NPA Conference - Plasma Cosmology Questions

[peter09]

Two bits only from me, seriously just two bits:
1. Everyone is religious, scientists many times more than most...

Only if you seriously want to redefine religion

[webolife]

Hey Peter, did you read my #2?

Failure to recognize one's own assumptions and beliefs operating during scientific investigation leads to arrogance and suppression of those with alternate views. Tolerance of alternate views, conversely, implies an understanding of one's own foundational "faith system". "Religious" is sometimes characterized by a failure to examine or alter one's own assumptions in the light of controverting evidence, and worse, by the disallowance of another person's contributions. I think this describes much of the science world of today. Perhaps you haven't seen this as much as I have? I am no conspiracy theorist, by the way, but I have been teaching science and math for over 33 years, and challenging colleagues' paradigms for the last 30. Old ideas are extremely tenacious, just like religious zealots.

[peter09]

Hi webolife,
firstly my comment was a bit light hearted and not too serious, secondly I do agree with you that science, like a lot of other things, can get bogged down in peoples vested interests and entrenched ideas, as you describe. (Frankly, this can be seen on this forum as much as any other - well may be )

I suppose what actually trigered my comment was the idea that these failings? constituted religion. We all, most probably, could have failings in these areas somewhere in our world view (politics, people, race etc). This would make us all religious, which sort of defeats the real meaning of religion. (By the way I am not relgious in the accepted way )

I guess we are really well off-topic here, so perhaps best not to continue this in any depth

[Lloyd]

* Here's a late reply to my original set of questions. See http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?t ... lay&id=715 for all of his abstracts.
- You have addressed to me, probably because [you] read my theses to NPA-18, [or] my articles published in reports NPA 13-17. I consider that space [is] not vacuum, and [is a] huge ocean which consists of particles [neutrinos] which poorly co-operates with environment, ... not participating in any kinds of interaction (electric including), except the gravitational. If [one were] to adhere to this point of view, it is possible to explain analogy between galaxies in space and hurricanes in atmospheres of the Earth, Jupiter, Saturn and even the Sun. It is possible to explain also [the] Analogy between convection cells in a liquid and hexagons in atmosphere of Saturn and in the Universe.
- Answering your questions, I will notice that hurricanes on the Earth and in atmosphere of Saturn are accompanied by electric categories [phenomena]. Such categories in galaxies are unknown to me, but I do not exclude their existence ... as well as on the Earth. They occur after возниковения [voznikoveniya] these hurricanes, rather [than] the reverse.
- And on stars and planets they arise in the course of a current of nuclear reactions [in] these objects. For galactic movements are responsible first of all heterogeneity which arise at ocean surrounding us, by analogy to how hurricanes in atmosphere of the Earth arise. Concerning pulsars and Postulates of professor Santili I ... cannot tell. The same concerns the plasma theory cosmology.
- Hope we will meet in Merilende [Maryland] from July, 6 till July, 9th, 2011 [See first post on this thread re the conference there.]
Best regards. Aleksandr Tsybin

http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/NPANewsletterJul2007.pdf
Galaxies move in an ocean of neutrinos. In fact, as noted by Tsybin [78] from Russia, spiral galaxies would then be like stationary hurricanes in a neutrino ocean. The effect of the rotation of the spiral galaxies produces a honeycomb distribution of the neutrino flux in space. Starting with the Newton gravitational force he defines V the rate of change of a neutrino flux as equal to GM, where G is the gravitational constant and M is the mass of a neutrino. Using various scaling factors, he determines the mass of the neutrino, and knowing this mass, he determines the gravitational effect of the flux of neutrinos.

[Lloyd]

Today's NPA speech is called
Beyond Euler: Simple Geometry Unifying Vectors, Scalars and Complex Numbers
http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?t ... lay&id=334
by Michael Studencki, an IT engineer [Interests: Atomic Structure, Quantum Physics, Quantum Computing, it, Ai Cognitive Science, Consciousness, Electrodynamics, Gravity, Ether, Dna, Biochemistry, Geometry, Vedic Maths, Ancient Tech, Cymatics etc; Nationality: Polish; Age: 28]
Description: Vectors, scalars and complex numbers are mathematical concepts which evolved separately and nowadays they are considered different. Although they have been around for many years, there are still lots of misconceptions and problems with understanding of their true nature, which brings even more confusion to their applications in modern physics, especially Quantum Mechanics. My goal is to show that all these three mathematical concepts are in fact one and the same animal, but seen from different perspectives. A simple geometry shows that the unification of notation is possible, which could allow us to use one tool for all these applications. This can lead to several simplifications in physics.

Assumptions:
"The same equations have the same solutions" -- Feynman.
"The same equations suggest the same common underlying phenomenon hiding behind them" -- Me.
Energy is a wave. Wave is an information.
Every atom is like a neuron in a huge neural network of the Universe. It has its own bit of memory (quantum state), it computes (quantum transitions) and it is connected with all other atoms in the Universe (energy transfers over quantum waves).
Everything is connected to everything else. All separation is only an illusion.
Mathematics and geometry is the true language of the Universe.
Nature is simple and it hates complications (because complications cost more).
The Universe is a huge, self-conscious, hyper-intelligent quantum computer.
So it always knows better what's the best for you and your surroundings.
There are NO point particles! They're only appearances.
We are Nature's way to understand itself.

[Lloyd]

Message from NPA http://www.worldsci.org

Welcome Electric Universe People!
I'd like to thank the Thunderbolts Project and the Electric Universe people as well as they start to find the WSD and we are expecting upwards to 100 Electric Universe people at this year's NPA conference in July (6-9) in College Park Maryland.

We have over 35 people from the Electric Universe already signed up to attend and there will be many more on the way. We welcome all of you to update your online profile.

Conference

We have 125 people already signed up to appear in person at the conference with 181 including absentias. We expect to be around the 200 mark this year smashing our attendance records from previous NPA conferences.

Here are the links for the database and conference:
http://www.worldsci.org
http://conf18.worldnpa.org

Thanks to all who have helped grow this community! It is truly incredible to watch!

Volunteers

Volunteers include manning the video recordings of sessions (this is quite simple actually - we use kodak flips), helping with slides on the computer, and helping setup and tear-down audio visual equipment at the beginning and ending of the day.

You can sign up as a volunteer for the conference via your conference admin page. Just click on the link to get there automatically. Find the Registration Attendance box and click on the days you can volunteer.

Having your profile up-to-date and online allows you to add your papers, books, journals, websites, etc. This allows others to learn and read about your work.

You can edit the current information and choose whether to display your profile and contact information publicly so your information is safe with us!

Present your Work Live over the Internet

You also now have an opportunity to present your work world-wide at anytime via our video conferencing. It is an easy way to present your work to a interested, targeted audience anytime, anywhere without the travel expenses of physically going to a conference. More info can be found at http://video.worldsci.org.

-David de Hilster
World Science Database

[Lloyd]

*****====================================================*****
Wallace Thornhill video conference on Saturday, April 2, 2011

The Natural Philosophy of the Electric Universe
When in session, click here to join the video conference: https://my.dimdim.com/dehilster http://live.worldsci.org
Date: Saturday, April 2, 2011
Time: 07:00 AM - 09:20 AM (U.S. Pacific time)
New York: 2011-04-02 10:00 AM
Rio: 2011-04-02 11:00 AM
Rome: 2011-04-02 04:00 PM
Delhi: 2011-04-02 07:30 PM
Sydney: 2011-04-03 01:00 AM
Length: 2 hours, 20 minutes

Where: Online Video Conference
Contact: David Scott de Hilster
Info Tel: 310-991-5744
Email: david@dehilster.com

Yes (6): Pal Asija, David Scott de Hilster, Thomas Findlay, David Talbott, Wallace Thornhill, Greg Volk
Guest Speaker:
Wallace Thornhill, "Wal"
Physicist
Interests: Solar system, Cosmology, Electric Universe, Plasma
Nationality: Australian
Books: 6
Abstracts: 4
Read details: http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?t ... lay&id=585

In my presentation in September 2009 I covered most of the principles of the Electric Universe cosmology. Since then I have found confusion about its relationship to plasma cosmology. My view is that plasma cosmology, although crucially important, is not a complete cosmology since it deals only with the physics of the medium of space. ‘Physics of the plasma universe’ is a more accurate title. Cosmology must be capable of providing insights into all disciplines including life itself and the human condition. It must be predictive. And to be correct there can be no exceptions. So a guiding principle of EU cosmology is convergence of all human knowledge, not mere consensus in one specialized, theoretical field. This approach contrasts with the divergent tunnel vision of modern cosmologists. Clearly, specialists are essential. However, in my presentation I will sketch my personal odyssey and argue for a return to the principles of physics and natural philosophy as arbiter in the quest for a real cosmology.

Please come early, there are only 100 spots and we expect those to be taken quite quickly.

[Jarvamundo]

Check out who else is on the cards: http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?t ... lay&id=411
Dr. Ari "plasma redshift" Brynjolfsson

Hot diggity, nice one NPA.

[Lloyd]

WAL THORNHILL VIDEO CONFERENCE LIVE

Saturday morning, April 2, Australian physicist Wal Thornhill, will present an updated overview in a live video conference sponsored by the Natural Philosophy Alliance.

The presentation will last two hours and will include plenty of time for questions and answers.

There are no special requirements or downloads needed to attend the conference, which is free and open to all. A live "chat" (keyboard style) will run concurrently with the presentation, and all attendees can use this function to pose questions or offer comments.

When: Saturday, April 2, 7:00am US Pacific Time.

Where: Just go to http://live.worldsci.org about 10 minutes before start time, to ensure a place. "Room" name is "dehilster." Places will be limited to the first 100 attendees. Once at the conference site just enter your name in the box and click OK, and you'll be in.

First come first served. A few who came late on Wal's last conference call did not make it in!

[Lloyd]

Next Weekly NPA Video Conference
Experiment of the Biefield-Brown Effect using Symmetric Plate Capacitors Charged below 35kV
Date: Saturday, April 9, 2011
Time: 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM (U.S. Pacific time)
New York: 2011-04-09 10:00 AM
Rio: 2011-04-09 11:00 AM
Rome: 2011-04-09 04:00 PM
Delhi: 2011-04-09 07:30 PM
Sydney: 2011-04-10 12:00 AM
Length: 2 hours
When in session, click here to join the video conference: http://live.worldsci.org

Guest Speaker: Jeffrey N. Cook, "Jeff"
Inventor, Independent researcher; Interests: Gravity, Electrogravity, Zero Point Energy, Synthetic Life
Nationality: USA; Abstracts: 1; Read details: http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?t ... ay&id=1915.

Since at least as early as the 1920's it has been documented within the literature that asymmetric capacitors exhibit a net force in the direction of their charges when high voltages are applied. It also has been demonstrated that certain electrode shapes have an impact on the effectiveness of this effect, that which is called “the Biefield-Brown Effect”. The author herein explores the limitations of certain designs in order to better understand the physics of this phenomenon, as well as to add measurable data to this study. Nine designs are considered and strict controls are applied to the experimental steps in order to provide the best possible data and analysis for this research. It has been found through this research that the “skin effect” of a charged metal can give insight into better designs, as well as the electrical breakdown distances of the dielectric materials of such capacitors. While this paper does not rule in (nor out) the exclusivity of ion wind in such designs, it does bring into account where and when such ion wind factors are a critical block to future technologies in this regard, as well as to where and when they are not.

[Lloyd]

* Russian Prof. Kanarev has very amazing, cutting-edge info on the Microcosm. See e.g. http://Kanarev.innoplaza.net, http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory: ... ectrolysis, http://www.new-physics.com, http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/link ... ectron.pdf.
* I'm trying to submit some highlights of his findings, but they're much more interesting than they may sound here.
Journal of Theoretics
Planck's CONSTANT AND THE MODEL OF THE ELECTRON
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/link ... ectron.pdf
The Photon & the Electron Are Ring-shaped
They Each Have 6 EM Fields
The Electron's Electric Field Is Apple-shaped
It's Magnetic Field Has a Figure-8 Shape
Free Electrons Absorb Local Ether Mass after Emitting Photon Mass
The Electron's External Electric Field Emits the Large Photons
An Electron Can Become a Positron
Electricity Is Longitudinal Waves Between Electrons
Photons Are Rotating Rings
A Photon's Mass Comes from Its EM Fields
Photon EM Fields & Motion
Range of Photon Wavelengths
Photon Formation & EM Fields
Why Photons Are in Motion
Photon Particle & Wave Properties
Photon Polarization
Photon Charge Neutrality
Cosmic Background Radiation

Journal of Theoretics Vol.4-4 - Electrons in Atoms
Electrons Do Not Orbit, But Precess
Formulae Indicate No Electron Orbital Motion
Opposite Electric Fields Draw Electrons & Protons Together
Same Magnetic Poles Hold Them Apart
Sizes of Protons, Electrons & Atoms
Electron Shells
Atomic Electrons Are Like Spinning Tops [or Gyroscopes?]
Valence Electrons
Water Molecules

Journal of Theoretics, Inc. 2002
19. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON THE MICROCOSM
19.2. A photon
Photons Are Rings of Magnetic Compression & Centrifugal Expansion
Photons Are Unbalanced
Photons Interact with Ether
Photon Shapes
Photons Have Combined Rectilinear, Rotary & Oscillatory Motions
Photon Mass Produces Its EM or Magnetic Fields
Maximum Wavelength of a Photon
The Spectrum Is Photon Radiations, Not EM Radiations
Photon Motion
Thermal Photons
Protons Can Emit UV Photons
Thermal & Nonthermal Photons
Photons Have Spin
Identical Photons Attract
Light Diffraction
Light Reflection
Photon Polarization
Light Refraction
Light Diffraction
Light Interference
Diffraction of Elementary Particle Waves
Photons Begin Motion Below Light Speed
Photons Lose Mass in Transit
Photons Are the Fundamental Carriers of Energy
Blackbody Radiation
Photons Produce Temperature
Thermal Photons
Background Radiation
Oversized Photons Dissolve into the Ether
All Photons Are Particles
Photons Cannot Yet Be Imaged
Protons & Neutrons
Proton Constant of Localization
The Proton Is a Ring or Torus
Proton Vectors
Proton EM Field Strengths
The Proton Has 2 Magnetic Poles; The Neutron Has 6
Neutrons Settle Between Adjacent Protons
Neutron Constant of Localization
Protons Can Become Neutrons

19.5. Spectroscopy
Electron & Proton Interaction
Spins & Magnetic Moments
Spectrum Math Model
Atomic Structure
Hydrogen Electron & Proton Interaction
Electron & Proton Sizes
Electron Maximum Power Level
Hydrogen Spectral Line
Monatomic Hydrogen
Ionization of Hydrogen-like Atoms
Ionization of Helium
Ionization of Beryllium
Electron Energy & Mass Changes
Photons Cause All Explosions
Electrons Are the Same Size as X-ray Photons
Compton Effect & Atomic Number
Explosive Water Molecule Formation
Formation of Hydrogen Molecule
Orthohydrogen & Parahydrogen
Electron & Proton Magnetic Moments
Why Both Paired & Unpaired Oxygen Are Chemically Active
Rod Magnetic Fields Can Cluster
Increasing Temperature Increases Mass & Volume
Increasing Temperature Increases Atmospheric Pressure
Temperature Dependent Extraction Technology [Exclusion Zones]
Heating Removes Ions, Reducing Weight

19.7. Nucleus of atoms
Proton Magnetic Field Is Like Rod Magnet
Neutron Magnetic Field Intensity
Nuclear Force Is Magnetic
Neutrons Shield Protons from Repulsion
Each Nuclear Proton Lies on the Surface of the Nucleus
Electrons & Protons Each Have 2 Magnetic Poles
Neutrons Each Have 6 Magnetic Poles
Nuclear Force Is Magnetic
Transmutation Occurs by Photons
Nuclear Radiation
Nuclear Charge
No Neutrinos
Atomic Mass Loss to Ether
Radioactivity
Cheap Energy from Water, Alternative to Tokamak
Stellar Synthesis of Helium
Problems with Conventional Science
Problem Understanding Photons
Stellar Energy Source
Useful Powerful Magnets Resulted from Tokamak
Explanation of Nuclear Explosions
Transmutation

Journal Home Page
09.05.07.
The 1st paragraph of the third chapter from a rate of lectures
«Bases of the Theory of Nanotechnologies»
3. ELECTRON
3.1. The prologue
3.2. Ring model of electron
3.3. Toroidal model of electron
Electron Potential and Kinetic Energy

01.06.05
THE FIFTH AND THE SIXTH LECTURES BY THE UNITY AXIOM
PHYSICAL MEANING OF HEAT, TEMPERATURE, RELIC RADIATION, PHOTOEFFECT AND COMPTON’S EFFECT

PHYSICAL MEANING OF RELIC RADIATION
Source of Background Radiation
Stellar Hydrogen Formation
Hydrogen Is Formed Within Stars [?]
Background Radiation Implications
Maximum Photon Size
Background Radiation Sources
Conclusion
ANALYSIS OF THE COMPTON EFFECT
Proton Magnetic Field Is Like Rod Magnet
Photons Cannot Regain Energy
Biased Line Decrease with Atomic Number Increase
Conclusion

Published 19.05.2004
NEW FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANT
Meaning of Planck's Constant
Photon Localization Constant
Photon Has Six EM Fields
Photon's Mass Is in the EM Fields
Photon Magnetic Fields
Photon Mass Is Inversely Proportional to Its Wavelength
Photon's Maximum Wavelength & Minimum Mass
Photon EM Waves
Hydrogen Electron Energy Level Limits
Single Photon Maximum Size
Two Classes of EM Radiation

THE DOPPLER EFFECT AT PHOTON EMISSION
Doppler Effect
Inadequacy of Relativistic Redshift Theory
Correcting Relativity Error
Doppler Effect from the Classical Viewpoint
Object Stationary Relative to Space

[Lloyd]

Kanarev's Findings (See previous post too.)
Electron Structure
http://symmetrymath.com/sitebuilder/ima ... 50x219.jpg

N: North; h: ?; Me: Electron Magnetic Field; re: Electron Radius; pe: Torus Cross-section Radius; S: South
- The Electron has a slinky Torus shape
- The slinky is the path of a high-speed particle
- The particle makes 6 helical turns per revolution around the center
- Protons, Neutrons and Photons have similar Torus structure
- The Electron's Electric Field Is Apple-shaped with vertical axis
- Its Magnetic Field Has vertically rotated Figure-8 Shape
Hydrogen Structure
http://i573.photobucket.com/albums/ss18 ... /HAtom.jpg

Me: Electron Magnetic Field; e: Electron; h: height?; P: Proton; Mp: Proton Magnetic Field
Proton Diameter: 2.6x10^-15m
Electron Diameter: 4.8x10^-12m = 1846 times the Proton Diameter
Proton-Electron Distance: 10^-9m = 385,000 times the Proton Diameter
- Hydrogen is an Electron-Proton Rod
- The Electron does not orbit the Proton; It hovers above the Proton
- Opposite Electric Fields Draw the Electron & Proton Together
- Same Magnetic Poles Hold Them Apart
Nuclear Structure
- Each nucleus has 3 perpendicular axes, x, y & z
- Neutrons occupy the centers of each axis
- Protons occupy the outer portions, separated by central Neutrons
http://www.sciteclibrary.ru/ris-stat/34 ... e10877.gif

The Graphite & Diamond Atoms in the image are Carbon Atoms.
Black & Gray Balls are Neutrons; Plain White Balls are Protons; White Balls marked "e" are Electrons.
http://guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy ... age041.gif

a) K (19,20) ------------------ b) O (8,8) ------------------ c) Si (14,14)
Fig. 3. Diagrams of the atomic nuclei of: a) potassium, b) oxygen, c) silicon
* Here are more Atomic Structures.
[url]H-Be: http://www.guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/en ... /0904.html[/url]
[url]Na-Sc: http://www.guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/en ... /0914.html[/url]
[url]Ti-Cu: http://www.guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/en ... /0925.html[/url]
* This section shows more of the exact structure with the electrons, which make atoms appear cone-shaped. Below is Lithium.
http://www.guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/en ... /1003.html
http://www.guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/en ... age093.gif

[Lloyd]

Here is an upcoming video conference.
To participate, you only need a computer, and internet hookup, and sound.
When in session, click here to join the video conference: http://live.worldsci.org

Practicism: The Unifying Body of Understanding for Everything
Date: Saturday, April 16, 2011
Time: 07:00 AM - 09:00 AM (U.S. Pacific time)
New York: 2011-04-16 10:00 AM
Rio: 2011-04-16 11:00 AM
Rome: 2011-04-16 04:00 PM
Delhi: 2011-04-16 07:30 PM
Sydney: 2011-04-17 12:00 AM

Length: 2 hours
Guest Speaker: Wilfred Berendsen
Interests: Meta-semiotics, Semiotics, Phronesis, Management, Social Sciences
Nationality: Dutch; Age: 37

Abstracts: 1
- Scientists have been looking for ages for a theory of everything, capable of unifying all theory and practice. While many scientists have explored the path towards this theory of everything, till now no-one has found one. The reasons are numerous, of course, but among the most important are a) a theory of everything is just not possible, and b) scientists like Einstein and Hawking have simply looked in the wrong directions and with wrong perspectives.
- Now, there actually IS a great body of understanding for everything, unifying both theory and practice. It is, without doubt, the sole way to reach a theory of everything. Based on a methodological approach, this great understanding that really ALL of science and practice, and also ALL of human and non-human sense making, must be grounded on only ONE sole great underlying structure and nature of ALL of our universes. I term this sole great underlying structure holoplurality.
- Everything in our universes is an instance of this notion of holoplurality. Therefore, my body of understanding called practicism (based on holoplurality and my understanding of sole true great sane sense making) has to become fundamental for ALL of sciences and practices and sense making. This will enable unification of science, practice in all of our universes. Practicism is THE answer, the greatest framework for ourselves and our universes. It is the beginning and fundamental for the greatest, most excellent understandings and growth of plurisims and life as such.

Abstracts Online:
2011 Practicism: The Unifying Body of Understanding for Everything
Biography
- I am a social researcher and practitioner, and wrote two books, soon to be released, covering
1. A meta-semiotic body of understanding, a sort of theory for everything, in which differences between theory and practice disappear.
2. An alternative money system enabling a whole new world of possibilities and existences.
- I was born in Lichtenvoorde, the Netherlands, in 1973. Some of my educational backgrounds include the HAN university of applied sciences (at that time called HEAO Arnhem) where I graduated in Logistics and Economics. Then also I completed Business Administration at the Erasmus University in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Specialization into change management. Besides that I studied some months at the Prague University of Economics in Prague, Czech Republic.
- During my studies in Arnhem and Rotterdam, I also worked in the Czech Republic. Setting up a subsidiary for a Dutch company there.
- After graduation from Erasmus University, I enrolled into an SAP implementation project. Which was a multiplant, cross cultural implementation of SAP. Me working on the material management parts. The material master, stock keeping, MRP, purchasing and other material management functionalities. This was a very successful implementation, but of course this project ended.
- After it I mainly pursued my research in social sciences and practises. Already knowing that there was something fundamentally wrong with our money system and economics. Later on, during my research I came to understand that just all of sciences are based on the wrong, (potentially) insane and damaging fundaments. But, more importantly, I came to understand that ALL of sciences and practises NEED to be grounded on one sole true great underlying structure and nature of ALL of our universes. This resulted in my phronesis meta-semeiotical body of understanding called practicism. Which is a unifying body of understanding for everything, unifying theory and practise. This body of understanding for everything HAS to become the new fundament for ALL of sciences and practises and ALL of human sensemaking.
- Besides being a social researcher and practitioner and intellectual in change management, I am also kind of addicted to falconry. Being the art of hunting with birds of prey.
- My work can be found through googling, there is quite a lot being published on the internet already. For instance on http://www.scribd.com/wberendsen or http://www.academia.edu and then my page there. Also I can be found on Facebook and Linkedin. Anyone interested in more information or wanting to negotiate is cordially invited to contact me.

[webolife]

Kanarev's "rod" like relationship of proton/electron pairing fits well with my "vectoral" view. I also like his crystalline model for the atom, which to me is an exigent result of universal fractality, or at least for the scalability, of electrical phenomena. His conical electrical fields are fascinating and just may be the particle model of the future.

[Lloyd]

* Re the cone-shaped Electron-Proton pairs, I hope folks understand that the cone shape is just to show the connection between the two particles. Each of the two particles is actually torus-shaped, the proton tiny, the electron huge, like the small and large ends of a blow horn. The electric fields are somewhat apple-shaped and the magnetic fields are double-sphere-shaped, like a figure-8. I don't know if the proton's fields are similar in size to the electron's. But the two toruses are inside two apples & 8's, where the apples attract and the 8's push apart, so the forces balance.
* Kanarev's model may be the near future, at least for more alert scientists.