Metabunk discussion
- Zyxzevn
- Posts: 1002
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Metabunk discussion
There is not much discussion there.
As usual skeptics are just stating that it is pseudo-science... pfff.
As usual skeptics are just stating that it is pseudo-science... pfff.
More ** from zyxzevn at: Paradigm change and C@
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:29 pm
Re: Metabunk discussion
I think there is an opportunity to make some impact there.Zyxzevn wrote:There is not much discussion there.
As usual skeptics are just stating that it is pseudo-science... pfff.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:29 pm
Re: Metabunk discussion
psi wrote:I think there is an opportunity to make some impact there.Zyxzevn wrote:There is not much discussion there.
As usual skeptics are just stating that it is pseudo-science... pfff.
Or we could just all stay in our silos.
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:41 pm
Re: Metabunk discussion
The link lead me to a login screen, but found their forum...
I only read through a few threads, but kinda agree with Zyxzevn.
The thread "Tesla was overrated" was sad.
He did make some valid points, but it's hard to avoid the bias when the OP (an admin) repeatedly referenced links to the "edisontechcenter" site...
a bit like asking for an honest assessment of socialism from the Communist party.
I only read through a few threads, but kinda agree with Zyxzevn.
The thread "Tesla was overrated" was sad.
He did make some valid points, but it's hard to avoid the bias when the OP (an admin) repeatedly referenced links to the "edisontechcenter" site...
a bit like asking for an honest assessment of socialism from the Communist party.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests