I just told you what it implies. Did you read my post? I'm not complicating anything. I'm delivering a message by what action at a distance has traditionally and historically meant. Have you ever heard of Isaac Newton or "spooky action"? This is non-local and violates c.marengo wrote:So what, in your opinion, does 'action at a distance imply'?viscount aero wrote:Ok and in the field the propagation is at c; I read that. It's just that isn't what action at a distance typically implies. It implies an instantaneous influence across distances. There is no propagation.
In my opinion it simply means that one body causes an action on a second separated body.
You always have to complicate things. Why?
the absurd implied density of moons kills gravity
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: the absurd implied density of moons kills gravity
-
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:40 am
Re: the absurd implied density of moons kills gravity
The so called "spooky action" is entirely different from the action at a distance caused by the electric and the gravitational effects. Once again you are in a muddle.viscount aero wrote:I just told you what it implies. Did you read my post? I'm not complicating anything. I'm delivering a message by what action at a distance has traditionally and historically meant. Have you ever heard of Isaac Newton or "spooky action"? This is non-local and violates c.
http://www.aetherpages.com
A series of scientific papers on the new Aether physics.
A series of scientific papers on the new Aether physics.
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: the absurd implied density of moons kills gravity
Newton first proposed the idea to my knowledge and it originated about gravitation. Regardless of what application of it being discussed, it violates c (which is why Einstein disliked it and called it "spooky.") My original point is that it violates c and that there is no propagation in "action at a distance" as it is instantaneous regardless of distance.marengo wrote:The so called "spooky action" is entirely different from the action at a distance caused by the electric and the gravitational effects. Once again you are in a muddle.viscount aero wrote:I just told you what it implies. Did you read my post? I'm not complicating anything. I'm delivering a message by what action at a distance has traditionally and historically meant. Have you ever heard of Isaac Newton or "spooky action"? This is non-local and violates c.
I typically dislike WIki but the definition is simple:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_at_a_distance
In physics, action at a distance is the nonlocal interaction of objects that are separated in space.
This term was used most often in the context of early theories of gravity and electromagnetism to describe how an object responds to the influence of distant objects. More generally "action at a distance" describes the failure of early atomistic and mechanistic theories which sought to reduce all physical interaction to collision. The exploration and resolution of this problematic phenomenon led to significant developments in physics, from the concept of a field, to descriptions of quantum entanglement and the mediator particles of the standard model.[1]
-
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:40 am
Re: the absurd implied density of moons kills gravity
The above is sensible and correct.viscount aero wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_at_a_distance
In physics, action at a distance is the nonlocal interaction of objects that are separated in space.
This term was used most often in the context of early theories of gravity and electromagnetism to describe how an object responds to the influence of distant objects. More generally "action at a distance" describes the failure of early atomistic and mechanistic theories which sought to reduce all physical interaction to collision. The exploration and resolution of this problematic phenomenon led to significant developments in physics, from the concept of a field, to descriptions of quantum entanglement and the mediator particles of the standard model.[1]
Bodies accelerate according to the gradient of the potential field at their location.
The field is previously established by a source body possibly many, many years earlier. Changes to the field are propagated at the speed of light.
That is very simple, isn't it?
http://www.aetherpages.com
A series of scientific papers on the new Aether physics.
A series of scientific papers on the new Aether physics.
- viscount aero
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: the absurd implied density of moons kills gravity
Yes it's what I was saying the whole time. But when I said it you were contrary. But now that Wiki says it you suddenly agree with it. Okmarengo wrote:The above is sensible and correct.viscount aero wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_at_a_distance
In physics, action at a distance is the nonlocal interaction of objects that are separated in space.
This term was used most often in the context of early theories of gravity and electromagnetism to describe how an object responds to the influence of distant objects. More generally "action at a distance" describes the failure of early atomistic and mechanistic theories which sought to reduce all physical interaction to collision. The exploration and resolution of this problematic phenomenon led to significant developments in physics, from the concept of a field, to descriptions of quantum entanglement and the mediator particles of the standard model.[1]
Bodies accelerate according to the gradient of the potential field at their location.
The field is previously established by a source body possibly many, many years earlier. Changes to the field are propagated at the speed of light.
That is very simple, isn't it?
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
-
- Posts: 3517
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm
Re: the absurd implied density of moons kills gravity
quantum entanglement
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
"It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong."
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
"Doubt is not an agreeable condition, but certainty is an absurd one."
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests