Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:25 am
Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang
Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang (theory of how the universe came to be)? I don't see a reason for why both can not happen at the same time. There would be no vortex, swirl, plasma if there are no bang. The thinking of plasma materialize out of nowhere is weird. However, both contradict law of conservation.
- D_Archer
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang
Plasma cosmology has no theoretical beginning, the universe is of an unknown age and extent.
vs
Big Bang has a theoretical beginning, the universe has a known age and is limited in extent.
There could not be more difference, the theories are not reconcilable.
Regards,
Daniel
vs
Big Bang has a theoretical beginning, the universe has a known age and is limited in extent.
There could not be more difference, the theories are not reconcilable.
Regards,
Daniel
- Shoot Forth Thunder -
-
- Posts: 3517
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm
Re: Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang
The big bang model is nonsense. Red shift theory has been falsified, and that takes big bang down with it.
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests