Eclipsing Cepheid Falsifies Stellar Evolution Theory

[Goldminer]

Can you give ten, say, examples of "consensus cosmologists" who have "reigned" [sic] "ad hominem, vitriol, and vituperation" [sic] down upon Arp? Be sure to provide explicit, concrete examples of such, for each of the ten . . . Well, I guess that should make it a trivially simple task, to find ten (or more!) such cosmologists, shouldn't it? (to be continued, maybe)

Sure, I can make it trivially simple for you! Just read his two books; you can check them out from your local library, unless you live in the Antarctic, the Gobi Desert or some such place. [maskurl=http://metaresearch.org/publications/books/SeeingRed-Arp.asp]Seeing Red and Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies, where he documents all the abuse he has endured. Since you seem to be so outspoken about the consensus view, I am surprised you haven't availed yourself of these resources. As is the case with Robitaille's article, Arp's work stands on its own. I repeat: the abuse is well documented. You can gloss all you want; any concerned, unbiased reader can judge for themselves!

.

[Nereid]

Sure, I can make it trivially simple for you! Just read his two books; you can check them out from your local library, unless you live in the Antarctic, the Gobi Desert or some such place. Seeing Red and Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies, where he documents all the abuse he has endured.

Thanks for this.

[kiwi]

Code: Select all

...The reasons why Arp's research is not accepted by the standard model is still the debate 

no debate necessary, ... its nothing personel against Arp, all E/U academics are treated the same, .. because to let anyone get their foot in the door will open the way for all others, and if that happens and the research is allowed to operate in an open unfetted enviroment , it would not be long before science found the holy grail ala Tesla,... how to tap into the "circuit", bringing the system to its knees,.. and we cant have that

[kiwi]

serious question: with the red-shift being shown to have (unknown?) factors as to its function ... how does the "blue-shift" behave? ... as per its normal description or are there anomalies there also?

[Goldminer]

serious question: with the red-shift being shown to have (unknown?) factors as to its function ... how does the "blue-shift" behave? ... as per its normal description or are there anomalies there also?

According to Arp's "embryology" of Quasars, they stepwise blue shift into conventional galaxies, i.e. spectral red shift is youth, blue spectral shift, relatively speaking, is adulthood. Intrinsic red shift is the evidence, the "embryology" deduces from Arp's extensive work with QSOs. The consensus coreligionists wish to dissuade unbelievers from even thinking of such things!

Doppler shift is still part of the equation, it's just not the whole story. When spectral red shifted QSOs are obviously associated with less spectral red shifted objects, intrinsic red shift is present.