Uranus explosion

[seasmith]

onthehook » Wed Dec 28, 2011 6:14 am

Do certain harmonic frequencies charge Ions, like just happened in our solar system?

In the case of Uranus and Neptune, I think we have planets intersecting the solar field after the stabilization of Jupiter and Saturn. Their orbital distance is therefore not determined only by the field of the sun. If they had predated Jupiter, they would have settled lower than him. As it is their orbital distances are determined by an additive field of sun+Jupiter+Saturn. Uranus and Neptune aren’t orbiting the sun as much as they are orbiting the trio. Newer small planets suffer the same fate. They cannot find a place under Jupiter, so they accumulate only above Neptune, in various levels of the Kuiper belt.
...It is undeniable that an E/M field allows for various levels of orbit. And it is undeniable that a study of intersecting E/M fields should help to explain the motions of bodies within those fields. It is my belief that the E/M fields within the solar system are a much richer source of information on orbital distances than so-called gravitational fields.

http://milesmathis.com/third5.html

[onthehook]

I like that.
And also the 4d Energy to Matter ratio around each planet.

[seasmith]

Not guilty.


http://milesmathis.com/water2.pdf

[onthehook]

Much better explanation than mine, there may be better words than Energy potential to Mass Potential, I almost look at it like echoes of the future, that as time goes by the Suns mass increases and Energy decreases - kind of like a footprint out of 4d. That probably makes no sense either but that's kind of my mental picture.
I'm just here to treat the wood, you all have to build the barn and buy me beer.

[onthehook]

Is there a relationship between a planets speed of axis rotation and its energetic state? what do the differences between orbital rotation speeds add to the equation? What about the composition of Earth, layers of differing electrically conductive materials? How does the atmosphere act as a charge separator? How would the differing densities from space to core effect the equation? All questions today, ha ha.
So does increased charge equate to increased density, I think that was answered earlier. But that may also work the other way as far as generation of charge.
At what point does it reach infinite energy and density? And how would core size differ between the Earth and Sun?

[onthehook]

If what Seasmith says about the plasma balls is true, than why is it not true for the planets? why is not the energy and density at the core of the earth not a ratio of energy and mass from the sun, why not all the planets?, and the sun a mirror and focus to the planets as far as energy and focus of density?
Or just differentiation of what energy is, a standing wave that changes frequency as time?
Each snowflake on every blade of grass on every world as part of the power of every sun infinitely. If infinite mass was equal to nothing, if infinite energy was equal to nothing, that would make them the same thing. Only by differentiation can you experience what you are as a whole.

[nick c]

Moderator note

This thread is in the "Electric Universe - Planetary Science" board, the topic is a recently observed disruption in the atmosphere of Uranus. Posts on this thread should be in some way connected to that topic.
Off topic ramblings about the pyramids, alchemy, etc. do not belong on this board or in this thread. There are other areas of the forum for discussion of such topics.
Please, let's make an effort to keep this thread (to a reasonable degree) on topic.
If there is a topic that anyone wishes to discuss, please put your post in the appropriate thread, or make a new thread and place it in the appropriate board.

Thanks,
Nick

[onthehook]

Yeah, didn't really mean to spread it out like that, just the way it worked. Hard to find a decent place to post new idea's, but I will stop. Anyway, thanks for listening to my rambling, the race is on for a better world (all around the world)