whom they styled "Time without limits."

When you read the ancient texts - particularly the Sumerian and Egyptian- a picture becomes very clear- the gods descended from the heavens, created men and taught them the arts of civilization and then returned to the stars. Over time, scholars have seen all of this as metaphor. That's scholars for you. Everything is a metaphor.

But what if your business was power? Government, religion, the culture industry, the military- if you could somehow ingratiate yourself to these "gods" to the point that somehow they decide to align themselves with you, well, that would be the ultimate advantage. Wouldn't it? The question becomes how do you even contact these beings?

From Seqenenre Tao to the Mystery Cults to the Gnostics to the Cathars to the Templars to the Freemasons and beyond, we see a tradition sealed by blood oaths, a very ancient tradition of people willing to die to keep their sects secrets. Why? Where does this come from? Was there once a secret so profound that to reveal it would cause such harm that only the penalty of torture and death could keep it hidden?

I've been studying this dilemma for several years and none of the secrets these groups supposedly kept were even all that interesting, never mind profound (Morals and Dogma will bore you to the point where you pray for the sweet release of death). I'm not sure exactly when it happened, but at some point in the last year or two I became convinced that there had to be something else. Perhaps something lost in time that we could only figure out by reading the symbols and metaphors these groups couched their secrets in. And that process began to pick up speed in the Imperial Age, with breakthroughs like the discovery of the Rosetta Stone.

A funny thing happened with the rise of science and technology in the 18th and 19th Centuries. The obsession with these ancient "superstitions" didn't fade into Randian hyper-rationalism, it exploded. The 19th Century saw a new Renaissance of Masonic-derived orders like the Theosophists and the Golden Dawn. At the same time the Rosetta Stone was found and deciphered, external models of what would once seem miraculous were either being imagined or actually manufactured. And eventually all of those ancient myths made a new kind of sense- these were not incorporeal deities, these were advanced beings from another solar system, mistaken for gods by primitive humans.

So while most Freemasons are in it simply for the steak and beer, a scattered few have dusted off all of those old tomes and tried to figure out what all of it is really all about. It’s the same with others in other cults, sects, secret societies, and religious institutions. And one need look no further than Hollywood blockbusters like the Stargate or Indiana Jones franchises to realize this concept has seized the imaginations of some of our most powerful culture creators.

So when you look at all of this ancient symbolism being used today, you can chalk it a lot of it up to diffusion and corruption, but I'm willing to bet that the guys who really understand what it all means are trying to make contact. After all, you may have noticed that the guy who directed this year's Indiana Jones ancient astronaut extravaganza is also one of the major benefactors of SETI, The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence.

And oh, surprise of surprises, "Seti" also happens to be the name of one of Egypt's most important Pharaohs.

But let's take a look at what even caught my eye about this election in the first place...

The very next day after the Republicans lost the Congress in 2006, the Franklin Institute of Philadelphia announced that it would play host for the first stop on the King Tut revival tour.

I went to the show last year on my birthday. It was pretty amazing. Now, I don't know about you guys, but I have a hard time believing that they haven't found at least a few tombs just like King Tut's. Neither do I believe the story that Tut's tomb was just some little afterthought, found off the beaten path in a gulley somewhere. Because Tut is one of the most important Pharaohs in Egyptian history, at least to this whole orbit of groups descended from the Shemsu Hor. Why?

Because Tut restored the Throne of Horus.

There can be no overstating the importance of the reign of King Tut to the Shemsu Hor and their descendants. Tut came to power after Akhenaten's disastrous monotheistic experiment (Akhenaten's alien connections are a whole other story). Let's take a look at excerpts from The Restoration Stela of Pharaoh Tutankhamun:

The good god, son of Amun, son of Kamutef [literally, Bull-of-his-Mother, title of Horus], the good son, the holy egg whom Amun created, father of the Two Lands, the one who makes the one who made him, the ba's of Heliopolis united in order to form him, to be King forever and ever, as Horus, living immortally. He is the effective King who did what was good for his father and all the gods. He restored everything that was ruined, to be his monument forever and ever. He has vanquished chaos from the whole land and has restored Ma'at to her place. He has made lying a crime, the whole land being made as it was at the time of creation.

Now when His Majesty was crowned King the temples and the estates of the gods and goddesses from Elephantine as far as the swamps of Lower Egypt had fallen into ruin. Their shrines had fallen down, turned into piles of rubble and overgrown with weeds. Their sanctuaries were as if they had never existed at all. Their temples had become footpaths. The world was in chaos and the gods had turned their backs on this land. If an army was sent to Djahy to extend the boundaries of Egypt, it would have had no success. If you asked a god for advice, he would not attend; and if one spoke to a goddess likewise she would not attend. Hearts were faint in bodies because everything that had been, was destroyed.

Astonishing! According to the priests of Amun (a biased source, to be sure) armies could not win their battles and the gods would not speak to men under Akhenaten's monotheism. Without the Throne of Horus in its place - which the gods themselves had established in their absence- the gods would not recognize Egypt as their own. That's how important this symbolism was to these people

So we had the rise of the great Monotheistic religions, which succeeded where Akhenaten failed. And yet we have this constant underground lineage -- the Mithraic cults to the Knights Templar to the Alchemists to the Kabbalists to the Rosicrucians to the Freemasons and beyond. Ancient symbolism is used to identify all of these groupings, that is to say, the ancient symbolism derived from the traditions of the Shemsu Hor.

Philadelphia is an interesting city for a few reasons. First of all, it was first capital of the United States and hosted the first Constitutional Convention. There's a mammoth Masonic lodge there, just a short walk from the Franklin Institute, named in honor of the famous founding father and Freemason/Rosicrucian/Hellfire Club Initiate. But there may be a double entendre at work here: "Philly" brings us back to Philae, the ancient Egyptian city sacred to Isis (particularly in Roman times) and believed to be one of the burial places of Osiris.

And according to some traditions, Philae is the site of the First Land- the Primordial Mound to emerge from Chaos. Might this not be particularly significant to a tradition that venerates the "First Time?"

And what else happened in Philly not so long ago?

Here's the video we looked at before of the UFOs that appeared while Bruce Springsteen sang at a rally for Obama in Philly. Bruce also performed "The Rising" in Philly, which was played at Obama's victory rally in Grant Park in Chicago following the president-elect's speech. And of course, we looked at the strange Phoenix imagery flashed onscreen as that song played. It was in Philadelphia that Obama gave his famous speech on race and politics, which came at a crucial point in his campaign.

So why is this apparent UFO sighting at an Obama rally so important to the narrative? It has to do with where it happened. These UFOs hovered not only above an Obama rally, but over the Franklin Institute, where the King Tut exhibit premiered on its latest tour through the US and UK. And remember who King Tut is -- he is the Pharoah who restored the Throne of Horus, put in place by the gods themselves. And how do many people believe those gods came to Earth? In UFOs

Now, we have no reason to believe these UFOs in Philly were necessarily an alien craft, but in the symbolic narrative it doesn't have to be. That's the whole point of ritual -- the symbol is often more powerful than what it is actually meant to symbolize.

We looked at the Obama and McCain campaign logos, which split the Stairway to Sirius iconography between them. It was Obama who had the Stairway itself, so I guess it's not surprising he's coming to power with big majorities in Congress, and a crushing victory in the Electoral College (who, of course, actually pick our president for us). Note that in his first press conference Obama continued to ride the dog motif, driving Synchromystics out of their minds.

We also have a strange speech by Obama filled with Masonic double entendres and an inexplicable money shot of a Phoenix atop a flagpole right after it. Of course, this all fits into the symbolic narrative -- the Phoenix was venerated in Heliopolis, the headquarters of the Shemsu Hor. And, of course, the Phoenix is sacred to the Zep Tepi -- when the gods walked the Earth. (I find the Phoenix symbolism the most troubling, given its implications).

So ask yourself why are we bombarded with all of this ancient symbolism all of the time in films, on TV, and in advertising? Why is there this vast network of secret societies that pick and groom the best and the brightest among us to get us all to dance to their tune? What is the New World Order really all about? What's the point of any of it?

Now ask yourself this- what could be that secret that people would be willing to die for? How about this: human beings were engineered somehow through whatever science we are only now beginning to understand by beings who left the planet and who will come back one day to take control once again. And maybe, just maybe, they are still in contact with a few of us and have been working behind the scenes to prepare their return. That sounds a bit more urgent than some spiritual or mystical ruminations.

What if all this symbolism we're seeing is all part of some ceremony, some strange ritual meant to summon these beings back to Earth? Or even freakier, what if it's a kind of "Welcome Home" party?

It's hard to believe, it sounds crazy to some people. You don't have to believe it. But what if they do?

It's funny that we accept that baseball players have all sorts of strange, superstitious rituals they perform before a game or before they go to bat. We've got thousands of years of rituals before wars, before a ship is launched or before a new leader is seated. We know that a strange new death cult has appeared among drug runners in Mexico. We have a whole host of religious traditions with billions of adherents in which people beg and cajole gods and angels who travel back and forth from the heavens (read: outer space) and act pretty much the way the gods in the ancient myths of Sumer and Egypt did.

So what's so hard to grasp about politicians in a governmental system created by Freemasons- the spiritual descendants of a priesthood dedicated to bringing the gods back to Earth- doing the same thing? Especially when the stakes are so much higher?

[lizzie]

The Western Origins of the Witchcraft Tradition: The origins of the Arya
http://gblt.webs.com/Witchcraft_Tradition.htm

The priests of the Mysteries were symbolized as a serpent, sometimes called Hydra. The Serpent Kings reigned over the earth. It was these Serpent Kings who founded the Mystery schools which later appeared as the Egyptian and Brahmin Mysteries. The serpent was their symbol. They were the true Sons of Light, and from them have descended a long line of adepts and initiates." - Hall

The Druids called themselves the Naddreds, which translates to Serpents. Their symbol was a serpent wrapped around a rod and the Dragon. The true source of the term “Arya/Aryan” comes from Lord EA. EA pronounced or spoken properly is Arya -- hence the race of him and created by him in his image and blood and the other “Shinning Ones.” The Nordic’s of Orion bare his name no different then you bare your Father’s surname. It also relates to alchemical concepts within the race as well of the spiritual light of the inner Godhead, of which our race’s most ancient of holy banners the swastika relates.

Origins of the European connection:

“The Pheryllt were Druids of the Cymry people who arrived in the British Isles from “Defrobani” which is a Welsh approximation of the Greek name of Taprobana, a name for Sri Lanka. It is said that the Cymry where guided from Sri Lanka to the British Isles by the Welsh cultural hero, Hu Gadran; and proof of their Westward journey is the Welsh language which is full of Sanskrit root words. Hu Gadran founded what many believe to have been the incipient sect of Druids, the Pheryllt, a term meaning “Alchemists.” The term Britain itself comes out of the ancient Sanskrit word Bharat, the ancient Aryan name for the area today known as the Indian subcontinent. “The Druidical religion prevailed not only in Britain, but likewise across the East.” - E. Keneanly, the Book of God

It is well known that the Sanskrit language is the root language of the Indo-Aryan. “When we examine the etymology of the word Teuton or Teonic which are both derived from base word teuta (pronounced tay-oo-tay), this compares precisely with the Egyptian scribe of the Gods, Tahuti, who is known as Thoth by the Greeks.” This title is also carried with the Tuatha de Danaan of ancient Arie. In Erie (Arie in the original spelling), today the sacred Tara mounds still exist. “Arya Tara” is a Goddess still worshipped in the East and was also known in Egypt.

Arie of Egypt connection:

References to some of the earliest epochs in Egypt and the arrival of Atlantean colonists can be found of the country’s remaining papyrus scrolls. The papyrus of Turin, for example, alludes to priest-kings ruling Egypt. The country was ruled by the “Shemsu Hor.” The original race that built the pyramids lived in the land today known as Egypt and called themselves the Shemsu Hor or Heru. They described themselves as blue eyed sons of the blue eyed, blonde haired God Heru. Heru in the ancient language translates as “He of the Ari” and Shemsu as “Serpent(s).” So we see a common kinship with the other Ari or Arya of Europe and the East.

One of the most important finds in Egypt happened with the Egyptologist and Archaeologist Professor Walter B. Emery (1903-1971) while excavating tombs at Saqqara. Emery found men with blond hair and fair complexions. These individuals were revered by the Egyptians as a special class, an endowed elite, the “Shemsu Hor” (Serpents of He of The Ari). The famous Egyptologist, author of Archaic Egypt discovered the remains of those who lived in the pre-dynastic epoch. These presented a dolichocephalous skull larger than that of the local ethnic group, fair hair and a taller, heavier build. Emery declared that this stock wasn’t indigenous to Egypt. This race kept its distance from the common people, blending only with the aristocratic classes. The scholar associated them with the Shemsu Hor. The Shemsu Hor are recognized as the dominant sacerdotal caste in pre-dynastic Egypt.” -V. Di Cesare and A. Forgione “Malta: Skulls of the Mother Goddess"

Professor Emery wrote of these Shemsu Hor: “The Demigods of Manetho’s history.” These Shemsu Hor were stated to have originally lived on an island homeland as well. A very revealing text on the truth of the ancient Egyptians record of their origin:

Col. Henry Steel Olcott, a former president of the Theosophical Society, who explained in a March, 1881 edition of The Theosophist (page 123) that:

"We have a right to more than suspect that India, eight thousand years ago, sent a colony of emigrants who carried their arts and high civilization into what is now known to us as Egypt. This is what Bengsch Bey, the modern, as well as the most trusted Egyptologer and antiquarian says on the origin of the old Egyptians. Regarding these as a branch of the Caucasian [Aryan] family having a close affinity with the Indo-Germanic races, he insists that they 'migrated from India before historic memory, and crossed that bridge of nations, the Isthus of Suez, to find a new fatherland on the banks of the Nile."

The Egyptians came, according to their own records, from a mysterious land on the shore of the Indian Ocean, the sacred Punt; the original home of their gods who followed their people who had abandoned them to the valley of the Nile, led by Amon, Hor and Hathor. This region was the Egyptian 'Land of the Gods,' Pa-Nuter, in old Egyptian, or Holyland, and now proved beyond any doubt to have been quite a different place from the Holyland of Sinai.

By the pictorial hieroglyphic inscription found on the walls of the temple of the Queen Haslitop at Der-el-babri, we see that this Punt can be no other than India. For many ages the Egyptians traded with their old homes, and the reference here made by them to the names of the Princes of Punt and its fauna and flora, especially the nomenclature of various precious woods to be found but in India, leave us scarcely room for the smallest doubt that the old civilization of Egypt is the direct outcome of that the older India." (source: Theosophist for March 1881 p. 123).

The legends of Atlantis, the Aryan homeland we have in the West were handed down to Solon and then Plato via the ancient Egyptians who stated they had come from Atlantis which had been destroyed thousands of years before, and of which they were the cultural/racial bears of. Now we have an Egyptian record showing this Isle was on the shore of modern day Southern India and we have archeological proof today of massive sunken cities in this region around S. India and Sri Lanka, even a sunken land bridge and numerous cultures claiming with proof origin from said area themselves. Someone switched the direction the Egyptians stated they had come from, from West to East instead of the original East to West. Sri Lanka was part of a much larger land mass that sunk beneath the waves thousands of years ago. [On a personal note: years ago I came across in a National Geographic article a photo of an old wall fresco from a ancient palace dug up in Sri Lanka. The women on the walls had red hair and blue eyes and White skin.]

Another connection:

“The Yezidis, who now reside in Northern Iraq, before coming to Iraq they had resided in India” The Yezidi God is Melek Ta'us whose symbol like Murrugan in Sri Lanka is the Peacock and the Serpent. Within the Yezidi writings Melek Ta'us makes mention of Shambhala, the sacred place of the East, and to the Lotus another Eastern spiritual theme. The Peacock the sacred symbol to the Yezidi, Mandean and Hindu alike, is native only to the Far East not the Middle East or Europe and nowhere else on the planet. The Peacock was a sacred bird in Europe to the Goddess Hera and the God Dionysus (of whom the serpent is also sacred). “Like the Yezidi the Mandeans also have a tradition regarding Melek Ta'us, whom they refer to in their texts as Malka Ta'us. Melek Ta'us was present at the birth place of the Mandean culture, the island paradise of Sri Lanka where he was known not only as the Peacock Angel, but also as Murrugan. According to Mandean legend Melek Ta'us came down from Sri Lanka’s highest mountain and taught the Mandeans’ their spiritual wisdom.

The Mandeans have also stated the Sumerians (of whom they view themselves being a remnant of, like the Yezidi) came from Sri Lanka area. Graham Hancock, author and researcher on the subject, stated in an interview that the coast of Southern India is covered with sunken cities especially the sunken land bridge that once connected the island of Sri Lanka to the main Indian continent. The Mandeans state the Garden of Edin (abode of the Gods) was in Sri Lanka as do many other tribes in the Near East today.

"Kumarai Nadu once stretched across the Pacific Ocean; most of this primeval continent sank to the bottom of the ocean except for those parts of it that became islands, such as Sri Lanka, the paradise currently recognized by much of the Arab world as not part of the primal Garden, but the Garden of Edin (Edin means abode of the Gods in English). Melek Ta'us is worshipped by the Sri Lankians as Murrugan and center in English means "Place of the Peacock. He also is known as Al-Khadir among the Arabic world.

"The black stone of Mecca, which, according to the geography of the Purana(s), is a Shiva Linga situated in the ancient sacred site called Makhevshvara (Lord of the Crocodile). Vestiges of an important colony of people from the Indus Valley have been discovered at Oman, on the Arabian Peninsula."

Melek Ta'us (Satan) is also known in Europe as the Green man among the Pagans there. It has also been proven the Sumerian language has its origin in Sanskrit. Many of the Sumerian cylinder seals also match those of the Indus Valley. Modern archeological finds in India have unearthed a massive ancient Aryan civilization along the Saraswati river bed. The Saraswati river mentioned in the ancient Veda’s was though a myth until satellite imaging found its ancient course. The findings show the river went dry over eight to ten thousand years ago. This not only rolls back the Vedas to over eight thousand years but is proof that the earliest Aryan civilization was in the East, not the Middle East. The dates on the sunken finds around Sri Lanka and Southern India match with that of the Sarawati finds.

The Western Tradition of Witchcraft

It was from the Western directed branch of the Arya migrating out of their destroyed homeland and seeking new shores that the base and origin of the European or Western Witchcraft Tradition is rooted in. The Priestarchy of the Arya known universally as the Serpents later became popularized in Europe as the “Druids.”

On the Serpents of Europe:

The Druids called themselves the "Naddreds" which is Gaelic for "Serpent Priests." The Druids or Naddreds held the symbol of the Serpent and Dragon in the highest honor as the symbol of royalty. It was recorded the Druid Arphaxad referred to himself as thus: "I am a Serpent." The main symbol was a serpent wrapped around a rod or a tree. The title Dragon is passed down from Latin Draco which means "Serpent" but in the sense of the fully empowered Kundalini energy of a Sidhe. This culture was described by an expert who studied it as more advanced in all areas of civilization then Rome or Greece at its height. The homes unearthed alone are grand palaces unmatched today.

“Who were the Druids? The Druids did not call themselves by such a name. The name itself was a Gaelic word (Druidhe) for "Witch.” Interestingly enough, among them were a caste of high ranking Serpents called the Sidhe. From what has been found the origin of Gaelic as a language is from Sanskrit in which Siddha is a term for a being with a fully risen Serpent and Siddhi is a term for the powers that come with such a state.

As Sir Laurence Gardner writes: "Thus it can be seen that Sidhe and Siddhi are one and the same." From the Eastern Tantric texts on the subject we can see clearly what this state of being "Sidhe" or Siddha actually entails and the state of Gnosis that is part of it:

"Liberation arises from gnosis (jnana); gnosis arises from the maintenance of the vital breaths. Therefore, where there is stability mercury is empowered and the body is stabilized. Through the use of mercury one obtains a body that is unaging and immortal.

Supernatural powers and bodily immortality were the goals of the tantric practitioner [Siddha].

“As an immaculate as the chaplain of the gods, he is an alchemical wizard and wonder-worker. He moves with the imposing gait of a great bull; his voice is deep and mellifluous. Like the divine elephant Airavant, he surges ever forward into the world Radiant as a lotus pond, he outlives even the sun, moon and stars of this world. He is a consummate logician and expert in all the sciences; he is a protector of the percepts of the virtuous men because he knows, by his power of inference, what is righteous and proper. The heroic equal of Vishnu and Siva, he is as enduring as the sun, moon, and sea. (The Siddha is)."

The Gaelilc meaning of Witch is 'Wise One.' It in essence is a reference to truth in the sense of the state of awareness that comes with activating/raising this serpent energy and opening the "Eye of Wisdom" the center [Pineal Gland] of heightened awareness representing the ability to see things clearly when fully activated by raising the Kundalini to the crown. Another famous term for this state is Gnosis [Janna in Sanskrit].

Witch also relates to the female aspect of the serpent power, but at the same time Warlock an old Gaelic term for Wizard symbolizes a male Pagan Priest who has obtained Gnosis via fully risen serpent. Witch is also a Gaelic title for the female Priestess; in the Pagan world to be a Priest or Priestess one had to have a fully risen serpent.

Another famous title for the Serpents is Magi which means “Wise One”, but in the same sense as Witch/Druid, it comes from a Sanskrit term meaning Magnificent as in radiant with energy from having a fully risen kundalini. Note this is also the original of Gnosticism; gnosis is the ancient term for the all-knowing state that manifests when the kundalini serpent ascends to the crown.

The Serpents are also the origin of the famous King Arthur and Grail mythos -- all allegories for the Great Working or Magnum Opus of the personal Godhead. Only later some were given a Xian (Christian) veneer over top. The joke of what passes for Gnosticism today in the mainstream has been so infested with Jewish-Christianity. It leads to nothing but the opposite of Gnosis.

The Arya Serpents of Europe “built a Gnostic civilization with a fluid caste system composed of commoners, at its lowest, followed by the warriors and then themselves the Serpents Priests, who could be male of female.” Within the Arya society class was based upon spiritual evolution. Thus a fluid caste existed where individuals may rise, fall or exist as they like, with those who desire to achieve spiritual enlightenment evolving to the top, thus ensuring society has the highest conscious beings governing its course and mentoring the next generation of the Folk with it.

“At the pinnacle of the Serpents caste was the Arch-Druid and below him where the Druid Elders, who administered an unwritten law known as the “Tara” and sat as lawmakers and judges in Councils of Twelve. The high Druids were the final word in all matters relating to divine law [divine in the Aryan world was cosmic or eternal laws of nature; understanding the universe and its order or laws of life as divine] and justice; they were the “Supreme Court” of a tribe and co-ruled it with a specially chosen warrior or divinely chosen king.”

The major position of many Serpents was to oversee the massive Temple schools, the largest of which existed in Arieland (Ireland today) and the British Isle, such as the one mentioned as Snowdon in modern Wales. "The students at these universities numbered at times sixty-thousand souls, among whom were included the young nobility of Britain and Gaul. It required twenty years to master the circle of Druidic knowledge.” The reason for the time was that it took around 20 or more years to fully ascend the serpent (thus becoming a full qualified Priest). This is seen in many ancient traditions and mentioned today by teachings from India (in fact due to removal of knowledge many are lucky to ever achieve it, as it has extended to several more decades at all if they obtain it). One such center in Arieland housed 300,000 import texts. These Temple centers were destroyed by the Catholic church over several decades of pulling them down stone by stone and recycling them into other buildings.

“The Serpent caste was subdivided into Bards who functioned as chanters (the symbol of the Harp means the power of vibration to empower the soul) as well as Vates who played the roles of diviners, and those who served as priests, judges and advisors to the ruling kings. Although all priestly Druids were of the same status, one sub-sect of them, known as the Pheryllt, appears to have been one of the most advanced.” This seems to be a caste mainly concerned with the apex and highest rung of Witchcraft, that of achieving the personal Godhead.

“In their Temple center of Snowdon in modern day Wales the Serpents founded the “ambrosial city of Emrys.” Emrys is also remembered as “Dinas Affaraon,” the “place of Higher Powers,” i.e., the place where a Druid could achieve the apex of his or her spiritual powers and consciousness” -- the Godhead of spiritual and physical perfection and immorality along with all the powers the perfected Godhead contains. Emrys was the headquarters of the “Dragons of Beli” and the Goddess Kerridwen.

The alchemical initiation of the Pheryllt (thus the entire Serpent Order) involved an elixir of immortality that was decanted from a chalice shaped like a crescent moon called the Cauldron of Kerridwen, or the “Cauldron of Inspiration.” To partake of this elixir of Kerridwen’s Cauldron lead the initiate into an inner death and rebirth, (by awaking the inner serpent power and raising towards the crown leading to the subsequent awakening of gnosis). The Druids referred to this state as Awen meaning “inspiration.” Here is the origin of the Grail mythos as the Grail is another symbol for the Perfected Soul or Godhead and is seen in Lucifer’s Sigil.

When Awen is fully active, a Druid was able to fully access the powers of her psyche. Awen is another name for the female serpent power called Sophia or Shakti in other traditions; hence its awakening leads to expansion of consciousness still symbolized in the Cobra with its hood fully opened in the Egyptian and Vedic Aryan cultures. Hence it was why when Awen was fully activated the serpent (Druid) was able to fully make use of their her mind as the serpent power when raised fully activates the dormant parts of the mind, leading to super consciousness or Gnosis.

“A Welsh alchemical verse within the Book of Talieson, known as The Spoils of Annwn, defines both Kerridwen and her Cauldron as intimately related to the alchemical serpent power. The allegory contained in the poem recounts the journey of King Arthur and his Knights as they journey though Annwn, the underworld and discover the Cauldron of Kerridwen in the” Four Cornered Castle in the Isle of the Strong Door.”

This is a cryptic allusion to Kerridwen’s Cauldron being the British version of the serpent power Kundalini which lies deep within a person (her underworld ) in the four-petal root charka (the Four Corned Castle) at the entrance to the Sushumna energy meridian (the Strong Closed Door).”

In the center of Glastonbury, the Serpents built a mound known as Glastonbury Tor, “the Spiral Castle,” which is comprised of the serpentine number of seven levels or tiers. Also known as the home of the Dragoness Kerridwen, the Tor contains polar opposite red and whites springs that circulate and unite to produce the power and wisdom of the serpent, which vibrates throughout the Tor. Through the ages alchemists have traveled to Glastonbury Tor to capture water from the red and whites springs for their experiments.”

“Megalithic stones found on the summit of Glastonbury Tor point its use as center for rituals. It has been suggested that during the most energetic days of the years, the Sabbats and Esbats, special rites where performed by the Serpents on Glastonbury Tor.”

"One of their (Druids) temples in the island of Lewis in the Hebrides bears evident signs of their skill in the science of astronomy. Every stone in the temple is placed astronomically. The circle consists of twelve equidistant obelisks denoting the twelve signs of the zodiac. The four cardinal points of the compass are marked by lines of obelisks running out from the circle, and at each point subdivided into four more."

The Druids, after numerous attempts by the then Jewish-controlled “Roman Empire” to destroy it, is now kosher owned and operated at the top (much like the American Empire of today). To destroy them by armed force from without failed, but they were slowly subverted from within by a sect called the Culdees. This internal subversion is identical to how the Jews and their agents toppled the powerful priesthood of Serapis in Egypt and the Free Masons with the Illuminati later on.

"Christianity was first introduced into Britain when Pope Gregory I approved a law which sanctioned the fusion of Celtic and Christian belief. Soon afterwards, many British kings, such as King Diarmuid MacCerunbhail, accepted Christianity and declared that both it and Druidism should co-exist as cooperative religious faiths. As a result, some new sects arose which were an amalgamation of the two traditions.

The Druid-Christian synthesis eventually engendered the formation of certain sects like that of the Culdees. The Culdees pursued a daily regimen of both Druid and Christian spiritual disciplines while living as a cloistered group of monks upon the ancient Danaan Island of Iona. After genuflecting in front of the cross and chanting Christian devotional hymns, they would commune with the Druid nature spirits in the fields or recite the magical incantations of the ancient Pheryllt and Danaans. Many Culdees who mastered the Danaan magical rites were known to have achieved the power to shape-shift, becoming invisible and even summon blistering storms on demand. Their ultimate goal, however, was to achieve the state of Jesus Christ, a renowned ascended adept who was both a Christian Master and the greatest of all Arch Druids." – HP Carlson

In the case with the Serapis way (as with the Druids in a war of Christian genocide) the majority of Pagans, the leaders and lay alike, were murdered in a genocide in Egypt after a 20 year rampage. Not one of the upper Pagan classes, priestly included, was left alive.

The same happened in Arieland where Patrick spent decades on a warpath of death and destruction against the Arya Serpents; he is still honored by Christians today as the Commissar who drove the Serpents from Ireland. Thankfully the Church was not as powerful as it claims till later on in history and many Serpents escaped and remerged with the veneer of external Christian trappings such as the Cathars and Templar Orders later on, and from there, the Free Masons and Rosicrucian Order.

[lizzie]

Was Ahmose I really Moses? Was he the same person as Amenemnhat IV, the “adoptive son” of Amenemnhat III of the “southern dynasty” named the 17th of the 2nd Intermediate Period by Manetho?

The records of this dynasty indicate that Ahmose I inherited his position as early as 10 years old. If this were correct, then he was still a youth at the court of Amenemnhat III of the 12th Dynasty Middle Kingdom, but not yet Pharaoh of Upper and Lower Egypt.

Other records say that Ahmose I was supposed to have inherited the throne of Upper Egypt from his brother (Kahmose)

Was Moses of Hyksos origin?

It was supposed to have been Ahmose I who drove out the Hyksos and became the new Pharaoh of the XVIII Dynasty (of Upper and Lower Egypt)

Did Ahmose I (Moses) preside over the “Exodus” (expulsion) of the “Hebrews” (Hyksos)?

Who were Moses, His Adoptive Father and Mother/Sister?
http://oahspestandardedition.com/OSAC/Exodus9.html

The Pharaoh who was Moses' adoptive father had a grown daughter at the time of Moses' birth, which means that he must have been on the throne for at least more than 44 years before he died around 1546 b.c.e. Thus, a clue to his identity should be a lengthy rein prior to 1546 b.c.e. at least as far back as 1590 b.c.e.

However there are no accounts of any pharaoh reigning anywhere near as long as that in the 2nd Intermediate period. But the third last ruler of the 12th Dynasty of the Middle Kingdom, Amenemhat III reigned for some 56 years. His only known offspring was one daughter.

But, someone named Amenemhat IV is listed as having reigned for some 9 years before Amenemhat III's daughter, Sobekneferu, who reigned for 3 years before the end of that dynasty.

Amenemhat IV's relationship to Amenemhat III is mysterious; he appears to be treated as a son, yet, Amenemhat III had no son. He was appointed by Amenemhat III as a co-regent. It was usual for the pharaohs of that time to co-rule with the heir to the throne. Historians speculate that he was a grandson of Amenemhat III, and Sobekneferu was his aunt or sister.

The uncertain relationship of Amenemhat IV to Amenemhat III and Sobekneferu is remarkably similar to the relationship as outlined in Oahspe, between Moses and his adoptive father and mother/sister.

Oahspe reveals that when the Egyptian court pressured Pharaoh to remove Moses from his position (a position which would allow him to inherit the Egyptian throne after Pharaoh)

However, this evidence is presented to indicate that Amenemhat IV's details do not contradict the personal details about Moses, but rather they appear to match remarkably, far more than one would expect by coincidence.

Amenemhat IV is believed to have ruled as co-regent for at least the first year of his reign, but references to him often show him to be co-regent with the king beyond that time, including temple dedications attributed to both Amenemhat III and IV, and a signet seal with both names.

Historically, Amenemhat IV is known to have ruled for more than 9 years; Oahspe states that Moses was in his position of representing Pharaoh for 12 years. There is a close correspondence in these two periods, and it could well be that Moses acted in his position for a period before his adoptive father, approving of his work, made him co-regent:

Once Moses was removed from this position as Pharaoh's ambassador, he traveled throughout Egypt, for 4 months investigating, then for another 3 years arranging the Migration. The pharaoh was old and ill. His daughter begged Moses not to leave them alone. This explains why it was Pharaoh's daughter who would have been occupying the position of regent for the Pharaoh in place of Moses, acting and representing the wishes of her old and ill father in the last three years of his life, and ensuring that Moses was free to proceed with the plans of the Migration.

Historically, Sobeknefrure is recorded as ruler and considered by Egyptologists to have been a ruler in her own right, even thought it is a complete anomaly for a woman to be ruler of Egypt in that period, she would have been the first female ruler in her own right, in 1500 years! Hatshepsut, who ruled as regent was eliminated from history because she then declared herself Pharaoh and ruled independently, because as a woman, she could not legitimately rule in her own right.

Sobeknefrure could only have ruled as regent for her father while the old pharaoh was still living. The close accord with the period of Pharaoh's daughter's regency and the period of Moses' forced retirement from his position 4 years before that, to the death of the old Pharaoh as detailed in Oahspe is extraordinary.

The Pharaohs of the Middle Kingdom had built extensive canals to control flooding and maximise available water for agriculture, which gave the Egyptians the capacity to weather regular fluctuations of the Nile. If the low Nile levels and threatened famines in the last year of Sobekneferu's co-regency and the end of Amenemhat III's reign occurred in the year that the Israelite slaves migrated from Egypt, then this drastic loss of labor force and the various catastrophic plagues as described in the Ezra bible and the Oahspe, would have been the extraordinary factors added to the threatened famine, which would have had such a significant impact on Egypt's wealth and economy.

Various biblical scholars also consider the 12th Dynasty to be the Egypt of Moses, and Amenemhat III to be Moses adoptive father and Sobekneferu as the princess who found him among the rushes, and Amenemhat IV to be Moses:

||The last of the great pyramids of Egypt was built by Amenemhet III at Hawarra, 110 km (70 miles) south of modern Cairo. This Pharaoh could well have been the foster father of Moses. Amenemhet III may have had one son, known as Amenemhet IV, who was an enigmatic character who may have followed his father or may have been a co-regent with him. If the latter, Amenemhet IV could well have been Moses. Amenemhet IV mysteriously disappeared off the scene before the death ofAmenemhet III. || from Searching for Moses by David Down; TJ Archives; Vol.15.Issue 1; 53-57; April 01: retrieved 8 March, 08.

||Amenemhet III had a daughter, Sobekneferu, was the last ruler of this dynasty, and she had no son to succeed her. She might well have been the daughter of Pharaoh who "came down to wash herself at the river" (Exodus 2:5). This was not because she had no bathroom at the royal palace. Instead, she would most likely have been there praying to the Nile fertility god, Hapi, for a baby. When the basket containing the baby Moses came to her attention she may well have considered it an answer to her prayer. || from The Pyramids of Ancient Egypt by David Down; Creation Archive; Vol.26.Issue 4; 44-49; Sept. 04: retrieved 8 March, 08.

In attempting to identify Nu-ghan, it should be taken into account that as a succeeding Pharaoh, not related to the previous dynasty, he would have had the power and motivation to eliminate references or connections to his predecessor, whose affiliation with the hated Hebrews (Hyksos?) through his adopted son Moses would have been abhorrent to Nu-ghan.

The other aspect to be taken into account is that by the time of Ezra, the records of Egypt were in confusion when the account of the Exodus of the Hebrews was copied from the Egyptian records by Ezra ca 494 b.c.e.

Ahmose I was attributed a reign of 25 years and the dates of his reign differ according to varying sources. Some say he reigned as early as 1567 b.c.e., but others place the beginning of his reign at 1539 b.c.e.; most, however, agree it was around 1550 b.c.e. He was supposed to have inherited the throne of Upper Egypt from his brother (Kahmose) who inherited it from his father, Tao II, who was preceded by his father, Tao I.

As already demonstrated in previous parts of this series, this was a southern nomarch dynasty named as the 17th Dynasty of the 2nd Intermediate period by Manetho. The records of this dynasty indicate that Ahmose I inherited his position as early as 10 years old. If this were correct, it would mean that when he acquired his full title as a nomarch of Egypt, he was still a youth at the court of Amenemnhat III of the 12th Dynasty Middle Kingdom, but not yet Pharaoh of Upper and Lower Egypt.

When Ahmose I succeeded to the Egyptian throne he became the first Pharaoh of a new dynasty and established a new order which became known as The New Kingdom. He was credited with a militaristic defeat of the rulers of the Delta region, the Hyksos, and bringing Nubia back within Egyptian dominion. He was also credited with building the last royal pyramid in Abydos in tribute to Osiris, but then abandoning the Osirian religion after the Expulsion of the Hyksos, and establishing the cult of Amun/Re, and moving the royal power base to Thebes.

Ahmose's burial place is unknown, although most Egyptologists are convinced he was not buried in Abydos with previous rulers of the 17th dynasty. But his son has been credited with beginning the tradition of God King burial in The Valley of the Kings.

Considering what we know about the record keeping of Pharaohs and what we are told about Nu-ghan ordering records to be written about the Exodus of the Hebrews (Hyksos?) from an Egyptian perspective, it would not be difficult to assume that a whole lot of rewriting and cleansing of history took place at that time to support the beginning of a new era and dynasty which would attribute much credit to the one who began it.

||There was no distinct break in the line of the royal family between the 17th and 18th dynasties. The historian Manetho, writing much later during the Ptolemaic dynasty, considered the final expulsion of the Hyksos after nearly a century and the restoration of native Egyptian rule over the whole country a significant enough event to warrant the start of a new dynasty.

A new dynasty indicates a new line of pharaohs; therefore the reason for the establishment of a new dynasty in recording the genealogy of pharaohs would be that the pharaoh was not in direct descendent of the previous pharaohs. Hence Manetho's account does not support the long-standing tradition of the Egyptian pharaohs.

It is more probable that Ahmose I was not in direct line of the last Pharaoh. Being a "southern prince" and succeeding the throne through the lesser southern nome, the ancestry of Ahmose I's lesser dynasty has been historically mistaken as the throne of Egypt when he succeeded to the Egyptian throne after the last pharaoh of the Middle Kingdom.

Oahspe tells us that Moses' adoptive father had a daughter, but no son to succeed him, the throne had to pass to another male after the death of the Pharaoh, and since Moses, Pharaoh's adopted son, was no longer contender for the throne, it fell to Nu-ghan.

Nu-ghan and his courtiers were said to reside in Harboath, which apparently was close to the route the Hebrews were to take toward the wilderness of the Sinai.

In maps of Ancient Egypt, the place Horbeit (Harboath), is also known as Tanis and Hawaret, this location later became the city of Pi-Ramses, or as named in the Ezra bible Exodus account, Rameses.

Two places South East of Tanis are Avaris and Tjaru (possibly Arabenah and Najaut), which are indeed directly west of where Sukkoth is believed to have been situated, being the place were the multitudes passed as they entered the wilderness. (This wilderness area, known as the Sinai wilderness, was known to Amenemhat IV who had made a number of expeditions to the mines of Sarabit el-Khadim).

From this conversation between Moses and the King, we can also deduce that Nu-ghan and Moses' adoptive father resided in different locations. And it appears that, once Nu-ghan succeeded the Egyptian Throne, he had not moved his residence before the Exodus occurred.

Thebes however is a great distance south and so Horbeit must not be the ancestral residence of Nu-ghan. And this also accords with historical facts, since the strategy of the latter Pharaohs of the Middle Kingdom, to reduce the power of the nomarchs, was to take the sons of the nomarchs to their courts and bring them up, educating them and giving them positions directly sub-ordinate to the Pharaoh.

||Senwosret III [father of Amenemhat III] was continuing the practices initiated by his predecessors to centralize the government around his court. Although attempts were made earlier during the Middle Kingdom to reduce the power of the nomarchs, it was this pharaoh that was responsible for instituting the practices that usurped their remaining power. Senwosret required the male children of nomarchs to be educated at Lisht and then serve the state somewhere detached from their homeland. Nearly all of the nomarchs were personally appointed by the pharaoh and many of their traditional titles disappeared from the archaeological record. Practices such as those mentioned above crippled the succession of the powerful familial nomarchs.

Because of the influx in the population of the capital, more positions became necessary to teach the nomarchs' children and to keep them employed afterward. It is not surprising that during Senwosret's reign numerous Old Kingdom titles were brought back and even more new titles were created. In order to centralize and keep the powerbase of the state within his court, Senwosret inadvertently created a bureaucracy like never seen before.

The relationship of Nu-ghan to the Egyptian throne is not explicit in Oahspe other than he was the successor approved of by the King's court. It is possible that the successor was the most powerful noble of Egypt next to the Pharaoh, and if Nu-ghan was Ahmose I, then he is identified as the nomarch of Upper Egypt, whose power was supported by the nobles of Thebes.

Ahmose I had sons, but his heir apparent died before Ahmose, being only 12 years old, and so a younger son, Amenhotep succeeded Ahmose I.

||Ahmose-ankh was Ahmose's heir apparent, but he preceded his father in death sometime between Ahmose's 17th and 22nd regnal year. Ahmose was succeeded instead by his eldest surviving son, Amenhotep I, with whom he might have shared a short co-regency.||

Moses, Pharaoh, Pharaoh's daughter and Nu-ghan can be accounted for in Egyptian history and it so happens that all four are recorded as Kings of Egypt. More correlations between the archaelogical record and Oahspe's account of the four identified Egyptian rulers can be found in the pyramids and religions of the time.

Dynasty XVIII
http://www.phouka.com/pharaoh/pharaoh/k ... 07new.html

Extreme prosperity and a renaissance in art and build ling projects mark the beginning of the New Kingdom. The 18th Dynasty marks the high point of power in Egypt -- the Hyksos were defeated and ejected, Egypt is in a strong economic position with foreign trade and expansionist policies into nearby lands.

The 19th Dynasty beings the rise to power of the Rammesside royal dynasty, which began an unprecedented period of success in international affairs, a succession of able kings -- dominated by the notable pharaoh Ramesses The Great (Ramesses II). Wars and treaties with the successor of the Hyksos kings, the Hittites, continued. By now, Egypt was an ethnically diverse society and this is reflected in the artistic styles that rise during this period.

A series of Ramesses controlled the 20th Dynasty, but none of them reached the power or prestige of Ramesses II, and many of them ruled over a land that was failing rapidly. After Ramesses III, Egypt began to suffer economic problems and seemed to be unable to exploit the revolution of the Iron Age. Once again, a chaotic Third Intermediate Period arose

Dynasty XVIII

Ahmose (Moses I?)
Amenhotep I
Thutmose I
Thutmose II
Hatshepsut
Thutmose III
Amenhotep II
Thutmose IV
Amenhotep III
Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten/Moses II?)
Smenkhkare
Tutankhamen
Ay
Horemheb

[lizzie]

The Ancient Egypt Site
http://www.ancient-egypt.org/index.html

The more than 3000 year long history of Ancient Egypt has been divided into 8 or 9 periods, sometimes called Kingdoms. This modern-day division is somewhat arbitrarily based on the country's unity and wealth and the power of the central government. The Ancient Egyptians themselves did not group their rulers according to such criteria. They rather seem to have developed the notion of dynasties throughout their history.

The Palermo Stone simply lists the kings one after the other, without any apparent need of grouping them. The Turin Kinglist, which is more recent, has grouped the kings according to their descendance or origin. Thus, Amenemhat I and his descendants are described as the kings of Itj-Tawi, the capital whence they ruled.

We owe the division into 30 dynasties as we use it now to Manetho, an Egyptian priest who lived at the beginning of the Ptolemaic Era. In many cases, however, it is not clear why Manetho has grouped some kings into one dynasty and other kings into another.

The 18th Dynasty, for instance, starts with Ahmose, a brother of the last king in Manetho's 17th Dynasty. Theoretically Ahmose and Kamose should thus have been grouped in the same dynasty. Thutmosis I, on the other hand, does not appear to have been related to his predecessor, Amenhotep I, but still both kings are grouped in the 18th Dynasty.

2nd Intermediate Period (1783-1540)

As a result of the weakened positions of the 13th and 14th Dynasties, Egypt lay open to any outside aggression. At around 1640 BC, Egypt was invaded by a group of Canaanites, whose leader used the title HqA-xAs.wt, 'ruler of the foreign land', or Hyksos.

The Hyksos easily conquered Avaris as well as Memphis, causing the end of both the 13th and 14th Dynasty and founding their own dynasty, the 15th Dynasty. The fall of the 13th Dynasty created a power vacuum in the southern part of Upper-Egypt, which was quickly filled by two local dynasties: one in Abydos and one in Thebes, the latter's power extending from Thebes to Aswan in the South. The kings of the Theban dynasty are grouped in the 16th Dynasty.

At the same time, the Hyksos pressed on further to the South as well, and after it had been independent for about 20 years, they made an end to the Abydene Dynasty. It would take them another 30 years before they would successfully end the 16th Dynasty and enforcing their rule upon the entire country.

The Hyksos kings, however, were not able to maintain their control over the whole of Egypt, and only a few years after it had been conquered, Thebes again arose as an independent state, and home to the 17th Dynasty. The circumstances that led to Thebes' renewed independence are not clear. A change of power in the 15th Dynasty may hint at some dynastic troubles among the Hyksos, and it is possible that the Thebans took advantage of the situation not only to reclaim their autonomy but also to extend their rule as far North as Abydos.

After the Theban conquest of Abydos, a status quo appears to have been established between the 15th and 17th Dynasty and both dynasties even appear to have entered into trade. This situation lasted at least until the reign of Seqenenre, the penultimate king of the 17th Dynasty, during which hostilities between the Thebans and the Hyksos appear to have been reinitiated. A Ramesside story relates about a quarrel between Seqenenre and Apophis, the penultimate king of the 15th Dynasty. The historicity of this story can, of course, be doubted, but the mummy of Seqenenre shows signs of a violent death, consistnd with the weapons that the Hyksos could have used.

The first historically recorded traces of a war against the Hyksos are dated to the reign of Seqenenre's successor, Kamose. Two stelae commemorate Kamose's struggle against the Hyksos and their vassals. Against the advice of his council, Kamose started or continued the war, punishing all those who had collaborated with the foreigners.
It would be Kamose's successor, Ahmose, who would finally succeed in overthrowing the Hyksos. With his reign, a new period of prosperity and wealth would begin: the New Kingdom.

17th Dynasty (1571-1540)

Only a few years after the Hyksos finally defeated the Theban 16th Dynasty and annexed the south of Egypt to the territory over which they ruled, the Thebans were able to reclaim their lost independance and establish a kingdom that stretched as far north as Abydos, thus founding the 17th Dynasty.

The circumstances that allowed the Thebans to rid themselves of the Hyksos yoke are not known. Perhaps there was some internal struggle among the Hyksos themselves, which sufficiently weakened their position for the Thebans to rise against them, as is suggested by the fact that the new Hyksos king, Apophis, does not appear to have been a member of the family of his predecessor, Khiyan. It is also possible that the Hyksos were forced to divert their military efforts from the south of Egypt to the northern part of their territory.

Whatever the reason, the Hyksos were forced to accept the new dynasty that ruled the south of Egypt from Thebes, while the Hyksos ruled from their capital, Avaris, over Middle and North Egypt.

Once the Thebans had extended their realm to Abydos, the relationship with the Hyksos appears to have been relatively peaceful for about 20 years.

During this time, it appears that 4 Theban families succeeded each other on the throne. Rahotep seems to have died without a male heir, allowing the kingship to pass to the family of Sobekemsaf I, who was succeeded by two of his sons, Antef V and Antef VI. Antef VII, a brother-in-law of his two namesakes, only seems to have ruled for a short time as a co-regent of Antef VI.

The current sources do not allow to find a family relationship between Sobekemsaf II and his predecessors, nor does he seem to have been related to the last family of Theban kings that are grouped in the 17th Dynasty: Senakhtenre, Seqenenre and Kamose.

The relative calm between the rivaling Hyksos and Theban dynasties came to an end at the latest during the reign of Kamose, the last king who is grouped in the 17th Dynasty. It is, however, quite likely that hostilities already started during the reign of Kamose's predecessor, Seqenenre.

A Ramesside papyrus tells the story of a quarrell between Seqenenre and his Hyksos counterpart, Apophis. Although indeed but a story, it is quite possible that it was actually based on some historic fact. Seqenenre's mummy, actually shows that this king died a violent death and shows lethal wounds that are consistent with the type of weaponry that the Hyksos used. It is therefore tempting to place Seqenenre's death on the battlefield, perhaps in what would be the first in a long series of battles that would rid Egypt of the Hyksos.

The first historically recorded traces of a war against the Hyksos are dated to the reign of Seqenenre's successor, Kamose. Two stelae commemorate Kamose's struggle against the Hyksos and their vassals. Against the advice of his council, Kamose started or continued the war, punishing all those who had collaborated with the foreigners.
It would, however, be Kamose's successor, Ahmose, who would finally succeed in overthrowing the Hyksos. With his reign, a new period of prosperity and wealth would begin: the New Kingdom.

New Kingdom (1540-1070)

The expulsion of the Hyksos, began during the late 17th Dynasty by Seqenenre or by Kamose and completed by 18th Dynasty monarch Ahmose in 1522, was the start of a series of conquests that would bring Egypt peace and prosperity. The age of conquest had begun!

Even though Ahmose was the brother or nephew of his predecessor, Kamose, Manetho has placed him at the head of a new royal house: the 18th Dynasty.

In an effort to secure Egyptian borders against future invasions, Ahmose conquered a territory stretching from Syria-Palestine in the North, to the 2nd cataract in Nubia in the South. Within a few decennia, Egypt became the most powerful nation in the Ancient Near East.

Ahmose's aggressive policy against Asia and Nubia was followed by his successors, especially by Thutmosis I and Thutmosis III, who expanded the boundaries of the new empire as far as the 4th cataract to the south and as far as the Euphrates river near the modern-day Turkish border in the north.

The spoils brought home from the many successful military campaigns and the tributes owed by the many conquered states increased Egypt’s wealth and prosperity, which was translated in a tremendous building activity: new temples were built; older ones were restored or enlarged. Especially favoured were the god Amun and his great temple at Karnak, in the capital Thebes.

Egypt’s stability was briefly ruptured when the late 18th Dynasty king Amenhotep IV, also known as Akhenaten, changed the Egyptian religion and had most temples closed, favouring one new god, the solar-deity Aton. During this period of turmoil and upheaval, the so-called Amarna-revolution, Egypt lost a lot of its former influence in Asia and Nubia.

The first kings of the 19th Dynasty, Seti I and Ramesses II, set out to restore Egypt’s lost glory, reclaiming the lost territories abroad and continuing the formidable building activity started in the 18th Dynasty. Again, large parts of Asia were conquered, but the international situation had changed and the Egyptians found themselves facing a new and powerful enemy: the Hittites. The enmities between Egypt and the Hittites came to an end in the 21st year of Ramesses II’s year with a peace treaty between the two countries. The remainder of the 67-year long reign of Ramesses II would be peaceful and prosperous.

With the 20th Dynasty, Egypt’s half millennium of prosperity and relative stability would slowly draw to an end. Although Ramesses III was clearly a very capable ruler who had successfully repelled several foreign invasions and was able to restore the Egyptian influence in Syria-Palestine, his reign was also marked by corruption, social turmoil and a conspiracy against his life!

During the years following his death, Egypt’s unity and stability started falling apart: the Theban priests of Amun were becoming more and more the de facto rulers of Upper-Egypt, while Lower-Egypt was in the hands of the administration of the Pharaoh. Another powerful group in the Egyptian society was the military, especially the military who descended from former Libyan prisoners of war. They too claimed their part in the government and in Egyptian territory.

By the end of the 20th Dynasty, Egypt was again divided into many fractions and the New Kingdom came to an end.

18th Dynasty

The 18th Dynasty starts not with the accession of a new royal family to the throne, but with the reign of Ahmose, a brother or nephew of his predecessor Kamose, who is counted as the last king of the previous dynasty.
After about a decade of relative peace and status quo with the Hyksos who still controlled the northern half of the country, the Theban king Ahmose rekindled Kamose's war against these foreign rulers. Within 5 years, he succeeded in expelling them from his country, reuniting it back under the sole rule of one Egyptian king.

The reign of Ahmose's son and successor Amenhotep I was somewhat more peaceful than that of Ahmose and seemed to have been focused more on the building of new temples throughout the country.

With Thutmosis I a new family ascended to the throne. The mother of the new king is only known by the title of King's Mother, which she obtained after her son came to power. She was not the sister, daughter, or wife of a king, which means that the father of Thutmosis I, who is not known, was definitely not a king.

It is sometimes argued that the royal line was continued through Ahmes, Thutmosis' principal wife, but the fact that this queen is not known to have held the title King's Daughter, does indicate that she was neither a daughter of Ahmose nor Amenhotep I. Her title King's Sisiter might as well mean that she was the sister of Thutmosis I himself.
Thutmosis I was succeeded by his son Thutmosis II who died after a brief reign leaving only an infant son, Thutmosis III, to inherit the empire. The widow and sister of the deceased king, Hatshepsut, was appointed regent on behalf of the new king, her stepson. Within a few years, Hatshepsut evolved from regent to king, forcing the young Thutmosis III into the role of junior partner in a co-regency.

When Hatshepsut disappeared from the political stage the then adult Thutmosis III was faced with a rebellion that threatened Egypt's hold on Syria-Palestine. Like his grandfather before him, Thutmosis III embarked on a series of military campaigns in Syria-Palestine and in Nubia that reinforced Egypt's control over both areas.

The 18th Dynasty peaked during the reign of Amenhotep III, a great-grandson of Thutmosis III.

Another interesting development in the course of Amenhotep III's reign was more of a religious nature. Next to the apparent deification of the living king, a new god made his appearance in the already vast pantheon of the Ancient Egyptians: Aton, the solar disk. All the while, however, Amenhotep III continued to support the cult of the god Amun, whose priests became increasingly wealthy and powerful.

Perhaps driven by a desire to break this power, Amenhotep IV, the son and successor of Amenhotep III, advanced the status of this new god from being the most important solar god, to being as good as the only god. Amenhotep IV changed his name to Akhenaten, which means as much as "ray of Aton", ordered all temples that were not dedicated to the new god closed and moved the capital away from Thebes to a new city which he built in Middle Egypt: Akhet-Aton, "the horizon of Aton", which, in modern-day literature is called Amarna. The so-called Amarna Revolution had begun.

As part of his revolution, Akhenaten also made some drastic changes in the way people and things would be represented. The most obvious change would be the way he had himself and the members of his family portrayed. His protruding belly, elongated face, fat thighs and small ankles and arms are in sharp contrast with the young and athletic portrayals of his predecessors. Whether or not this was actually what Akhenaten looked like, is still the subject of much debate.

Although there was some military activity during Akhenaten's reign, the king seems to have been interested more in his religious and cultural reforms than he was in protecting Egypt's interests abroad. Calls for support from his vassals in Syria-Palestine went largely ignored, opening the way for the Hittite empire to expand its own realm of influence in that region.

Tutankhamun having died without leaving an heir, the throne passed to two of his courtiers. The first was Ay, who is sometimes believed to have been a brother-in-law of Amenhotep III and who married the widow of the deceased king in order to legitimise his claims to the throne.

The second was Horemheb, a former general who served under Tutankhamun and who may have been married to a sister of Nefertiti, Akhenaten's wife. It was during Horemheb's reign that the restoration policy after the Amarna Revolution turned into a policy of destruction: Akhenaten's names were chiseled away, his statues torn down and his temples smashed to bits.

As he had no male offspring, Horemheb appointed an old comrade in arms, the general Paramesu, to be his successor. With Paramesu's accession to the throne as Ramesses I, the 18th Dynasty had come to an end.
Akhenaten's religious reforms were also reflected in the different way he had himself portrayed in statues and reliefs.

Towards the end of his reign, Akhenaten appointed Semenekhkare to be his coregent, leaving all the worldly matters to him. Remarkably, the junior coregent appears to have set the first steps towards a restoration of the old cults.

It would, however, be Tutankhaten, who would abandon the capital of Akhenaten, along with the cult of its god. Having changed his name to Tutankhamun, this young king set about reopening the temples that were closed during the reign of Akhenaten, restoring the old priesthood back to its former power. Despite the importance of his reign, Tutankhamun will probably be best remembered for his tomb, which was found almost intact in the early 1920s.

Was Tutankhamun murdered?

Tutankhamun's early demise and the lesion in his left jaw have resulted in a lot of speculation about the cause of his death. It has often been supposed that the young king fell victim to a vicious plot and accusing fingers are regularly pointed in the direction of two of Egypt's most powerful men at that time: Ay and Horemheb.

Harrison's discovery of a bone fragment inside the mummy's skull has only heightened speculation, as it was deemed unlikely by some that the fragment is part of the nose-bone that is broken during the mummification. It is not clear if this bone fragment is related to the lesion in the king's left jaw.

On the other hand, it must be noted that the lesion had already started healing before the king passed away. Whatever the cause of this wound, it did not kill him immediately.

A possible piece of the puzzle that was discovered in 1968 is the fact that the king's sternum and part of his rib-cage are missing.

Denis Forbes pointed out correctly that it is very unlikely for Tutankhamun to have been born without them and lived to become a teenager. This means that the sternum and missing ribs were removed some time after his death, either during the mummification process or after the mummy's initial examination by dr. Derry. The latter could explain why Derry does not mention that they were missing.

Forbes hypothesises that these vital body parts were therefore removed before the king's burial, thus during the embalming process. As the removal of the sternum and part of the rib-cage was not part of the normal mummification, Forbes assumes this was done because they were badly damaged. Perhaps the damage to the chest was such, that it hindered the embalmers' work.

The only way the sternum and rib-cage could have been damaged to necessitate their removal, is if the king's chest had been crushed. With a crushed chest and a healing wound in his left jaw, it can not be doubted that Tutankhamun died a violent death.

Another piece of the puzzle has been discovered during the Egyptian CAT-scan examination of the king's remains in 2005. The scan revealed a broken leg which might have caused a quick spread of gangrene, resulting in the young king's death. Even if one assumes that Forbes' initial assumption that the sternum and ribs were removed during the mummification process, is wrong, a broken leg too would point to an accidental death.

Forbes further hypotheses is that young Tutankhamun may have been thrown off balance during a hunt, falling from his chariot and being crushed by the chariots of his hunting-companions.

Although this is not an unlikely scenario, there also remain other possibilities. Scenes from the tomb of Horemheb at Saqqara show foreigners being led in captivity before the great general, probably during the reign of Tutankhamun.

Other sources from Tutankhamun's reign also point to military activity in Asia and perhaps also in Nubia. If Tutankhamun was present on the battlefield, he may have received a blow against his left jaw, causing him to lose his balance and fall. In the tumult of the battle, it would also be possible that the fallen king was crushed by horses or chariots. As in Forbes' scenario, he would have lived long enough for the wound to his jaw to start healing, but he would finally succumb to the gangrene resulting from his broken leg. If his sternum and ribs had been severely damaged during the fall, then that too would have speeded up the young king's death.

The first discovery Harrison and his team made in 1968 was that, contrary to Carter's official account, the mummy had not been re-wrapped at all before its re-burial in 1926. It simply lay, denuded and covered by a simple sheet, on a tray of sand in the outer coffin, almost exactly as in the official pictures taken in 1926.

For unknown reasons, Carter had neglected to re-wrap the mummy and had lied about it in his official account. It also became clear that Carter had been a lot less careful while unwrapping the pharaoh than he claimed.

Both arms were severed from the chest at the shoulders. The forearms and hands had been amputated, to allow the removal of the many bracelets. The legs and feet of the royal mummy had received a similar treatment: the legs had been amputated at the hip, knees and ankles to help reveal the king's age of death.

The body trunk was separated from the pelvis to facilitate its removal from the mummy coffin. In order to be able to free the mummy from its golden mask, its head was severed from the body at the 7th cervical vertebrae. The tissue in the back of the neck was destroyed, probably while decapitating the king or removing the severed head.

The archaeologists may probably have inflicted even more damage to the royal mummy in their attempt to free it from its coffin. Not only did they use hot knives to melt the resin, by itself a questionable technique, they also exposed the mummy for hours to the hot desert sun. This, and not, as Carter stated, the liberally poured embalming oils, may have caused the mummy to start carbonising.

Aware of what they had done, Carter and his team neatly camouflaged the damage they had inflicted on the royal mummy when the official pictures were taken. Tutankhamun's body was laid on a tray of sand with enough sand not only to support the royal remains, but also to hide the fact that it had been cut apart. Detail pictures of the king's head too did not reveal that it had been severed from its body.

A comparison of the mummy in 1968 and 1978 with the pictures taken in 1926 revealed some other curious facts. Both the king's right ear and his penis, clearly present in the older pictures, were missing in 1968! Have they, for some obscure reasons, been removed in 1926?

Worse still, it was noted that the mummy's condition had drastically deteriorated! The eyelids that were neatly preserved in 1926 had collapsed. Derry described the mummy's skin as "greyish in colour"; it had appeared darker and more charred-looking to the later examiners. This might indicate that over the 42 to 52 years between the first, second and third examination, the mummy has started carbonising and disintegrating. After each examination, the mummy has been put back in its outer coffin and in its original tomb, instead of moving it to a place with a more controllable environment.

[lizzie]

Who is Imhotep? One source claims that he is Thoth and the king he serves (Djoser/ Netjerikhet ) is Joseph; another source claims that Imhotep is the Prophet Enoch; still another source claims he is the biblical Hebrew patriarch Joseph.

Imhotep, Doctor, Architect, High Priest, Scribe and Vizier to King Djoser
http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/imhotep.htm

Of the non royal population of Egypt, probably one man is known better than all others. So successful was Imhotep (Imhetep, Greek Imouthes) that he is one of the world's most famous ancients, and his name, if not his true identity, has been made even more famous by various mummy movies. Today, the world is probably much more familiar with his name than that of his principal king, Djoser. Imhotep, whose name means "the one that comes in peace" existed as a mythological figure in the minds of most scholars until the end of the nineteenth century when he was established as a real historical person.

He was the world's first named architect who built Egypt's first pyramid, is often recognized as the world's first doctor, a priest, scribe, sage, poet, astrologer, and a vizier and chief minister, though this role is unclear, to Djoser (reigned 2630–2611 BC), the second king of Egypt's third dynasty. He may have lived under as many as four kings. An inscription on one of that kings statues gives us Imhotep's titles as the "chancellor of the king of lower Egypt", the "first one under the king", the "administrator of the great mansion", the "hereditary Noble", the "high priest of Heliopolis", the "chief sculptor", and finally the "chief carpenter".

The Book of Enoch
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/sc ... enoch.html

To begin with, Hebrew 11: 5; literally says, "By faith Enoch was 'Translated' (from a physical mortal being, to a glorious immortal spiritual being) and HE, the only man to have ascended into heaven, was the one who came down.

Jude, or Thomas Didymus Jude, was the half brother to Jesus and to James the younger of Mary’s three biological sons, and he quoted verbatim from the book of Enoch. There is also ample evidence that it was from the book of Enoch that Jesus drew much of the material that he taught privately to his disciples, such as the end of this cycle of universal activity as spoken by Peter the simple fisherman; when the universe will roll up as a scroll with a great hissing noise and the universal elements becoming so excited will burn up and fall as fire into the great abyss as described in the Book of Enoch.

In the first few centuries of the evolving Christian church, the book of Enoch was cherished by the early Christians and many of the church fathers held the books in great reverence, Christian leaders such as Origin, Tertullian and Irenaeus. Even Jerome, although disproving of the works of Enoch, believed him to be one of the two witnesses in revelation, who ascended up to heaven in a cloud.

Eventually, in the fourth century A.D., after being banned by such dogmatic Christian authorities as Jerome, Hilary and Augustine, it finally passed out of circulation and was thought to be lost for Millennia, and the book of Enoch remains one of the earliest extant mystical documents. It’s referred to in the Hebrew Zobar, and the Epistle of Jude, and is considered by some as an early draft of-or at least, a critical influence on the New Testament.

Enoch who is the foundation of all scripture, was rejected by the builders of the universal church, and the stone that the builders rejected, turns out to be the most important of all.

Enoch the Prophet (The one year old sacrificial Lamb of God) who, at the age of 365 (The number of days in a calendar year) was carried to heaven and stripped of his earthly garment and anointed with the sweet smelling ointment of God that shone with the brilliance of the sun and behold he was as one with the glorious ones, “Christ”...’The anointed one.’ Hebrew 10: 5; ‘Therefore, when He (Christ -- The anointed one) was about to come into the world, He said, “Sacrifices and offerings You did not desire, but a body you have prepared for me.”

Now we know that the human body that God had prepared for the heavenly anointed one was named “Jesus”, but what was the name of the heavenly one, who had been anointed by God?

In the books of the Last testaments of the 12 Patriarchs, the words of the righteous Enoch are referred to, but all of the patriarchs died in Egypt, meaning that they had access to his writings even back as far as 1700 B.C.

The Testament of Benjamin to his children, Chapter 9: 1; “And I believe that there will be evil doings among you, from the words of Enoch the righteous: and that you will commit fornication with the fornication of Sodom etc.” Add to this the fact that Moses who was brought up in the house Pharaoh, would have been educated by the greatest teachers of Egypt and that he bought those teachings with him after removing the leaven that had been added over the many years to the Holy words by the Egyptian priests, He gave to Gods chosen people the unleavened bread of God for the spiritual growth of that new nation.

It was Moses who gave to Aaron the regulations that he as High priest was to perform and one of those regulations was to choose a scapegoat and after laying his hands upon the head of that goat, he symbolically transferred the sins of Israel to the goat, which was then sent out into the wilderness to Azazel. You are undoubtedly well aware that that Azazel was the fallen Son of God to whom all the sins of mankind was to be ascribed, as spoken of in the book of Enoch.

Azazel was the one who taught mankind all about metallurgy and the making of swords, knives, shields and breastplates, and bracelets and ornaments, and the use of antimony, and the beautifying of eyelids, and all kinds of costly stones, and all colouring tinctures Etc. Tubal-Cain, the seventh and last recorded descendant of Cain, was an artificer in copper and iron; the master of all coppersmiths and blacksmiths.

Those angels (Watchers or Observers) who had come from heaven had to return to heaven, but they would have no peace, and they first had to be bound in the valley of earth till seventy generations had passed, (Jesus is seventy generations from Enoch, See Luke 3; 23-38.) While Azazel was punished separate from the rest, he was taken out to a place in the wilderness called ‘Dudael’ where he was cast into a pit and covered with rough and jagged stones, and all sin was to be ascribed to him. See Enoch the Prophet 10: 4 to 8.

As there is no known source for the story of Azazel other than the Book of Enoch the Prophet, I think that we can safely assume that the Egyptians had access to the writings of Enoch/Imhotep.

Imhotep: “Father of medicine” 2980 B.C. Imhotep, called “God of Medicine,” “Prince of peace,” and a “Type of Christ.” Imhotep was worshipped as a god and healer from approximately 2850 B.C. to 525 B.C., and as a full deity from 525 B.C. to 550 A.D. Imhotep was a known scribe, chief lector, priest, architect, astronomer and a creator of drugs and medicines from plants. For 3 thousand years he was worshipped as a god in Greece and Rome. Early Christians worshipped him as the “Prince of Peace.” A poet and philosopher, Imhotep coined the saying, “Eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die.

From The Book of Enoch the Prophet, chapter 108: 2; And now I will summons the spirits of the good who belong to the generation of the Light and I will transform those who were born in darkness, who in the flesh, were not recompensed with such honour as their faithfulness deserved. And I will bring forth in shinning light those who have loved my Holy Name (Who I Am) and I will seat each one on the throne of his honour. And they shall be resplendent for times without number.”

Could Joseph and Imhotep have been the same person?
http://josephandisraelinegypt.wordpress.com/

Imhotep was second in charge of Egypt. He designed the Djoser Pyramid Complex at Saqqara. He is also credited with saving his people from a seven year famine. He was not of royal blood. He was born a commoner. When he died, he was buried in a tomb in a coffin like many of the Pharaohs. Many years after his death he was deified. It has been suggested that Joseph and Imhotep may be one in the same person.

Oahspe Study: Who was Thoth?
http://oahspestandardedition.com/OSAC/WhowasThoth.html

The discipline of archaeology, ironically, began with the impetus to prove the Ezra Bible (The Jewish Torah, and the Old Testament) to be correct. The findings however were not what the first archaeologists expected and the very discipline that set out to prove the Ezra bible often became its detractor. Assumptions that the information in the Ezra Bible was absolutely correct and handed down without error from the ancient Hebrew tribes have been strongly and successfully challenged. Not least of these challenges are various translations from Sinai Hebrew (hieroglyphic) to Chaldean/Aramaic (Assyrian phonetic and the basis of the Ezra bible and the Jewish Torah which became the bible of the Jews when they returned from captivity in Babylon) to Greek (the basis of the Old Testament of the Christians, translated from Aramaic to Greek by Alexandrian Jews).

As archaeologists continued to dig and uncover the past, the names and dates of persons, places and events as written in the Ezra Bible were either different missing, or not readily recognizable.

According to Oahspe, the cycle of Cpenta Armij, which began 5960 years before the present (3800 bce), names a number of kings and other persons of South Arabin'ya (an ancient name of Egypt) and Egypt. Egyptologists have constructed timelines and identified historical references of ancient personages, among whom it may be possible to find various persons mentioned in Oahspe.

The first mentioned in the land of Arabin'ya after Abraham and his son Isaac, is THOTH.

Bk of Wars against Jehovih:

||25/27.11. And again De'yus spoke, saying: The Lord your God said to you, Osiris, and to you, Te in, and to you, Sudga: Search among mortals for one high in su'is [seership], for when I announce my doctrines, you shall go to that mortal and cause him to write my words, saying:

"These are the words of the Lord, your God." To answer if you have found such a su'is,
I bid you all to speak now before me.

25/27.12. Osiris said: According to your commandments I have searched and have found Thoth, the highest man in su'is, and he dwells in Arabin'ya.||

The words of the Lord God were to be the "Dey'us bible" which was essentially a post-Abraham corrupted version of God's word as it had first been given to Zarathustra (See Bk of God's Word 21/8.1-21/12.8) more than 9000 years before the present.

The substitution of the false Lord God as the Creator included reinterpretations of the origin of sin and discarded the greater wisdom of the nature of the Creator and His Creation. (See Bk of Wars against Jehovih 25/29.1- 25/29.42).

This su'is (seer) through whom the Bible was to be dictated, apparently, was not raised expressly for that purpose by generations of preparation, but was searched for among the mortals within the false Lord's dominions. Once such a su'is was found by Osiris, not only would he have to write the De'yus bible but the new bible would require a powerful ruler to proclaim and impress it as a religious doctrine upon the population.

IMHOTEP, in Egyptian chronology was the architect and builder of the "first" pyramid for King Djoser of the 3rd Dynasty, dating anywhere from 2900 to 2600 b.c.e. Djoser did not build the very first pyramid, as there were pyramids made before his time in smaller scale and less durable materials.

DJOSER

||......Nevertheless, he was certainly the first pharaoh to erect a [substantial] pyramid or large monument of stone. The design of the Sakkara Step Pyramid's adjacent temple complex, in particular, provides ample proof of this. Columns are shaped in imitation of reed bundles and ceilings in imitation of palm logs. Doors are provided with imitation hinges.....||

Oahspe reveals that Hojax (the builder of the Great Pyramid) named himself after Thoth, i.e. Thothma, signifying the God Thoth (Bk of Wars:25/48.14). Moses refers to the builder of the first pyramid, and the great pyramid as Thothma (Bk of Arc of Bon:27/17.17). Whether he was referring to the original Thoth orThothma who named himself after God Thoth, is not absolutely clear, but it is probable that he was referring to Thothma who lived some hundreds of years before Moses.

Thoth was a deity of Egypt, and Imhotep the man is closely associated with him. And conversely, Thoth's titles connect him with Imhotep.

||...Thoth was considered to be the heart and tongue of Ra as well as the means by which Ra's will was translated into speech. He has further been involved in arbitration, magic, writing, science, and the judging of the dead. His roles in Egyptian mythology were many. Thoth served as a mediating power, especially between good and evil, making sure neither had a decisive victory over the other. He also served as scribe of the gods, credited with the invention of writing and alphabets (i.e., hieroglyphs) themselves.

The Egyptians credited him as the author of all works of science, religion, philosophy, and magic. The Greeks further declared him the inventor of astronomy, astrology, the science of numbers, mathematics, geometry, land surveying, medicine, botany, theology, civilized government, the alphabet, reading, writing, and oratory. They further claimed he was the true author of every work of every branch of knowledge, human and divine.

Thoth was universally worshipped by ancient Egyptian Scribes. Many scribes had a painting or a picture of Thoth in their "office". Likewise, one of the symbols for scribes was that of the ibis. Thoth was inserted in many tales as the wise counsel and persuader, and his association with learning, and measurement, led him to be connected with Seshat|| (Wikipedia)

And Imhotep was also a "patron god" of scribes and considered to be a god of wisdom and peace among other titles which are similar to those of Thoth:

||Imhotep is one of the few Egyptian gods (other than the pharaohs) who was actually a real person. He was the vizier of Netjerikhet (Djoser), a pharaoh of the third dynasty. He was skilled in all areas of administration and royal enterprises. Imhotep was also a priest, writer, a doctor and a founder of the Egyptian studies of astronomy and architecture.

Imhotep was known perhaps best of all as the architect of the Step Pyramid of Djoser at Saqqara, near Memphis. The Step Pyramid was the first structure created by human hands to be built entirely from stone. It was as a wise man and scribe that Imhotep was first honored as a god. In the New Kingdom was venerated as the patron of scribes. Scribes would pour a couple of drops of water in libation to him before beginning to write.

Imhotep was the royal advisor to King Zoser during the Third Dynasty of Kemet. Regarded as the world's first recorded multi-genius, Imhotep was an architect, astronomer, philosopher, poet and physician. During his lifetime he was given a host of titles, among them: Chancellor of the King of Lower Kemet, the First after the King of Upper Kemet, High Priest of Heliopolis and Administrator of the Great Palace.

His very name, Im-Hotep, translates as the Prince of Peace. He was also associated with Thoth and became a patron of wisdom and medicine. Imhotep was called "God of Medicine," "Prince of Peace," and a "Type of Christ." Imhotep was worshipped as a god and healer from approximately 2850 B.C. to 525 B.C.|| (Egytian Myths.net; Masters Museum; College Park; Ancient Egypt online)

Oahspe reveals that the Ezra Bible contains the Egyptian version of the De'yus bible and a book of generations (Genesis), as given and later revised by Osiris.

And so, it is not surprising to find that the personage of Thoth, Osiris' scribe of the first Genesis also corresponds to an important person in the Genesis of the first Ezra Bible. Biblical scholars have found common characteristics between IMHOTEP, priest, seer, sage and deified builder of the first large stone pyramid (the Step Pyramid of King Djoser at Saqqara), and JOSEPH, a descendent of Abraham. Joseph and King Djoser share very similar names which both mean "The Wise". King Djoser received this name after his death as well as being deified. His greatness is associated with the wisdom and achievements of his vizier Imhotep. The two personages Imhotep and Joseph have a long list of characteristics in common, below is a link to the article: The Genesis of Israel and Egypt by Emmet Sweeney which lists and discusses the connections:

Extracts: ||[Matching Personages between Egyptian and Jewish historical figures are Joseph and Imhotep]. Egyptian tradition tells us that two centuries or so after Menes there lived a great pharaoh named Djoser ("the Wise"), whose vizier, Imhotep, was regarded as the greatest of all Egyptian sages.

Djoser and Imhotep, the legend says, lived during a famine lasting seven years, and it was a dream of the king's that provided Imhotep with the clue to solving the crisis. Similarly, Hebrew history tells us that two centuries or so after Abraham there lived Joseph, the great seer and visionary, who became pharaoh's vizier, and helped solve the crisis of a seven-year famine by interpreting the king's dreams.

Historians, of course, have long been aware of the striking resemblances between Imhotep and Joseph, and a great deal has been written on the subject. They would undoubtedly have realized the identity of the two men a long time ago, but the erroneous chronology, which separated them by over a thousand years, confused the issue.

......it is to Immanuel Velikovsky that the present work owes most. Velikovsky's brilliant exposition of the contradictions inherent in ancient chronology is the key that has unlocked the secrets of antiquity. In Ages in Chaos (1952), he proposed a complete reconstruction of later Egyptian history, beginning with the Exodus, which he believed to date from the fall of the "Middle Kingdom". It is largely under the inspiration of Ages in Chaos that the present work seeks to reconstruct the earlier part of Egyptian history. Velikovsky began with the Exodus; we end with the same event.

Djoser's reputation was enhanced by that of his vizier, the godlike Imhotep. This man was, as we shall see, regarded as Egypt's greatest ever seer and interpreter of dreams.||

The biblical scholars find that the dates according to Egyptologists and the Ezra bible do not match, and search to explain a gap of 1000 years:

||Scholars were not slow to associate Djoser's famine of seven years with that of Joseph, and they would undoubtedly have made the connection between Imhotep and Joseph, Djoser and Joseph's pharaoh, had it not been for the chronological discrepancy. Djoser was supposed to have reigned around 2600 BC., whereas according to biblical chronology, Joseph would have lived around 1700 BC; yet again there is that gap of 1000 years".||

But Oahspe has revealed that the first De'yus bible (the first story of Genesis) was given in the time of Thoth, at the beginning of De'yus reign, which is around 2850 b.c.e. (Cpenta-Armij cycle Timeline by V.W.), but Osiris revised the De'yus bible after he rebelled from De'yus around 900 years later. And so the Ezra Bible, which, according to Oahspe was compiled around 494 b.c.e. sourcing Egyptian records, contains the revised edition of the first Dey'us bible. It evidences the deletion of the generations and chronology from Abraham to the beginning of Osiris worship (Bk of Wars: 25/48.6-12.).

While Oahspe reveals the Egyptian origin of Genesis in the Ezra bible back in 1882, biblical scholars since then suspected such a case and put forward strong evidence of same. The noted early pioneer of this approach was A.S. Yahuda, who wrote "The Language of the Pentateuch in its Relation to Egyptian" (Oxford U.P., 1933) and "The Accuracy of the Bible" (USA:E.P. Hutton & Co.,1935). Here again is confirmation that Oahspe, through spirit, revealed information not known in its time:

Egyptian Origin of Genesis

||The terms and idioms used [in Genesis] are Egyptian through and through. Indeed such is the resemblance to Egyptian phraseology and custom that that some scholars now regard these chapters of Genesis as based on an Egyptian record. One such commentator is the Israeli Egyptologist A.S. Yahuda.

Yahuda wondered at the superabundance of Egyptian terms, phrases, metaphors and loan-words present throughout Genesis, remarking on their comparative absence from later books of the Old Testament. Indeed, as we have said, so strong is the evidence that some commentators have suggested an Egyptian original of the narrative which Hebrew scribes more or less copied.||

Whether Thoth's origins were according to the story of Joseph, or whether those details in the Ezra Bible were a later embellishment to more closely connect the Egyptian account to the forefathers of the Israelites to authenticate it in the minds of the post-exodus apostate Israelites is not known to this writer.

When Oahspe refers to Arabin'ya, it includes a large area of land which covers all or part of Africa and what is now the Middle East to Iran. Southern Arabin'ya, usually refers to the area of modern day Egypt and surrounding countries to a certain distance. In which case, Thoth may not have been born in the land which is now called Egypt, but Osiris (the false), would have ensured he was given a position close to the king to enable the proclamation and impression of Dey'us' new bible and his other decrees through his chosen seer/priest. It would not be surprising then, to find that Thoth alias Imhotep was of obscure birth and origins.

The importance of Joseph in the Genesis Story of the Ezra Bible also may be a clue to the character of the writer. If Thoth alias Joseph alias Imhotep was the original scribe of this account, then his own self-importance and role in history was autobiographical. It is not beyond Joseph's personality (according to the Ezra bible account) to see himself as a central figure worthy to be bowed down to, even as a god/king is bowed down to, as in the story of Joseph's prophetic dream of his brother's bowing down to him. However, it is also likely that these embellishments grew from the process of deification that Thoth's name and memory became subject to in the Egyptian Osirian culture and religion.

The tribes of Zerl and Iz, according to Oahspe were ancient tribes of the Faithists of Ham, whose origins are far more ancient than the name Israel which the Ezra Bible associates with only one favored man. The Ezra bible reduces the beginning of the Israelites down to having sprung from the twelve sons of Jacob in Egypt only a few hundred years before Moses' time. However, the term Israelite apparently originates from a combination of two ancient tribes of I'hin Faithists, Iz and Zerl. According to Oahspe (Bk of Wars against Jehovih), there were various and continual migrations of Faithists to Egypt over long periods, usually as a result of famine and warfare in Western Arabin'ya. The names and numbers of the houses of Israel as originating from the twelve sons of Jacob do not agree with Oahspe's account:

Bk of the Arc of Bon:

||27/13.8. Levi, being of the fourth birth of I'hin blood, was not acknowledged an heir of the chosen race, the Faithists. Therefore Levi established a new line, which was called, the House of Levi.

27/13.9. Levi, not being eligible to a Faithist wife, was inspired by the loo'is to take an
I'hin, Metissa, to wife. Metissa bore him a son, Kohath, who, at maturity, was admitted to the Order of Avah, the third degree of Faithists, at which time he was circumcised, and afterward called an Israelite, the name given to the Faithists of Egupt.....

27/18.30.....They were the uncircumcised tribes of the ancients, the Hebrews nicknamed
them Levites, i.e., imperfect flesh.

27/18.31. And Moses commanded the Levites to camp aside, and not to mix with the Israelites, and they obeyed him in all things, maintaining that they were the true descendants of Abraham.||

With Oahspe's historical accounts containing details not known previously to mortals, a greater understanding of the sources of the Ezra bible and its origins in Egyptian antiquity and other pagan cultures is gained. Oahspe reveals a far richer and longer history of the Faithists in relation to their historical counterparts than was known previously.

Were Joseph and Imhotep of Egypt The Same Man?
http://oahspestandardedition.com/OSAC/WhowasThoth.html

In short, when the Israelites came to write down the story of Joseph, they borrowed heavily on what the Egyptians themselves had written about him. None of this should surprise us. Genesis tells us quite clearly that Joseph was a major personality. He became the king’s vizier. He brought Asiatics into Egypt.

Having stated all this, we now find that Joseph, coming just a few generations after the time of the Abraham migration, would have lived in roughly the same era as “The Wise” King Djoser and the wise seer Imhotep. It thus begins to look more and more obviousclear that Joseph and Imhotep, the two great sages, were identical persons, and that Joseph’s wise king was “The Wise” Djoser.

There is little that can be added to the above assessment. Imhotep, plainly and simply, was the greatest of all Egypt’s wise men. As we have said, the close correlations between Imhotep and the biblical Joseph have not gone unnoticed by scholars. In recent years, an English historian named Tom Chetwynd revived the whole debate by argued strongly for identifying the two men.

Chetwynd held by the conventional view that Imhotep belonged in an “Old Kingdom” dated to the third millennium BC, and did not attempt to resolve the chronological difficulties inherent in this. Nevertheless, he demonstrated that the parallels between the two were sufficiently compelling to overrule the chronological problems.

The Constellation of Ophiuchus
http://the-red-thread.net/ophiuchus2.html

The constellation of Ophiuchus is the only sign of the Zodiac which is linked to a real man. This man lived in ancient Egypt around the 27th century BCE, and his name was Imhotep [again patterned after Enki]. Many of the same attributes of Imhotep can also be found in the Biblical Hebrew man Joseph, son of Jacob. Imhotep is credited with many accomplishments including the knowledge and use of medicine. It is said of Imhotep that he brought the art of healing to mankind. The symbol of a serpent [or snake], which is still widely used today to represent the medical profession, was used to represent Imhotep. Imhotep was also known as 'Aesclepius' to the ancient Greeks, but by any name the attributes are still all the same. The attributes listed below describe the Serpent Holder, Imhotep, i.e. the Hebrew Joseph, and Aesclepius.

[lizzie]

EVIDENCE OUR SUN IS PART OF A LONG CYCLE BINARY STAR SYSTEM
http://endgametime.wordpress.com/unders ... e-equinox/

Precession of the equinox is the observed phenomenon whereby the equinoctial point precesses (moves backward) through the constellations of the Zodiac at the rate of approximately 50.24 arc seconds annually.

In examining the mechanics of the motion of precession of the equinox, one will notice two observables:

1. The North Celestial Pole on its 23.45 degree incline slowly traces a large circle in the sky, pointing to different pole stars over thousands of years, and

2. The observer on Earth, at the point of equinox changes his orientation to inertial space at the current rate of about 50.24 arc seconds annually. At this rate the entire precession cycle time required to traverse all twelve constellations of the ancient Zodiac, is 25,792 years, although evidence indicates it is declining.

The principal cause of precession then is not an Earth that wobbles relative to the Sun, but a solar system that moves in a curved elliptical pattern through space resulting in all the current observables of precession; a changing pole star and movement of the equinoctial point through the zodiac, but the wobble is only apparent relative to the fixed stars because it does not exist relative to the Sun.

In the new model, our Sun “moves through a curved pattern” through space as it orbits the Milky Way Galaxy. This causes an “apparent wobble” to the observer on Earth which is an illusion created by the solar systems curved movement through space; thus producing an observable “precession of the equinox” without creating any season shifting issues and cause another riddle in for the old lunisolar theory.

We remove the riddle without requiring any movement of the equinoctial points on the Earth’s orbital path, or new interpretations of equinoctial years, thereby allowing the equinoctial year to which we adjust UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) to reflect a 360 degree motion of the earth around the Sun, but not through space. The motion through space as viewed from a distant star would indicate the Earth moves in a cork screw pattern around the Milky Way in a fight for momentum with its binary companion. This cork screw pattern creates the Illusion of the Precession of the Equinox as understood by the old lunisolar theory and is evidence that the 50.24 acrseconds of precession is not a wobble, but an illusion.

According to Newtonian physics the only force that could cause the Sun to display such a curve would be another large mass to which the Sun is gravitationally bound, which is by definition a binary star system. In this model, the Copernican Third Motion of the Earth would be caused primarily by the Sun’s curved path in a binary orbit, rather than strictly lunisolar forces.

Visually, the new model is one of a rotating object (the Earth) in an almost circular orbit around a second object (the Sun), which in turn is an elliptical orbit around a third object (the binary center of mass of the Sun and its companion star). If the Earth’s orbit and the Sun’s orbit are relatively fixed (i.e. given) then the equations of classical mechanics predict that the axis of rotation of the first rotating object (the Earth) will precess (relative to inertial space) at a rate dictated by the Sun’s path around its binary center of mass. To an observer on Earth the first objects axis will “appear” to precess by 360 degrees, in the same amount of time it takes the second object to undergo a complete orbit around the third object, independent of the masses and distances involved. In this model the Earth’s axis does not really wobble, or change relative to the Sun, but it produces the same “observable” now attributed to lunisolar precession: a precession of the equinox. From this we conclude:

In a binary model the Sun’s angular momentum is in its movement through space, not just in its spin axis. A binary model might also help explain the non-random path of certain long-cycle comets (Svitil October 2001), without requiring the existence of a tenth planet or huge quantities of dark matter within the solar system. Also, the recent finding that our solar system has a sheer edge (Allen et al. 2001) is now readily explainable, indeed expected in a binary system. Another new finding that was published in 2010 is that the Voyager spacecraft trajectories are behaving as if they are being acted upon by an unknown force as they leave the grip of the sun and feel the grip of our sun’s companion.

Our Sun is probably part of a binary system, gravitationally bound to another star, likely a dark companion, which is estimated to be 1000 to 4,000 A.U. distant (0.0155LY to 0.062 LY). We are open to other possibilities such as a visible star, however, because this would require a different understanding of long range gravitational effects (i.e. MOND or other new theories). We are not going to speculate on the full range of potential companion stars.

The Sun’s path currently curves at about 50.24 arc seconds per year (one degree every 71.657 years) around its apparent binary center of mass, and the Sun is now accelerating, at the approximate rate of 0.000349 (arc seconds per year) per year. The old lunisolar model fails to explain this acceleration. The binary theory explains the acceleration as movement from apoapsis (at farthest orbit) to periapsis (at closest orbit). At the closest orbit, the precession accelerations zero and as the companion stars pass periapsis, precession will begin to decrease.

The apparent binary orbit plane is expected to be the same as, or within a few degrees of, the invariable plane (the angular momentum plane of the solar system).

The Earth’s changing orientation to inertial space (as required by any binary orbit of our Sun), can be seen as Precession of the Equinox. This fact has been masked by the illusion called the lunisolar explanation for precession.
The current apparent binary orbit speed is one cycle every 25,792 years, but due to acceleration (as we move away from apoapsis), is expected to average approximately 24,000 years per complete orbit.

CONCLUSIONS

Our solar system is part of a binary solar system and the precession of the equinox is an illusion caused by the movement of our solar system in a cork screwing elliptical pattern around the Milky Way Galaxy.
What awaits us at periapsis?

The angular momentum distribution of our solar system is a problem that has frustrated attempts at developing a reasonable theory of how the solar system developed. This problem disappears using a binary relationship model.
The gravitational effect of a binary companion could easily cause a non-random distribution of long-range comets. In a single sun system, an abrupt edge like the one just beyond our Kuiper Belt would not be expected. In a binary system a sheer edge would be normal and expected.

The current model of precession (spinning top slowing down) would mean a very different value of precession 100,000 years ago. In a binary relationship model, precession 100,000 years ago would be about the same as today –because it would be cyclical. This is in keeping with the accepted Milankovitch (Precession) Cycle. (Berger 1977)
Moreover, the binary model is a simpler more logical model for explaining the mechanics of our solar system and the motions of the Earth.

For example, unlike lunisolar theory the new model does not require concurrent slippage of the equinoctial point in order make precession work:

An equinoctial year, tropical year and solar year all, once again, represent a 360 degree motion of the Earth around the Sun.

The equinox occurs at the same place in the Earth’s orbit path each year (relative to the Sun). The ecliptic plane and celestial equator are once again fixed at the point of the equinox.

The calendar year, once again, represents a complete orbit of the Earth around the Sun. (Except for the differential between 365.25 (average days in a year) and 365.2422 (actual rotations in a year) that exists because mans calendar is made of whole days).

Also, the new model does not require extremely complex equations to predict precession. Nor do the new equations suffer a high degree of degradation over time:

The Earth’s changing orientation to inertial space is only minimally affected by the planets, tides, geo-physical movements, asteroids, etc. The principal source of movement is caused by the binary motion and the Sun curving through space, slowly changing the Earth’s orientation.

Precession can be more accurately and easily predicted by plotting the angular velocity of the Sun in its binary orbit, and using this as the main input in precession calculations. The Sun’s angular momentum is now proportional to its mass, along with the other planets.

Precession’s annual increase is attributed primarily to the increasing angular velocity (curved motion) of the Sun’s “elliptical” orbit around its binary.

Precession waxes and wanes with the elliptical orbit of our Sun around its binary center of mass. In this model precession is cyclical and the current accelerating precession trend, expected in elliptical orbit, is now understandable.

Precession was never so small as to not exist and it will never become so large that we all wobble off the Earth. Minimum precession is about one degree every 72 years when the Sun is at apoapsis, and maximum precession is about one degree every 60 years when the Sun is near periapsis. The Earth will average about one degree of precession per 66.6 years over the 24,000 year cycle.

The new model does not require one cause to be given to explain the difference between a solar and sidereal “day” (orbital curvature) and another completely different principal to be given to explain the difference between a solar and sidereal “year”:

The sidereal year is 360 degrees plus precession due to the Sun’s motion.

The sidereal year realigns with the same stars of a year ago, 20 minutes later than an equinoctial year (50.24 arc seconds), only because the solar system has curved through space by 50.24 arc seconds, along it’s binary orbit.

Just like the delta between a sidereal day and a solar day, the delta between a sidereal year and solar year is also due to curvature of an orbit. The “day” delta is due to curvature of the Earth around the Sun. The “year” delta is due to curvature of the Sun around its binary center of mass.

Many others are on board with the binary theory. These scientists show a number of equations showing that theoretical lunisolar effects do not correspond with the Earth’s actual rotations; the other is a paper by the Italian scientist, Carlo Santagata, who has written an extensive treatise on where Newton and his successors miscalculated certain inputs of the lunisolar precession equations. Our role is not to confirm or deny the workings of lunisolar theory but rather to put forth a new model that solves current solar system enigmas in a simplified manner.

The binary model is a simpler, more logical model for explaining the mechanics of our solar system and the motions of the Earth.

[lizzie]

Could the “second sun” be Sirius A?

Could Sirius C be a magnetar? If Sirius C is a magnetar then could it be the “seat of universal magnetism” rather than the Galactic Center? A magnetar could be considered a “dark star” since it does not emit visible light.

Was the Vela supernova really the Sirius B supernova? Was Sirius C a magnetar that was created as a result of the “Sirius B supernova”?

The sun with its planets and their moons takes some star (Sirius A?) for its dual and revolves around it in about 24,000 years of our earth-a celestial phenomenon which causes the backward movement of the equinoctial points around the zodiac

The sun also has another motion by which it revolves round a grand center called Vishnunabhi, (Sirius C, a magnetar?) which is the seat of the creative power, Brahma, the universal magnetism.

China reports two suns
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread682681/pg1

Sorry if this has been posted already...but a Chinese mainstream news network has recently reported on the appearance of a second sun...WTF....its going down to the wire now.

Go to http://www.google.com... and type Sirius A. Google is blocking something. Why?

Here’s the clip; I don’t know what to think anymore!

China reports 2 Suns March 2, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCwZT_X6vHo

Star Wars Binary Sunset
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEUGF3NGbPg

The only explanation I can come up with is if the second sun is much larger than the Sun, and quite some distance behind it. The real sun may block the rest of the world's view in that case.

It would be interesting whether it could still be seen from, say, a couple hundred kilometres away though and whether the two suns appeared closer together at that location.

Maybe it's not another sun but a huge planet like thing instead. If it was larger than the sun and positioned behind it, it may be reflecting the suns own rays.

THE HINDU THEORY OF WORLD CYCLES
http://baharna.com/karma/yuga.htm

In the introduction to his book The Holy Science, Sri Yukteswar describes an interesting variant of the Hindu theory of ages. According to him,

The sun, with its planets and their moons, takes some star for its dual and revolves around it in about 24,000 years of our earth-a celestial phenomenon which causes the backward movement of the equinoctial points around the zodiac. The sun also has another motion by which it revolves round a grand center called Vishnunabhi, which is the seat of the creative power, Brahma, the universal magnetism. Brahma regulates dharma, the mental virtue of the internal world.

Yukteswar goes on to explain that the sun's 24,000 year revolution around its companion star takes the sun progressively closer, and then progressively further away from the mystic center Vishnunabhi. In his system, dharma increases as we approach Vishnunabhi and decreases as we draw away from it. The cycle of yugas takes place twice in each 24,000 year revolution. As the sun recedes from Vishnunabhi, the ages pass in the usual order: Satya, Treta, Dvapara, Kali. As the sun approaches Vishnunabhi, the ages pass in the opposite order: Kali, Dvapara, Treta, Satya.

With regard to the 24,000 year cycle, David Frawley begins like Yukteswar by ascribing the cycle to the sun's revolution around a companion star. Frawley says that this revolution varies the amount of cosmic light we receive from the galactic center. Thus, he seems to have identified Yukteswar's Vishnunabhi with the center of the galaxy, which Yukteswar never explicitly does. Still, it is a plausible interpretation.

Unfortunately, a 24,000 year orbit would make only a negligible difference in our sun's distance from the galactic center, which is at a vast remove from us. Presumably because of this, Frawley abandons Yukteswar's notion that it is our varying distance from Vishnunabhi that causes the cycles of yugas. Instead, he posits that our companion star is a dark star, and when it passes between us and Vishnunabhi, tends to eclipse some of the cosmic light from that source, thus causing the decline into the less inspired ages like Kali Yuga.
In describing the greater cycle, Frawley states

The greater cycle consists of 8,640,000 years, and what it corresponds to astronomically is not now known. In this cycle we are in a dark or Iron age whose duration is 432,000 years. Exactly when it began or when it will end is not clearly known either. (Some begin it at 3102 B.C. but this is just to confuse it with the beginning of the Bronze age or the dark half of the lesser cycle.)

In this passage, Frawley gives the traditional length for Kali yuga while giving double the traditional length for the cycle as a whole. Why? Presumably he considers that the greater cycle follows the same pattern as the lesser, with both ascending and descending yugas. Thus a full cycle would consist of Satya-Treta-Dvapara-Kali-Kali-Dvapara-Treta-Satya. Presumably also the whole cycle follows as a result of our overall revolution around some object more distant than the "companion star" or "dark star."

The Sirian connection(how they knew about Sirius C)
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=71074

Since my ancestors are Hebrew and the language is sacred to me, and I have never read word of it. It's beginning to come all back to me. The other race I want to talk about who are indeed sort of lingering between Sirius are in fact from the Sirius C system. ANU.

Syrians came to Egypt, the holy land, and Syria, this is this blue blood came from. The gods who came here are indeed from Sirius and Orion. There are literally dozens of races from these systems.

The secret here that a lot don't know is that we are not just a double star system. Our companion is a combined star companion of Sirius A and B; the third star of Sirius travels between our two solar systems; when we reach the dense galactic plane spin it is then that the far out planet Nibiru crosses through the middle of our solar system between Jupiter and Mars where it crushed a planet where the asteroid belt now is.

The fascinating thing is that our solar system doesn't just physically change and become active this way alone. The stargates spark such cosmic energy between our two solar systems that it’s a time of pure chaos. It's a time where many races meet and converge to follow the divine intervention of evolution. It's a time where we all meet our differences and face new light. This is the beauty of our existence. We have managed to survive these changes each time, and each time they bring great changes to all these solar systems. That is what the mark of the pyramids symbolizes. The beings of Orion, Sirius, Leo, Cani major are all your closest family. Earth is special because all these races are involved with you now at this time

The dark star that lurks a few light years away actually travels between Sirius and our Sun. Since Sirius is one of our brightest and nearest neighbours, it is only 8.7 light years away. If someone could calculate 3,600 years cycles, this would explain how fast this dark star (and Nibiru ) is traveling towards us now. This is Sirius C. It has been found and shown to exist as our ancients recorded it. They didn't need telescopes; Sirius C can be seen with the naked eye. I don't know if I really have exposed the truth here, but this is my own prophecy.

Mainstream scientist's have yet to confirm it. The Annunaki have their base world here. I cannot say if it's their home world. There seem to be a lot of races involved for me to actually give any of you a definite answer. But they do have slave races on their world. They are predominantly power driven. Red is the colour connected to them. The races on Sirius A and B are not the same spaces at all. Their stars are totally different nature. But I still love the people from our dark star. It's the evolution of ying and yang.

The Approach of Sirius
http://livingbeing.com/2012/tag/astronomy/

The great star Sirius, our cosmic friend, is approaching us. Sirius’ position in the sky varies a little over long periods. Now, we are approaching this magnificent star at thousands of miles per hour

Sirius has a companion, Sirius B that is a small white dwarf the size of earth but as heavy as the sun. This small companion star has an incredibly powerful magnetic field and together the two celestial companions are ringing out across the cosmos sounding the OM.

It has been said by ancient astronomers that Sirius is our binary companion in a long 24,000 year cycle. I believe this is true. Light and cosmic rays from the Sirius system bathe our whole solar system.

If this is our long lost solar twin, her increasing light will continue for around another 11,000 years. As she approaches, she appears blue, but when she recedes we see her as reddish. There is a small Sirius C star as well, not visible to the naked eye.

A Companion to our Sun?
http://www.viewzone.com/sirius.html

The vast majority of observable stars are binary or multiple star systems. In these systems, two or more stars share a common focus of revolution and are gravitationally bound to each other in defined orbits. This is such a common observation such that the gravitational interaction of multiple stars appears to be the "normal" mode of stellar system formation.

Is the idea of a solar companion to our Sun unprecedented? Not at all, in fact there have been numerous scientific publications examining the evidence for a "dark star", literally speaking, to which our Sun could be gravitationally bound in a definite orbit [3]. This alternate dark star is known as Nemesis, and its proposition comes primarily from observed perturbations of orbiting objects such as the planet-sized Kuiper belt object named Sedna [4]

Walter Cruttenden of the Binary Star research institute has propounded that a solar companion need not necessarily be of the "dark star" variety. Given the paucity of empirical observations and measurements of the movement of many of the bright stars within our own local galactic sector, it is with some justification that visible stars be examined to see if any may share a common focal point with our own Solar System [5]. At the heart of the poly-solar system theory is a simplification of the mechanics of constellation precession (precession observable) with a more logical model, one that does not rely on a putative wobble of the Earth but instead explains the precession observable with the movement of the Solar System itself.

Is there a candidate for binary revolution among the visible stars? Logically we could begin with the closest star to our own, which is Alpha Centauri. At a distance of 4.37 light years, it is the third brightest star and, as is common, it is itself a binary system.

Another star that shows evidence of being gravitationally bound within the system and is called Alpha Proxima. Alpha Proxima is 0.2 light years from Alpha Centauri AB, about 400 times the distance of Neptune's orbit from the Sun. This shows that a dual or poly star system does not have to necessarily be in close orbital interaction. However Alpha Centauri lies at a declination of -60°, which is well out of the plane of the Solar System, and as such, has a near circumpolar motion in the sky.

A more suitable candidate would be a star closer to the plane of the Solar System, or celestial equator. Sirius meets this criteria at a declination of -17°. It is also the brightest star in the night sky, three times brighter than Alpha Centauri and twice as bright as the next brightest star Canopus. Sirius is also the 5th closest system of stars to our own [6]. More significant is the fact that The Sirius Research Group has been recording the position of Sirius for approximately 20 years now and has not recorded any measurable alteration in its location relative to the precession [7].

Celestial bodies in our Solar System show harmonic resonance with the Sirius system. Pluto and Sedna are at an incline to the plane of the solar system of roughly 17°, the same as Sirius. Both have orbital periods of 250 years and 12,000 years, which are at 1:5 and 1:2 resonances with Sirius, respectively (12,000 years is roughly one half of the orbit of the Sun around Sirius, hence a 1:2 resonance).

Sirius is a binary system. Sirius A is the highly visible star, but there is a companion known as Sirius B, first described in modern times by the Dogon tribe of Mali (Africa) and subsequently verified by the observational science of astronomers. The Dogon also described a third celestial body with characteristics of a neutron star.

While a neutron wouldn't be visible in the same manner as Sirius B, the combined gravitational attraction of a neutron star, a white giant star and a white dwarf would certainly provide the gravitational force needed to keep the Sun bound at a distance of 8.6 light years. In fact, the presence of a neutron star is by no means necessary for the gravitational interaction of the Sun with Sirius.

Historic and mythological descriptions of Sirius provide further insight into the nature of the relationship between the Sun and Sirius. A shaft leading from the Queens chamber of the Great Pyramid of Egypt was -- and still is -- aligned precisely with Sirius. Given the high probability that it was constructed that way, and considering that the pyramids form a star map in and of themselves, it shows how many epochs Sirius has been in a stationary position relative to the movement of the other stars.

By what mechanism is a secondary retrograde rotation of the axis itself induced? The theory that was posited came to be known as Lunisolar Precession. It was hypothesized that torque from the Sun and Moon supplied a force that perturbed the orientation of the axis, causing it to wobble. I call this the "Wobble Hypothesis".

When you take into account all the rotational motions and orbital paths of these three bodies (i.e. the Sun, Earth and Moon) it is staggering to think that a uniform force could be applied to generate a stable enough torque to maintain a 26,000 year periodicity through the precessional cycles.

From Africa, where the Dogons live, the star Sirius disappears below the horizon and is out of sight for a couple of months; then it appears again on the morning of July 23, when it rises about one minute before the Sun. It appears bright ruby-red, just above the horizon, almost exactly due east. Sixty seconds later the Sun emerges. So you can see Sirius for just a moment, then it's gone. This is called the helical rising of Sirius, which was a very important moment for most of the ancient world, not just for the Dogons and Egypt.

This is the moment when Sirius and the Sun and the Earth are in a straight line across space. In Egypt, almost all the temples were aligned with this line, including the gaze of the Sphinx. Many of the temples had a tiny hole in the wall somewhere; then there would be another wall and another, going into some dim inner chamber. In that chamber there would be something like a cube or Golden Mean rectangle of granite sitting in the middle of the room with a little mark on it. At the moment of the heliacal rising of Sirius, a ruby-red light would strike the altar for a few seconds, which would begin their new year and the first day of the ancient Sothic calendar of Egypt. [12]
The Helical rising of Sirius in the summer shows how the Sun and Sirius become aligned along the horizon of the Earth as it rotates into the light of the Sun. Similarly the Sun and Sirius are aligned in the winter as well; however, because Sirius is on the outside it appears directly above the Sun as it rises in the winter. This is the source of the Star of Bethlehem. It is the star Sirius.

The term Nibiru is well known, and equally misunderstood. The Babylonians used it more as a descriptive term than a name representing a specific object. In Babylonian Astronomy it was used to describe a star -- not a planet -- as can be seen in the following examples from translations by Horowitz [14]: The Helical rising of Sirius as the Sun orbits it. Since the location of the solstices and the equinoxes are occurring at the same location within the Earth's orbit around the Sun, the helical rising is switched when the Sun reaches the opposite point in its orbit.

* He [Marduk in context] set fast the position of Nibiru to fix their [the stars] bounds."

*"...let Nibiru be the holder of the crossing place of the heaven and of the earth."

*...the red star which stands in the south after the gods of the night [the stars] have been finished, dividing the sky in half, this star is Nibiru, (i.e., Marduk)." (note it's a red star, and this is often how the Ancients described Sirius)

* "Nibiru is his [Marduk's in context] star, which he made appear in the heavens ... The stars of heaven, let him [Nibiru] set their course; let him shepherd all the gods like sheep."

What can be seen clearly here is that the term nibiru is being used to describe a star, and that this star sets the course of the other stars, that is to say that it is the source of their precession, and that it is the crossing point.

It is my supposition that Nibiru is referred to as a "crossing point" because when the Sun passed apastron and began its opposite revolution, Sirius would cross the sky. Not only did this crossing of Sirius mark the turning point in the Sun's orbit, but also the turning point in the Yuga cycles.

The new Sun-Sirius system model satisfies the observational behavior of Sirius and the constellations of the zodiac as they regress throughout the great cycle of 26,000 years. There is no need to introduce a "wobble" in the Earth's axis, induced by the action of 9 other celestial bodies -- a theory which is just a relic from a time when the motion of the Solar System was not yet conceived.

It would be sagacious not to place Sirius at the center of the Solar System, for in a fractal system there is no true center. The fractal nature of the Universe engenders its self-arrangement, or more apropos, the Universe is a holofractal graphic system [15]. Therefore there are many nested orbital interactions, going out as far as the local cluster of galaxies, which themselves have a focal point.

This is nothing new. Previous civilizations understood celestial mechanics at an advanced level, and the mathematical precision of their astronomical observations is a testament to this [16]. The reason why the Egyptians and many other civilizations of that era used Sirius as their marker for the passage of time is because they picked the most stable object as their reference point.

We choose the Sun as our reference point, and this is obviously highly inaccurate. Every 4 years a day has to be added to keep accurate time. But even Sirius was not accurate enough for the "Keeper's of Time", the Mayans. With their remarkably advanced astronomy they quickly detected the inaccuracies in using Sirius as a marker for the passage of time, and switched to an even more accurate cycle involving the Pleiades. There is however an even more stable reference point than the Pleiades and that is the Galactic center, which from the perspective of our galaxy is the ultimate center of rotation.

And indeed the Mayan's chose the Galactic Center as a reference point to mark the passage of time, which is evident as the Mayan Long Count ends with the galactic alignment of the Solar System on December 21st 2012. Therefore, the idea that the Earth orbits the Sun, or that the Sun orbits Sirius, or that Sirius orbits Alcyone and that Alcyone orbits the Galactic Nucleus, is not revolutionary -- it's just a rediscovery of lost knowledge.

http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... c94#p48269

Though, not yet confirmed by scientist, "The Little Sun" Sirius C, exhibits similar characteristics to that of Sirius B. Sirius C, Emma Ya Tolo, is hard to observe, since its small faint stellar field is masked by the great brightness of Sirius A. It is a red Dwarf Star or Pulsar and is called the "Sun of Women."

According to the Dogon, Sirius C lies at the centre of the Sirius Star System constantly emitting red solar rays - a Blazing Star transmitting its essence towards Sirius A and B from its orbital position. Sirius C is also accompanied by a spiraling satellite called Nyan Tolo, the "Star of Women." Nyan Tolo is represented by a spiral and/or cross.

This is also the key to the mythos about a Planet X or Nibiru -- a red dwarf plantet on a 3,600 year elliptical orbit with our Solar System -- prominently espoused through the interpretations of the Babylonian/Sumerian clay tablets by writer Zecharia Sitchin. This is also the key to the idea of a Messiah or Son of God -- a redeemer figure expected by numerous religions to bring forth a rapturous salvation to the world. But the designation of Nibiru as the Planet of the Crossing and the eschatological theories of the return of the Son of God is really about the passage, orbit and convergence of the Sirius Star System that has been “occultified” by this fraternal group of Priest Class Magicians. The Planet or Star of the Crossing is really the “Star of Women,” in Sirius – the Grand Cross that is symbolized in all instances of the Trinity and Cross symbolism since ancient history.

I contend that the ribbon and the interstellar matter currently discovered by NASA are really part of the debris from Sirius B’s explosion and that the preparations being made by the Vatican constitutes the fundamental part of the worship and “occultification” of the interstellar explosions of Sirius B, which has been symbolically revived in the ancient traditions, mythologies and religions such as with the death of the God Osiris and his rebirth as the God Child Horus -- The Dying and Rising Phoenix. It must be remembered that according to the Dogon tribe, this explosion formulated a creative organizing energy source producing a sacred energy of Eloptic Black Light from its stream of ionized hydrogenous essence.

http://49-17.bluehost.com/forum/phpBB3/ ... 041#p48819

"During my ascension through the ranks of Freemasonry, one of the things that I am researching vigorously is the origins of the Mason Calendar of Light, or "Anno Lucis" timetable.

I came across an interesting book in the Masonic library last month, refuting the claim (often made by non-Masons or uninformed brethren) that the start of the AL dating, 4000 BC, is due to the Bishop Usher calculation of Genesis.

Usher, you might know, counted backwards using the alleged ages of people in the Old Testament, and came up with the year 4004 BC for the date of creation. Just because the Usher date is close to the AL start date- 4004 instead of 4000 - many people just assume (due to Freemasonry's connections to Christianity) that the Masonic calendar is based on Usher.

However this old book, written in the 1700s, instead asserts that the A.L. date is based on a calendar created by an Isis cult from ancient Egypt. In the year 4000 the star Vela went supernova, and for months, if you were located near in the latitudes of Egypt, you would have seen two suns.

The Vela explosion effectively created a "year of Light" by blazing away and preventing any night for most of the year 4000. The Isis priests apparently took this as a sign for a new era being born and started their calendar accordingly."

The Freemasons begin their calendar from A.L., "In the Year of Light," found by adding 4000 to the modern year: Thus 1990 + 4000 = 5990 A.L.

George Michanowsky wrote in The Once and Future Star that;

"The ancient Sumerian cuneiform...described a giant star exploding within a triangle formed by...Zeta Puppis, Gamma Velorum, and Lambda Velorum...located in the southern sky....[An] accurate star catalogue now stated that the blazing star that had exploded within the triangle would again be seen by man in 6000 years."

According to the Freemason's calendar it will occur in the year 2000.

Cooper seems to be generally "right on"; however his last bit, claiming that the star would appear again, obviously turned out to not be true. I have looked (extensively) and not found anything in any official Masonic writings on the subject referring to this prophecy, or the Calendar supposedly being oriented to the year 2000 for this purpose, so maybe he made that up or got it from a spurious conspiracy source.

The Sirius Mystery
http://www.debunker.com/texts/dogon.html

Nevertheless the Sumerian Oannes myths, first described by Sagan and Shklovskiy in Intelligent Life in the Universe in 1966, are as intriguing as ever. In a recent book, The Once and Future Star (Hawthorn Books, 1977), George Michanowsky identifies "Oannes" as a Hellenized version of the Sumerian name Ea; he theorizes that the myths may refer to a gigantic supernova. Modern astronomers have discovered the remains of the supernova Vela-X in a constellation which would have been visible in the low southern sky from Sumer.

The mystery of the ancient "red" Sirius also remains baffling. Some astronomers speculate that the white dwarf Sirius B might have been a flaming red giant only 2000 years ago although current astrophysical theories decree that any such transformation in less than 100,000 years is impossible. Other ancient astronomical records make no mention of Sirius being red.

Meanwhile the Dogon myths continue to baffle investigators. The obviously advanced astronomical knowledge must have come from somewhere, but is it an ancient bequest or a modern graft? Although Temple fails to prove its antiquity, the evidence for the recent acquisition of the information is still entirely circumstantial.

Dogon descriptions of Jupiter, Saturn and Sirius remind one of Jonathan Swift's uncanny description of the two undiscovered moons of Mars. But that isn't the only parallel. Swift appears to have taken the idea of two close (although not necessarily small) moons of Mars from Voltaire's novel Micromegos in which an extraterrestrial visitor tells earthmen about the undiscovered Martian moons. And from what star system does the visitor come? You guessed it -- Sirius!

In 1977 two radio astronomers were interested enough in the Sirius mystery to direct their telescopes at the star system in hopes of picking up any artificial radio signals. None were detected. That was not surprising since, judging from the age and energy of the stars in the Sirius system, astronomers believe it is unlikely that any earthlike planets could exist there long enough for life to emerge and develop.

So where does this leave the mysteries of Sirius? The antiquity of the Dogon astronomy is not so obvious as ancient astronaut enthusiasts claim but neither has it been disproved. The ancient records are filled with unanswered astronomical questions -- including the "red Sirius" and the possible Sumerian Ea-Oannes references to the spectacular Vela-X supernova. The Dogon myths may or may not be related to these other putties (or even to Kepler's supernova, which has been seriously suggested.) It seems likely that we will never know for sure.

ELECTRIC NEUTRON STARS
http://www.the-electric-universe.info/S ... etars.html

The supernova implosion produces neutrons but only from proton-electron pairs. The protons in overbalance will be fixed on the surface of the neutron body and create a magnetic field and a synchrotron-radiation via rotation. The enclosed proton-bubbles swim upwards. The biggest proton-bubble surfaces at first and explodes into space. This "proton-volcano" kicks the neutron star from the center of the SNR. The later proton-explosions produce only proton-jets.

Why does a neutron star have a magnetic field? One of the old answers was: the neutron star inherited its field from the field of the presupernova. Chandra, however, showed the Crab pulsar´s two jets in its rotational axis, clearly without precession. Magnetic and rotational axes are identical, but the pulsar pulses. This old model cannot explain this identity and also the non-axial jet which was recently discovered by Chandra!

The electric current of a neutron star is in order of 1020 A which does not flow in the body but it rotates with the body in this model! Therefore, this star does not need power for the sustaining of its magnetic field. Only the rotation of the protons emits synchrotron radiation which calculably consumes the rotational energy very slowly and very evenly. This spin down due to the synchrotron radiation has been well known for decades without an exact model. Now it became calculable! This positive star produces the cosmic ray particles by its high voltage of +1025 V (easy to calculate via sphere-condensator and charge of 1 cm3 protons!). This highest voltage of the Universe strips the electrons from falling atoms, attracts and fixes them. It repulses the positive atomic nuclei electrostatically along lightyears to relativistic velocities. These are the cosmic ray particles.

What is the difference between pulsars and magnetars?

Pulsars contain fewer protons.

Why is the burst of a magnetar invisible?

It is because it is cold. The eruption of protons causes filaments due to the rule that parallel currents attract each other. No collision among protons is possible. Therefore the HST does not see the X ray-jets of the Crab pulsar.

TREMENDOUS GAMMA-RAY FLARE BLASTS EARTH
http://carlkop.home.xs4all.nl/magnetar.html

An intense wave of gamma rays, emanating from a catastrophic magnetic flare on a mysterious star 20,000 light years away, struck the Earth's atmosphere on August 27, 1998, providing important clues about some of the most unusual stars in the Universe. Scientists said the gamma radiation posed no health risk to humans.

The wave hit the night side of the Earth and ionized (or knocked electrons out of) the atoms in the upper atmosphere to a level usually seen only during daytime. This astonishing blast of ionization was detected by Prof. Umran Inan of Stanford University. "It is extremely rare for an event occurring outside the solar system to have any measurable effect on the Earth," Inan said. It was so powerful that it blasted sensitive detectors to maximum or off-scale on at least seven scientific spacecraft in Earth orbit and around the solar system.

The wave of radiation emanated from a newly discovered type of star called a magnetar. Magnetars are dense balls of super- heavy matter, no larger than a city but weighing more than the Sun. They have the greatest magnetic field known in the Universe, so intense that it powers a steady glow of X-rays from the star's surface, often punctuated by brief, intense gamma-ray flashes, and occasionally by cataclysmic flares like the one observed on August 27. Astronomers think that all these effects are caused by an out-of-control magnetic field -- a field capable of heating, mixing, and sometimes cracking the star's rigid surface to bits.

[lizzie]

Mars the Great Leaping One

The Concept of the Egyptian Sep Tepy
http://www.kheperu.org/other/other7.html

The ancient Egyptians had a concept they called the Sep Tepy or “First Time”. This was a primordial golden age, an age of the gods that preceded the rise of the culture we know today as ancient Egypt. According to the Egyptians’ own legends, the exceptionally advanced technologies and mystical systems which the dynastic Egyptians enjoyed were actually the legacy of this elder culture. Many of the Egyptian temples were believed to be reconstructions of temples that had existed in the Sep Tepy but where destroyed in the cataclysm that ended that golden age.

The following material is drawn from Andrew Collins’ reading of the Edfu Building texts, as it appears in his book, “The Gods of Eden. I think the Edfu documents are important enough to continue the search.

First, let me give some background material on the primary resource this is coming from: In the ancient Egyptian city known as Edfu, there are extensive texts which adorn the walls of the existing Ptolemaic temple. These are known as the Building Texts, and they record the history of the Sep Tepy as it was passed down among the ancient priesthood.

The texts describe a temple surrounded by a possibly man-made channel of water with a nearby field of reeds. This is called the Island of the Egg, and it is associated with the point of First Creation (the point where the self-created first uttered I became, and the becoming became…). In Thebes, this was known also as the Island of the Twin Flames. Divine pillars, called djed pillars, are situated around a sacred domain here called the Wadjeset-Hor or Wadjeset-Neter.

The original divine inhabitants of this temple numbered 60. These were led by a group of individuals referred to as durwarty falcons, or Sages. The Sages were themselves ruled by an enigmatic figure known simply as “This One”, who was also described as an embodied bird. Bird imagery predominates, and many of these original divine inhabitants are referred to as “winged”.

Of the sixty, those that are described as the “companions”, particularly of the One, all have names which incorporate the word hr, which means “face” or “countenance” - generally these names imply a striking countenance, very fair and beautiful of face, radiant, attractive, etc.,

“The Edfu account speaks at length of the events surrounding the Island of the Egg and the Wadjeset-Neter, collectively referred to as the “homeland”, and alludes to some kind of violent conflict which brought to a close the first period of creation. An enemy appears in the form of a serpent known as the Great Leaping One. It opposes the sacred domain’s divine inhabitants, who fight back with a weapon known only as the Sound [or whole, uncorrupted] Eye.” (Collins, 175)

(The Eye it should be noted is associated in other tales with the Eye of Ra, an object or force which is capable of great, fiery destruction as well as the Wadjet Eye or Eye of Horus which was a magickally fashioned eye of spirit made to replace a natural eye lost in battle).

The Eye wreaks destruction on enemy and allies alike. There is mass devastation. The first temple is destroyed and all the inhabitants die. There is a period of darkness where death and decay are everywhere, and the Island of the Egg is now renamed, being given titles like the Island of Combat, the Island of Trampling, and the Island of Peace. This is the end of the First Age, or Sep Tepy.

A second generation of divine inhabitants reclaims this sacred area as a new age dawns. These are the Shebtu, who are seen as builder-gods. They have titles like “Lords of the Island of Trampling”, “The Far Distant”, “the Sailor”, and the “Lord, mighty-chested, who made slaughter, the Soul who lives on the spilling of blood”.

These new divine inheritors of the sacred temple are tied to the original inhabitants in an enigmatic way. In one version, one of the Ogdoad (a group of eight builder gods) claims to be a reincarnation of one of the older divinities, who is portrayed as also being his grandsire (so he is simultaneously claiming to be descended from this god and to be this god at the same time, clearly expressing the reincarnational principle we hold so strongly to). In contrast to the Sages, however, the new divinities are described as being “living deities” who can live “in the company of the sun”.

The Shebtu, being builders, fall to construction projects, fortifying the place of the temple with a great enclosure. They also build the Grand Seat or Temple of the Falcon. Very specific descriptions and measurements of the lay-out of this temple & its enclosure follow.

The Shebtu also have in their possession powerful relics from the Sep Tepy which are stored in a subterranean chamber within the island named, appropriately enough, “Place-in-which-the-things-of-the-earth-were-filled-with-Power”. (This underground area is also referred to as the Underworld, and the Place of the Well, and it has an association with akhekhu, an Egyptian word often translated as darkness or shadow.) These powerful relics allow them to harness and control the rains and the tide, thus staving off a second flood that threatens the new temple. Collins identifies this Underworld as the physical reality reflected symbolically in the Shat-en-am-Duat, or “Book of What is in the Duat” -- a portion of which I’ve quoted in other works.

“Various subsequent stages in the creation of the world involve a gradual progression in the design and appearance of the Temple of the Falcon, while a further building, named as the Solar Temple, is said to have been built on the site of an earlier battle, plausibly one connected with the destruction of the first divine inhabitants by the enemy serpent ... It must be pointed out, however, that these additional building phases are not necessarily to be seen as later events, since the texts are often mixed up, duplicated and confused and may therefore refer to events relating to the first two periods of creation.”

Finally, the Shebtu inexplicably sail away to another part of the world to continue their task of rebuilding. Time passes, and the divine inhabitants of the Wadjeset-Neter are replaced by the Shemsu-Hor, or “Followers of Horus”, semi-divine beings who ruled pre-dynastic Egypt and eventually gave way to the Horus-kings of the First Dynasty circa 3100 BCE.

Timeline:

28,000 BCE: The ancient historian Manetho describes a period of about 25,000 years before the rise of Menes, first king of the First Dynastic period in Egypt. The first rulers are the gods themselves, particularly Horus, who ruled for a period of about 13,000 years.

15,000 to 11,000 BCE: Cataclysmic end of the last Ice Age, typified by a rising of waters and multiple natural disasters.

15,000 BCE: According to the Edfu Building texts, when the original gods are destroyed, after a transitional time of darkness, death, and decay, there is a period of rebuilding led by the Shebtui, or builder-gods, who then leave for parts unknown to continue their work.

12,500 to 9500 BCE: the people of the Nile river valley have agriculture, domesticated animals and advanced tool-making technology as attested by tens of thousands of vases, cups, and other artifacts carved from excessively hard stones such as diorite, amethyst, porphyry, and rose quartz.

12,000 BCE: In the fifth century BCE, Herodotus records that 11,340 years have passed since the reign of the first Pharaoh, placing the beginning of that reign in the twelfth millennnium. It is likely that this first Pharaoh is included among the Shemsu-Hor, who were recognized as being demi-divine like the later Horus-kings.

11,380 to 9220 BCE: Precessional Age of Leo. Several writers have argued convincingly that the Sphinx is dated to this period and is intended as a monument to mark specific events related to this age. The date of 10,500 BCE seems significant based on astronomical parallels that occur on the Spring Equinox in that year. The Valley Temple and Osireion, as well as other cyclopean structures probably date to this period or before.

7000 to 5000 BCE: Precessional Age of Gemini. Egyptologist Lucy Lamy offers compelling evidence that pre-dynastic Egypt is split at this time between Upper and Lower Egypt and governed by two rulers, typified as twins and mythologized as Horus in the North and Set in the South. The association with twin rulers holding sway over Egypt continues into Dynastic times, when early Pharaohs were symbolically buried in two locations -- one in Upper Egypt’s old capital, one in Lower Egypt’s traditional capital.

Circa 5000 to 4000 BCE: The Nilotic culture mysteriously wanes and much technology seems to be lost. Eastward, beliefs and technologies associated with the elder race emerge in Sumeria. This culture flourishes for a while but is dealt a fatal blow by Assyrian invaders.

Circa 3500 BCE: advanced technology once again emerges in the Nile Valley. Some scholars attribute this to an influx of technology from Mesopotamia

2300 BCE: Akkadian Dynasty in Sumeria with Sargon I and Naram-Sin, who ruled for fifty-five years. (The date here is suspect: I have compared numerous timelines in books from the past 100 years, and there is a marked trend of shortening the past in recent years - that is to say, cultures such as Egypt and Sumer, which were given founding dates of in the 4th, 5th, or 6th millenniums BCE fifteen years ago when I was first studying archaeology, have now all been foreshortened to the 3rd millennium. I have run across timelines that tell me Egypt was founded first, and some that even insist Sumer was founded before Egypt. The most current things seem to want to place Egypt’s founding at about 3100 BCE and Sumer’s at 3300 BCE, a fact which makes no sense at all to me!)

Circa 3100 BCE: Hor-Aha, better known as Menes, unites Upper and Lower Egypt and initiates the First Dynastic Period. Accepted history in the Nile River Valley begins.

SEEKING SARDINIAN MYSTERIES
http://www.andrewcollins.com/page/articles/sardinia.htm

I have just returned from a memorable and rather strenuous stretch at the L'era dei Giganti ("the age of the giants") event, held in the heart of the Sardinian landscape at a place called Pauli Arbarei, noted for its own legends of giant graves and giant bones being discovered in the pastoral lands locally.

Held over the weekend of November 6/7, 2010, the diversity of speakers and performers, all Italian except for myself and Austrian mysteries researcher Klaus Dona, were encouraged to champion their own opinions on giants, whether as flesh and blood human beings, ancestral myths or as ancient astroanuts.

There was a minute's silence, for the recently departed Zecharia Sitchin, who championed the somewhat wild notion that the Watchers and their giant offspring, the Nephilim, as well as the Annunaki of Sumerian and Babylonian tradition, were aliens from the planet Nibiru who came here 250,000 years ago to colonize earth and create the race of Adam to mine for gold in darkest Africa.

Naturally, I championed the somewhat more sober view that the Watchers of the book of Enoch, and other Enochian texts found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, were a memory of the ruling elite that likely entered the Near East around 10,000 BC and laid the foundations for the Neolithic revolution. They created, in my opinion, the first settled agricultural communities with the founding of Pre-pottery Neolithic sites such as the extraordinary megalithic complexes of Gobekli Tepe and Nevali Cori in SE Turkey.

The memory of this elite, most probably shamans associated with the cult of the dead, was recalled across countless generations until these great wisdom bringers, described as walking serpents, became not only the Watchers of the book of the Enoch, but also the Annunaki - the supposed builders of the first Mesopotamian city states.

Much of this is backed up by the fact that this same region of the globe, focused on the great inland sea of Lake Van, is the traditional site of the land of Eden - mentioned on occasions in the Old Testament and famed for its noted garden, serpent and disobedient couple. It is here that the sources of the four rivers of paradise can be found, and it was here also that the first creation of wheat from the domestication of wild grasses took place around 9000 BC

In stature the Watchers of the Book of Enoch, who I firmly believe were flesh and blood human beings, are described as like trees, while their offspring, the Nephilim (a word thought to mean "those who fell", or "the fallen"), were often described as gigante, "giants" (indeed, the famous "giants in the earth" quotation from Genesis 6:4 was originally "Nephilim in the earth", not "giants" - this substitution coming only in much later times).

Personally, I have no reason to assume that descriptions of Watchers as large as trees are based on actual fact. More likely is that the indigenous peoples of the Near East were much smaller than the proposed shamanic elite that arrived on the Euphrates and Tigris rivers sometime around 10,000 BC. I suspect they were no more than six to six and a half feet (2-2.25 m) tall at the most.

The Watchers' original homeland remains a mystery, although I have repeatedly proposed that it was the Upper Nile of southern Egypt and northern Sudan. Here between 15,000 and 11,000 BC some of the most advanced communities anywhere in the world thrived. They possessed a sophisticated microblade technology, superior homesteads comparable with those of the later Neolithic age, and even possibly a form of proto-agriculture. This is my best bet as to where the builders of Gobekli Tepe originated.

Evidence of the global disruptions caused by a comet impact in North America c. 10,900 BC can be found in Egypt. A thick carbon-rich layer caused by falling ash and debris from the intense firestorms that would have raged following this unimaginable cataclysm on the North American continent has been found all over the world. The ash would have remained in the upper atmosphere, creating a dense cloud cover that would have blocked out the sun. This would have caused a prolonged period of total darkness and bitter cold, something that is recalled in catastrophe myths worldwide. Afterwards, the ash would have gradually fallen to the ground, creating this 20 cm thick layer known as the Usselo Horizon. It is the greatest telltale sign we have of the reality of this great devastation at the end of the last Ice Age.

Evidence of this destruction is even preserved in the records of ancient Egypt. The so-called building or foundation texts at the temple of Edfu in southern Egypt speak of a time of floods and destruction following the onset of a period of darkness. This occurred after the appearance in the sky of an enemy snake known as the Great Leaping One. In my opinion, this is a memory of the comet impact, c. 10,900 BC.

Austrian mysteries writer Klaus Dona provided anatomical evidence for the former existence of giants in the earth, some as much as five and a half metres in height! He showed also a number of pictures of deformed human skulls, mostly from Central and South America.

Although many of these can be put down to artificial deformation through the binding of the skull at a very young age, others shown were more difficult to understand. It was a point admitted by an Italian anthropologist whom Klaus turned to constantly on the panel in order that she might explain what was being seen here. She suggested that the weirdest deformations were genetic in nature, although as was pointed out, when do you ever see people like this today?

The one point which intrigued me most is that the seemingly increased size of the craniums caused through deformation must also increase the volume capacity of the brain, especially as some of the deformations are enormous, causing the individuals to become cone heads!

Reconstructions of some of the individuals behind these strange skulls brought out the odd appearance of these ancient ancestors, some of whom had double ridges across their scalps that really did make them look like aliens, one reason for including the skulls in the lecture.

After other speeches on the Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh, the discovery of over-sized statues in Sardinian tombs, a talk on contemporary Mexican shamanism, and ceremonial displays from an authentic Aztec dancer, I listened to a talk by an "expert on extra-terrestrial life". He told us that the Egyptian hawk-headed god Horus was/is an alien, and implied that the pyramids of Giza were aligned to Orion because this was the home of an alien race. I found these ideas extremely difficult to accept. Perhaps I am just not ready to accept that there are a plethora of alien races out there from an assortment of home planets.

Salii
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salii

In ancient Roman religion, the Salii were the "leaping priests" of Mars supposed to have been introduced by King Numa Pompilius They were twelve patrician youths, dressed as archaic warriors: an embroidered tunic, a breastplate, a short red cloak (paludamentum), a sword, and a spiked headdress called an apex. They were charged with the twelve bronze shields called ancilia, which like the Mycenaean shield resembled a figure eight. One of the shields was said to have fallen from heaven in the reign of King Numa, and eleven copies were made to protect the identity of the sacred shield, on the advice of the nymph Egeria, 'consort' of Numa, who prophesied that wherever that shield was preserved the people would be the dominant people of the earth.

The NASA Conspiracies
http://www.unknowncountry.com/dreamland ... nspiracies

Whitley Strieber asked Nick Redfern, "was Mars murdered" which begins a terrific discussion not only about Mars, but also about what Gary McKinnon found in NASA's database, what Edgar Mitchell really knows, and the role that he and Gordon Cooper have played in encouraging disclosure. The photo included here is also discussed in the interview. It is of what appears to be a figure leaping off a rock on Mars, taken by one of the Mars Rovers. Could such a thing really be true?

On Velikovsky's Mars Catastrophe
http://www.velikovsky.info/Sean_Mewhinney

"According to Immanuel Velikovsky, on at least three occasions in the eighth and seventh centuries B.C. Mars passed close enough to the Earth to disturb its motion, tilting its axis, generating tremendous earthquakes and storms, raining fire from the skies, and causing great loss of life. For many nights before and after each of these catastrophes, Mars must have been a spectacular sight in the sky. As he himself wrote, this "period is part of the well authenticated history of the lands of the eastern Mediterranean". That being the case we should expect to find explicit references to these stupendous events by eyewitnesses in the records of their times. They recorded their wars, treaties, royal marriages, temple dedications, deeds of property, and the sale and purchase of sheep and goats. They could hardly have passed over these tremendous upheavals in silence. Too much has come down to us from this period to hide an event of this magnitude ."

Venus of the Flood, Mars of the Exodus
http://www.emmetsweeney.net/article-dir ... xodus.html

In his Worlds in Collision (1950) Immanuel Velikovsky used myths, legends and traditions from throughout the world to illustrate his thesis that between the fifteenth and seventh centuries BC the earth suffered a series of devastating encounters with planetary bodies, which were recorded by the peoples of the time. Controversially, Velikovsky argued that in the fifteenth century a giant ball of fire, later to be the planet Venus, had erupted in a terrific explosion from the gas giant Jupiter and that this proto-planet, pulled by the sun’s gravitation, moved towards the inner solar system, where it came on a near-collision course with the earth. This resulted, according to Velikovsky, in the series of catastrophes told in the biblical Book of Exodus, popularly known as the Ten Plagues of Egypt.

In Worlds in Collision Velikovsky argued that his ideas would have profound consequences for ancient chronology. He placed the dramatic encounter between proto-planet Venus and the Earth around 1450 BC. Yet Egyptologists, who claimed to know the very coronation-date of the pharaoh who sat on the throne at that time, insisted that the records of Egypt contained not a hint of this terrible event. Velikovsky, on the other hand, found a series of hieroglyphic documents which did indeed allude to events similar to those described in Exodus, but these were dated by Egyptologists centuries earlier than 1450 BC.

Velikovsky divided Worlds in Collision into two parts. Part 1 dealt with events caused directly by Venus. Part 2 dealt with events seven centuries later, beginning in the year 776 BC, when Venus disrupted the solar orbit of the planet Mars, a body which then itself moved on a collision course with the Earth, bringing a series of catastrophic upheavals of nature which continued until the year 687 BC.

Saturn and the Flood
http://www.pibburns.com/smsaturn.htm

The Venus and Mars catastrophes of Worlds in Collision are only the latest in a series which, according to Velikovsky, involved every planet visible to the naked eye, at one time or another. Critiques of the Worlds in Collision scenario began appearing even before its publication in book form. This may have something to do with the fact that Velikovsky never finished the books describing these earlier catastrophes, because they make Worlds in Collision look pretty tame by comparison. Someday, his executors may release the manuscripts of Jupiter of the Thunderbolt and Saturn and the Flood. In the meantime, some articles in Kronos provide a few details. Ice cores also have implications for claims of these earlier catastrophes, which I will review here.

Chief among them was the biblical Deluge, which Velikovsky ascribed to an explosion of the planet Saturn which he called a "nova". "It is conceivable that the Earth was, at that time, a satellite of Saturn, afterwards possibly becoming a satellite of Jupiter." Shortly after the explosion, the earth was enveloped in clouds of water or of hydrogen gas ejected from Saturn, which precipitated as the Flood. "The volume of water on the Earth was vastly increased.... the Atlantic Ocean... came to be only after the Deluge." This newly acquired water was said to be warm. It "may have been rich in chlorine... Chlorine may thus be of extraneous origin..." In this catastrophe, as in later ones, "all volcanoes erupted."

All this is supposed to have happened quite recently, "in times preceding the Middle Kingdom in Egypt..."

Noah's Flood - Was This How God Caused It?
http://www.trustbible.com/flood.htm

Noah's Flood, and several other happenings on Earth were probably caused by the planet Mars. I agree with Donald Patten that the orbit of Mars was different in the past. I think starting in (?) BC until at least the 8th century BC Mars had a very elliptical orbit. One end of its orbit was out near the orbit of the asteroid belt and the other end of its orbit around the Sun was near the orbit of the Earth. So I think Mars used to pass astronomically close to the Earth periodically until as least the 8th century BC. There is also evidence that some of the other planets, moons, and objects in our solar system have occasionally disturbed or even destroyed another object in our solar system. The evidence indicates the orbits of some planets and objects orbiting around the Sun can and have been changed in the past. Here is a short list of some of this evidence.

1) The global change in the calendars of the Earth. Bill Hollen has informative articles on the change in the world’s calendars from 360 days per year prior to the 8th century BC to 365 and 1/4 days per year. Prior to the 8th century BC I believe the Earth had an orbit slightly closer to the Sun, as well as 360 days per year.

2) Deimos and Phobos. The two irregularly shaped satellites of Mars. Since these satellites of Mars weren't discovered until 1877 how did the Greeks know they existed? The Greeks knew Ares (Mars) had two sons. They named one Phobos meaning terror or panic and the other Deimos meaning fear.

3) Mars and its moons in Greek Mythology. In Greek mythology why was Ares (Mars) referred to as the god of war. Why did the Greeks say Ares (Mars) rode into war with his horses, Deimos and Phobos, the moons of Mars?

4) Mars the war god. Why was Mars referred to as a warrior or a war god in many cultures? I think it had nothing to do with Mars red color. Look at some of the names Mars the war god had in various cultures.

5) Tyr (Mars) in Norse and Greek mythology. In both cultures Mars was a warrior or war god. In Greek mythology Ares (Mars) lost a son Kyknos. In Norse mythology Tyr (Mars) lost a hand. I think in ancient times Mars had a third satellite which it lost due to some astronomical catastrophe.

6) The past water on Mars: How is it that Mars, which has hardly any atmosphere or oxygen, and which is very cold, once had a lot of water on its surface. Where did the water come from?

7) What caused the tremendous cratering of Mars' southern hemisphere? Why is its northern hemisphere relatively uncratered?

8) Mars' huge crater, Hellas Planitia. What slammed into Mars? What caused Mars to have a very large bulge, Tharsis, as well as the highest mountain, Olympus Mons, in our solar system?

9) Comets. Why do some comets like Tempel-Tuttle and Hale-Bopp have orbits whose one end is close to the Sun but whose other end is very far from the Sun? Could it be the orbit of Mars in the past also had more orbital eccentricity?

10) Venus and Uranus. Why do Venus and Uranus have a retrograde or CW spin instead of a CCW spin like the Sun and the rest of the planets?


11) Triton. Why does Triton, Neptune's biggest moon, orbit CW around Neptune, instead of CCW like all the other moons? What happened to cause Triton to orbit in a reverse direction?

12) Saturn. Why are there rings around the planet Saturn? Are the rings the remains of an icy satellite that got too close to Saturn when it was pulled apart due to "Roches Limit?"

13) Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune. Why do the planets Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune also have rings around them? Was each of them approached by comets or asteroids, which were pulled apart into many small pieces by the larger planets, resulting in the rings around the planets?

14) The asteroid belt. Is the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter the remains of a planet that got too close to a bigger planet?

15) Nereid's orbit. Why does Nereid, one of Neptune's moons, have a very elliptical orbit?

16) Jupiter and Io's arc. Why is there a huge arc of ions and electrons flowing between Jupiter and its satellite Io? Io is about 422,000 km from Jupiter. Here is some more information on the Io torus.

17) The severe tilt of some of the planets. Notice the strange orbit of Pluto compared to the other planets.

18) "Migrating Planets" by Renu Malhotra in "Scientific America." This article presents evidence that some of the planets in our solar system have not always been in their present orbits.

19) Phobos and Deimos, the two satellites of Mars mentioned in 1735 by Jonathan Swift over 100 years before telescopes were developed enough for Asaph Hall to detect them in 1877. How was Jonathan Swift in "Gulliver's Travels" on about the 18th page of part 3 able to describe fairly accurately the orbital periods of Phobos and Deimos and their distances from Mars? Mr. Swift said the innermost satellite had an orbital period of 10 hours and was 3 Mars' diameters from the center of Mars. If Phobos' orbital period was 10 hours, it would be 3.3 Mars' radii (not 3 diameters) from Mars. Phobos' orbital period is currently 7.65 hours and it is 2.7 Mars radii from the center of Mars.

Jonathan Swift also wrote that the outermost satellite was 5 Mars' diameters from Mars with an orbital period of 21 and 1/2 hours. If Deimos's orbital period was 21 and 1/2 hours it would be 5.5 Mars' radii (vice 5 diameters) from the center of Mars. The present orbital period of Deimos is 30.3 hours and it is 6.9 radii from Mars. Swift also mentioned the law about the square of their periods equaling their distances cubed. But he seems to have mistakenly used the word diameters instead of radii. In "The Annotated Gulliver's Travels" Asimov speculated that Jonathan Swift protrayed Mars as having two moons because of Kepler's guess that it did. Isaac Asimov also figured Swift guessed that the reason we couldn't see Mars' satellites was because they orbited too close to Mars for us to see them. However, why were Jonathan Swift's guesses so close to the truth? I think Mr. Patten is correct that Swift may have discovered a record of the orbital periods of Phobos and Deimos someone made eons ago when Mars had one of its encounters with the Earth.

20) Almost all rocks in the crust of the Earth have microcracks. Are these microcracks there partly as a result of the Earth interacting with Mars?

21) There is evidence that several civilizations in Earth's past were suddenly sunk and or destroyed.

22) Underground cities in Turkey that may have began to be built around 11,500 B.C. to protect people from freezing. Were these cities built as a result of an ice age brought on by Noah's "erets" flood?

23) Did the Poles shift rapidly several times in the past? Could the interaction of Mars with the Earth have caused the Poles to shift?

[lizzie]

Aryans, Mars and the End of Days
http://snakeoilblog.blogspot.com/2010/0 ... -days.html

Every so often, the sun emits a massive solar flare which pretty thoroughly fries Earth and messes with its magnetic fields. The super-advanced race which lived here millennia ago saw it coming and managed to evacuate to Mars (Aries, hence Aryans). There they waited for several centuries until the Earth was habitable again. Their underground Mars bunkers nearly out of resources, they limped back to Earth only to find that monkeys had come down from the trees and started using primitive tools and were walking upright.

The Aryans, accustomed to their dark underground bunkers, could no longer stand the harsh light of day, and so they lived underground on Earth, where they have secretly directed the affairs of humans to this day. Also, white people are not Aryans, but the bastard offspring of Aryans and humans. With another solar apocalypse on its way, the Aryans are once again getting ready to jump ship and head back to Mars. They are slightly concerned, however, that the human elites who have served as their middle management have been back-engineering their technology and might try to follow them this time.

ARYANS LEAVING EARTH FOR MARS (ALTERNATIVE 3) USING FOURTH REICH MANUFACTURE SUPPORTED BY THEIR TECHNOLOGY
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/ar ... ead=171117

Author, filmmaker, and hermetic scholar Jay Weidner discussed his documentary about life-after-death, as well as his research into an ancient group known as the Aryans or the Vril, who migrated to Mars. His film, Infinity: The Ultimate Trip features such people as Dannion Brinkley and Gregg Braden exploring concepts of the afterlife and reincarnation. Weidner said he made the film to help people not be afraid to die, and to no longer be afraid to live their lives freely. "Once we realize that there's no such thing as death, then I think we're going to be liberated from the political and social environment that we've been thrust into," he said. In the film, Brinkley reported that the government has investigated near-death experiences but has refused to tell the public what they've found, because it's in their interests to control the populace through fear.

Secrets are going to come undone, "and one of the main secrets of all is that we are hyperdimensional beings...and that energies do not die, they only transform themselves," Weidner declared. In his study of the ancient Sanskrit texts called the Puranas, he learned that humanity has been on Earth for as long as a million years, and repeats four different cycles. Our current age, they predicted, will end in the year 2442 with coronal mass ejections wiping out life as we know it.

According to Weidner's interpretation of the Puranas, during one of the previous cycles when solar ejections occurred, a group of Earthlings were able to escape to Mars and live there safely underground. When they returned to Earth, their appearance had changed to tall, pale-colored beings who became known as the Ayrans or the Vril, he said, adding that they're secretly ruling the planet. He also talked about L. Austine Waddell's research into the Aryans, and director Stanley Kubrick, whom he believed was trying to reveal knowledge of secret ruling societies, in his films like Eyes Wide Shut, and an abandoned project called The Aryan Papers...

Aryans are those who hide on Mars when Sun winds up to explode (every few tenths thousands years).

Then they return to earth to restart the civilisation, designing it.

When the time comes they organize such civilisation to manufacture hardware using their technology so they could again escape to the Mars underground and fare the oncoming Sun explosion.

Disclosure: Aryans, Mars and the End of Days
http://unitednationsoffilm.com/?p=1944

If you are wondering about all the catastrophic events and accelerated global changes, mass genocide in the Gulf going on right now, there is an explanation. It’s clear the global elite have lied to us, secret societies have hidden and destroyed historic documents and sold their own souls for their own selfish solution of underground bases with a promise of survival but they have been sold a lie themselves and will be sealing themselves in a gigantic tomb under the earth as the broiling magma and volcanic earth changes continue to occur deep underground.

Described by Wired Magazine “an authority on the hermetic and alchemical traditions,” and “erudite conspiracy hunter,” Jay Weidner is a renowned author, filmmaker, and hermetic scholar. He is considered to be a modern-day Indiana Jones for his on-going, world-wide quests to find clues to mankind’s spiritual destiny via ancient societies and artifacts.

His body of work offers great insight into the circumstances that have led to the current global crisis. He is the producer of the documentary films, “2012 The Odyssey,” it’s sequel, “Timewave 2013.” He’s the director of the the feature documentary, “Infinity: The Ultimate Trip.”

Jay: The powers that be are ruled by an inner group, and we will have a video series out next year called “The Sacred Geometry of Time”, with Robert Lawlor, which is going to explain this in a much deeper way.

But this group apparently knows all of the knowledge of the past, maybe as far back as several hundred thousand years. And they live here, on Earth; and they have lived here for a long time. But they’ve lived separately; until about 6,000 years ago, they lived separately from us – some place on Earth, in a very nice place. But, about 6, 000 years ago, the first of many alarms went off. And these alarms have to do with the advance of what we call the end of the Kali Yuga.

Now, the beginning of the Kali Yuga was right near the beginning of the Mayan calendar, 3114 B.C. And it was the beginning of cities and writing and kingships and slavery and women as chattel and animal husbandry and farming and wars and walled cities and writing and science.

And all those things actually began at the beginning of the Kali Yuga – not because we were getting better, but because we were getting worse.

But not only because we were getting worse but because there was something going on: the reason those things came into being is because this group – that are human, but are different – went into action, because the beginning of the Kali Yuga, 6, 000 years ago, the beginning of the Mayan calendar, was a signal.

A signal in a very long, long, long calendar – not 6, 000 years, but like 60,000 years. And it said that the end of this age was going to come to an end, and the prophecy said that the sun would explode into gigantic solar flares, which would fry everything on Earth and cause huge Earth changes here on the planet.

And this group knew all of this, because they had been through it before and they kept accurate records. So they went into action; and they took a lovely planet, filled with tribes of hunter-gatherers, and they transformed it into civilization.

And they transformed it into civilization so that they could get out of here before the coronal mass ejections hit. And that is what has been going on for over 5, 000, almost 6,000 years.

It is a central organizing principle, decided and governed by a group that we don’t even know who they really are, for purposes which until recently has remained completely hidden and secret.

And, they promised the managers that they’re leaving behind, that they can have the underground shelters and everything; but I don’t think that that’s really going to help, because I just can’t see how that could survive what is foretold.

And the secret space program and all of these things – flying saucers, and bases on the moon, and the Nazis and Joseph Farrell’s great book on the alchemy that the Nazis were doing – this is all part of this group developing the technology for what I call “Project GOOD”, which stands for “Get Out Of Dodge”. And they’re getting’ out of Dodge, baby; and they’re almost out.

And, if you follow the work of Ed Grimsley – I don’t know if you know who he is. He has these night-vision goggles, and he goes out at night and he videotapes these craft that you can’t see with your eyes. You can type him in on Google. On YouTube, they’ve got a few astounding videos that he’s taken of the gigantic craft.
And that’s the story. And I figure I might as well get it out now, because you never know when it’s going to be too late.

Lance: Absolutely. Now, of course, some people attach names to these unknowns. And I have read some accounts that these are some kind of Anunnaki/Atlantean lines, and then of course you have some kind of illuminati bloodlines flowing in there. But nobody really seems to know who they are, except that they’re not -

Jay: Well, yeah, actually, we do. Yeah, well, they are the – Anunnaki is one of the words that they have. The Nephilim is another that they have.

These are words created by different cultures – the Hebrews, the Babylonians, the Sumerians, the Persians – to describe these people. OK? But their real name is very easy, because it describes where they go when they get out of Dodge. They’re called the Aryans.

“Aryans” is just another word for “Martians”, because Aries is Mars. They escaped – at the end of the last Kali Yuga – I think, at the end of every Kali Yuga – the same cycle occurs every time; it may even be why there is a Kali Yuga.

They come to Earth after the Earth is healed from the gigantic coronal-mass ejections which occur; and they come back in their ships, and they repopulate the Earth. They may even take genetic strains with them, which is what the genome project is; they may take all the seeds with them, which is what the seed project is.

And they take it there; and they bury themselves under, because Mars is a pretty inhospitable place; and they wait for the Earth to recover. And they came back 60, 000 years ago, and they thought that the Earth had pretty much been wiped out. But a few groups had survived.

Native Americans had survived, by being in caves; and they tell those stories, about how hot – it was so hot that you stuck a stick out the cave opening and it lit on fire. The Chinese survived – somebody – one of those Asian groups must have survived, obviously. And some of the African survived.

So, when the Aryans landed, they kept to themselves. But they did have ships, and they went around; and they had an order that they couldn’t have any sex with the remnants that were left behind. They could help them, teach them how to read and write and how to farm and all these other things; but they couldn’t have sex with them. But those Earth women and the way they move: they just couldn’t resist.

So these are humans, but they went to Mars for a long time; and they lost the pigment in their skin, they lost the color in their hair, their eyes turned blue or green or hazel. They were tremendously big, because of the low gravity on Mars, when they landed here. Very advanced, super advanced – and they’ve been here for a very, very long time.

And they’re leaving. They’re going. They’re leaving now. There are colonies – I know this sounds as if I’m out of my mind, but I have proof for all this. There are colonies up on Mars; just type in “Hale Crater civilization” on Google, and read Skipper’s work – Joseph Skipper’s great work on the colony there, up in Hale Crater.

This is what’s going on. This is the long and short of it. And, yes, they live here; they actually lived once in Norway. That’s where they lived, because they liked the coolness; they couldn’t get used to the heat. And that spiral that exploded over Norway when Barack Obama was going to get his Peace Prize in Norway – yes, well, that’s their weaponry.

Here’s the problem Obama faces. OK? These guys are leaving. They’re getting out of here because they think that the coronal-mass ejections are coming. They’re leaving, and they don’t care who runs the United States anymore. They did up until last year. Now they don’t care anymore.

And so Obama is sitting here, and he’s got the remnants of their technology. He’s got the stuff sitting around; right? And they’re probably busily back-engineering the Aryan technologies and this is what’s going on in Argentina and Chile, where they’re raiding the tunnel systems.

This is the new world order; these are the managers that have been left behind. The new world order is not the Aryans; the new world order is the Aryans’ left-behind managers.

Lance: Right; that would make sense.

Jay: Yeah. The Aryans think of themselves as the ‘People of the Red’, or ‘the People from the Red Planet’. And, when Bauer changed his name to “Rothschild”, which means “red shield”, he was really signifying that he was the shield for this thing, this project, which moved into high gear at the beginning of the industrial age.

And everyone’s thinking that they’re deforesting the planet, raping the mountainsides, enslaving people, doing all this stuff, just because there’s something that has gone out of control; but it isn’t.

It’s all the underpinnings of a huge, secret project to develop, quickly, colonies and ships and moving gigantic amounts of goods and services across the gap between here and Mars. And that’s the truth right there. And a lot of people are going to know this pretty soon; I’m not the only one that knows what’s going on here. This is all written down, by the way, in ancient texts from India, all of this.

Lance: Oh yes, that’s right. You briefly touched upon that the last time, I think. Jay: Yes, this is all ancient texts, and these texts were from the Aryans and they told their story.

Lance: If they had the ability to go back and forth to Mars and further, I’m sure, isn’t coronal mass ejection going to destroy Mars as well?

Jay: No, because they’re going underground. First off, it will hit Mars but it won’t be anything like what happens here.

Secondly, the problem with the coronal mass ejection – which I have to say, the film “2012″ did a pretty good job of evoking – is that it is a huge electromagnetic blast which has a commensurate effect on the core of the Earth, which is heavily electromagnetic. So it causes a core flip.

OK, here’s how it works. The poles of the sun rotate every 37 days. The equator of the sun would also rotate every 37 days, except that the angular momentum of the planets at the equator of the Solar System causes it to slow down, so it only rotates every 26 days, instead of 37.

Every 87 days, there is a crossing over of the magnetic field, as the 26 catches up to the 37 again. You follow me?

Every 87 days, there’s a small electromagnetic crossing, which encases the sun in a tightly woven electromagnetic shell. After about 12-13, 000 years of this nonsense, the entire sun is bound in a huge receding-quickly magnetic field, which has a commensurate effect on the Earth’s electromagnetic field, which also begins receding.

This is all happening right now with the loss of the sun spots and the Earth’s magnetic field receding. It’s a 13, 000 year cycle that we are right on the edge of and when the sun finally has to right itself, i.e., move its rotational fields back into sync again, which it has to do, there will be a huge electromagnetic storm which will go out way beyond the Earth.

It will be carrying with it gigantic coronal mass ejections, which will ignite the forests of the Earth and boil the oceans.

If you’re underground, on Mars, well you have a pretty good chance of making it. There are no electromagnetic fields on Mars. There are no tectonic plates. Nothing is going to be spinning around and you just wait it out. You just wait it out and maybe after a few hundred years, I don’t know how long, when the forests grow back and the animal life comes back, then you mount your expeditions and you go back.

So we’re building not only the expeditions that are going there, but we’ve been building for the last three hundred years the expeditions that are going to take them back here, too. Yeah, that’s what’s going on.

It reoccurs all the time. In the Vedic texts and the Mahabharata this is what they’re discussing, including the gigantic ships, or arks, as they call them.

I want to make one thing clear. I’m not saying white people are Aryans. I’m saying that white people are the bastard children of Aryans and Earth people. You understand? They do not look like us at all. They’re chalk-white. They’re freakish-looking. They’re where the vampire myths come from because they can only come to the surface of the Earth at night. Their skin is so translucent that you can see the capillary system, so they look blue in certain kinds of light.

Lance: You know there was a movie that was a remake of “War of the Worlds” and I thought to myself, “Well isn’t this strange for them to make this kind of movie where they’re already underground, and those laser beams.”
Jay: Spielberg has to know. When I saw that, I just went, “My God, he has to know.” He has to know that they’ve been here the whole time and they are underground. That’s exactly where they are.

And by the way, these other things that we see – and I’m not saying there are not other aliens, there could be; I’m not even going to argue that – but some of the other things that we’ve been seeing are their robotic creations.
They’ve been here, these robotic creations, for a long time. I don’t know if they’re robotic or genetic, I can’t tell. Sometimes they’re robotic, sometimes they’re genetic.

Here’s the thing Obama has to ask himself. He knows that these guys are leaving. He knows there’s a disaster coming of some kind. They shoot a hyper-dimensional weapon over Norway while he’s picking up the Peace prize and everybody’s screaming and yelling, “Why does Obama get the Peace Prize, he hasn’t done a damn thing.”
I’m going to tell you why Obama gets the Peace Prize. He gets the Peace Prize if he doesn’t shoot at them while they’re leaving. Here’s the problem that he faces, though, and this is a serious problem.

You’re the Aryans and you’re back on Mars waiting for the coronal mass ejection. You got the hatches buttoned down, everything, right? What is to prevent the elites that you’ve left behind from back-engineering the craft, that you’ve left behind – the ship – and coming after you and stealing your place? I know that sounds crazy.

Lance: No, to me it doesn’t.

Jay: and I’ll tell you what. He’s worried that they’re going to attack us, and that’s what that thing in Norway was about. These people are saying that these are benevolent aliens and stuff. You haven’t read your history. The Aryans stormed down, they enslaved all of India; they created the caste system.

Lance: Every war has been created indirectly by this influence, hasn’t it?

Jay: Absolutely. If you read Andrew Collins’ book “From the Ashes of Angels,” it’s a great book. He talks about the history of these babies, these magical babies that are born after the Aryans and Earth women had sex. These babies are white and they have white hair and chalk-white skin, and some tribes were fearful of these children and they killed them.

But other tribes thought that these children were exalted beings and they raised them up into exaltedness in the tribe. These beings frequently had red hair; red hair because of the overabundance of iron oxide in the air on Mars causing red hair.

So they exalted these beings and these were the European tribes who exalted these beings. Read his books, they’re very interesting.

Lance: I will, I’ll check that out for sure.

Jay: On the other hand Africans have a history of killing albino children right when they’re born. I don’t know if you know that. They’re considered wicked. They think that these children, the offspring of the Aryans, were wicked or there was something bad about them. This is a long tradition where they would get rid of these angel- demon children.

So the Aryan influences are more prevalent among the European-stock cultures and so they became the vehicles of the real Aryans, which have nothing to do with white people at all, actually, except for leaving behind some genetic trace.

And so that’s what’s been going on. Skull and Bones is part of this group. Michael Tsarian has traced a lot of these German groups back. The German groups are the key. Once you start back engineering the German groups, you can find everything -- the Saturnian Society, Aleister Crowley, all of the UFO stuff from South America. All this stuff is all intertwined into a cohesive story that makes total sense and gets rid of a lot of the gobbledygook.

But it’s backed up and bolstered by very, very serious ancient texts, Purana texts and Vedic texts, which tell the whole story very clearly.

Lance: Huh! Well, how does that tie into the idea that there are different ages? In other words, do we ever get out from under the prison bars of some kind of highly advanced extraterrestrial civilization that controls us without our knowing? Isn’t there supposed to be a Golden Age after the Iron Age?

Jay: Well, it is, and here’s the thing. This is really the crux of the matter. What happens is that through the long cycle of the Yugas, which is really called a Kulpa – which is all of the cycles together – there are so many deaths.
And as you approach the Bronze Age and the Kali Yuga, there are more and more deaths of violent nature.

And it takes thousands and thousands of years for bones to completely vanish. The Earth becomes haunted by an inescapable presence – called the ‘Ka’ in Egypt, which is a residual that’s left behind. And the only way that you can have a Golden Age is for all of the Ka to be burned away so that the Earth is completely renewed.

And unfortunately these guys, these Aryans, broke the rules. They didn’t want to die in the last catastrophe, which they had to do. That was part of the deal. The Earth can only be renewed if all of the Ka goes. And they escaped, and they went away. And they kept all of the knowledge that had been gathered from the previous Kulpa, which we were also supposed to lose. The only way for the Golden Age to actually incarnate is for the earth start out in a pristine state again. And they broke the rules.

And this is why Tsarion’s work is so good because these guys broke the rules, and now we’re just their slaves. Now racism has come into it. Whereas before there was no racism. Now there’s racism. The Aryans think that the Earth peoples are too stupid, that the Earth peoples are too dumb.

And it’s not dumb or stupid. They never had the advanced technology carried over from the Dark Age and this is the problem. So there has to be a cleansing of the earth so that it can be renewed. And they’re not allowing that to happen.

And they keep bringing back the same genetic strains over and over when actually the Earth is constantly rolling the dice and searching for new genetic strains that it can use to embrace consciousness. The Aryans keep bringing back all the old genetic structures.

Lance: Well, then what are the chemtrails and HAARP?

Jay: Yeah. Those are to keep us away from seeing what is going on behind our backs, which is a giant evacuation. And they don’t care about us anymore.

Jay: We know as much as we know, and that’s all we know. The Vedic texts say that the divas, which have been destroyed through this current Kali Yuga according to the text, have gone back to the Godhead.

They left thousands of years ago to travel back to the Godhead to tell the Godhead that the evil Archons, who are the Aryans, by the way, have taken over the entire planet and that they needed help because the divas have been driven off the planet. The divas, of course, are the nature spirits.

And as Tolkien shows us very clearly in the Lord of the Rings, Sauron and Sauraman are destroying nature to fuel and finance some mysterious project. And if you go back and look and see in history who Sauron is, it’s obvious that Tolkien talking about Sargon. Sargon was the first real king of the Kali Yuga in Mesopotamia.

He started calendars. He started clocks. He started the workday. He started everything, and he was an Aryan. And so you can see that there’s this regimented thing that starts entering in and removes us from the natural state of a highly advanced hunter/gatherer, which is really what human beings are.

And that’s our natural state – very close to the Earth, no agriculture, all fresh foods, a lot of hunting, and a lot of gathering. Very spiritual though. Not a grunting life, but a wonderful beautiful life filled with meditation and a much higher standard of living, which was what was going on before the Aryans emerged.

[lizzie]

Mars the Great Leaping One

Was the planet Astra the same as Maldek?

Life on Mars? Did it Come from Earth?
http://www.arn.org/docs/odesign/od181/mars181.htm

Review of the "evidence" of past life on Mars from the meteorite AHL84001 shows that only those already persuaded could be convinced. The organic compounds found lack the oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur that compose the amino acids that form protein. The authors of the report in Science readily admit that "organic compounds" does not mean "biogenic compounds." The "evidence" from AHL84001, like Rorschach inkblots, tells us more about the role of preconceptions than about Mars.

Mr. Daniel Goldin, NASA Administrator, held a briefing on the "Discovery of Possible Early Martian Life" at the NASA Headquarters in Washington, DC. Mr. Goldin is well-known for his enthusiasm for the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, life on planets around stars, manned missions to Mars and the search for "evidence" of life on Mars. The several members of the team of scientists, McKay et al. reviewed the "evidence" provided by the scientific examination of ALH84001:

• the meteorite came from Mars.
• the meteorite contains the mineral calcite, calcium carbonate, the chemical that is found in limestone.
• the meteorite contains organic material: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
• the presence of very small crystals of magnetite and iron pyrite.
• bodies that were interpreted as microfossils.

Each member of the team cautioned that the observations were neither conclusive nor confirming evidence for a biological origin. They pointed out a number of times that the term "organic compounds" does not necessarily mean "biogenic compounds". This provides a window of deniability that NASA ever said that ALH84001 had evidence of life on Mars. At the same time that is just what the President, the Congress, the press, and the public now believe.

CATASTROPHISM AND ANCIENT HISTORY - VOLUME XIII Part 1
http://www.thule.org/mars/index.html

For at least a century it has been speculated that some relatively small planet at one time disintegrated in the region between Jupiter and Mars. Struve and Zebergs, for example, write as follows: [ I ]

The formation of the asteroids and meteors often has been attributed to the break-up of a planet between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, or to the failure of the matter occupying this region to condense into a single body.

And Pickering notes: [2]

Theories of their origin are divided between their being (a) the debris of an ancient planetary collision, or (b) the material of which a planet might have been made, but was not, because of the gravitational influence of Jupiter, with the preponderance of opinion favoring the latter theory.

Moore and Hunt add: [3]

Until relatively recently asteroids were merely considered to be the "dregs" of the Solar System, the debris of a former planet, but it has come to be realized that they hold important clues to the origin and evolution of the planetary system as a whole. It is thought that the asteroids were planetesimals just like any others growing elsewhere in the solar nebula.... Before they could form into planets, however, their orbits were perturbed, becoming tilted and elongated. This resulted in fragmentation and disruption rather than coalescence. They are probably still colliding today but less often. Some scientists believe that Jupiter's gravitational forces were responsible for disrupting the asteroids in the first place and preventing their accretion into a planet.

Thus we see divided opinion on the origin of the asteroids, of which about 2750 have been discovered and named. Opinions seem to reflect various astronomers' conceptions of the solar system's origin. And opinions are divided as to whether they gathered or accreted as might dew on ice, or whether they were the results of a "collision.' If they are the debris left from a collision, what planetary body could possibly have caused such an event?

One major concept of this paper is that Mars caused the fragmentation of a former small planet into the current asteroids. It was the gravitational force not of Jupiter (as Moore and Hunt suggest) but rather of Mars which caused Astra to disintegrate into asteroids.

A secondary concept implicit in this work is that Mars' former orbit was considerably more eccentric than its current orbit. And our ability to conceive this goes along with our rejection of the idea of planets or planetesimals accreting over billions of years as a viable theory for the genesis of any planet. Perhaps another catastrophic cosmology for the origin of the planets is needed.

A third concept is also implicit in this paper: Mars in its former orbit had the potential to interact catastrophically with the Earth-Moon system, since its perihelion was within Earth's orbit. The first concept, the presentation of evidence that Mars caused the fragmentation of a minor planet, will be discussed below; the second and third concepts, implicit and important though they may be, will not be developed in this paper.

If it can be demonstrated that Mars was the sole cause for Astra's fragmentation, then we can say, as a demand deduction, that Mars was in a former orbit with higher eccentricity and a more remote aphelion. Assuming this, and to accommodate the principle of conservation of energy and angular momentum, a second demand deduction is that the former perihelion of Mars was nearer to the Sun than the present perihelion.

Thus it is proposed that Astra was very much like the planet Pluto in size, but it was more like Jupiter's Europa in density (about 3.0).

It would thus seem that, of the components of Astra in number about one-half became impact asteroids, hitting Mars. As asteroids one-half missed Mars and proceeded to assume a variety of other orbits. But in volume about one-third of the mass of Astra was in the core, Hellas, and another third was in impact asteroids, and yet another third was in Mars-missing asteroids which we see today as current asteroids.

On these calculations it is concluded that Astra had a diameter of somewhere between 1250 and 1300 miles, quite like Pluto with an estimated diameter of 1500 miles. Astra was significantly smaller than the Moon. And its distance was in the range of 205,000,000 miles from the Sun at the moment of its fatal fly-by with Mars.
On the heavily cratered planet Mercury the craters are somewhat equally distributed in both hemispheres, which is also true for the Moon. Interestingly, the craters on Mars are not widely or evenly distributed in both hemispheres.

At a distance of 205,000,000 miles from the Sun a planet such as Astra, or a contemporaneous asteroid, will be revolving at a rate of about 6000 miles per hour in orbit relative to the Sun. The motion of Mars is a second factor to be considered, but for general purposes it is assumed that the Astra fragments approached Mars at a rate of 6000 miles per hour. With reference to Figure 2, the impacting of asteroids began about 31 minutes from the moment of fragmentation, and it was all over in about 25 minutes, except for certain other aftermath effects which will be discussed shortly. Thus the time for torture of Mars' crust was only 55 to 60 minutes in duration. Initial pressure and shock waves within Mars may have lasted another 15 to 30 minutes.

When did this catastrophe occur? Traditionally astronomical essays reflect the nebular hypothesis principle of a genesis four to five billion years ago of the solar system, from which point discussion usually begins. In the present essay we do not know when fragmentation occurred. These indications will be reserved for a future essay. Nevertheless, whatever the lapsed time, a study of drifting dust into (and out of) Mars' craters, especially the rates of dust drifting, along with its quantities, should give an approximation of the timing of the Astra-Mars event.

One thing is clear-that there has been a subsequent watery catastrophe for Mars, with ancient rivers forming channels at a much more rapid flow rate than rain-fed rivers on Earth. That watery event appears furthermore to have been later in time, since the channels appear to be superimposed on Mars' cratered physical geography.

Two additional suspicions need also to be stated. One is that at the time of Astra's fragmentation Mars had an icy satellite somewhat like the satellites of Uranus in size, 500 to 800 miles in diameter, and composed of ice like some of the satellites of Jupiter. This "frosty" body we suggest was also impacted to some extent by Astra fragments and we postulate that Astra had a high proportion of iridium which was deposited both on the crust of Mars and its ancient icy satellite. Thus the subsequent fragmenting or the "frosty" satellite may have had something to do with Mars' channels and may also account for the high iridium concentration in the sub-sea level deep ice deposits on Mars' antarctic bedrock. This is to suggest there was a subsequent and very severe Earth-Moon interaction with the Mars-Frosty system’

Scars on Mars
http://www.thule.org/mars/mars2.html

In 1983 a total of 2736 asteroids were identified and logged.[6] These were, of course, only the largest. Based on the pitlets of some asteroids and on Deimos and Phobos, Mars' two trabants (satellites), there must have been considerable debris too small to see in telescopes or to record in telescope photography.

Based on the fact that the center of the Hemisphere of Craters is at 45 degrees South Latitude, it is concluded that Astra approached Mars to the south of the ecliptic plane, and perhaps up to 1000 miles to the south at the moment of fragmentation. Also, from other data yet to be presented, it would seem that Astra approached Mars on the sunward side (of Mars); probably Astra was moving toward aphelion and Mars probably had just passed aphelion about 30 days previously and was beginning its motion toward perihelion.

In contrast with what "many scientists believed," the conclusion of this essay is that the later period of catastrophic flooding on Mars was more like 5000 than 5,000,000,000 years ago. And the timing of the Astra fragmentation and the Hellas Impact Asteroid event was between 5000 and 15,000 years ago not more. Contradicting or substantiating facts, such as dust drift accumulations in Mars' craters and other data, will undoubtedly clarify the matter in due time.

After Astra's fragmentation, Mars acquired two small asteroid-like satellites, Deimos and Phobos. And perhaps Mars acquired, temporarily, a ring of lesser asteroidal debris, judging by the pitlets on Deimos and Phobos.

At the time of Astra's fragmentation, it is suspected that both the surface of Mars and "Frosty" were enriched with iridium, assuming iridium to have been abundant as a trace element in Astra's composition. A further catastrophe ensued later (not discussed in this paper), wherein Frosty also fragmented, depositing ice and water upon the surface of Mars, among other places. [8]

In this thesis Mars acquired about 70 percent of Astra's mass as it gathered that much of the volume of asteroidal debris. Hellas alone was as much as 38 percent of the mass. Mars new mass is between 1 and 1 1/2 percent greater than its former mass: for that kind of a sudden growth the thin crust needed to find some accommodation for expansion. The crust, parallel to he equator, split open and expanded, just as a tear in a pantleg will occur, due to a new, sudden, internal stress such as the abruptly added weight of the wearer.

Mars has two small satellites named Deimos and Phobos. Both are pock-marked or pitted as if they have encountered many smaller asteroidal collisions. Deimos, the outer one, is the smaller of the two. Its dimensions in miles are about 6 x 7 1/2 x 10. Phobos, the inner one, is about 12 x 14 x 17.

Not only Mars has captured two asteroid-like satellites. Jupiter has directly captured another eight.[12] And in addition, Jupiter's immense gravity has so influenced the asteroids as to have gathered two clusters of them into parallel orbits. These are named the "Trojan" asteroids after mythology relating to Mars coming from Homer and the Trojan War, around 864 B.C.

The Trojans are about a dozen asteroids which have assumed two strange orbits in our solar system. One group is at 2/3 and the other is at 3/4 of the orbital period of Jupiter. For each group the positions of the Trojans in their orbits always make an equilateral triangle with the Sun and Jupiter being the other two points of the triangle.

How could little Mars capture two tiny asteroids when Jupiter, with its massive gravity, has managed to collect only six or eight? Jupiter's mass is about 3000 times greater than Mars' paltry mass and gravitational attraction. According to Richards: [13]

Phobos and Deimos are the same size as many of the asteroids. On the face of it, such a hypothesis [evolutionary capture by chance of the two trabants] sounds quite possible, but upon closer examination it does not stand up so well. A planet only one-tenth as massive as Earth could not easily effect a capture. Suppose that eight small satellites of Jupiter are captured asteroids. Then Mars, with a mass only 1/2950 that of Jupiter, has done extraordinarily well to have been able to latch onto two such bodies. The asteroids revolve in orbits that have no particular relationship to the orbit of Mars.

Suppose one of the satellites is a captured asteroid, captured in such a way that it revolves in a circular orbit in the plane of the planet's equator.... It does seem incredible that Mars could have effected two such very special captures. Further speculation along this line is useless.

Richards has correctly pointed out that tiny Mars could hardly grab a small asteroid moving about 6000 miles per hour on the fly. Any asteroid buzzing Mars would be well past it in the timespan of an hour or two and beyond any hope of capture.

Richards, however, has not considered the possibility that Mars in ancient times once had a different orbit, wherein it caused the fragmentation of Astra. In Figure 5 we have suggested that Deimos and Phobos were exploded backwards from Astra's trajectory. This had a tendency to cancel or neutralize the velocities of these two trabants or to brake them temporarily. Within our model the capture of these two bodies is not only possible but also the most probable explanation, effecting a capture along with some minor asteroidal debris.

Deimos and Phobos' pitlets, quite numerous on such small trabants, give testimony to the possibility of other, smaller debris also gathering in rings around Mars.[14] And perhaps, if Figure 1 validly portrays Mars' ancient orbit, later interactions with the Earth cleared away all of that debris except Deimos and Phobos.

Figure 6 illustrates the capture of Deimos and Phobos. In order for these two bodies to be captured retrogradely, the geometry requires that Astra approach Mars from the sunward side. This suggests Astra was receding toward its aphelion whereas Mars was just past aphelion and beginning its long 720-day journey toward perihelion.

All planets in the solar system revolve directly, which is counter-clockwise as viewed from Polaris. Almost all of the satellites also revolve in direct motion. Only four of the small asteroid-like moons of Jupiter, the two moons of Mars, and one moon of Neptune revolve in retrograde motion.[15]

If this fragmentation had occurred around 205,000,000 or 210,000,000 miles from the Sun, then how did the asteroids come to arrive at regions considerably more distant? For instance, among the ten largest asteroids, the average perihelion distance is 240,000,000 miles.

There are two factors to consider in answering this question. First, Astra was apparently moving in its orbit away from the Sun when it was at the fatal scene. This motion was imparted to each of the fragments plus a variety of vectors added from the force of explosion. The exploding force would accelerate some fragments, retard others, and disperse yet others in sideward directions.

But also, if fragments nearly hit Mars yet just missed, Mars' gravity would have acted upon them precisely as the massive gravities of Jupiter and Saturn acted on some recent spacecraft, which was to act as a booster. Thus three factors (at least) need to be examined in the trajectories of the current asteroids.

Some thirteen levels of evidence have been presented in support of this concept of Mars and the asteroids. Perhaps some day a young celestial mechanic will program the asteroid orbits on a computer and measure and adjust for the perturbing effects of Jupiter and Saturn. In such a scenario many asteroids could be traced back to one location some 205 to 210 million miles from the Sun. And they could be trailed back to one certain moment of time.

We suspect this fragmentation was a recent event in the solar system, and will be considered "ancient" only in terms of thousands not millions or billions of years .

Further, we suspect that such a location will be posited in the general region of 270 degrees from the Earth's autumnal node. This is the region directly overhead at midnight in mid- or late June.

An analysis of the physical geography of both hemispheres of Mars has been made. Both hemispheres have shown evidence for such massive fragmentation.