SRĐAN mathematics
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am
SRĐAN mathematics
I will present you a math composed of only two basis (natural and realistic basis)
Current mathematics (CM.)
Natural Base
-natural straight line the main axiom, its beginning or end point and natural straight line a defined length and with two points
NOTATION - natural straight line (lower case), points (capital letters or numbers (when specified point uploads metric (such as the number line))) -natural gaps negation natural straight line , natural emptiness and emptiness is defined with two points
NOTATION - natural gaps (small underlined letter) -basic rule merger - natural straight line and natural gaps are connected only points
-basic set - all possibilities defined theorem
(CM.)does not know the natural straight line , point is not defined, knows no natural gap, is not defined by basic set
Current mathematics (CM.)
Natural Base
-natural straight line the main axiom, its beginning or end point and natural straight line a defined length and with two points
NOTATION - natural straight line (lower case), points (capital letters or numbers (when specified point uploads metric (such as the number line))) -natural gaps negation natural straight line , natural emptiness and emptiness is defined with two points
NOTATION - natural gaps (small underlined letter) -basic rule merger - natural straight line and natural gaps are connected only points
-basic set - all possibilities defined theorem
(CM.)does not know the natural straight line , point is not defined, knows no natural gap, is not defined by basic set
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
Theorem - Natural straight line (natural gap) are connected in the direction of the points AB (0.1)
PROOF - straight line (gaps) b (\underline{b}) -defined AC (0,2) - straight line (gaps) c (\underline{c}) -defined AD (0,3) ...
infinite one way straight line (one way infinite gaps) \infty(\underline{\infty}) defined A\infty(0, \infty) (CM.) - straight line (not from the natural basis), there is gaps, a one-way infinite straight line the (semi-line (not from natural base)), one-way infinite gaps does not exist
http://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php - latex read , red letters
PROOF - straight line (gaps) b (\underline{b}) -defined AC (0,2) - straight line (gaps) c (\underline{c}) -defined AD (0,3) ...
infinite one way straight line (one way infinite gaps) \infty(\underline{\infty}) defined A\infty(0, \infty) (CM.) - straight line (not from the natural basis), there is gaps, a one-way infinite straight line the (semi-line (not from natural base)), one-way infinite gaps does not exist
http://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php - latex read , red letters
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
Theorem - there is a relationship between the points 0 and all points one-way infinite straight line(one-way infinite gaps) including points 0
PROOF - relationship points 0 points 0 and the number 0 -relationship points 0 points 1 and the number 1 (\underline{1}) -relationship points 0 points 2 and the number 2 (\underline{2}) ...
basic set of natural numbers N^o=\{0 , 1 , 2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,...\}
basic set of natural numbers gaps N_p^o=\{0 , \underline{1} ,\underline{2} ,\underline{3} ,\underline{4} ,\underline{5} ,...\}
(CM.) - natural numbers are given as an axiom, there is no natural gaps numbers (there is this form, but do not call numbers (\{0,0\}\cup\{a,a\} a\in N)
PROOF - relationship points 0 points 0 and the number 0 -relationship points 0 points 1 and the number 1 (\underline{1}) -relationship points 0 points 2 and the number 2 (\underline{2}) ...
basic set of natural numbers N^o=\{0 , 1 , 2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,...\}
basic set of natural numbers gaps N_p^o=\{0 , \underline{1} ,\underline{2} ,\underline{3} ,\underline{4} ,\underline{5} ,...\}
(CM.) - natural numbers are given as an axiom, there is no natural gaps numbers (there is this form, but do not call numbers (\{0,0\}\cup\{a,a\} a\in N)
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
Theorem - natural numbers and natural numbers gaps can be connected in the direction AB (0.1)
PROOF - Number 1 and number \ underline {1} receives the combined number of 1\ underline {1} or dup (]duž , praznina ) -Number \ underline {1} and number 1 [/color] receives the combined number of \ underline {1}1 or dup -Number 1 and number \ underline {2} receives the combined number of 1\ underline {2} or dup - A basic set of combined natural numbers K^o=(a_n,\underline{b}_n,a_n\in{N^o},\underline{b}_n\in{N_p^o},(a_n,\underline{b}_n)>0)
a_1\underline{b}_1
a_1\underline{b}_1
\underline{b}_1a_1
a_1\underline{b}_1a_1
\underline{b}_1a_1\underline{b}_2
...
(CM.) - Dup do not know, not know the combined numbers (there is this form, but not numbers \{0,a\}\cup\{c,c\},\{0,0\}\cup\{a,b\},\{0,b\}\cup\{c,d\},\{0,0\}\cup\{a,b\}\cup\{c,c\},...
PROOF - Number 1 and number \ underline {1} receives the combined number of 1\ underline {1} or dup (]duž , praznina ) -Number \ underline {1} and number 1 [/color] receives the combined number of \ underline {1}1 or dup -Number 1 and number \ underline {2} receives the combined number of 1\ underline {2} or dup - A basic set of combined natural numbers K^o=(a_n,\underline{b}_n,a_n\in{N^o},\underline{b}_n\in{N_p^o},(a_n,\underline{b}_n)>0)
a_1\underline{b}_1
a_1\underline{b}_1
\underline{b}_1a_1
a_1\underline{b}_1a_1
\underline{b}_1a_1\underline{b}_2
...
(CM.) - Dup do not know, not know the combined numbers (there is this form, but not numbers \{0,a\}\cup\{c,c\},\{0,0\}\cup\{a,b\},\{0,b\}\cup\{c,d\},\{0,0\}\cup\{a,b\}\cup\{c,c\},...
-
- Posts: 2815
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
SRDAN Math
msbijanica, what does it do ?
Could you please solve a sample problem with it here, that current math can't solve ?
thank you, s
msbijanica, what does it do ?
Could you please solve a sample problem with it here, that current math can't solve ?
thank you, s
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
3 ? 5=5seasmith wrote:SRDAN Math
msbijanica, what does it do ?
Could you please solve a sample problem with it here, that current math can't solve ?
thank you, s
3 ? 5=6
3 ? 5=7
3 ?5 =8
that the calculation operations between 3 and 5 ?
current math would say that it can not except 3+5=8 , , because there are different forms of addition , so go slowly to see how things are connected (not by the axioms)
-
- Posts: 2815
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
~
i see now
thank you
⌘
i see now
thank you
⌘
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
Theorem - Two numbers have contact, their condition is described counts of first number
PROOF - number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 0
3^{\underline{0}}2 - number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 1
3^{\underline{1}}2 - number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 2
3^{\underline{2}}2 - number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 3
3^{\underline{3}}2 (CM.) - Knows no contact numbers
PROOF - number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 0
3^{\underline{0}}2 - number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 1
3^{\underline{1}}2 - number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 2
3^{\underline{2}}2 - number 3 and number 2 have a contact at point 3
3^{\underline{3}}2 (CM.) - Knows no contact numbers
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
Theorem - The contact numbers is sorted horizontally to be the only one natural straight line that gives a natural straight line
PROOF - 1\rightarrow 1 4{+_1^{\underline0}}2=2
4{+_1^{\underline1}}2=(1,1)
4{+_1^{\underline2}}2=2
4{+_1^{\underline3}}2=(3,1)
4{+_1^{\underline4}}2=6 or 4+2=6
+1 - addition rule 1
(CM.) - There are no "addition rule 1" only when the contact point number, the axiom
PROOF - 1\rightarrow 1 4{+_1^{\underline0}}2=2
4{+_1^{\underline1}}2=(1,1)
4{+_1^{\underline2}}2=2
4{+_1^{\underline3}}2=(3,1)
4{+_1^{\underline4}}2=6 or 4+2=6
+1 - addition rule 1
(CM.) - There are no "addition rule 1" only when the contact point number, the axiom
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
Theorem - The contact numbers is sorted horizontally to be the only one natural straight line that gives a natural straight line , when there are two (more) results between them becomes a gap.
PROOF -[tex]1\rightarrow1(\underline{1})[/tex] 4{+_2^{\underline0}}2=2
4{+_2^{\underline1}}2=1\underline{2}1
4{+_2^{\underline2}}2=2
4{+_2^{\underline3}}2=3\underline{1}1
4{+_2^{\underline4}}2=6
+2 - addition rule 2
(CM.) - No "addition rule 2"
PROOF -[tex]1\rightarrow1(\underline{1})[/tex] 4{+_2^{\underline0}}2=2
4{+_2^{\underline1}}2=1\underline{2}1
4{+_2^{\underline2}}2=2
4{+_2^{\underline3}}2=3\underline{1}1
4{+_2^{\underline4}}2=6
+2 - addition rule 2
(CM.) - No "addition rule 2"
-
- Posts: 2815
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
~
Do your "natural lines" eventually prescribe a whole space ?
~
Will there be also vertical and 'thru-screen' lines, to come in this extended proof ?msbiljanica » Mon Apr 27
Theorem - The contact numbers is sorted horizontally to be the only one natural straight line that gives a natural straight line , ...
Do your "natural lines" eventually prescribe a whole space ?
~
-
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 8:29 am
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
What does SRDAN mathematics have to do with plasma cosmology? (serious question, I'm not dismissing your ideas).
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:26 am
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
no vertical , not natural but real (when we get to them) describe spaceseasmith wrote: Will there be also vertical and 'thru-screen' lines, to come in this extended proof ?
Do your "natural lines" eventually prescribe a whole space ?
~
mathematics and physics are the basic science, mathematics should only intelligence (I believe that the current mathematics is limited, a consequence of the large number of axioms) except for Physics intelligence requires great amounts of money, has to do with plasma cosmologywillendure wrote:What does SRDAN mathematics have to do with plasma cosmology? (serious question, I'm not dismissing your ideas).
-
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 8:29 am
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
Are you saying that physics would be more natural if it were based on a different mathematics?msbiljanica wrote:no vertical , not natural but real (when we get to them) describe spaceseasmith wrote: Will there be also vertical and 'thru-screen' lines, to come in this extended proof ?
Do your "natural lines" eventually prescribe a whole space ?
~
mathematics and physics are the basic science, mathematics should only intelligence (I believe that the current mathematics is limited, a consequence of the large number of axioms) except for Physics intelligence requires great amounts of money, has to do with plasma cosmologywillendure wrote:What does SRDAN mathematics have to do with plasma cosmology? (serious question, I'm not dismissing your ideas).
I've heard of Quaternions being useful in some areas of physics.
-
- Posts: 2815
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm
Re: SRĐAN mathematics
Do you know of anybody who actually uses that byzantine math ?I've heard of Quaternions being useful in some areas of physics.
Now that the "imaginary" [sq. rt. -1] of Maxwell/Heaviside equations is commonly recognized to represent actual electric space,
a versor algebra is being developed to much more easily handle electric power transitions.
`
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests