Jan
11, 2007
M15: A Great Globular Cluster
Globular clusters are a particularly difficult problem for a
gravity-only cosmology. They should not be where we see them, and
their spherical configuration defies the expectations of standard
theory.
Today, astronomers continue
to wrestle with problems posed by exotic structures in space that
appear to mock Newton’s elementary “laws”. In their attempts to
account for unexpected galactic motions, astronomers have invoked
invisible entities and forces: Black Holes, "dark matter" and "dark
energy”, which are imagined to be far more powerful than anything
actually seen. In stepping out on this lily pad, they have even
speculated that as much as 99 percent of the matter in the universe
is “dark” and can be measured only by “apparent gravitational
effects”. It was this resort to unseen matter that caused
Astronomer Halton Arp to observe in
Seeing Red that "past
90% it [dark matter] begins to make observations irrelevant".
Within our own galaxy, the
Milky Way, globular clusters or spherical configurations of stars
such as M15 above, are a particularly difficult problem for a
gravity-only cosmology. By what mechanical magic does gravity hold a
million stars together in this way, as a sphere rather than
the familiar disk of gravitational models? Gravitationally,
spherical configurations of stars simply hanging in space are
absurd.
The problem is heightened by
the fact that M15 is only one of about 100 known globular clusters
associated with the Milky Way. Strictly speaking they are not a part
of our galaxy as traditionally defined. Rather they appear close to
the core of the galaxy as a spherical “halo” above and below the
center of galactic rotation.
Yet astronomers rarely
acknowledge the dynamic problems this creates. Theory states that
clusters above the plane must move on orbital paths around the
center of the dynamic system as a whole, and in completing an orbit
each will intersect the galactic plane twice. Such an intersection
with the plane would induce tidal distortions and disrupt the
cluster.
The problem was recently
noted by the physicist C. Johnson of the University of Chicago, “It
is almost like physicists have been assuming they [globular
clusters] just hover there like a swarm of bees. But that wouldn't
happen. They could NOT just follow elliptical paths above or below
the Galactic Plane. Basic gravitational theory insists that their
elliptical paths
pass through
the Galactic Plane, because the two halves of any path must be on
opposite sides of that Plane”.
Johnson suggests that
something is missing—and not a small piece of the puzzle. "It would
appear that either our understanding of the Laws of Physics is sadly
lacking, or our understanding of the geometry of the situation is
greatly in error. The commonly accepted view of a halo of ancient,
stable Globular Clusters hovering around the Core of the Galaxy,
like a swarm of bees, is just not compatible with our current
understanding of the Laws of Physics. Clearly, further research is
necessary".
The same quandary applies to the relative
motions of stars within each cluster. And while Johnson accurately
describes the gravitational dynamic, the rule he applies is a
formula for chaos. As any
gravitational simulation will demonstrate, it would quickly lead to
some stars being accelerated out of the system, while others would
lose energy and fall to an orbit closer in. Over time, the globular
clusters would largely "evaporate".
But from another
vantage point, it is not unthinkable that the stars of
globular clusters are “just hanging there”, both with respect
to the clusters’ own center of gravity and the gravitational center
of the galactic disk to which the clusters are symmetrically linked.
In the electric
universe model of stellar composition and energy, stars are
concentrations of highly positive-charged material. For globular
clusters, such a collection of stars with no other external
distorting forces in play might indeed form a stable ball-of-stars
formation. In fact, the new view of the universe provides many
examples of star-sized masses—even galactic clusters—in symmetrical
arrangements that gravitational theorists never dreamt of (including
polar alignments). And as for the spherical form of globular
clusters, the cosmic electricians suggest that the best analogy may
come from something as unfamiliar to astronomers as ball lightning.
_______________________
Please check out Professor Don Scott's
new book The Electric Sky.
NOTE TO
READERS: Wallace Thornhill, David Talbott, and Anthony
Peratt will share the stage with other investigators of
planetary catastrophe at the British Society for
Interdisciplinary Studies “Conference 2007” August
31-September 2.
GET INFO