by galaxy12 » Mon Apr 15, 2024 10:53 pm
The following article is titled: "Top Astronomers Gather to Confront Possibility They Were Very Wrong About the Universe."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/top-astronom ... 05446.html
The article states:
"A number of high-profile astronomers are set to convene at London's Royal Society to question some of the most fundamental aspects of our understanding of the universe."
and this:
"We have great data, but the theoretical basis is past its sell-by date," he added. "More and more people are saying the same thing and these are respected astronomers."
It also states:
""We are, in cosmology, using a model that was first formulated in 1922," coorganizer and Oxford cosmologist Subir Sarkar told the newspaper"
The big question is whether they will replace the current and failed "standard model" with another incorrect model. Maybe they should replace it with the Electric Universe model?
The following article is titled: "Top Astronomers Gather to Confront Possibility They Were Very Wrong About the Universe."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/top-astronomers-gather-confront-possibility-161905446.html
The article states:
"A number of high-profile astronomers are set to convene at London's Royal Society to question some of the most fundamental aspects of our understanding of the universe."
and this:
"We have great data, but the theoretical basis is past its sell-by date," he added. "More and more people are saying the same thing and these are respected astronomers."
It also states:
""We are, in cosmology, using a model that was first formulated in 1922," coorganizer and Oxford cosmologist Subir Sarkar told the newspaper"
The big question is whether they will replace the current and failed "standard model" with another incorrect model. Maybe they should replace it with the Electric Universe model?