Latest research on the nature of gravity?

[justcurious]

Greetings,

I found this source http://electrogravityphysics.com which seems pretty good, it suggests that gravity has to do with eletromagnetism.
I'm not quite up to speed on the science yet (still reviewing my maths and EE knowledge which is basic and 15 years old).
I was wondering if anyone on this board might validate that site, and/or offer other sources related to the latest research on the nature of gravity (or is it something that institutional science gave up trying to understand?).

Thanks in advance!

Sam

[Sparky]

Sam, I have found that an "advanced google search" of thunderbolts.info is the best way to find a subject being discussed. Such a search returned 10.8k for "gravity".

[justcurious]

Thanks Sparky....

I put "site:thunderbolts.info gravity" in google and it returned lots of stuff. Had to sift through the "it's electricity not gravity" posts but managed to find what I was looking for with little effort.

I also read the forum rules, I should have put my link in the "mad science" section, sorry about hat (my first posts).

Thanks again!

[tayga]

Here's a good starting point on electric gravity. It summarizes some of the work of T.T. Brown, an early 20th Century pioneer whose work became classified and is now widely misunderstood. There are a couple of links at the bottom of the page. Ignore the author's assumptions about “bending space”, there are plenty of empirical observations to be going on with. If I were looking to experiment, I'd start with trying to recreate T.T. Brown's work.

http://montalk.net/science/84/the-biefeld-brown-effect

See also Wal Thornhill for a theoretical look at electric gravity:

http://www.holoscience.com/wp/electric- ... -universe/

BTW if your Mum's an open-minded nuclear physicist, ask her whether she thinks there's really such a thing as the strong nuclear interaction. If you're interested, there are empirical data to show that it's a mistake used to fudge an incorrect assumption...

[Vasa]

Tayga,

I am interested in this data. Do you have a link?

[tayga]

Tayga,

I am interested in this data. Do you have a link?

http://mb-soft.com/public2/nuclei6.html

There you go, Vasa. I'd be interested to know what you think.

[Vasa]

Tayga,

I am interested in this data. Do you have a link?

http://mb-soft.com/public2/nuclei6.html

There you go, Vasa. I'd be interested to know what you think.

Thanks Tayga! I will try to read it and offer an opinion tonight after band practice.

[justcurious]

Here's a good starting point on electric gravity. It summarizes some of the work of T.T. Brown, an early 20th Century pioneer whose work became classified and is now widely misunderstood. There are a couple of links at the bottom of the page. Ignore the author's assumptions about “bending space”, there are plenty of empirical observations to be going on with. If I were looking to experiment, I'd start with trying to recreate T.T. Brown's work.

http://montalk.net/science/84/the-biefeld-brown-effect

See also Wal Thornhill for a theoretical look at electric gravity:

http://www.holoscience.com/wp/electric- ... -universe/

BTW if your Mum's an open-minded nuclear physicist, ask her whether she thinks there's really such a thing as the strong nuclear interaction. If you're interested, there are empirical data to show that it's a mistake used to fudge an incorrect assumption...

Brilliant thank you!

[Vasa]

Tayga...

I'm impressed. I won't pretend i fully comprehend it all or the implications, but he makes a very strong case.

[tayga]

Tayga...

I'm impressed. I won't pretend i fully comprehend it all or the implications, but he makes a very strong case.

Even without the reasonable speculation, simple analysis of the data leaves no room for the strong nuclear interaction which is near the bottom of a whole stack of cards which makes up the Standard Model of Particle Physics.