the lambright devices

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:35 pm

hi....my other thread was locked....sorry if i offended anyone....so anyway, since then there has been more and more replicators building my devices and getting the SAME results!...i have made a new device using iron oxide as the core material...this device radiates a VISIBLE energy field ...this IS the same energy that Leedskalnin used ...it is called many differnt names ....my devices are easy to build and are not expensive either!...i know that this sounds far feched...please search this and or expirement before you think it is BS.... this is not new, it is just an easier way to produce this energy....hutchinson uses HV/HF to produce his effect, i only use 1 split second spark from a 9v battery to charge either of my devices.....here is a post from another forum...ok, FIRST you need to understand what the Perpetual Motion Holder is. Ed Leedskalnin gave this magical wonder to the world.
its basically a metal loop, with a piece that can be open and closed like a switch. Ed used a seperate metal piece, called a "keeper", its like the bar you see across a "U"-magnet
a coil is wound around each end of the loop, opposite the gap.
and wound opposite one another, to form two electromagnets.

when current is sent through the coils, and the "keeper" is in place, a magnetic current will develop through the entire loop, holding the keeper in place. even after the electricity is shut off.

After you understand this simple concept
then go to Dave's YouTube page and watch all his videos.
he shows a few different ways to make the PMH.
its all the same concept, just applied differently.

this new device is modeled after Ed's wheel, found in coral castle

Dave added his own creativity to it, and discovered that it radiates energy.

its a very simple design, and Dave walks you through the building process in YouTube video. plus several other videos of him playing with it. I have to tell you, what you see in the videos doesnt do it justice, you have to see this for yourself. (all words of caution i mentioned above still apply)

david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:40 pm

here is another post...Van T Stride
Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2

Corroborating Experience

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi-

So far, I have been a lurker in this thread, but also an avid reader of the forum and following David's YouTube vids. I KNOW that he is correct in describing what he feels / felt, while experimenting with his device.

Here is my experience: I don't have resources (time, mostly) to build David's rig. So I built a small 3" PMH which consists of two semi-circular pieces of spring steel, filed on the ends, to make a slightly oval profile. I used about 25 wraps of copper wire and energized with a car battery. Both halves are magnetized together (locked). The overall shape looks a bit like an egg. (There are no heels or legs sticking out.)

I mounted this to a circular piece of plastic with zip ties, used a carriage bolt with a hex-nut - on the underside of the disk - and place the bolt in my variable speed drill and spun it at approx. 500 RPM.

Using a variety of stones that I have collected over the years I tried every one (including Amethyst geodes which contain quartz) and felt very little - if anything.

Then I tried a green rock I have which is very heavy for it's size which definitely has a great deal of crystalline composition (might be a form of Serpentine). Using this rock I DID feel a PUSH in my hand which varied depending on how I moved the rock in relationship to the spinning PMH. Looking closely at this stone, it does have at least one surface which could be viewed as a "cavity" (CAVITATION?) that is a finger-nail sized depression in the surface. It was near this surface at about 10 degree angle to the spin plane, that provided the most feedback (although I sometimes did feel a similar push using a pointed end of the stone nearly touching the "axle."

Comment to Dave: Hang in there, buddy, I know you are right - check your geode for cavities / surface features that could be somehow collecting and amplifying the effect.

I also noticed that Dave's rig is without one feature that Ed's rig included (and I have seen it in other's pictures on the forum) which is the "Quatrefoil" shape (PMH?) on the top edge of Ed's machine. I would theorize that adding a part shaped like this on Dave's device may amplify or "tune" the output??

I am also in Oregon, I live well North of Dave, but both my wife and I have felt a clear "push" when moving this stone over the PMH. I am tempted to take it to his "neck of the woods" and try it there. I also saw (with my eyes) some "interaction" between the stone and the PMH but I doubt it could be filmed and I am trying to decide if I really saw what I believe I saw.

Also, I feel a little odd when I am around the PMH for extended periods of time. I slept with it on the night-stand last night and slept very well, but woke feeling very off - something in the pit of my stomach???

-Van
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:43 pm

this one is from my youtube channel......
screaminvern (5 days ago) Hi david, I finished respacing the pipe segments on my wheel. I energized it with a 12V batt. I have a geode about the size of a tennis ball, and yes I can see a glimmer around it, and as a matter of fact when I move the geode over the top of the pipes, approx. 3-4 inches above, there seems to be what you discribed as a vortex.
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:55 pm

here is an email;....The wheel‏
Sent: Wed 7/14/10 2:15 PM
To: david.lambright@hotmail.com
from:tomirock

Check out the attached pictures and feel free to share them with anyone you want to


Im not going to post them because some blog basher would start asking me questions about something i know very little about ( I feel for you dave ) Don,t let them bring you down


Now that this device has been charged for a few weeks the waves seem more visible


Its kinda like if I try to look to close I cant see it as much. I think the brain tricks itself because it knows its not normal, kind of like when you look at spinning spiral video and everything is wavy after but in reverse


Im still looking for something good to mount it on and give it a spin


Anyway Ill let you know if I find anything interesting




Thanks
Tom




.
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:58 pm

i do not know how to post the photos but i will email them to anyone who would like to see them...david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby Aveo9 » Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:29 pm

hi....my other thread was locked....


For those of us who didn't get to see your other thread, could you give a bit of background on what you're talking about and what you're trying to achieve? All I picked up was that you've found a way to get spinning electromagnets make stones glow.

Cheers

Aveo
"If opposite poles attracted each other, they would be together in the middle of a magnet instead of at its ends"
-- Walter Russell
User avatar
Aveo9
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:51 pm

hi aveo9....hi, my name is david lambright, and i have built something interesting. these devices are based on Leedskalnins PMH. i guess you could say the devices are perpetual radiators. my devices make a visible optical distortion, that mimics a heat type wave or mirage, with out any heat....there is much more that it does, but for now, i will focus on the visible effects....i have built a rotor, with 24 steel segments, on a bearing so that it can be spun....this device radiates a visible distortion and needs no motion, no batteries, only an initial charge from a battery, like EDs PMH.....i post at EF also, i started a thread "gravity waves found" there with lots of interest....i have also built a simpler device to show this "glimmer" effect as it is being called.....there are step by step videos on my utube, potatoheadists channel, how to build the rotor device...the next type of device uses iron oxide inside of an aluminum tube bent into a circle or toroid and energized....this device produces a "lensing" type effect.....they are very simple to build ........david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:55 pm

Edward Leedskalnin built coral castle and he used the same energy that i have re-discovered using my devices...there are more and more people replicating these devices...and getting the SAME results as me....the "gravational" or magnetic push in materials that do NOT exibit normal magnetic properties....the visualdistortion around the devices and the vortice formation above the device....i know that this theory is correct and now that there are other WORKING models, making the same energy flow...Ed never told anyone how...but he did leave clues....i saw a blurriness in his b&w pix and realised it was this same energy flow that i was seeing around his PMH.....this IS the energy he harnessed....as time goes on, more and more people will build these types of devices and will find out ALL of this energys properties....thank you all for your interest and replicating the devices....i will continue to try and help anyone who have not got results...hopefully these new replications will radiate more of the visible spectrum on this subject!.....thanks...david lambright
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:00 pm

there are 2 streams of this current that Ed describes...they need to be seperated for them to be "useable".....what i try to do is use only the things that are at his castle...i know that there are many people now working on this, in light of my re-discovery...i have been expirementing with a budget of 0 money so progress has been slow....i am just excited that replicators are getting the SAME results...i know that this technology is our future...Hutchinson showed us it can be done,[anti gravity] Leedskalnin TOLD us it could be done WITHOUT HF/HV...and now i have shown that Ed was right!...no more speculation...no more guessing!!....this is the real deal and i KNOW that the are a lot of replicators who agree...the fact that all of this is re-producable is the best part...so many others have made claims and have had good results but their devices are difficult to replicate or they dont work or they do not disclose all of what makes their stuff work etc...my devices WORK!! please spread the news... expirement with what i have found...see for yourself it works...david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:16 pm

i post on a few forums...i know how this must sound but it is true....i ask you, PLEASE, do not pass judgment on this until you have seen it with your own eyes....it really does what i have said....i have said this before;...if this fake or if it is nothing, it will be exposed as such...but if it is as i say, then it will continue to grow and we will continue to unlock the secrets.....thank you for your interest!...david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:24 pm

this is interesting...http://www.physforum.com/index.php?act=idx.....also i found this text..START...Sir William Crookes had seen within the action space of his now famed high vacuum tube — There, suspended over the cathode, was a black space which was actually radiant. THe radiance extended beyond the tube walls in certain special instances. Sir William had no difficulty accepting the fact that this was a "space–permeating" blackness, a radiance having far greater significance than a mere physical phenomenon. ... (p257)

Electrogravitic Phenomenon.

George Piggot mentioned the mysterious "black bands" which appeard around his highly charged suspended metal marbles. Light seemed to disappear into these zones.

It was Nikola Tesla whose forgotten and ignored testimony on the perceptual effects of high voltage electrical systems, who made the most observations. Tesla produced such intense electrical arcs that the same "blackout effects" were repeatedly observed. In the case of Tesla's famed Colorado Springs Experiments, the blackout effect produced a lingering state which Tesla described as a perceptual-spatial distortion.

Noted in his published diary, the results followed the intense activity of his Magnifying Transformer. Visual distortions, clarifications, black shadows, black streamers, black waves, lingered for hours all around his plateau labroratory, whereby he stated that:

"These phenomenon are so striking that they cannot be satisfactorily explain by any plausible hypothesis, and I am led to believe that possibly the strong electrification of the air, which is often noted to an extraordinary degree, may be more or less responsible for their occurrence."

Invis (p265)

(p259)
STOP...this is interesting, i had never read any of this but suspected that it must have been documented...i am glad it was the likes of Tesla and others who reported on these effects....i am trying to get the link...http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=w ... HcuQ...try that link and i will be searching for more stuff...david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:23 am

i believe Ed heated those segments past their Curie point before he assembled his wheel so that the iron was "fresh", with no permanent magnetism....scotty [loadstone?] shows that a PMH can be locked with a single long wire that goes through the center of the PMH, not even wraped around either leg!...you need to use a larger wire but it does work.....i can lock steel to ferrite with one wrap of wire... YouTube - david showing ferrite+steel PMH ...i have used a cap from a camera flash to lock a PMH also but i did not notice any difference in the strength of lock .....scotty said with a larger device, the strength of lock varied with input, voltage, amps etc. up to saturation....i think what i need to be looking for is material that can be super- saturated ....possibly an alloy or an oxide mixture...magnetite sand from china? ...the oxide core devices work very well, with plenty of visual radiations [vibrations?] and other super -magnetic [making all materials feel as being push/pulled magneticly] forces, radiating from these devices....replicators are seeing/feeling these SAME things...little by little we are figuring out EXACTLY how to reproduce this radiated wave, every time....for all replicators....this is something very different yet following some of the same sets of rules as electricity or magnetism...we all heard about the plastic film factory and the "wall" produced ...nothing there but an area made "solid" , by an invisible source?....this makes sense if these waves can add density or take the density out of a material ....in my first videos i am spinning a 14 pound quartz geode, with my fingers, it feels as though it has lost some of its mass and feels light. at this same time there is what looks visually like an interference pattern....i believe when these waves interfere or cancel,is when these effects are at their best....in affect, cancelling out some of an objects mass/inertia/gravity, it is all the same thing...the static wall shows us that something can cause invisible density or mass?...i propose that if a density can be manufactured, then so can its opposite, that can take the density/mass out...david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:57 am

Lambright, you seem like a nice guy but you have been bumbling on this topic here and at Energetic Forum for a good part of a year with thousands of posts. I'm not sure you have much to 'boast' about as regards what 'your' device can or cannot do. Right now it cannot do a damn useful thing and you continue to play and post useless videos which don't really show the viewer anything.
Having said this, I KNOW that the Leedskalnin wheel/pmh produces these effects, therefore dont think I am refuting what you have to say. Where you are failing big time is in your scientific methodology. You run around like a little kid, freezing water, doing this and doing that, posting videos and trying to convince people....THIS IS NOT SCIENTIFIC METHOD! For a start....forget trying to convince the audience of anything....are you a believer? If the answer is yes, then start building your 'evidence locker' and decide where you want to take this technology. If you want to attain funding or come out with a useful product you will not achieve this by roping in half interested forum people meanwhile acting like a child yourself who has Attention Deficit Disorder because he can't stay focussed on one track.

Until then all you have is a mystical novelty that isn't doing you or humanity any good.

E-Goose........sorry for wasting your time...david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:22 pm

hi ...i have done something interesting.....i was experimenting with some gold leaf and i succeeded in making it paramagnetic...i was able to pick it up with a magnet..this was done by putting the leaf between the junction of a PMH and energizing it...i left it like that a few hours and now part of the leaf sticks to a magnet...i am not sure of the impurities in my leaf....but in any case it worked.....david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: the lambright devices

Unread postby david lambright » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:26 am

more theory.....magnetism is not quite equal...one pole is stronger than the other.....pulsing a PMH twice changes the polarity of the dominant stream...lets say Earth has a dominant N...in my experiments with a toroidal PMH show that polarity is connected to thermal convection...a PMH with a dominant S has thermal convective flows reversed from what is natural on Earths surface...these flows are visible with the naked eye as they dissapate back into the field, like a mirage...the flow has been seen and recorded by many people...this flow of convective force is not connected to heat....just like a magnet, this flow has polarity but its polarity can be reversed...unlike poles attract....so the PMHs dominant S is attracted to Earths N...if you want, try this....energize a PMH two times...take a piece of calcite and lightly hold it near the PMH....you will find that there are places on the ring [circular PMH] that will repel the calcitce crystal...try this cheap and easy expirement for yourself.. .in a PMH, the force flows in the center of the material...we know that this force is magnetic in its nature, holding the keeper on PMH and lighting a bulb shows us this...this ENERGY,being a bi-directional flow.and being magnetic in nature is attracted to the poles of a magnet and since it likes to flow in metal can be coaxed to flow in a wire...everyone has seen the photo of Ed with his hand on his "rotor" right?...why is there the mass of metal ABOVE his device?...this metal mass had to be above the rotor for this polarized flow to accumulate into....a wire from this over to his quarry ...this half of the flow being polarized S but now it carries upward convection, is attracted to Earths N like an upside-down siphon...spinning the rotor started the flow which would continue to flow from the S wire as long as the siphon didnt break...this flow could then be used to fill the stones with S polarized, upward convective force [levity]....and the same way heat is absorbed, a stone could be filled to its buoyancy point and moved...as the stone "cooled" its weight comes back...this flow of energy is distinct ....it can flow forever...we know that super cooled matter does this, by cooling them to their reverse buoyancy point.....as they warm back up their weight returns....Ed did this exact thing, using the earths natural fields....this is my theory these conclusions were arrived at through experimentation and rediscovery! thanks.......david
david lambright
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:29 pm

Next

Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests