Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Unread post by junglelord » Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:17 am

Since they always talk about Magnetic Fields of Planetary Bodies in Gravity only Cosmology, one should become aware of the Dual Vortex and the forces at work in Magnetic Fields. Yes the E Field that creates it is what the EU is all about, but the true Nature of Magnetic Fields in and of itself is not known by the public. I mean to set that record straight for this forum.

I feel that digesting Howard Johnson's work on mapping magnetic pole vortices is the most important concept someone have to master before any predicted success can occur. You can still achieve success with what they tell you in books but you are flying blind and resting on luck when it comes to iron filings and 2-D magnetic field symmetry concepts ...
All known forces are symmetrical in nature, in that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
This symmetry we are taught that is universal and applies to everything including magnets.
:?

That not true, either one of those Ideas.
:o

Iron Filings show you NOTHING of the true nature of a dynamic magnetic field. They merely become little magnets themself in the Dynamic Magnetic Field. Magnetic Poles are not equal. These two misconceptions are hiding huge truths.

The 3-D and 4-D Magnetic Dual Vortex is something you cannot afford not to learn.

Since I started to do visualization of interacting and opposing vortices in my mind, conceptualisation went up 50%. And that is thanks to my researches on magnetic motors.

A magnet is: imbalanced forces in a balanced system.

On the North magnetic pole of a magnet, the North vortex is at 100% and the South vortex at about 80%.

On the South magnetic pole of a magnet, the South vortex is at about 120% and the North vortex at 100%.

This create a warp sphere of influence on the sides of the magnets and in the overall form of the vortex structures.

The reentry points of the magnetic vortices are possibly not in the center of the physical magnet. They may be displaced by as much as a ratio of 60/40.

If you learn this information and how to derive EM by the original 20 Quaternions of Maxwells EM Thesis, you will totally be able to take the next step to derive all Spin Domains.
:D :D :D :D

This will allow you to be a master of Spin. The work of both Maxwell and Faraday are very clear.
The EM field is a Mechanical Field. It is a EM Gyroscope. All the rules of EM relationships are due to the mechanical relationships of Gyroscopes to induced pressure.

And who says a COMPLETE revolution is 360 degrees? Suppose a complete revolution was actually 720 degrees, which would be more in line with the asymptotic dimensional dynamics of quantum physics. Can you detect the corresponding principles involved in spin and velocity as they relate to matter and anti-matter? Imagine a sine wave itself, behaving within a traveling sine wave creating rift polarities from which dimensional energies find similarities within our environment, and express themselves accordingly.

This requires a pump. This requires a Gforce. APM has measured this Gforce via the Quantum Constants.
This is the cause of all Spin at all Levels. Spin is a harmonic of PHI at all levels.
:D :D :D

Casting Out the Nines.

Now read this.
Spin In Space.
http://treeincarnation.com/articles/Spin-of-Space.htm
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

flyingcloud
Posts: 490
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:07 am
Location: Honey Brook

Re: Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Unread post by flyingcloud » Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:18 pm

junglelord wrote:
And who says a COMPLETE revolution is 360 degrees? Suppose a complete revolution was actually 720 degrees, which would be more in line with the asymptotic dimensional dynamics of quantum physics. Can you detect the corresponding principles involved in spin and velocity as they relate to matter and anti-matter? Imagine a sine wave itself, behaving within a traveling sine wave creating rift polarities from which dimensional energies find similarities within our environment, and express themselves accordingly.

This requires a pump. This requires a Gforce. APM has measured this Gforce via the Quantum Constants.
This is the cause of all Spin at all Levels. Spin is a harmonic of PHI at all levels.
:D :D :D

Casting Out the Nines.

Now read this.
Spin In Space.
http://treeincarnation.com/articles/Spin-of-Space.htm
you say you want a revolution
spin is in

I often find it difficult to change from 2D to 3D as it is engrained in our basic thought fundamentals

shouldn't 720 be 1080 considering x,y, & z axis for complete revolution

altonhare
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:54 am
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Re: Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Unread post by altonhare » Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:37 pm

The EM field is a Mechanical Field. It is a EM Gyroscope. All the rules of EM relationships are due to the mechanical relationships of Gyroscopes to induced pressure.
-JL

I agree that the EM "field" is mechanical. How do gyroscopes interact in such a way as to sometimes attract each other and sometimes to repel each other? Discrete, separate objects may only collide (push).

Pushing on a gyroscope merely changes how it spins. Again how can a gyroscope attract another gyroscope?
And who says a COMPLETE revolution is 360 degrees?
-JL

It is defined that way. 1 revolution = 1 revolution = X "whatever unit you want to use" = curvilinear distance-traveled by an object or some part of an object at location A as it returns to location A.
Suppose a complete revolution was actually 720 degrees, which would be more in line with the asymptotic dimensional dynamics of quantum physics.
-JL

Is one revolution equal to one revolution or not?
Can you detect the corresponding principles involved in spin and velocity as they relate to matter and anti-matter?
-JL

What is anti-matter?

For that matter (haha) what is matter?
Imagine a sine wave itself, behaving within a traveling sine wave creating rift polarities from which dimensional energies find similarities within our environment, and express themselves accordingly.
-JL

A sine wave is a picture on a piece of paper or a computer screen. It does not "behave". It expresses a relationship between numbers on the axes and these numbers refer to objects or groups of objects. The objects themselves are behaving, the wave we draw is just a useful conceptualization. So what are these objects waving?

What is "dimensional energy"?
shouldn't 720 be 1080 considering x,y, & z axis for complete revolution
-flyingcloud

Is a revolution the curvilinear distance-traveled by something at location A as it returns to location A or not?
Physicist: This is a pen

Mathematician: It's pi*r2*h

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Unread post by junglelord » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:25 pm

This is the link to Howard Johnsons
The Secret World of Magnets.
The gyroscope theory along with this little book will change your entire knowledge base.

No longer spoon fed crap linear BS information of equal poles, static iron filing field lines, blah blah blah.

Its time to wake up to the Non Linear Universe and to the Dual Vortex.
Spintronics is the future of Magnetic Theory and Technology.
Cheers.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Unread post by junglelord » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:25 pm

This is the link to Howard Johnsons
The Secret World of Magnets.
The gyroscope theory along with this little book will change your entire knowledge base.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34317/Spintro ... rd-Johnson
No longer spoon fed crap linear BS information of equal poles, static iron filing field lines, blah blah blah.

Its time to wake up to the Non Linear Magnetic Universe and to the Dynamic Dual Vortex.
Spintronics is the future of Magnetic Theory and Technology.
Cheers.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

lizzie
Guest

Re: Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Unread post by lizzie » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:36 pm

Alton Hare said: What is anti-matter?
For that matter (haha) what is matter?
Google, a popular search engine, is a tool for finding resources on the World Wide Web. Google scans web pages to find instances of the keywords ...
http://www.lib.unc.edu/instruct/manuscripts/glossary

Google: what is antimatter (press enter)

What is antimatter
http://www.particleadventure.org/framel ... atter.html

The idea of antimatter is strange, made all the stranger because the universe appears to be composed entirely of matter. Antimatter seems to go against everything you know about the universe. :o *

But you can see evidence for antimatter in this early bubble chamber photo. :( The magnetic field in this chamber makes negative particles curl left and positive particles curl right. Many electron-positron pairs appear as if from nowhere, but are in fact from photons, which don't leave a trail. Positrons (anti-electrons) behave just like the electrons but curl in the opposite way because they have the opposite charge. (One such electron-positron pair is highlighted.)

(Alton Hare said: What's Google?)

The Talking Drum
http://www.thetalkingdrum.com/cointelpro.html
Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main function was to discredit and disrupt. :shock:
Why it’s enough to make my hare stand on end! :o

*
Why Matter and not Antimatter?

The difference in the stability of neutral matter and antimatter could explain why we live in a world made up predominately of matter. - Paul LaVoilette - Genesis of the Cosmos - the Ancient Science of Continuous Creation, pg 85.)
(Alton Hare said: What's neutral matter?)

altonhare
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:54 am
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Re: Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Unread post by altonhare » Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:57 am

Lizzie:

I didn't ask what the authorities think matter and anti matter are. I asked what YOU say they are.
But you can see evidence for antimatter in this early bubble chamber photo. :( The magnetic field in this chamber makes negative particles curl left and positive particles curl right. Many electron-positron pairs appear as if from nowhere, but are in fact from photons, which don't leave a trail. Positrons (anti-electrons) behave just like the electrons but curl in the opposite way because they have the opposite charge. (One such electron-positron pair is highlighted.)
-lizzie

This experiment is "evidence" for antimatter. But what IS a magnetic field? What IS positive and negative? We take these words so for granted that we don't realize that we don't actually know what they mean! We have equations that match experiments and observations, but that is not understanding. Field workers can go count the number of alive/dead deer in the forest at various times and plot it. They can tell hunters only to hunt in June because the deer population is highest then. They didn't have to understand anything about WHY the deer population fluctuates to generate these equations. The question of "why?" involves visualization and demonstrating. Why should one ball attract or repel another ball? A field? What does this field look like? If we can't explain the field physically it is just black magic.

What IS a photon? What are any of these things? Ask a particle physicist and they will be baffled! At best they will just write equation. However, if I ask you what IS a ball, will you give me this:

x2+y2+z2=R2

Or will you show me a ball and measure it, illustrating that it has uniform extent in all directions? Mankind had to understand the concept ball before we could write an equation for it. Equations must be derived from structures, not the other way around. When you do it the other way you inevitably end up with reification.
Physicist: This is a pen

Mathematician: It's pi*r2*h

lizzie
Guest

Re: Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Unread post by lizzie » Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:32 pm

Alton Hare said: Lizzie: I didn't ask what the authorities think matter and anti matter are. I asked what YOU say they are.
Antimatter is what I become when I don't matter. When I feel I matter, then I turn back into matter. :D

User avatar
junglelord
Posts: 3693
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:39 am
Location: Canada

Re: Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Unread post by junglelord » Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:46 am

Meanwhile back at the Dual Vortex Non Equal Magnetic domain, we find a deeper investigation into Spintronics reveals the future of Magnetic Technology and Theory.
If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe.
— Nikola Tesla
Casting Out the Nines from PHI into Indigs reveals the Cosmic Harmonic Code.
— Junglelord.
Knowledge is Structured in Consciouness. Structure and Function Cannot Be Seperated.
— Junglelord

lizzie
Guest

Re: Balanced Forces? Magnetic Symmetry?

Unread post by lizzie » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:29 pm

Juglelord said: The EM field is a Mechanical Field. It is an EM Gyroscope. All the rules of EM relationships are due to the mechanical relationships of Gyroscopes to induced pressure.
Magnetic Gyroscope
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Eiz6own ... re=related

Dual Magnetic Electrolysis Vortex
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHm20079 ... re=related

The Human Double Vortex:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGEGGotp ... re=related

Two mobius coils –one for the brain (bicameral oscillator); one for the body (heart oscillator - energy transformer);

Spiral Waves (Gforce)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95IF1EsV1aQ

The Universal Pattern 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcmpCW1h ... re=related

The Universal Pattern 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CynkLP0_ ... re=related

Reaction Diffusion Pulses
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=917cQRGD ... re=related

This is what LaViolette is talking about in his book on the spontaneous creation of matter (refraction diffusion chemical waves).

The Relationship of the Gyroscope to induced pressure

GRAVITY, KEELY'S DEFINITION
Text: "Gravity is nothing more than an attractive, sympathetic stream, flowing towards the neutral center of the earth, emanating from molecular centers of neutrality; concordant with the earth's center of neutrality, and seeking its medium of affinity with a power corresponding to the character of the molecular mass. Gravity, he defines as transmittive inter-etheric force under immense etheric vibration. He continues: - The action of the mind itself is a vibratory etheric evolution, controlling the physical, its negative power being depreciatory in its effects, and its positive influence elevating." [Chapter 5 of Keely and His Discoveries
Junglelord said: And who says a COMPLETE revolution is 360 degrees? Suppose a complete revolution was actually 720 degrees, which would be more in line with the asymptotic dimensional dynamics of quantum physics. Can you detect the corresponding principles involved in spin and velocity as they relate to matter and anti-matter? Imagine a sine wave itself, behaving within a traveling sine wave creating rift polarities from which dimensional energies find similarities within our environment, and express themselves accordingly.

This requires a pump. This requires a Gforce. APM has measured this Gforce via the Quantum Constants.

This is the cause of all Spin at all Levels. Spin is a harmonic of PHI at all levels.
Levitation or Gravity Control
http://www.svpvril.com/svpweb10.html

Feynmann’s Morphology
http://www.svpvril.com/Fig_7.html#TOP%20Fig_7

Keely’s Molecular Morphology
http://www.svpvril.com/Fig_8.html

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests