Dense Ether Theory

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

User avatar
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:36 am

Dense Ether Theory

Unread post by spark » Thu Nov 28, 2019 1:50 am

Part 1:
Part 2:

Source: ... uery=ether

Nikola Tesla's quote on density of the ether and gravity which he called universal compression:

"What is the ether and why is it so difficult to detect it? I reflected on this matter for a seriously long time and here are the outcomes I have been led to: I think that all the contradictions about whether the ether exists or not are the result of wrong interpretation of ether's properties. The ether has always been presented as an aero - form environment (gaseous). That was the essential mistake. The ether has a very strong density. It is known that the more dense a substance, the higher is the speed of wave propagation within it. When comparing acoustic speed in the air and the light speed I have drawn a conclusion that ether density is several thousand times higher than air density. It is not the ether that is aero - form (gaseous) but the material world is an aero - form to the ether!

A good example for such an interaction becomes apparent in gravitation, which should rather be named, universal compression. I think the material bodies do not gravitate between each other but it is the ether that makes one material body to press to another. We wrongly call this phenomenon gravitation. We can also feel ether's reaction when sudden acceleration or braking (inertia). The stars, planets and all the universe appeared from the ether when some part of it, due to certain reasons, became less dense.

It can be compared with formation of blebs (air bubbles) in boiling water although such a comparison is only rough. The ether tries to return itself to its initial state by compressing our world, but intrinsic electric charge within the material world substance obstructs this. It is similar to that when the water compresses blebs (air bubbles) filled with hot water steam. Until the steam does get cold the water is unable to compress the bleb (air bubbles). With time, having lost the intrinsic electric charge, our world will be compressed with the ether and is going to turn into ether. Having come out of the ether once - so it will go back in to the ether." - Nikola Tesla.

Source of quote: ... _ether.pdf

Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:33 am

Re: Dense Ether Theory

Unread post by crawler » Thu Nov 28, 2019 2:31 pm
I agree with some of Distinti's stuff re matter consuming aether & gravity being due to the acceleration of aether flowing into matter.

But i don't understand the need to talk of the density of aether. Aether is subquantum, it has no quantum mass & no quantum density.

Mass & inertia are due to matter consuming aether. Aether duznt consume aether therefore has no mass.

Conrad Ranzan would disagree with me here. He says that aether is contractile, meaning that when aether flows into mass the aether has a secondary self consumption magnifying the inflow. Conrad says that the math requires this.

Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2017 10:42 pm

Re: Dense Ether Theory

Unread post by X-RAY » Sat Dec 14, 2019 11:26 am

I enjoyed reading Tesla’s quote. Thank you for that.

I thank the works of the late Walter Russell describes what Tesla is referring to better than anyone. He talks of the centrifugal radiative force spiraling out from the Sun and the centripetal compressive force of gravity spiraling inwards toward the Sun.

The implication is that expanding forces spiraling out from the Sun have an inverse relationship with gravitational (or compressive) forces spiraling in towards the Sun-–meaning that both forces are impacted equally by the square of the distance. It is described here as an equilibrium vortex center (or homogeneous state) which negates planetary-mass altogether—implying there is no resistance to acceleration so the body is weightless, and therefore, its mass is zero.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest