Yes we know, there is a lot of resistance against Electrical models in astronomy.
As I understand it, the electric sun model is about the nuclear reactions taking place
near or even outside the surface of the sun.
There is a good video on focus fusion.
So there is likely a combination of heat radiation and electric light.
The electric light gives the illusion of a very high temperature.
The black body radiation:
[quote kiwi / from other thread]
Pierre-Marie Robitaille, PhD is a Professor of Radiology at The Ohio State University, with a joint appointment in Chemical Physics. He initially trained as a spectroscopist and has wide ranging knowledge of instrumentation in the radio and microwave bands. A recognized expert in image acquisition and analysis, Professor Robitaille was responsible for doubling the world record in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 1998. In 2000, he turned his attention to thermodynamics and astrophysics, demonstrating that the universality advanced in Kirchhoff's Law of Thermal Emission is invalid. He has published extensively on the microwave background, highlighting that this signal arises from water on the Earth and has no relationship to cosmology and has recently published a paper on the Liquid Metallic Hydrogen Solar Model (LMHSM).
My addition: the black body radiation does not work in practice.
The theory works only for a special kind of transmitter/body.
The electric comet is mainly about the comet being electrically active.
Due to its path.
I think there is a lot of evidence for that. The electrochemistry is caused by the solar wind
interacting with the material of the comet. The comets tail is directly related to the solar wind,
and not really related to the surface temperature.
The material of the comet is certainly not just ice or snow.
In fact on the surface of the comets there is almost no water at all. Only a few small
spots of water have been found.
The lander crashed because of this reason. They did not expect a hard surface.
The reason why scientists believe in snow-ball comets, is because they have the fixed idea
of comets coming from an Oort-cloud. This again is based on the accretion disk model, in which
the outside material must be lighter than the inside material.
The reason why the comet is reported being made of light material, is not exactly known.
My guess is that the sun causes a continuous chemical burning of the material, which makes
it like coal or a light volcanic material.
Looking at the comet's surface from the start to the end of the mission, I see almost no change.
So it is likely that the surface is hard and strong. And does not melt in the sun, like ice.
In my opinion the sun would affect its surface and even its shape dramatically.
So the ice-comet model is wrong.
But I don't know exactly what is going on with the mass of the comet,
maybe they just assumed it to be like ice or snow and never really did any real measurements
(which is a pretty common problem in science).
In some thunderbolt videos the speaker states that a difference in the electric charge of the
comet might also affect its apparent gravity. In this case the comet could be just a solid rock.
Sadly the surface material tests failed dramatically, which makes impossible to make a
final statement on the material of the comet.