~ Intervening comet sucking-up / diverting charge carriers ?Wonder why it was so calm (without the usual thunder and other electrical goings on) for the months / year leading up to the blow?
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
~ Intervening comet sucking-up / diverting charge carriers ?Wonder why it was so calm (without the usual thunder and other electrical goings on) for the months / year leading up to the blow?
Confirms:A new paper, just published by "Natural Hazards and Earth System Science," describes that three suspected pre-earthquake indicators were recorded by this QuakeFinder station: (i) short bursts of electromagnetic radiation, 10-30 sec long, increasing in number over the last two weeks before the quake, (ii) a 14-hours long episode of intense air ionization on the day before the earthquake, and (iii) a continuous wave of ULF magnetic pulsations, lasting for nearly 1 hour during the time of the most intense air ionization. In addition, satellites picked up enhanced infrared radiation emitted from several areas around the earthquake site. Together these observations make a strong case that they are all related to this earthquake BEFORE it struck.
I received the following replies:Hah! For several years, EU theory has been saying there's a strong electric component that possibly triggers earthquakes.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/ ... hquake.htm
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/dec05/2367
Dr. Freund was involved in the research linked above. They didn't just stumble onto this. They have a comprehensive plan to monitor the electric environment/triggers of earthquakes.
Folks are going to eventually discover, within a few years imo, the validity of EU theory.
Friedemann wrote:
You are right... we didn't just stumble onto this. The work started (unbeknown to myself) decades ago when I first discovered dormant electronic charge carriers that can be "brought to life" by various processes. One is stress. This launched me into the pre-earthquake signal research. It is growing at an exponential rate with new scientific nuggets coming to light at a charming rate.
Friedemann
VK6KPH wrote:
Hi,
I agree with your comments there is a group of like minded scientists from many countries that have formed I.S.E. P (International Study of Earthquake Precursors ) We are from Australia and have been researching this for many years)
Phil
This was the reply:VK6KPH wrote:
Hi,
It may come as news for you that China has one of the best systems (electromagnetic MDCB-5) that shows pre electromagnetic signals. Down to M4.
They have been researching for the best part of 2,000years so we could learn alot from their research.
France and Russia have satellites in orbit detecting said electromagnetic phenomina; Other countries researchers have other schemes, and all are working generally without funding. (I.S.E.P) international study of earthquake researchers
Here in Australia we use a P-H pulse system of ionospheric passive radar we now have a base line streching from Western Australia to New Zealand, we use technology that most ham radio oeprators around the world would understand with some training our range from single radar site is ~ 8,000km, giving resultion down to M1.6 up to 8 days in advance of events.
Abstracts see google 'p.hollis-watts'
de VK6KPH
Phil HOLLIS-WATTS AM
Research Associate
WASM Curtin University
Kalgoorlie
WA
Australia
Those comments would seem to be pretty encouraging for EU fans, IMO.Friedemann wrote:
Phil,
Yes, there is a lot going on around the world trying to capture pre-earthquake signals. As you say, most of this work is done with zero financial support from governments and government agencies. The reason is that, until now, nobody had a clue how the different reported pre-earthquake signals were generated and how they are linked together. What is so exciting is that we now begin to understand the underlying physical process. This process tells us that most, if not all, reported pre-earthquake signals derive from one fundamental process. The future lies in a broad collaboration across the boundaries of the different scientific disciplines.
What looks like an "ocean" beneath China is probably the result of density changes due to variable gravity in the crust.redeye wrote:And, whilst I'm on the subject of weird geological stuff that I can't get my head around.
Daily Galaxy
Livescience
I believe that volcanism is merely a mechanism for moving charge from deep inside the Earth to the surface. Could these subsurface lodes be created as charge is flowing in the opposite direction, using water as the charge carrier.
And could this process be reversed. If these lodes of water were to rise up and innundate the surface we could be looking at a sea level rise measured in kilometers.
Or are they even lodes of water? What else could return these results?
reflex seismology
I really like this idea. The different geological layers and thermoclines (minus the inner and outer core cos they don't exist) are simply extensions of the Earths magnetosphere. As the magnetosphere is deformed under pressure from the heliosphere/as the Earth is a resistor, embedded in the radial electric field that is the heliosphere, the Earth's magnetic field changes as the strength of the current flowing through the Earth fluctuates due to fluctuations in the sun. Just as the deformation of the thermoclines causes wind, similar deformations in the magnetic field below the surface cause earthquakes.In Thornhill's latest essay,Newton’s Electric Clockwork Solar System, he is talking about how the gravity of the Earth changes with charge. The problem is, charge distribution will never be uniform, and it will effect the crust unevenly.
http://thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpBB3/v ... p=334#p334Quote:
There are many types of resistors, both fixed and variable. The most common type for electronics use is the carbon resistor.
World of Carbon
http://invsee.asu.edu/nmodules/Carbonmo ... where.html
Quote:
Graphite :Natural: It is formed in high-grade metamorphic rocks as a final product of the carbonization of organic materials...
Diamond: A rare form of hexagonal "diamond" known as Lonsdaleite is found in certain meteorites, such as those from Canyon Diablo, (USA).
Buckminsterfullerenes: Natural: Minute quantities of the Buckminsterfullerenes, in the form of C60, C70, C76, and C84 molecules are produced in nature, hidden in soots and formed by lightning discharges in the atmosphere...
Electrical Resistivity:
The electrical resistivity measures the ability of a substance to conduct electricity. The resistivity of the various carbon allotropes span that between semiconducting to insulating. This behavior is a consequence of the bonding nature between the carbon atoms within the substance.
Magnetic Susceptibility:
The magnetic susceptibility measures how the electrons within the carbon interacts with one another. The diamagnetic (negative, repelled by a magnetic field) behavior indicates that the electrons within the carbon allotropes are paired, strongly indicative of covalent bonding.
http://thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpBB3/v ... p=337#p337Electrical properties of Precambrian Tien Shan rocksand their thermophysical-chemical activity at highpressures and temperatures
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:-Hg0 ... cd=9&gl=nl
Quote:
The most important result of our analysis of the dis-tribution of the thermoactive rocks over the three zonesis the increased concentration of these rocks found inthe seismic zone itself, i.e., in the South Tien Shan re-gion. Among the 19 rocks studied, 9 samples exhibitthe electric resistivity anomalies, with 8 of them belong-ing to the region mentioned above. This suggests that higher seismicity is related to the petrophysical features of geomaterials.
Electrical conductivity and carbon in metamorphic rocks of the Yukon-Tanana Terrane, Alaska
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/pro ... _id=245147
Quote:
The stringer is probably responsible for the anomalous conductivity change with pressure, making the sample the first for which anomalous electrical conductivity behavior can be attributed to carbon associated with a specific feature.
The observations indicate that carbonaceous material may exert a primary control on crustal electrical conductivity because it may be present as interconnected arrays in grain boundaries or microfractures or in megascopic, throughgoing fractures.
A safe assumption considering Dr. Freund lives in California.Osmosis wrote:I assume that Dr. Freund is also watching the magnetometers situated around the San Francisco bay area and along the San Andreas Fault.
I like it...I think what's at the centre of the Earth is what is doing the resisting in that model, an anode. An antistar in the centre of the Earth!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests