by Michael Mozina » Thu Aug 27, 2020 6:51 pm
https://www.christianforums.com/threads ... t-75289377
sjastro wrote:The “Theory of Everything” serves as an example of another failure in Plasma Cosmology which is unable to explain the production of protons and neutrons in the universe by examining a preliminary process, the electroweak interaction or force highlighted in the diagram.
LOL! This type of bogus scientific argument is exactly why astronomers are stuck in the dark ages of astronomy.
First of all there is no *single* ("the") theory of everything, there are an infinite number of them, including a few put forth by folks in our own community. Secondly, the BB model doesn't ultimately "explain" anything with respect to where the original "GUT energy" comes from, or how it got "hot" to begin with, or how or why the whole thing wouldn't implode instantly, so the whole concept is utterly irrelevant.
A GUT also *assumes* that the various forces of nature originated from a singular source which isn't "known" to be true in the first place, and to make matters worse for LCDM proponents, a GUT requires a *QUANTUM* theory of gravity, which is a complete departure from GR theory, the foundational concept of gravity that every other part of the LCDM model is based upon! It's also the ultimate form of hypocrisy to claim that a "theory of everything" in any way supports the LCDM model since the LCDM model is based on GR theory, not a quantum gravity theory.
To make matters worst, even sjastro's diagram points out the obvious other major problem of a GUT as it relates to the LCDM model. The LCDM model doesn't just require *four* known forces of nature be related to a single source since their dark matter claim requires a *non* standard particle physics model, not the "standard" particle physics model shown
in his diagram. The LCDM model also requires dark energy and inflation to boot. In short the LCDM model begins by "assuming" that there are actually at least *7* different forces of nature that all originated from a singular process, three of which fail to show up in any lab experiment on Earth!
PC theory doesn't require a "theory of everything" to exist in the first place, although it doesn't preclude it either. PC theory is certainly is not dependent upon the existence of a GUT, so it's absolutely irrational to suggest that a "theory of everything', which may not even exist in the first place, is some sort of a problem for PC theory. That's a patently absurd argument.
This type of bogus nonsense is exactly why astronomers cannot even explain 95 percent of their own model. They're not really looking for any real answers, and all their so called "answers" are simply "made up" metaphysical nonsense to start with, just like their "fix" for a non existent bogus "paradox" that violates the inverse square laws of light.
https://www.christianforums.com/threads/an-example-of-the-failure-of-plasma-cosmology.8160695/page-6#post-75289377
[quote="sjastro"]The “Theory of Everything” serves as an example of another failure in Plasma Cosmology which is unable to explain the production of protons and neutrons in the universe by examining a preliminary process, the electroweak interaction or force highlighted in the diagram.[/quote]
LOL! This type of bogus scientific argument is exactly why astronomers are stuck in the dark ages of astronomy.
First of all there is no *single* ("the") theory of everything, there are an infinite number of them, including a few put forth by folks in our own community. Secondly, the BB model doesn't ultimately "explain" anything with respect to where the original "GUT energy" comes from, or how it got "hot" to begin with, or how or why the whole thing wouldn't implode instantly, so the whole concept is utterly irrelevant.
A GUT also *assumes* that the various forces of nature originated from a singular source which isn't "known" to be true in the first place, and to make matters worse for LCDM proponents, a GUT requires a *QUANTUM* theory of gravity, which is a complete departure from GR theory, the foundational concept of gravity that every other part of the LCDM model is based upon! It's also the ultimate form of hypocrisy to claim that a "theory of everything" in any way supports the LCDM model since the LCDM model is based on GR theory, not a quantum gravity theory.
To make matters worst, even sjastro's diagram points out the obvious other major problem of a GUT as it relates to the LCDM model. The LCDM model doesn't just require *four* known forces of nature be related to a single source since their dark matter claim requires a *non* standard particle physics model, not the "standard" particle physics model shown [url=https://www.christianforums.com/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fmembers.iinet.net.au%2F%7Esjastro%2Fastrophysics%2FsymmetryB.jpg&hash=da3225f0bf383ac0a973431d3d96b652]in his diagram[/url]. The LCDM model also requires dark energy and inflation to boot. In short the LCDM model begins by "assuming" that there are actually at least *7* different forces of nature that all originated from a singular process, three of which fail to show up in any lab experiment on Earth!
PC theory doesn't require a "theory of everything" to exist in the first place, although it doesn't preclude it either. PC theory is certainly is not dependent upon the existence of a GUT, so it's absolutely irrational to suggest that a "theory of everything', which may not even exist in the first place, is some sort of a problem for PC theory. That's a patently absurd argument.
This type of bogus nonsense is exactly why astronomers cannot even explain 95 percent of their own model. They're not really looking for any real answers, and all their so called "answers" are simply "made up" metaphysical nonsense to start with, just like their "fix" for a non existent bogus "paradox" that violates the inverse square laws of light.