Tesla, Hutchinson Effect, Directed Energy and Dr. Judy Wood

[mathew]

Hello All,
Thought this footage of internal steel building columns turning to dust may interest some.

CNN:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goGGQhhTcDY
NBC:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Sv0My2zfFA

The future of science is here now. Dr. Judy Wood has compiled a massive database of EVIDENCE:
http://www.drjudywood.com/

Take some time and familiarize yourself with longitudinal wave effects, field effects, "toasted cars"
and continuing degradation of materials. also consider-



That is the bottom lobby wall of the building- should this be crushed?
Towers of Dust:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPJUP-Ry7d0

So what could possibly have caused such MASSIVE destruction?

[solrey]

So what could possibly have caused such MASSIVE destruction?

Controlled demolition. Specifically cutting charges on the core columns and floor joists with shaped charges to pulverize the concrete floor slabs. I was a demolition specialist in the army reserves so I have some background in that area of expertise. Matthew, I suggest you check out the information available on Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.

This conjecture of directed energy weapons used on 911 (or mini-nukes or holographic planes, etc.) does nothing but serve to discredit legitimate professional association 911 truth groups like architects & engineers, pilots, military officers, firefighters, scholars and so on. Posting that nonsense on TB forum serves to discredit EU theory as well.
on both counts.

Those "toasted" cars were vehicles that had been stripped and torched by criminal types, a common occurance in NYC, and were sitting in a salvage lot a few blocks from the WTC complex. Can't find the link right now but this has been researched and proven to be true. The damage to those vehicles has nothing whatever to do with 911. Ever been to NYC and seen bumper to bumper stripped and torched cars lining the parking lanes along certain post-apocalyptic streets?

Those ground floor perimeter columns in that pic aren't crushed, they were fabricated that way. The only noticeable damage to them is some detachment to a small sections of the aluminum cladding, the windows between the columns are gone and there's a pile of debris from 110 stories of building falling around them, but otherwise they seem relatively unscathed. Why do you think they appear crushed? Because of their unusual shape? That would be due to architectural flair.

Pay attention and look closely at that footage of the columns allegedly "turning to dust". They just fall straight down mostly, like they were severed at the bottom and the motion shook off the remaining asbestos coating and the dusting of pulverized concrete that had collected on them during the collapse.

The un-reacted nano-thermite, iron microspheres, lateral ejections, sulfated steel, steel cut at specific angles and dozens of eyewitness accounts of several different explosions occuring before the collapse of either tower can only be explained by controlled demolitions.

[GaryN]

Hey Mathew. The videos showing that steel spire just turn to dust and blow away just confirm that this was indeed something to do with the Hutchison effect. I believe an EMP device was used, and for a short while the whole of the steel core became resonant, a big antenna sort of. There is something very fundamental we are missing in the electro-magnetic sciences, some phase relationship of the known fields perhaps, that causes this loosening of the bonds keeping things 'solid'. Very clever stuff, some very impressive engineering, and an almost flawless execution. Shame to see it put to such evil use.

[GaryN]

Hi Solrey,
I'm certainly not going to question your expertise in demolition, and I agree conventional, though highly advanced explosives were part of the operation. Building 7 appears to be a classic demolition, but it was a more conventional structure. 1 and 2 were quite different, and I just can't imagine those central columns, even if you could cut them all with thermate/ite not leaving a huge 'pick-up-sticks' pile, many stories high. Thermal imaging of the site showed high temperatures for weeks, and someone calculated that an impossibly high amount of thermate would have been needed to produce steel melting on such a scale. And the kicker for me will always be those huge I beams bent like pretzels with no deformity of the inner or outer edges. I've done quite a bit of forge work, bent lots of hot steel, no way that could be achieved on such huge beams without deforming them.
I'll take your word on abandoned, stripped cars, but what happened to this fire engine? The front is wilted, the engine block has melted. There was more going on than conventional explosives, IMO.


http://chazzsongs911.blogspot.com/2007/ ... m-wtc.html

[kevin]

Solrey,
With respect.
I would have thought that an EU theory will explain what occured to the buildings that day.
I suspect multiple red herring methods were employed to create dead end pathways that just compound the ease at which all theories can be ridiculed, but.
That but is not only at the core of those buildings turning to dust, but is also at the core of understanding how universe operates.
Once We puzzle either one, then both puzzles will be solved, imho.
Kevin

[Jarvamundo]

cmon, that steel spire fell, it did not 'turn to dust'.

EU and PC is built from real world industrially verified physics, and from professional engineers. And so on that note...

Everything Solrey said +1

[mathew]

[AndrewDJohnson]

Those "toasted" cars were vehicles that had been stripped and torched by criminal types, a common occurance in NYC, and were sitting in a salvage lot a few blocks from the WTC complex. Can't find the link right now but this has been researched and proven to be true. The damage to those vehicles has nothing whatever to do with 911. Ever been to NYC and seen bumper to bumper stripped and torched cars lining the parking lanes along certain post-apocalyptic streets? .

You can't find the link? I don't think you have one because what you say is not true!

Anyway, why on earth would someone torch a car near the WTC on or just after 911? It makes no sense!

And don't forget this, will you? http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/

Microspheres in the dust? Perhaps it wasn't anything to do with "nanothermite" - evidence suggests otherwise, but not necessarily evidence from where you might expect.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RymiQDgXoe0

Don't forget Steve Jones' conntection to Los Alamos - where they developed the Atomic Bomb originally - and Steve Jones' work in cold fusion (his name for it apparently) - another energy phenomenon.

Glad to see some people working it out here - but please re-consider what happened to WTC 7.

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/WTC7a.html

[AndrewDJohnson]

Oh, and if people want to see Dr Judy and myself, they could do worse than watch this....

http://www.blip.tv/file/3281141

Thanks matthew for starting the thread on this very important topic...

[solrey]

cmon, that steel spire fell, it did not 'turn to dust'.

EU and PC is built from real world industrially verified physics, and from professional engineers.

Exactly. And that would be my response to Kevin.

Here's a video clearly showing the dust covered "spire" falling.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaysznxC ... re=related

Matthew, that third picture clearly shows the top of the "spire" much lower than the first two pics. The dust covering the spire hung in the air a bit as the spire fell. The WTC towers had six stories of sublevels or at least sixty feet of space below ground level for that spire to fall into.

GaryN, you might want to check your sources. This chazzsongs blogger lists their occupation as musician and teacher. Perhaps a music teacher? Regardless, they don't know what they're talking about.

what happened to this fire engine? The front is wilted, the engine block has melted.

chazzsongs says "A FDMY Hazmat truck in front of WTC6 on West Street." and "The upper part of the cab is gone and the engine block seems to have disappeared."


That would be a FDNY aerial ladder truck, apparently "Ladder 3". The front cab of that truck and the end of the ladder were crushed and bent by falling debris. The engine is not even located in front of the drivers cab, it's closer to the middle in front of the rear wheels I think, depending on make and model. The engine block didn't disappear, it was never in front of the cab to begin with.

Ladder 3 on a better day. Note the drivers position is at the very front like a rear engined bus, with no room for a nearly 500hp diesel engine attached to a transmission, water and hydraulic pumps.


Ladder 3 having a bad day.



A paper dismantling Judy Woods "hypothesis".
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volu ... enkins.pdf

As Dr. James Fetzer suggests, Dr. Judy Wood may be unable to provide answers to basic questions regarding her own speculative hypothesis. However, this paper does quantitatively analyze those issues raised during the interview as well as address other evidence advanced by Dr. Judy Wood and others that the WTC towers may have been destroyed by directed energy weapons. The following arguments will prove that the degree of implausibility places the hypothesis squarely in the realm of the impossible.

@andrewdjohnson.

You can't find the link? I don't think you have one because what you say is not true!
Anyway, why on earth would someone torch a car near the WTC on or just after 911? It makes no sense!

Are you accusing me of being dishonest or making stuff up just because I can't find a link that I apparently forgot to bookmark a long time ago?
Cars are stripped and/or torched in NYC every day. Have you even been there? I've seen curbs lined bumper to bumper with stripped/torched vehicles, much like the vehicles along FDR actually.
http://ny.curbed.com/tags/toasted-cars

I was talking about this parking lot, actually a salvage lot where stripped/torched cars were towed/stored and they were there in that same condition, minus the WTC dust, prior to 911. Notice how close those cars are parked to each other and they're all facing the same direction (except the back row against the wall), just like a salvage lot.

Oh, and if people want to see Dr Judy and myself, they could do worse than watch this....

andrewdjohnson, sounds like a troll who pushes this Judy Wood nonsense in every single comment he's posted on this forum. Is he even interested in EU theory or did he just come here to spam the forum with his nonsense, solrey asks the mods...hint, hint.

Thanks matthew for starting the thread on this very important topic...

Thanks for working to discredit both 911truth and EU theory by starting this thread.

x2

I want the casual reader to understand that Judy Woods 911 directed energy hypothesis is not endorsed by either the professional association 911truth groups or by the Thunderbolts group.

[GaryN]

I would have thought that an EU theory will explain what occured to the buildings that day.

That's what I was thinking Kevin. Someone has knowledge of EM principles that are outside of
accepted science. When you overdrive an antenna, you end up with odd harmonic spikes in the
near field patterns, and it is these unpredictable and, even to the perpetrators, uncontrollable
spikes that I believe caused the odd effects, parts melting or burning while nearby parts were untouched. The nature of these EM effects demonstrate to me that there is something we are
missing in our full understanding of the universal forces.

@solrey:

The front cab of that truck and the end of the ladder were crushed and bent by falling debris.

So where is the debris? I doubt they would take the time to attend to their injured truck
with so much more important stuff to do that day.

The WTC towers had six stories of sublevels or at least sixty feet of space below ground level for that spire to fall into.

Wouldn't those 6 stories be pretty full of debris already? I probably don't need to inform you,
but in a demolition the rubble pile usually is 10-12% the height of the original structure,
which means there should have been about 13 stories of rubble. There were less than 3. A lot of stuff went missing, ended up as dust floating over NY. Have you aver seen so much dust from a
gravity only collapse? And the molten steel? Impossible from my understanding of physics.

I think this whole subject is interesting from another aspect too, the fact that so many
people can all look at the same evidence, and come up with so many different opinions. It
involves perception, reasoning, logic, scientific knowledge, and consciousness. Perhaps we
may never understand the event, but it might help us understand ourselves. If the thread
isn't locked down.

[kevin]

GaryN,
Here's a way out thought, I admit,
Suppose You could go back in time and cause an event that would enable Yourself in a past life to better comprehend the universe?
And of course You would fully realise that nobody ever dies, as such.
How would You enable Yourself to comprehend universe?
Kevin

[solrey]

Why do some people feel the need to drag EU theory into just about every wack theory that happens to involve electromagnetism? No wonder EU advocates are constantly having to get over the credibility hurdle in discussions on other forums.

How could the same directed energy weapon produce two entirely different kinds of collapse between the twin towers and building 7? That's easy to explain with controlled demolition because the different designs of the buildings would dictate different styles of demolition. The tall overbuilt twin towers would have to be shredded while building 7 only needed a more standard implosion. Building 7 was a classic controlled implosion. There is no evidence of missing debris from the twin towers. The pile wasn't as high as would be expected from an implosion because a different style of demolition was necessary for the twin towers which produced a debris field much larger than the buildings footprint.

The debris that hit the truck could be anywhere, on the other side, down the street to the right...I mean that's a pretty narrow field of view in that pic and the debris would likely have hit at an angle. Hanging off the back of the truck I do see what looks like a piece of aluminum cladding that covered the perimeter columns. Hmmmm, think that might give us a clue that the debris might be related to perimeter columns?

If the thread isn't locked down.

That's not what I'm advocating. I was pointing out that andrewdjohnson only appears on this forum pushing a single agenda, whenever the subject of Judy Wood, 911 and directed energy weapons is mentioned, almost as if they were continually searching the net for those keywords. They've been somewhat rude in the process as well. I would place that activity squarely under the title of troll. I'd hate to see TB forum become a haven for trolling pseudo-scientific spammers like that.

[AndrewDJohnson]

[
@andrewdjohnson.

You can't find the link? I don't think you have one because what you say is not true!
Anyway, why on earth would someone torch a car near the WTC on or just after 911? It makes no sense!

Are you accusing me of being dishonest or making stuff up just because I can't find a link that I apparently forgot to bookmark a long time ago?
Cars are stripped and/or torched in NYC every day. Have you even been there? I've seen curbs lined bumper to bumper with stripped/torched vehicles, much like the vehicles along FDR actually.
http://ny.curbed.com/tags/toasted-cars

Yes - you are either being dishonest, or you do not have the full picture. For example, you are quoting links to Greg Jenkins without knowing the full details of his background in this matter.

This is covered here;

http://tinyurl.com/911ftb

The steel turned to dust - this much is clear - and it is one of the things on which great effort is expended in denial - in papers like the one above. It's partly why I posted that video link - as you can see the various video clips in that one which show it is turning to dust. And, of course, this precisely fits in with the paucity of debris seen in the IMMEDIATE aftermath of destruction.

Other info collated in this blog I made:

http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/

The biggest secret requires the biggest cover up - which is what we're seeing in motion - with many unwitting participants.

And.... waddyaknow - once again, I seem to be the only one using my real name... so come on brave ones, change your handles to your real names - with links to your websites and ways we can contact you!

Keep it real.

[kevin]

AndrewDjohnson,
kevin is kevin.
of Oxfordshire.
I am a dowser.
there is a duality of spin flows that are detectable.
in balance as the egyptians showed, all is fine.
They spiral in their pathways.
concentrate either one, or atune a %, then turn anything in creation to NO-THING.
Kevin