New Class of Black Holes 'Discovered'

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 7:25 am

New Class of Black Holes 'Discovered'

Unread post by dren » Mon Nov 04, 2019 8:10 am ... -scientist
But new research shows that their search might have been missing an entire class of black holes that they didn't know existed.
Their data crunching found a giant red star that appeared to be orbiting something, but that something, based on their calculations, was likely much smaller than the known black holes in the Milky Way, but way bigger than most known neutron stars.

After more calculations and additional data from the Tillinghast Reflector Echelle Spectrograph and the Gaia satellite, they realized they had found a low-mass black hole, likely about 3.3 times the mass of the sun.
Emphasis (bolding) added by me.

Posts: 294
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:02 pm

Re: New Class of Black Holes 'Discovered'

Unread post by Cargo » Mon Nov 04, 2019 4:05 pm

I can only laugh at the silliness of it all.
interstellar filaments conducted electricity having currents as high as 10 thousand billion amperes

User avatar
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:31 am

Re: New Class of Black Holes 'Discovered'

Unread post by Metryq » Tue Nov 05, 2019 3:54 am

"Low mass black hole"? Is that like pork rinds lite?

User avatar
Posts: 366
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:30 am
Location: London, England

Re: New Class of Black Holes 'Discovered'

Unread post by neilwilkes » Wed Nov 06, 2019 4:45 am

LIGO and it's collisions - again.
Honestly it staggers the imagination how the mainstream get away with this crap all the time. I have 2 major problems with the whole idea (and this does not even get into the fact that their ain't no such thing as a Black Hole in the first place which is a physical impossibility).
1 - IF the Universe is allegedly expanding, and if that expansion is allegedly speeding up, then how in hell's name is anything ever going to collide with anything else in the first place?
2 - IF they want to claim that "Neutron Stars" are real, how is this not a violation of the physical laws of matter, as it is utterly impossible to have an object composed of Neutrons simply because it is so far outside the bands of chemical stability that it would decay almost immediately. They are simply a mathematical construct with no basis in reality at all, and were invented as an ad-hoc response to the persistence of the "Gravity Only" paradigm, and no amount of elegant math will ever change the reality of hard chemistry - I was once told by a physicist that Neutron Stars are okay because chemical stability is chemistry, not physics!!

Please see ... oton-ratio
You will never get a man to understand something his salary depends on him not understanding.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests