by Open Mind » Sun Dec 31, 2023 4:51 pm
Cargo wrote: ↑Sun Dec 31, 2023 4:04 am
Somehow this just popped up in my YT feed. I haven't watched it yet.
Well, the video is from 6 days ago, and can't be found by google on youtube for some tweason.
It popped up on Christmas Eve on youtube.
https://youtu.be/uNk0a5je9G8?si=K5qBE6yQs8aDyIr5
At first, comments were open and many people chimed in, most in congratulations, but some clearly out of pessimism. The comments were turned off since for some reason, but before that happened, Monty did a spree of responses to everyone and answered some questions, but they're all gone now.
Aside from the value of Safire as a model of the Sun, (which I can't comment on as I'm too uninformed in that area), I do understand these efforts being driven from the new electrical perspective, and as such, I route for them only to confirm my assumptions that there are many very important discoveries awaiting us, as soon as some individuals overcome their cognitive dissonance blinders with regards to 'what we know and what we do not know'.
And in this case, with the claims alluded to early on, in regards to a 7% input achieving a maximum output, it seemed the main purpose of AUREON should have been the pursuit of a clean energy process. But now we find, they've locked into radio active remediation instead. Its still an exciting area that has massive needs world wide, but if given the ability to solve the biggest problem of energy creation, it seems like a 'distraction' and more like they buried the lead.
But if I put my tin foil hat on, I expect that if anyone shows up claiming to have THE SOLUTION for clean energy production, you become the enemy of some very powerful people, and the hoops to jump through to actually achieve a 'take over' of that commercial space are infinite. So with that thought, this direction makes total sense, (not to mention its a sector that promises near zero competition).
I mention this because before they turned off comments, I was able to grab this Monty quote in regards to that question:
"Great question! We decided purposely not to discuss energy... it raises serious flags in this world at this time. HOWEVER... there is no question - SAFIRE produces energy." He goes on, but the rest was cut off.
[quote=Cargo post_id=9575 time=1703995443 user_id=6759]
Somehow this just popped up in my YT feed. I haven't watched it yet.
Well, the video is from 6 days ago, and can't be found by google on youtube for some tweason.
[/quote]
It popped up on Christmas Eve on youtube.
https://youtu.be/uNk0a5je9G8?si=K5qBE6yQs8aDyIr5
At first, comments were open and many people chimed in, most in congratulations, but some clearly out of pessimism. The comments were turned off since for some reason, but before that happened, Monty did a spree of responses to everyone and answered some questions, but they're all gone now.
Aside from the value of Safire as a model of the Sun, (which I can't comment on as I'm too uninformed in that area), I do understand these efforts being driven from the new electrical perspective, and as such, I route for them only to confirm my assumptions that there are many very important discoveries awaiting us, as soon as some individuals overcome their cognitive dissonance blinders with regards to 'what we know and what we do not know'.
And in this case, with the claims alluded to early on, in regards to a 7% input achieving a maximum output, it seemed the main purpose of AUREON should have been the pursuit of a clean energy process. But now we find, they've locked into radio active remediation instead. Its still an exciting area that has massive needs world wide, but if given the ability to solve the biggest problem of energy creation, it seems like a 'distraction' and more like they buried the lead.
But if I put my tin foil hat on, I expect that if anyone shows up claiming to have THE SOLUTION for clean energy production, you become the enemy of some very powerful people, and the hoops to jump through to actually achieve a 'take over' of that commercial space are infinite. So with that thought, this direction makes total sense, (not to mention its a sector that promises near zero competition).
I mention this because before they turned off comments, I was able to grab this Monty quote in regards to that question:
"Great question! We decided purposely not to discuss energy... it raises serious flags in this world at this time. HOWEVER... there is no question - SAFIRE produces energy." He goes on, but the rest was cut off.