Bubbles Orbiting Charged Needle Electric Gravity Experiment
- spark
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:36 am
Bubbles Orbiting Charged Needle Electric Gravity Experiment
https://www.youtube.com/embed/1380BSYXaoc
This NASA experiment would make sense in electric universe as stars and planets are highly electrically charged bodies in space and that electric charge causes stars, planets and moons to orbit each other.
This NASA experiment would make sense in electric universe as stars and planets are highly electrically charged bodies in space and that electric charge causes stars, planets and moons to orbit each other.
- paladin17
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:47 am
- Location: Minsk, Belarus
Re: Bubbles Orbiting Charged Needle Electric Gravity Experim
Does your idea imply that the charge of celestial bodies almost doesn't change with time?
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:33 am
Re: Bubbles Orbiting Charged Needle Electric Gravity Experim
Gerald Pollack would hav lots to say here, re the 4th phase of water, & charge on droplets. Gerald would point out that they should hav suddenly shone a strong light (or IR) on a droplet, which would hav suddenly increased the layer of EZ water, & suddenly increased the droplets charge, & suddenly increased its attraction to the needle. Alltho praps the Faraday effect is paramount here (dunno).spark wrote:https://www.youtube.com/embed/1380BSYXaoc
This NASA experiment would make sense in electric universe as stars and planets are highly electrically charged bodies in space and that electric charge causes stars, planets and moons to orbit each other.
And the helical orbit would of course be helped by the Lorentz force & the righthand rule etc (don't quote me)(i failed physics).
- paladin17
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:47 am
- Location: Minsk, Belarus
Re: Bubbles Orbiting Charged Needle Electric Gravity Experim
Layer of EZ water forms at a hydrophilic surface. The surface between air and water is not hydrophilic. Ergo, no EZ water there.crawler wrote:Gerald Pollack would hav lots to say here, re the 4th phase of water, & charge on droplets. Gerald would point out that they should hav suddenly shone a strong light (or IR) on a droplet, which would hav suddenly increased the layer of EZ water, & suddenly increased the droplets charge, & suddenly increased its attraction to the needle. Alltho praps the Faraday effect is paramount here (dunno).spark wrote:https://www.youtube.com/embed/1380BSYXaoc
This NASA experiment would make sense in electric universe as stars and planets are highly electrically charged bodies in space and that electric charge causes stars, planets and moons to orbit each other.
And the helical orbit would of course be helped by the Lorentz force & the righthand rule etc (don't quote me)(i failed physics).
Plus, EZ water produces charge separation between water phases, but their total charge doesn't change.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:31 pm
Re: Bubbles Orbiting Charged Needle Electric Gravity Experim
sorry this may be plain false. jerry does think that the high surface tension of water is due to EZ zone an the air water boundary, i heard him reporting in QandA after a reading somewhere in 2019 i think....paladin17 wrote: Layer of EZ water forms at a hydrophilic surface. The surface between air and water is not hydrophilic. Ergo, no EZ water there.
Plus, EZ water produces charge separation between water phases, but their total charge doesn't change.
- paladin17
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:47 am
- Location: Minsk, Belarus
Re: Bubbles Orbiting Charged Needle Electric Gravity Experim
I might be wrong, but "I heard someone say" is not a good argument for me to change my mind at the moment. Some studies should be referenced.hlg wrote:sorry this may be plain false. jerry does think that the high surface tension of water is due to EZ zone an the air water boundary, i heard him reporting in QandA after a reading somewhere in 2019 i think....paladin17 wrote: Layer of EZ water forms at a hydrophilic surface. The surface between air and water is not hydrophilic. Ergo, no EZ water there.
Plus, EZ water produces charge separation between water phases, but their total charge doesn't change.
The only recent relevant study (to the problem we're discussing) did not claim anything even closely similar to that. In fact, it claimed that positive ions from the air actually disrupt EZ water formation.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests