ja7tdo,
Your personal (non EU) theorizing should not be posted on the "Electric Universe" or "Planetary Science" boards. It is an invitation for other forum members to respond to your post and that would only serve to divert the topic from an EU focus.
Many here have their own personal views and theories which may or may not be consistent with the Thunderbolts Project, and they are more than welcome to post those ideas and theorizing on the NIAMI board. There the discussion can be totally devoted to the pros and cons of the particular theory.
Please read the last post in the Rules and Guidelines thread here:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... p?f=11&t=4
The Age of Venus & Its lack of a Magnetic Field
- nick c
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
- Location: connecticut
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 4:43 am
Re: The Age of Venus & Its lack of a Magnetic Field
I'm assuming that that most planets began as the cores of stars, and that once a star encounters a more powerfully charged star the solid ionised/electron depleted core is slowed vastly more than the electrically active fluid/plasma exterior, and thus breaks out. Jupiter has a less dense core than expected NASA has their view, https://phys.org/news/2019-08-young-jup ... ssive.html [courtesy Lloyd elsewhere] , mine would be that it recently lost it's core and a new one is forming with a very different spread of elements. Depending on it's speed of approach, and it's possible Jupiter came in from 'our' south, previously belonging to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittari ... dal_Galaxy , with enough inertia to disrupt the whole previous planetary order, causing existing gas giants/captured stars to shed their 'new' cores as moons these cores being of differing generations. Though it's beyond my ability to deduce if Venus rotates with a spin compatible with the polar orbit of the dwarf galaxy, and other views are available http://viewzone.com/milkyway.htmlWebbman wrote:perhaps not every planet born is full of iron, nickel and cobalt.
It may be the case that when Jupiter+Venus was captured and the planets realigned with the new EM field into their present orbits that the slowing of a previous companion planet was decelerated to the point where it exploded due to the translation of it's kinetic energy into heat catalysing exothermic reactions giving us the asteroid belt.
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:36 am
- Location: Japan
- Contact:
Re: The Age of Venus & Its lack of a Magnetic Field
EU is not perfect theory. What you are saying is the same as mainstream science.nick c wrote:ja7tdo,
Your personal (non EU) theorizing should not be posted on the "Electric Universe" or "Planetary Science" boards. It is an invitation for other forum members to respond to your post and that would only serve to divert the topic from an EU focus.
Many here have their own personal views and theories which may or may not be consistent with the Thunderbolts Project, and they are more than welcome to post those ideas and theorizing on the NIAMI board. There the discussion can be totally devoted to the pros and cons of the particular theory.
Please read the last post in the Rules and Guidelines thread here:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... p?f=11&t=4
- nick c
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
- Location: connecticut
Re: The Age of Venus & Its lack of a Magnetic Field
Is there something that you do not understand about the forum Rules and Guidelines?ja7tdo wrote:EU is not perfect theory. What you are saying is the same as mainstream science.
If so, contact me through a PM.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests