Trojan work by Allyn on his epic post.
Alton should be contributing his knowledge to this thread.
Alchemy is the Art of Tranformation. The Universe is alchemy in action. But there again, I'm just an old fossil who likes to read even older texts.

I am sure we would all love to pitch in to get you a new program! I can see really nice elemental transmutation youtube videos too.The last post I did took two days and almost drove me nuts, computing Gold and all the related elements/compounds by hand would kill me. This needs a computer program that can be tweaked...to crank out the elements.
I wonder if the gold could have been created in electrical discharges associated with the event, as Zeus was well known for his penchant for hurling some nasty thunderbolts?Gold-bearing gravel—with ingots in it—originated from outside of the Earth and, if we should look upon the Greek legend of Zeus and the golden rain in Rhodes as containing revealing elements, then the ingots came from Jupiter.(3) It could be meteoric gold, and as to the origin the ancients could err; but the event happened in human memory, actually during the Early Bronze Age, or at its end.(4)
http://www.varchive.org/itb/gold.htm#f_5
The Calaveras skull is interesting, and has been officially labeled a hoax:In 1866 a human skull was unearthed in the interior of Bald Mountain near Altaville, in Calaveras County, California. The skull of Bald Mountain was reported to have been found in the shaft of a gold mine, in a layer of auriferous (gold-bearing) gravel, beneath four layers of lava, each separated from the other by four layers of gravel. The skull did not differ in structure or dimensions from the skull of modern man; however, it was fossilized.(5) In the gold-bearing gravel of Calaveras were also unearthed fossilized bones of the mammoth, the great mastodon, the tapir, horse, hippopotamus, rhinoceros and camel, all extinct animals in pre-Columbian America. But geologically the layer in which it was found belongs to the Tertiary, and therefore a great embarrassment was in store for the geologists and evolutionists.
But I cannot help but wonder if the hoax label may be attached mostly because of the first statement, "The skulls were simply too modern in character to be from the Pliocene age..." An embarrassment for those with an academic vested interest in the prevailing paradigm.The skulls were simply too modern in character to be from the Pliocene age, and in addition, the sediment attached to them was not from the mine deposit, indicating that they had been planted.
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Hoax ... ras_Skull/
To one of the latter finds,
the so-called Calaveras skull, great interest attaches because the
bone has lost its organic material and has taken on the appearance
of a true fossil. It has been claimed that the matrix investing the
skull is of the same character as the gravel of the mine where the
specimen was found.
http://www.archive.org/stream/recentinv ... h_djvu.txt
I suspect that the Calaveras skull may be a case of the established school of thought refusing to accept inconvenient evidence.A review of the evidence favoring the presence of the remains of man in the auriferous gravels, compels one to regard it as
insufficient to establish the fact.
I remember as a kid, going to a museum in Denver Colorado that had large quartz crystals laced with gold. The quartz crystals were big, clear, faceted, a couple of feet long and almost a foot thick, with sheets and wires of gold inside it. The gold in the quartz followed the basic structure of the crystal. A crystal that big and pure would act like a resonator within the crystal.GaryN wrote: I have a question for you. Do you think that these transmutations must occur within resonant cavities?
I keep flashing on some poor caveman out hunting, when a mass of pyroclastic debris covers everything, man, animals, and all, flash fossilizing them, and converting some of the debris to gold. Yikes!nick c wrote: Also of interest in the same article, is Velikovsky's mentioning of a fossilized human skull found in a gold mine:
I like this explanation for the Iridium you had in this thread--that it is transmuted from silicon to iron to iridium.Lloyd posted,
* Also see this older thread called Iridium as a marker for impacts? viewtopic.php?f=4&t=191&p=1989&hilit=iridium#p1989
2. They are found in bentonite, which often just means ash:The ammolite deposits are stratified into several layers: the shallowest of these layers, named the "K Zone", lies some 15 meters below the surface and extends 30 meters down. The ammolite within this layer is covered by siderite concretions...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammolite
3. The calcium carbonate of the shells have changed into metals:As the seas receded, the ammonites were buried by layers of bentonite sediment. This sediment preserved the aragonite of their shelled remains, preventing it from converting to calcite.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammolite
The shell itself may contain a number of trace elements, including: aluminium; barium; chromium; copper; iron; magnesium; manganese; strontium; titanium; and vanadium.
* I guess I should take back what I said above about ammolites being a kind of tektites. I notice that the ammonites are said to be found in shale, which I think is solidified mud [via electrical processes].Ammolite is approximately 70 million years old and is formed from a rare, mineralized fossil called an ammonite. Ammonites looked like giant Chambered Nautilus shells.
* I agree that it sounds like underground lightning formed the quartz veins. There are great images of gold and quartz here:he said that they would follow a vein of gold through undisturbed quartz rock. There would be this thin thread of gold ore running for thousands of feet, twisting and branching. All that sounds like lightning flowing through rock rather than water transporting gold.
That's where things get interesting.Lloyd wrote: * Allyn, I think it may be possible to simplify your electron shell analysis for the larger elements. It's generally the outer shells that change, so I think you should be able to confine the analysis to those shells, or the ones that change the most.
Yeah, that's what gets me in trouble, I've only seen animations of the proton neutron dance on PBS. I can't find links to references or the videos. I think it was NOVA or Elegant Universe, but I can't find it in the book, so I'll have to watch the DVDs again.Lloyd wrote: * Allyn, I think you stated yesterday that neutrons decay at the normal rate of about 15 minutes inside a nucleus, just as they do outside. And you added that the electron given off by the neutron is immediately captured by the adjacent proton, which proton then becomes a neutron, while the first neutron becomes a proton.
* Are there any sources from which you got this idea? Or can you provide further explanation about why this idea is likely to be true?
* For small atoms, there's an average of one neutron for each proton. For larger atoms, there is about 1.5 neutrons for each proton. That means for every 2 protons there are 3 neutrons. This may suggest that for small atoms the nucleons pair up as proton-neutron pairs, while for larger atoms nucleons divide into groups of 2 protons and 3 neutrons.
That's exactly what my Dad would say.Had a guided tour through the Central Deborah Gold Mine while at Bendigo, a very interesting tour!! This quartz seam is just what the gold miners are looking for when mining for gold. No quartz, no gold!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests