Greetings Antone:
There was a list of "advanced claims" (which Velikovsky preferred over "prediction") in the journal Pensee.
You could also add the discovery of remnant magnetism in lunar rocks as this was a big time bulls eye for Velikovsky. He wrote an article in the NY Times before the moon landing, urging NASA to conduct this test, they did not have it on their agenda because they already "knew" that it could not exist. Several missions later when they finally did test for remnant magnetism, all were surprised at the results. But few gave Velikovsky any credit.
Also, he said that Saturn's rings would be found to be composed of water ice.
A few notes concerning your list.
Gases observed escaping from moon--indicating heat and thus recent formation.
Wobble detected in orbit of various planets and moon--seeming to indicating it was recently created.
Velikovsky postulated a recent birth for Venus, within human memory, not the Moon or any other planets.
His theories do not speak for any other "newcomers" to the planetary family, although pre existing planets such as Mars, Moon, etc would have undergone enormous changes (surface features, internal heating, orbital changes, etc) due to the reordering of the solar system. He also thought that the Moon was previously a satellite of Jupiter, captured by the Earth.
A few yet to be confirmed advanced claims of Velikovsky:
-the orbital perihelion precession of Mercury is caused by electrical interaction with the Sun's magnetic field. And should not be seen as confirmation of Einstein's General Relativity.
-Jupiter and Saturn are 'dark stars.'
-planets are born from gas giants/brown dwarfs
-there are microorganisms on Mars, pathogenic to man
-Saturn recently went nova and therefore should emit x-rays and/or cosmic rays
-some Martian craters resulted from interplanetary electric discharges
- Mars must have localized areas of radioactivity as a result of discharges
-rayed craters on the Moon are the result of interplanetary discharges
-many craters on the Moon are the result of bubbling, collapsed bubbles
The list could go on and on. Keep in mind that Velikovsky was wrong about many things, however, when taken into context of the intellectual thought of his time, he truly was an intelectual giant, at times, capable of an unprecedented intuitive insight.
Nick C