Quasar Gravitational Lens Holograms by Plasmon Nano-lensing

[quantauniverse]

Three new quasar gravitational lenses inside galaxies have been photographed by Djorgovski using the Hubble telescope. http://sci-news.com/astronomy/article00212.html
A new technique by Kawata at RIKEN projects magnified full color holograms using a dipole object as a black hole at one end of a long rod that could represent a long aligned filament where light energy travels through the resonating plasmon modes to the other end of the rod (or filament).
http://www.rikenresearch.riken.jp/eng/frontline/6973
This would mean that quasar gravitational lenses are plasmonic holograms. See story with EU scientific explanation
http://holographicgalaxy.blogspot.com/2 ... s-are.html

[Michael V]

quantauniverse,

More likely, is that gravitational lensing is "exaggerated" and even misinterpreted. More likely, large objects "deflect" distant "photons".

What's a plasmon?

Michael

[Sparky]

Michael,

What's a plasmon?

come on, you know what a plasmon is...
Plasmons are collective oscillations of free electrons within metallic atoms that produce full-color holograms.

[quantauniverse]

Plasmonic holograms are viewable from any location or orientation. However, what I like about the quasar hologram theory is that a magnified tiny solar system sized galaxy component is nano-lensed. They all say that a gravitational lens "magnifies" the light behind it, making a background far redshifted galaxy appear larger and closer. We know gravity isn't going to do this. However, Arp showed many quasars with attached filaments have discordant redshifts. These new quasar grav lens photos show that from inside the galaxy the light is being magnified, not bent around the outside of the foreground galaxy. There is not a background quasar at all, which is so crucial for the redshift data that supports an expanding big-bang, with plasmonic holograms. They are entire magnified copies of Bostick's plasmoids which provide excellent EU proof for the binary quasar that is interacting electromagnetically not gravitationally.
http://everythingselectric.com/forum/in ... pic=131.15
http://chandra.harvard.edu/press/10_rel ... 20310.html

[mharratsc]

Good thinking there, Quanta. Hopefully further observation and analysis along that theory will put a few more nails in that old pine box the Big Bang theory is laying in.

[Sparky]

Once candidates were identified, Hubble’s sharp view was used to look for gravitational arcs and rings (which are indicated by the arrows in these three Hubble photos) that would be produced by gravitational lensing.

Dubious assumptions in the first paragraph!

Building a model on air foundation.