Gradualism in Economics
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:59 pm
Gradualism in Economics
I recommend the book Debt: The First 5000 Years by the anthropologist David Graeber. The founding myth of the study of economics is that primitive barter gradually morphed to money-based systems and then to credit, but as Graeber tells us:
'The problem with this version of history? There's not a shred of evidence to support it.'
His conclusions on the history of money are startling, fascinating, and indeed very relevant to 'The Human Question.'
'The problem with this version of history? There's not a shred of evidence to support it.'
His conclusions on the history of money are startling, fascinating, and indeed very relevant to 'The Human Question.'
- paladin17
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:47 am
- Location: Minsk, Belarus
Re: Gradualism in Economics
Maybe you can describe in short what his alternative concept of this question would be?fidelio wrote:I recommend the book Debt: The First 5000 Years by the anthropologist David Graeber. The founding myth of the study of economics is that primitive barter gradually morphed to money-based systems and then to credit, but as Graeber tells us:
'The problem with this version of history? There's not a shred of evidence to support it.'
His conclusions on the history of money are startling, fascinating, and indeed very relevant to 'The Human Question.'
- Bomb20
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:16 pm
- Location: Germany
- D_Archer
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Gradualism in Economics
so debt is primary.
How was debt established?, by force or was there uneven trade/barter etc first?
Regards,
Daniel
How was debt established?, by force or was there uneven trade/barter etc first?
Regards,
Daniel
- Shoot Forth Thunder -
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:59 pm
Re: Gradualism in Economics
D archer, you should really read the book, and for starters, read Amazon reviews and summaries of it. The practice of debt is as old as human beings. Only when it was systemized by the first agrarian empires, through taxes, do we start to see something like markets. As a member of this forum, I assume you know what events inspired these empires. From the third chapter called 'Primordial debt':
"The firsty kings were sacred kings who were either gods in their own right or stood as privileged mediators between human beings and the ultimate forces that governed the cosmos... Why was cattle so often used as money? The German historian Bernard Laum long ago pointed out that in Homer, when people measure the value of a ship or suit of armor, they alwasy measure it in oxen - even though when they actually exchange things, they never pay for anything in oxen. It is hard to escape the conclusion that this was because an ox was what one offered the gods in sacrifice. Hence they represented absolute value. From Sumer to Classical Greee, silver and gold were dedicated as offerings in temples. Everywhere, money seems to have emerged from the thing most appropriate to the gods."
He earlier explains how in some places rules started money systems in order to take care of their armies. They would each of their soldier some money, and then tell all the people they had to pay a certain amount of this money to the state every so often. You do the math.
"The firsty kings were sacred kings who were either gods in their own right or stood as privileged mediators between human beings and the ultimate forces that governed the cosmos... Why was cattle so often used as money? The German historian Bernard Laum long ago pointed out that in Homer, when people measure the value of a ship or suit of armor, they alwasy measure it in oxen - even though when they actually exchange things, they never pay for anything in oxen. It is hard to escape the conclusion that this was because an ox was what one offered the gods in sacrifice. Hence they represented absolute value. From Sumer to Classical Greee, silver and gold were dedicated as offerings in temples. Everywhere, money seems to have emerged from the thing most appropriate to the gods."
He earlier explains how in some places rules started money systems in order to take care of their armies. They would each of their soldier some money, and then tell all the people they had to pay a certain amount of this money to the state every so often. You do the math.
- D_Archer
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Gradualism in Economics
So it was force, that seems to be human nature, the stronger extort the weaker.fidelio wrote:D archer, you should really read the book, and for starters, read Amazon reviews and summaries of it. The practice of debt is as old as human beings. Only when it was systemized by the first agrarian empires, through taxes, do we start to see something like markets. As a member of this forum, I assume you know what events inspired these empires. From the third chapter called 'Primordial debt':
"The firsty kings were sacred kings who were either gods in their own right or stood as privileged mediators between human beings and the ultimate forces that governed the cosmos... Why was cattle so often used as money? The German historian Bernard Laum long ago pointed out that in Homer, when people measure the value of a ship or suit of armor, they alwasy measure it in oxen - even though when they actually exchange things, they never pay for anything in oxen. It is hard to escape the conclusion that this was because an ox was what one offered the gods in sacrifice. Hence they represented absolute value. From Sumer to Classical Greee, silver and gold were dedicated as offerings in temples. Everywhere, money seems to have emerged from the thing most appropriate to the gods."
He earlier explains how in some places rules started money systems in order to take care of their armies. They would each of their soldier some money, and then tell all the people they had to pay a certain amount of this money to the state every so often. You do the math.
Regards,
Daniel
- Shoot Forth Thunder -
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:59 pm
Re: Gradualism in Economics
Not exactly. It has to do with the massive trauma of the breakup of the polar configuration.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests