Maol
Not sure if I used good terms for query but I searched both Holoscience and the Thunderbolts TPOD’s for something related to the idea of
'accelerated orbital velocity’ ("natal kicks") for stars - regardless of stellar type, model, theory, and/or classification schemes. Have a look at this:
Abstract. Observational advances over the last decade have left little doubt that neutron stars received a large kick velocity (of order a few hundred to a thousand km s−1) at birth. The physical origin of the kicks and the related supernova asymmetry is one of the central unsolved mysteries of supernova research. We review the physics of different kick mechanisms, including hydrodynamically driven, neutrino –
magnetic field driven, and electromagnetically driven kicks. The viabilities of the different kick mechanisms are directly related to the other key parameters characterizing nascent neutron stars, such as the initial magnetic field and the initial spin. Recent observational constraints on kick mechanisms are also discussed. -
Neutron Star Kicks and Asymmetric Supernovae:
Dong Lai- Sept 2005
Along with various causes apparently there is still debate over:
1-Interacting binary induced acceleration
2-Supernova induced acceleration "at birth"
3-Post natal (after nova) induced acceleration
All of these acceleration theories incorporate the asymmetric property. Then...
Models to explain these high neutron star (NS) velocities have invoked the disruption of close binary systems (Blaauw 1961; Gott et al. 1970; Iben & Tutukov 1996), natal kicks from asymmetric supernova (SN) explosions (Shklovskii 1970; Dewey & Cordes 1987), and post-natal
acceleration through the electromagnetic rocket effect (Harrison & Tademaru 1975). -
GETTING ITS KICKS: A VLBA PARALLAX FOR THE HYPERFAST PULSAR B1508+55 S. Chatterjee et al (2nd sentence in the Introduction)
Here is the 1975 affectionately labeled
“electrodynamic rocket effect” paper by Harrison, E. R. & Tademaru, E:
There is therefore a language problem (“natal kicks” etc.) with articles and papers simply referencing a “popular model”. With a phrase like that it's not clear which ‘asymmetric ejecta’ model is being referred to. Nonetheless, buried in vague language, at least one of these models is based on electrodynamic acceleration.
For further inquiry into the “kick” (orbital acceleration) theories see:
Google:
Theories of Pulsar Natal Kick
Also, thanks to those referencing the work of Dr. Scott and the electrical relaxation oscillator relationship as opposed to the death defying rapid rotating, spin up-spin down, lighthouse paradigm. However, unless I missed something, this one potential dynamic - supernova electrodynamically induced ’orbital acceleration’ - (yes; just that part) was not covered therein.
I'll just add that the Milky Way, and other galaxies, still undergo process that induce “scattered like buckshot” acceleration phenomena whether as “hypervelocity stars”, so called “cannonball pulsars”, neutron stars etc. For the sake of debate the type of star is irrelevant. Between HVS’s and/or fast moving “pulsars” - all throughout the galaxy, the halo, and disc - several fast moving stars are quickly swarming around like agitated wasp protecting a nest. Is it all just gravity?
Does anyone have an EU reference for this electrodynamically accelerated orbit (“kick”) property regardless of stellar type?
Tired of reading papers and following references now.
"Our laws of force tend to be applied in the Newtonian sense in that for every action there is an equal reaction, and yet, in the real world, where many-body gravitational effects or electrodynamic actions prevail, we do not have every action paired with an equal reaction." — Harold Aspden