An ironic title, I know, but still, sometimes you can find information that is not 100% mainstream
Like this, for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_c ... ccurrences
Apparently the solar wind is an electric current go wiki, go
Here is another example, this time a mix of truth and utter nonsense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_ ... lt#Removal
Having problems with planetary double layers? No problem! We know people that can remove them in just under two months
Wikipedia + EU = Love
-
- Posts: 1405
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:37 am
Re: Wikipedia + EU = Love
Even more ironic- they use a picture of Kristian Birkeland's terella experiment to denote the Van Allen belts which they believe are generated entirely locally to the planet (hence why they think they can 'drain' them)!
Mike H.
"I have no fear to shout out my ignorance and let the Wise correct me, for every instance of such narrows the gulf between them and me." -- Michael A. Harrington
"I have no fear to shout out my ignorance and let the Wise correct me, for every instance of such narrows the gulf between them and me." -- Michael A. Harrington
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 11:55 am
Re: Wikipedia + EU = Love
Here's actualy a good one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliospheric_current_sheet
The only mistake I could find is the assumption that the rotating field is generated only by the sun's physical rotation (as opposed to galactic current input).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliospheric_current_sheet
The only mistake I could find is the assumption that the rotating field is generated only by the sun's physical rotation (as opposed to galactic current input).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest