Siggy_G wrote:Jarvamundo: First of all, brain signals are EM signals. Mainly in response to the opening post (headline) "If everything is connected, why cannot I access your mind?", then my point is that you do not receive your neighbour's brain signals because they are the interpreted result of signals from the environment. It doesn't matter if these signals truly travel faster than light through a universal structure - that has to do with the underlying nature of the signals. One has a scenario with signals distributed through the environment and the signals interpreted/working within each person's brain - they are connected, but not the same (which I think you pointed out with the connectedness versus awareness point).
Again you are invoking an EM-only understanding. An Electro-Magnetic wave is a retarded, transverse ripple, it is a slow wave, Wal is specifically NOT talking about this wave.
We do not have simple meters for longitudinal electric waves, since they violate c-limit physics and have either been destroyed or not developed.
You are correct in detecting Electro-Magnetic waves as result of brain activity, but your instruments are unable to detect longitudinal waves, so our understanding remains incomplete.
A device working from the energy of batteries has an individual electrical circuit. There is no additional circuit that everyone around will equally receive as well. However, the external effect will be a surrounding EM field (plus whetever interactive function the device has). The opening post suggests that everything around the device would receive the same signals/input, which they don't. Also, it is not coherent with energy conservation: at some point a signal (of energy) interfere with a medium and converts to a given effect. It won't preceed to the next object and do the exact same thing again (which is why we don't access minds).
Again, an EM interpretation. You are relying on an electrical conductor to conduct an electro-magnetic wave. This is a retarded/slow waveform, and is not the substance of Wal's talk.
I did not suggest that everything receives the same signal, but i would (
not sure if this is Wal's conclusion ) make the assertion that the signal would be available to everything capable of receiving it.
Having said that, I agree that the work of Thornhill is fascinating, and I would like to hear the continued explanation on the longtitudal waves, which I think he has in part 2 (pay to hear, Red Ice Radio). However, it is the "access other minds" interpreted from this work I don't buy into.
Continued Explanation:
Eric Dollard 2009 - Longitudinal Waves:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhuSn6sc7sc
Eric Dollard 1984 - Tesla Longitudinal Waves:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0757457294#
Also readings of: Tesla, Steinmetz, and others mentioned above.
Siggy i agree that with the phrase "you cannot access my mind", the distinction i was making was that a connection that is NOT EM shieldable exists, as demonstrated by Tesla's, Dollard's and many others experiments. This is a NON electro-magnetic wave, C-limit physics will not let you explore this.
Your assertions of "conservation of energy" are applicable and correct when interpreted with transverse c-limit physics. It has been clearly demonstrated by Tesla, Dollard, Meyl, + many others that this forms an incomplete understanding of nature.
Wal's comments regarding "only a few equations are left then we know the whole story, is nonsense" (or something like that)... highlights human ignorance, and to me the heavily guarded glass ceiling that is c-limit space time physics.
Cheers,