Electric Seasons and Vitality - A Hypothesis

[JP Michael]

Thesis: Humans (perhaps animals too) are prone to higher bouts of illness due to an increase in negative EMF strengths that promote bacterial/fungal growth during Earth's energetic winter Birkeland current cycles.

We know from Don Scott's research that Earth has a yearly cycle of current coming into and out of the respective north and south poles at different times of the year. The pattern is obvious for everyone who spends some time looking at earth.nullschool.net (10 hPa altitude, change the dates as necessary). During the North-pole winter (Nov-Apr), the North Polar vortex is at its typical peak intensity. It is, for all respects, an entire north-hemispheric Low Pressure System at the level of the mesosphere-stratosphere (this is quite in spite of any actual air pressure; the intensity of the vortex winds are obvious). According to paladin17, this represents upward positive current (current leaving) (and thus downward negative current arriving?? Not sure about this point). This process completely reverses in the northern-hemispheric summertime (May-Sep). During summer, positive current is arriving (and negative current is departing??) Earth's north pole. The visible air patterns of the polar vortex gradually reverses direction and intensity at this time, so the seasonal polarity direction of the current is blatantly obvious. The south pole and southern hemisphere has this pattern in reverse. During winter (Feb-Aug), the southern hemisphere is primarily receiving negative charge and emitting positive. During summer (Sep-Feb), it is receiving positive and emitting negative. I call these two phases energetic and quiescent.

During the energetic phase, which always occurs in each hemisphere's winter, that hemisphere is subject to increasing negative charge. This charge is strongest in the upper atmosphere at the pole but must, by nature, filter down all the layers of the atmosphere to seek equilibrium with ground. Due to the abundance of negative charge, winter sees impressive filamentary cloud formations (esp. cirrus) and rain. This may or may not be also related to cooler weather (I'm not yet decided whether the abundance of negative charge or the shorter day is the stronger contributing factor for winter cold and I don't know the interaction between charge polarity and air temperature, if there is one), but what I would like to specifically test is the natural atmospheric electric fields present in the air during winter to see if they are radically different to atmospheric electric field strengths during summer. If so, then what needs to be examined further is whether the change is significant enough a cause for the promotion of bacterial/fungal growth and thus an increase in bacterial/fungal toxicity (we all have bacteria/fungi in/on our bodies at all times), and therefore more illness in wintertime as opposed to summer. Thus, I need to demonstrate that bacterium/fungi exhibit preference for 1. negative charge, 2. increased reproduction rates in stronger electric fields, and 3. increased reproduction rates result in toxicity harmful to human and animal vitality. I believe 2. and 3 are already firmly established within biological fields.

During the quiescent phase, which always occurs in each hemisphere's summer, that hemisphere is subject to increasing positive charge. This charge is, again, strongest in the upper atmosphere at the pole but must, by nature, filter down all the layers of the atmosphere to balance with ground. Due to the abundance of positive charge, summer sees clear skies and hot days, but can still exhibit windy or stormy conditions due to the localised attraction of electrons to regions of positive charge. I need to demonstrate that bacterium/fungi dislike positive charge conditions prevalent during summer and that this results in a consequent decrease in toxicity in the human body.

I am thinking through a related hypothesis as to why plants like to grow in spring-summer (and day) which seems to be different to the above with bacterium/fungi (assuming that is even so). A sub-hypothesis is that plants prefer a positive-charge environment. Daylight supplies this positive charge in abundance, especially in spring-summer when the days are longer, but this also coincides to when the respective polar vortex is receiving positive charge. Plants may not like to grow at night or in winter because of the primarily negatively-charged environment. I am aware that plants have a specific respiratory day-night cycles which may have to do with the fact that plants bridge two charged regions: roots beneath in the earth and branches/leaves above in the atmosphere. Plants may exhibit their fractal forms (above and below!) simply by nature of them being conduits of positive/negative charge between earth and atmosphere. This sub-hypothesis posits that a plant's conductance of positive charge is greater in summer/day due to there being an abundance of such charge, so they grow more. Conductance of negative charge is greater in winter/night, so they grow less. I would need to demonstrate that plants exhibit such preference for positively and negatively charged environments (perhaps irregardless to light). It is probably also the case that some plants prefer negative/darkness, whilst some bacterium/fungi prefer positive, but that is research for another lifetime.

Tying it closer to Saturnian Hypothesis matters, previous fluctuations in earth's EMF strength due to past planetary collisions may have resulted in insane bacterial/fungi growth rates and thus the repetitive element in myth worldwide that disease and plague of epic proportions always accompanies the activity of the gods.

I would welcome feedback and criticism. At the moment this is just a thought experiment; I simply do not have time right now to pursue this at any level other than as a hobby EU enthusiast. It may see the light of day in some kind of published paper when I have finished my present studies and actually have time to commit to this!

[paladin17]

An interesting hypothesis. However, there are two things I'd like to note about this.

1) I would suggest using the actual measurements of Birkeland currents by satellites instead of the mentioned "Don Scott's research" which is pure conjecture. There are indeed seasonal differences in BC strength, and also noticeable hemispheric asymmetry in general. E.g. see here and here.
Note that there is no net current into or out of the Earth (or at least that's what it looks like), as BCs go in both directions from both auroral zones (again, I talked about this in my video). Birkeland currents are part of the ring current system, which is closed (in topological sense) and fed by the kinetic energy of the solar wind (+ the magnetic field of Earth).
These current measurements, of course, are derived from magnetometer data. But if we suppose that there is a current, we should detect a magnetic field from it, right? Unless you assume the existence of some yet unknown dark current. But we know where this road would quickly lead.
If there was such a net current, it could have been detected even from the surface - by a certain constant offset of magnetic field direction measured by different stations. If you assume such a thing exists, that's where I would suggest to look for it.

2) The very idea that infections are more prevalent in winter is quite complicated. It is currently assumed that you might get infected at any time of the year (and it seems to be correct) - the only thing needed is the contact with another infected person. But for some reason different parts of the world have their own flu seasons - sometimes one per year, sometimes two etc. It is not yet understood how exactly it works - for the most part specialists blame air humidity (example, plus some laboratory research) and socioecological factors (e.g. in cold winter people stay indoors and in a more tight contact with each other, hence higher transmission rates).
Anyway, my point is that you can't really trivialize the issue to just "winter = flu, summer = no flu", it's much more complicated than that (e.g. see the map from here).

[JP Michael]

Thanks for that feedback, Eugene. Obviously this is an open hypothesis and I will tweak it (probably considerably) as I go along in data collection and observation and as aspects of it get falsified.

I appreciate the corrections re. polar currents. Whether they physically contact earth's surface is actually irrelevant. I am interested in ways that those auroral energies are filtering down through various atmospheric layers from the polar regions . I already know that the polar votices 'cease' around the 70 hPa range. One then descends in altitude through the energetic and turbulent jetstream regions 250-700 hPa) until one reaches the least energetic surface interactions (at least when compared with jetstream/polar vortex regions of earth atmosphere). So one thing that needs work is precisely how the energies are changing as it filters down through various layers of atmosphere, assuming it can be proven that such filtering is actually occuring at all. Do auroral energies actually filter through the earth's atmosphere at large? If so, how much, and how does it manifest in lower systems? etc.

The movement of air around earth is complicated by many other local and geographical factors, but it remains observed that there are specific seasonal cycles of wind (current?) strengths at different layers of atmosphere. I would thus be very interested in a circuit theory of earth weather. Such a system is clearly a complex interrelationship of various layers of atmosphere in addition to day-night and seasonal positive-negative cycles. What must also be considered is the effect of localised surface ring currents which I suspect are the cause of high-low pressure fronts (not heat from the sun).

I think it is important to be attentive to the effects these local and seasonal changes may be having on human health, and whether discernable patterns or correlations can be discovered.

Luc Montagnier's research on water memory (esp. as a filtrate of blood plasma) and DNA/RNA electromagnetic signatures has recently come to my attention as well. Montagnier highlights the proliferation of bacteria and viruses in human blood and the faint EMF signatures they leave in a ULF (7 Hz, or Schuman resonance) background fields. I am very interested in what happens if the background field is strengthened or weakened, etc, in terms of in vivo bacterial/viral growth.

I am also aware of some significant challenges to germ theory in recent years (eg. Jon Rappoport) which may factor into the argument regarding the importance of local infection/transmission, but I have not had much time to delve into that at length yet.

There's a lot to think about and not enough time to work on it, unfortunately!

[EtherQuestions]

This was a very interesting read. Thank you

[Bin-Ra]

Electrical effect in and on the body and the biome are increasing in some news as a result of negative assignments to human caused exposures.
But in any larger view I include the body seeking homeostasis as a core functional response to a changing environment.
Sunlight is associated with vitamin D - a hormone that is hugely implicit to immune function - ie resilience to stresses and toxicity often associated with viral response as if virus was the primary cause. S.Seneff's work on sulphates metabolised as a result of sunlight is also in my mind.
Pollack's work on the increasing voltage from light (particularly NIR) on EZ water also must play a role.
Note that accumulated toxicities may be stored in short and longer term workaround if there is not the facility for a full regeneration, and so late winter to early spring would correspond with depletion of resources and or the initiating of a new influx or cycle as a priming and perhaps pruning - for those who are what we call immuno-depressed, or immune-dysfunctional are often brought to death by the onset of respiratory infection - on top of a range of other 'co-morbidities'.

My hunch is that changes are where reconfiguring or rebalancing of a system can involve what we interpret as episodes of sickness - and perhaps compound by our general medical interventions.

Cosmological influences are in fact the origin of the term 'influenza' and so our forebears - with no germ theory - had or made associations with comets and confluences that I suggest have past instances but also triggered fearful echoes of association, along with the identity-protective superstitions - of whatever measures are thought, wished or believed to be effective.

Fred Hoyle associated inbound germs as a cosmic phenomena - though if this were inbound toxins - and the biological response to the toxics was believed contagious then fearfully denying and casting out the sick would conflict with tending them and compound sickness with denial and isolation. (NB: Contagion in the pre germ theory would be the nature of an accursed fate, divine retribution or divine affliction - ie psychic that manifests as physic).

Hoyle and another mathematician also did significant research into the epidemiology of 'flu' contagion and deduced meteorological cause as the means of 'transmission'. IF a virus is a packet of information that can run on other bodies and replicate according to coded instructions or executables, then such protein covered RNA simply do not hold their genetic or structural integrity in UV light. This fact may also factor into seasonal and weather variations...

The full post continues at

https://willingness-to-listen.blogspot. ... ality.html

- in case it is too long or too general in scope.

[JP Michael]

Dr. Denis Rancourt has an excellent study (regarding CV-19 and what he calls goverment-policy-induced homocide) which includes important data/studies regarding the seasonal prevalence of death during winter, whereas the trough is in summer.

I have serious questions about viral theory, however. According to Dr. Andrew Kaufmann, no virus anywhere has ever fulfilled Koch's postulates (including HIV in the 90's, and our most recent novel coronavirus). No viral particle has ever been concretely demonstrated as the cause of a given illness and repeated in a controlled human sample. There is good evidence to suggest that what the medical sciences have identified as 'viruses' are nothing more than naturally-produced cellular exosomes that are being used to expel from selfsame cells other toxins from the body. There are many uncanny parallels between the two, see video, (and, in the case of the current 'novel coronavirus', it is actually identical with bronchoalveolar exosomes produced naturally by the body in the lungs)

I wish I had more time to work on this but unfortunately I don't!

[Maol]

Could this phenomenon have some to do with the OPs postulate?

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/20 ... near-poles

“Most of Earth is shielded from the solar wind,” said Mark Conde, space physicist as the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. “But right near the poles, in the midday sector, our magnetic field becomes a funnel where the solar wind can get all the way down to the atmosphere.”

[Maol]

Another possible seasonal influence.

https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observ ... discovered

"These fields, which are strongest in the winter, occur where upwards and downwards Birkeland currents connect through the ionosphere."

[JP Michael]

Seasonal variability of mortality (all-cause): it follows a specific northern-hemispheric pattern, which is reversed in the southern hemisphere.

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/sites/defa ... ph2(4).jpg

See also this graph and this graph.