tayga wrote:tholden wrote:The largest sauropods ... died out no more than a few thousand years ago.
I thought they are supposed to have died out 60 million years ago. Am I mistaken?
Yes.
tayga wrote:tholden wrote:The largest sauropods ... died out no more than a few thousand years ago.
I thought they are supposed to have died out 60 million years ago. Am I mistaken?
tayga wrote:tholden wrote:The largest sauropods ... died out no more than a few thousand years ago.
I thought they are supposed to have died out 60 million years ago. Am I mistaken?
* If Z-pinches were strong enough during proto-Saturn flares, which Cardona says there were many of, Earth would have changed shape numerous times. It's hard to imagine how that would have produced the current shapes of continents and ocean basins. It's more complex than the other theories we've been dealing with. But it seems very promising.
* The TB team and others were discussing the possibility in the Thoth email newsletter years ago that Earth had been egg-shaped in the past and that changing from that to spherical caused the continental movements etc. And now Fred has given a plausible means of getting the Earth to be egg-shaped. The theory used to be that Earth was close enough to Saturn at least for a while that it developed a huge tidal bulge. But a Z-pinch squeeze seems more likely to produce that shape. I don't see any moons of planets that are egg-shaped, so tidal forces don't seem likely to be enough.
* Fred said in the earlier post that the Z-pinch also made Earth spin much faster and that's what reduced the effect of gravity, so dinosaurs could reach huge sizes.
Does that mean that humans used to have horns in the past as in the pictures? Or could it be that most of those "dinosaurs" are horses in dress, armour etc.tholden wrote:tayga wrote:tholden wrote:The largest sauropods ... died out no more than a few thousand years ago.
I thought they are supposed to have died out 60 million years ago. Am I mistaken?
Try this for starters:
http://bearfabrique.org/Dinoglyphs/dinoglyphs.html
And most likely the hoax it was orignally admitted to being.tholden wrote:Also interesting would be google searches on 'ica stones'.
Does that mean that humans used to have horns in the past as in the pictures? Or could it be that most of those "dinosaurs" are horses in dress, armour etc.
Also interesting would be google searches on 'ica stones'.
And most likely the hoax it was orignally admitted to being.



Really? What about this...tholden wrote:Again no modern animal has dorsal spikes as the glyph shows.
Then what are these (cut from the 4th image from your link)?tholden wrote:There are no horned humans in any image which I have ever posted on any internet forum.
Aardwolf wrote:Really? What about this...tholden wrote:Again no modern animal has dorsal spikes as the glyph shows.
or this...
Then what are these (cut from the 4th image from your link)?tholden wrote:There are no horned humans in any image which I have ever posted on any internet forum.
Fred said: No, I hadn't looked closely at comets, but now that you mention it... Anyway, comets seem more to be in Wal Thornhill's expertise. ... My own focus has been on planetary bodies worthy of the name which could be distorted by the MHD polar column.
- Fred said: ... Evidence of a north polar bulge would tend to support [my] hypothesis, which would merely mean that the Earth is still settling down after the last "shape-shifting" excursion. Without any definite confirmation, I won't go any further than that.
- As mentioned earlier, the inversion from prolate to oblate form would have been a somewhat sedate damped oscillation, primarily because of the viscosity of the underlying magma, and which could have eradicated much of the polar extension. Now, understand that these are all mechanical effects, analogous to but separate and distinct from electromagnetic phenomena.
Fred
LLOYD: Page 466—The Arctic Ocean contains four depressions holding large volumes of sediment. If the sediment were deposited by tidal waves, other depressions, like Hudson's Bay and the Black, Caspian and Baltic Seas, should also have filled with sediment. The Eurasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean was caused by a tidal bulge of subcrustal magma and a collapse of the crust.
CARDONA: It is the entire Arctic area that was uplifted in a tidal bulge. The Eurasian Basin itself is a *REG[IO]NAL* collapsed area that once occupied that bulge.
LLOYD: Why didn't the magma pile up on the ocean floor and fill the Arctic Ocean?
CARDONA: Because, as explained in the text on that same page, material was removed in that area from Earth's lower mantle.
LLOYD: A swirling vortex of magma was detected 3,000 km under the North Pole.
CARDONA: That's right.
But you didn't draw the image did you. And the artist didn't label it so you don't know if the drawing is of a lizard or not. Those spikes certianly look more like lizard spikes than stegasaurus spikes. You would need explain exactly why its clearly not a drawing of a small creature. Is there a scale? A description? There's also a snake drawn underneath. Dinosaur snake?tholden wrote:I clearly was not talking about lizards or any other small animals and the creature you see on that canyon wall at Massinaw is clearly not a lizard or any sort of small animal.
Here's the link embedded in your quote;tholden wrote:That image simply does not exist on Bearfabrique and I have no recollection of ever posting it anywhere. Could you give me some sort of a url or something to jog my memory??
4th image down just as I stated immediately to the right of Dr Don Patton's hand. I guess they are dinosaur humans.tholden wrote:tayga wrote:tholden wrote:The largest sauropods ... died out no more than a few thousand years ago.
I thought they are supposed to have died out 60 million years ago. Am I mistaken?
Try this for starters:
http://bearfabrique.org/Dinoglyphs/dinoglyphs.html
Also interesting would be google searches on 'ica stones'.
Aardwolf wrote:...4th image down just as I stated immediately to the right of Dr Don Patton's hand. I guess they are dinosaur humans.
And there is no reason why the "dinosaurs" can't be horses with armour or ceremonial dress etc. There are many cultures which put garments on its animals.tholden wrote:Aardwolf wrote:...4th image down just as I stated immediately to the right of Dr Don Patton's hand. I guess they are dinosaur humans.
Or humans with hats or head-dresses on...
starbiter wrote:While stumbling through the desert i've seen tracks from creatures similar to the images Ted thinks are dinos. ...
michael
starbiter wrote:
The above tracks are from a large herbivore with round feet. Also North of Moab UT.
michael
Return to Electric Universe - Planetary Science
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests