I wonder if Ree's is quite clever at stating things for those with eye's to see within the restraints of his current role ? Here he seems to hint at the relatively weak nature of the gravitational force.The Sun is the tipping point, the point of departure from old big bang cosmology. Rees writes in the introduction to his book, “Gravity, almost undetectable between laboratory-scale bodies
I notice he says "that dominant force in astronomy and cosmology, and not "the dominant force in The Universe"....is the dominant force in astronomy and cosmology.
In fact, he seemed to suggest that it is the weakest.The basic structures in our cosmic environment – stars, galaxies, and clusters of galaxies – all involve a balance between gravitational attraction and the disruptive effect of pressure or kinetic energy.” Three things stand out immediately. First, gravity is the weakest force in the universe.
This a certainly valid but I wonder if Ree's is really the worst culprit ?Second, gravity is not understood. And third, although magnetic fields are detected on the Sun and everywhere in space, there is no mention of the necessary generative electric currents in plasma, which constitutes 99.999 per cent of the visible universe! This is a doctrinaire failure to notice the obvious.
The following excerpt is just astounding to me and pulls together so many questions, observations and "anomalies" that I have encountered over the years.
I find the psychological and sociological aspects to be very welcome here. As huge as the suggestions are they do lend themselves to contextualising so much about our experience here on Earth. So much up until now has simply not made sense. This Science, if real, and I dare say some of it will turn out to be, is so badly needed in a world where some of us have been in danger of almost completely losing our way.Also, the birth of plentiful brown dwarf stars and smaller bodies in proximity along an electrical umbilical cord provides the opportunity for capture by bright stars to form planetary systems. Capture is greatly enhanced by electrical energy exchange where the cross-section for capture is that of a star’s huge electrical boundary, called the heliosphere (~200 AU wide), or ‘astrosphere.’ Brown dwarfs captured by a bright star will have their power source stolen, lose their radiance and become gas giants. This explains a mystery known as the ‘brown dwarf desert,’ around main sequence stars.
The capture process of a brown dwarf involves drastic electrical readjustment from being an anode to a cathode, which the captured star achieves by a cometary-type electrical expulsion of matter from its heavy-element core and atmosphere, forming satellites and rings. Some of the expelled debris escapes to become families of comets, asteroids and meteoroids. It is a process entirely analogous to the observed electrical splitting of comet nuclei, often as they too approach the Sun.
The applicability of this model to the solar system is obvious with the distant gas giants sporting rings and many satellites. Saturn, with its spectacular ring system, appears to be the most recently captured. The inner planets are satellites lost to the gas giants/former dwarf stars. Astronomers have recently begun to suggest that the environment close to a dwarf star is conducive to life. But there is far more to this idea in an Electric Universe. So the Sun’s weird assortment of planets and their satellites are an adopted family and not primordial. Comparing gyroscopically stable axial tilts may show some familial associations. Significantly, Saturn, Mars and Earth seem related via this hypothesis.
Gravitational systems are essentially chaotic because orbital perturbations are not corrected. With intruders upsetting the solar system the obvious question is how come the planets move like clockwork? It is important that an effective ‘damping’ mechanism operates to enforce order in the solar system.
So, is this the currently accepted scenario ...
1. Earth/Mars were planets around our former star, Saturn.
2. Capture by our current star (The Sun) ramps down the former stars current, eventually creating Saturn in its current (non star) form..
3. Due to these changes a cataclysm effects Earth and Mars, almost completely destroying a former, possibly technological, civilisation on Mars and Earth, ref: Cydonia and why it seems so alien and yet so familiar. Yet Mars and Earth do survive due to the orbit arranging nature of EM/EU/Plasma as we see in Exoplanet discoveries.
4. As a result of the capture, and as the orbits settle down, visible EM phenomena in the sky are recorded by the survivors (petroglyphs, mythology).
5. Some survivors of this former civilisation are tasked with preserving important human knowledge for healing, healthy societies, etc. via the perennial philosophy passed down through the ages; sacred geometry, and other systems of preserving knowledge. This is why some of the deductions made from possible Cydonia ruins match up with current human knowledge, because that knowledge was originally human before the star capture, hence the Face.
This is SO HUGE I must admit I find myself going into paroxysms of incredulity and then forgetting the whole thing. But something compels me to come back. So much of what has never made sense to me DOES make sense when I figure this cosmology in. I wonder if Douglas Adams was responding to the same feeling - of something being out of place - in his Hitch-hikers Guide to the Galaxy.
Don't Panic.
