Question about Sun

[Yourself]

Does the Sun have a hole in the polar axis?

According to a belief in the flow of electrical currents through vortex filaments as causality, as opposed to fusion caused by gravity, the Sun has a hole in the axis, possibly shaped like a ring from a polar view. Is this true? Is this proven one way or the other? Has this been predicted before?

I recently saw a SOHO image purported to be a polar view, with no hole, but I assume this was in error since SOHO orbits between the Earth and the Sun.

Thanks,
Yourself

[KickLaBuka]

I tend to the idea that the center of the sun is a flattened sphere of neutrons, so hot that they repel each other, and surrounded by a shell of protons. Groups of neutrons meetup with the protons and spin towards the surface, but only He++ gets that nice nuclear bond. Electrons approach the poles and aid in the chemical process. Eventually near the surface, only neutrinos created from the neutron repulsion escape, along with protons that accelerate into the electron shell in the upper corona. Have you seen O.Manuel's famous equations?

[jjohnson]

SOHO and the STEREO pair are near-Earth probes,orbiting in the ecliptic with us. Ulysses was a true solar polar explorer, orbiting the Sun at about 80º inclination with a 6 year period which took it near Earth at one ecliptic crossing and nearer Jupiter at the other. You may have seen polar photos from ULYSSES, shut down in 2008, I think.

I don't think the Sun has an open hole through the poles any more than Earth does. There's no visual evidence of it as far as I've read so far. There is an equatorial toroidal ring, well documented from the side and from above (See Thornhill and Talbott's Electric Universe, for example, and photos of Birkeland's Terella experiments). The Sun itself is not shaped like a toroidally wound coil, I would propose, whether or not some of its currents may flow in such a fashion. Further, I am not sure there is evidence that the posited galactic filamentary current is small enough to fit through the center of the sun - I think EU theory makes it about a parsec in diameter and the Sun's heliosheath, well out past Pluto's orbit, serves as a collector of the filament's electron drift current which powers the Sun. These phenomena are as yet not well documented, in that Don Scott says we still do not know (have not measured) the voltage drop from the heliosheath to the photosphere, for example) so consequent calculations fall in the what-if category.

Kick - pointer to the equations please - I haven't seen them.

[redeye]

Ulysses was a true solar polar explorer

Nice!

the Sun's heliosheath, well out past Pluto's orbit, serves as a collector of the filament's electron drift current which powers the Sun.

I agree with this. I've read a lot of critics deride the electric Sun hypothesis on the basis that there is no influx of energy into the Sun. I don't think it is correct to look at the Sun as an electrical appliance that requires a neat power supply coming in via a cable (birkeland current). The Sun is a resistor. There is a large imbalance of charge between the Sun and it's electrical environment (the interstellar current sheet?), the Sun produces a plasma sheath to insulate it and spread the electrical stress over a larger surface area. Therefore the Sun discharges to the Heliosphere (the Heliospheric current sheet) and there is no influx of energy...or words to that effect.

Cheers!

[Yourself]

Thanks for your comments. I was unable to follow it so I made another post as to why I think the sun has a hole in it. Please tell me if I'm full of bull.

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=2788