I'm having trouble reconciling this statement from the TPOD listed in the subject.Since stars can be thought of as the foci for immense energies from the galaxies in which they live, their activities cannot be based on whether they possess a certain mass. Instead, they are externally powered objects: they are bodies formed electromagnetically where gigantic plasma filaments have squeezed matter in what is called a “z-pinch.” Electric fields are where the seeds of supernovae are planted.
If stars energies are only governed by the power of the Birkland Currents driving them, and their activities are not based on the mass they possess, is there no correlation between a stars mass and the energies it is capable of storing?
Is a blue giant no more energetic than a red dwarf?
Perhaps the mass of stars is related to the size and power of the Birkland Currents creating them?
Thanks,
Eutrophicated1