http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/20 ... l#comments
This oldest gas is still cooling, not yet zero K, but it is still ionized. The science suggests a black hole is to blame; I suggest the deterioration of same is reason. This ionization is the reason telescopes cannot 'see' the starless darks. Our missing 90% comes to mind.
My idea is that this increasing speed of expansion will result in meeting zero K temp and phase change. University researchers have modeled this: cold and thin equals hot and dense.
why can't we see the gas/ Its ionized
- orrery
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: USA
Re: why can't we see the gas/ Its ionized
My guess would be that the hydrogen signal is going to dominate the further out you go because it is the most basic form of radiation. Not because there aren't any stars out there, but because you're going to get a lot of hydrogen noise.
"though free to think and to act - we are held together like the stars - in firmament with ties inseparable - these ties cannot be seen but we can feel them - each of us is only part of a whole" -tesla
http://www.reddit.com/r/plasmaCosmology
http://www.reddit.com/r/plasmaCosmology
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:58 am
Re: why can't we see the gas/ Its ionized
Two hydrogen atoms meet . "I've lost my electron" says one.
"Are you sure ? " " I'M POSITIVE." {sorry)
"Are you sure ? " " I'M POSITIVE." {sorry)
"History teaches everything,even the future." Alphonse de Lamartine (1790-1869)
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:41 pm
- Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Re: why can't we see the gas/ Its ionized
Thanks katesisco. Interesting here that they know these "most distant" galaxies are more ionized than the rest. We know that when they say most distant, they really mean most redshifted. So what they really found is that more ionization (more plasma?) means more redshift. I know some people who would be happy to see this.katesisco wrote:http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/20 ... l#comments
This oldest gas is still cooling, not yet zero K, but it is still ionized. The science suggests a black hole is to blame; I suggest the deterioration of same is reason. This ionization is the reason telescopes cannot 'see' the starless darks. Our missing 90% comes to mind.
My idea is that this increasing speed of expansion will result in meeting zero K temp and phase change. University researchers have modeled this: cold and thin equals hot and dense.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests