Einstein's relativity theories had to be invalid.

Has science taken a wrong turn? If so, what corrections are needed? Chronicles of scientific misbehavior. The role of heretic-pioneers and forbidden questions in the sciences. Is peer review working? The perverse "consensus of leading scientists." Good public relations versus good science.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Roshi
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Einstein's relativity theories had to be invalid.

Unread post by Roshi » Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:09 pm

Of course if there was a clock attached on Rock 1 and Rock 2 it would have ticked faster, because reasons not explained. Along with all physical processes that would also have been slowed down with exactly the same %. A person travelling with Rock 1 would have had all his bodily function slowed down, yet he would not have observed this, and would not have any problem with it. Slowed down by unkonwn and unexplained forces.This means more time would have been recorded by the clock on the Rock 1 and 2, this means that somehow their speed would not have gone beyond 300000km/s. Cool ,but who cares. This is already magic land.

Cargo
Posts: 294
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:02 pm

Re: Einstein's relativity theories had to be invalid.

Unread post by Cargo » Sat Apr 02, 2016 9:25 pm

What? So the answer to long distance space sleep travel is it to just go faster?

What is the fastest a Clock as traveled that we know of empirically.
interstellar filaments conducted electricity having currents as high as 10 thousand billion amperes

Roshi
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Einstein's relativity theories had to be invalid.

Unread post by Roshi » Sun Apr 03, 2016 1:29 am

For the purpose of not breaking the speed limit clocks need to slow down at high speeds... This means more "time" has passed, this means less speed! No physical explanation given. And then the aberation grows. Time becomes a phyisical object that can stretch and bend, it's not just our count of a cyclical process. In fact it's not the clock that ticked slower, time itself was "passing slower", slowing all processes on board, keeping people younger (Twins paradox), etc.

All this - just to not break the speed limit, even when we are just adding 2 perfectly legal mainstream speeds.

If clocks should slow down at high speed does that mean less time passes, so distance/time (speed) increases in fact? And if "speed" increases, clocks slow down even more. Confusion forever. Nevermind.

I can't tell a relativist - that I have object X moving at 270000km/s in regards to object Y, he will say I need to add their speeds "relatively". Even if I just said the speed of X in relation to Y. In fact I cannot even be allowed to set this as a given in any mental experiment, I need to use the law of composition of velocities - to obtain another velocity. I just want object X moving at 270000km/s in relation to object Y - but not, cannot have that just like that...

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests