You've mentioned several times your "EM education".
May i politely suggest that..
I need no more than Maxwell. Harold Aspden also accepts them I just read.
No relativistic speeds to worry about.
Here is a good place to learn or refresh the basics of Maxwell's Electromagnetism.
seasmith wrote:
So now you are seeing how E currents are twisted and maintained in filaments, (as opposed to 'sheet currents' as in a double-layer), by the B field inherently generated as current is conducted.
Now in your image, note how the E current flows are Bi-Directional.
If you look at the currents on the sun, the current is certainly not Bi-Directional.
There are no full circles.
It flows from one area to the other. Just like flare in a plasma-globe.
The current flows from a positive charged region to a negative charged region on the Sun.
The current are the electrons and ions moving in the plasma. Ions move both ways.
All electric sun models agree with this, but this is already a break with the mainstream.
They believe that the currents are just lines of plasma hanging in the air, somehow following
magnetic field lines. But they see currents, so they see the currents as a side-effect of
the magnetism.
In my ray-gun model, the driving force behind the rail-gun is the electrical force
that produces the current.
There is NO other way these currents can be produced.
As I described above, according to basic EM, you need stronger and fast changing magnetic
field to produce currents for a magnetic field. In our technology we use spools with lots of
windings. The sun does not have that.
Anything that even looks like a magnetic field, does not match the requirements to
produce such currents. The mainstream magnetic fields are actually 90 degrees to have any effect.
It seems to me that the sun does not have that much magnetism at all, but is mainly electric.
Much more electric than most electric sun models.
That is due to the historical mix-up of the Stark effect with the Zeeman effect and bad understanding of EM.
On the liquid surface of the sun, we can see the Stark effect on many charged regions.
Some of these charged regions seem to be charged so much that they produce free electrons.
And free electrons look black in normal light, causing the dark spots on the sun.
The Stark effect is also very strong in these spots.
So following this logic, the electrical fields are much stronger on the sun than
expected, because the surface sun is not surrounded by a vacuum as the mainstream believes.
The mainstream does not even believe that the sun has a surface.
The mainstream believes that the lines and flares are in some kind of superconducting plasma.
Robitaille kind of proofs that this mainstream idea is completely wrong, and that the
sun has liquid, gas and plasma states. This is also what anyone with normal physical
knowledge would expect.
Now I follow my own idea of the sun:
The sun is surrounded by a gas that is much less conductive than believed. And this gas
is only becoming plasma when currents flow through it, or when the electrical fields are very strong.
The gas itself is surrounded by plasma, which extent we can see in the eclipse photographs.
The area between the gas and the outer plasma seems the photosphere.
This large extent of plasma will cause diffraction of the light, and will probably have
confused some astronomers with Einstein's gravitational bending of light.
The electric/magnetic mix-up goes even further.
In the article that I quoted in my previous post, the "magnetic reconnection"
myth is used in "black holes" and many other mythical objects.
This means that they have found a strong Zeeman effect at these places.
BUT, if this is the Stark effect, it will mean that all mythical objects are
actually strong electrically charged objects.
This is a direct confirmation of the principle of the Electrical Universe.
It is even more electric than we thought.
Now look at this latest research for example:
The core of the Milky Way unveiled in clearest infrared image yet
Astronomers have produced the first high-resolution map tracing the magnetic field lines around the Milky Way’s supermassive black hole.
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/AS6puCjm.jpg)
More info:
By observing polarized infrared light that is emitted by warm, magnetically aligned dust grains, astronomers have produced the first high-resolution map that traces the magnetic field lines around the Milky Way’s supermassive black hole.
So we have "warm" magnetic dust.
Warm dust is usually not ferro-magnetic, paramagnetism and diamagnetism are more common.
But these forces are not very strong.
But almost everything is dielectric.
On earth it causes dust to stick into corners of the room.
So it seems to me that they have found the distribution of the electrical charge
around the Milky Way instead. To produce the shown magnetic field, we also
need currents in perpendicular direction (right-hand rule).
There is no mechanism for that.
The mainstream believes in "frozen magnetic fields" to maintain such models.
The electrical field version is the simpler and more likely explanation again.
This goes on and on.
It seems that almost every "magnetic" reference in the mainstream astronomy
literature is actually "electric".
It does not mean that magnetic fields in astronomy do not exist.
They certainly do. The sun has a huge but weak magnetic field.
The earth has a weak magnetic field, capable of capturing particles from the sun.
But all evidence and basic EM-physics seems to indicate that
there are many electrical fields in the universe.
And these are likely connected via Birkeland currents and such.
Again:
The only change I made to the mainstream observations
is replacing most of the Zeeman-effect with the Stark-effect in cases
where they fit logically according to Maxwell.