picture of the day
archive
subject index

Copper statue of the god, Agni. Bihar,
India - 11th century.
Dec 19, 2007
The Nature of Nature Gods
Ancient mythology ascribes godlike identities to
the forces of nature. Could they be representations of
plasma phenomena?
No dictionary of
mythology will waste any words defining Agni as 'the god of
fire', the living force of nature encapsulated in any and
all natural manifestations of fire, ranging from the cozy
hearth fire at home to the most devastating lightning
strikes observed outside.
But just how
much does such a standard definition of a mythical god tell
us? To qualify a mythical and religious character such as
Agni primarily in terms of his common appearance in nature,
not in terms of his activities in myth, is a reflection of
the so-called 'nature school' of myth. This school saw its
heyday in the late 19th century but has left an indelible
stamp on the popular understanding of mythical entities
today, as reflected in dictionary entries.
Starting from
the assumption that each mythical deity in each culture
originated as a metaphor for some aspect of the natural
world or of human society, countless familiar definitions
arose. Do Zeus, 'the sky god', Hephaestus, 'the fire god',
Helius, 'the sun god', Poseidon, 'the sea god', Aphrodite,
'the goddess of love', Artemis, 'the goddess of hunting',
and Ares, 'the god of war' reflect anything of the way the
ancients themselves looked at these gods?
With a complex
'fluid' subject such as mythology, it is better to identify
historical tendencies and geographic patterns than to offer
facile over-generalizations. Greek thinkers from the
Hellenistic period (4th century BCE) onwards certainly
tended to compartmentalize the realms of nature and culture
into sections that would neatly correspond to divinities on
a one-to-one basis. Some Roman mythologists famously took
this to extremes, naming specific gods for the most nuanced
aspects of any conceivable activity in life.
But these
rational efforts really reflect no more than a contrived and
secondary systematization of the unfathomable welter of
overlapping and contradictory data mythology really is. The
comparative mythologist knows that the closer you look at
the cult and myth of any given god or goddess, the greater
the discrepancy between the straightforward dictionary
definition and the 'facts'. The further one goes back in
time, the stronger the following two tendencies.
Firstly, the
boundaries between different deities disappear and many
begin to look like duplicates of each other. And secondly,
the ancient texts rarely make an effort to 'define' their
gods in terms of nature definitions. Instead, one is just
offered detailed stories of the 'deeds' and 'looks' of these
gods. The archaic state of mythology gives the strong
impression that the worship of deities had little to do with
a conscious attempt to categorize nature.
Instead, it
directly flowed forth from a series of extremely impressive,
arguably traumatizing experiences mankind had had with
forces of nature rarely experienced today. From the start,
the 'gods' and 'goddesses' were merely labels for
recognizable and active forces observed in a dangerously
active sky. It was only long afterwards that people looking
at a quiescent sky began to extract rational paradigms from
the jumble of remembered customs and traditions they had
inherited.
While the
customary dictionary definitions of deities are not exactly
wrong, they tend to detract from the mythical events in
which these gods are merely actors. Whoever can suspend any
preconceived ideas about the 'nature of the gods' and
listens in to the myths themselves will repeatedly be drawn
to the cycle of creation myths, in which the axis mundi
or world axis plays the prominent role.
In the earliest
Vedic texts, Agni surely signifies fire, but this is
specifically the column of fire and smoke that rose up from
the altar that symbolically marked the 'navel of the world':
"Eager he rises like the new-wrought pillar which, firmly
set and fixed, anoints the victims." This vaporous column is
none other than the tree of life: "The other fires are,
verily, thy branches; the Immortals all rejoice in thee, O
Agni. Center art thou, Vaiśvānara, of the people,
sustaining men like a deep-founded pillar. The forehead of
the sky, earth's center, Agni became the messenger of earth
and heaven."
In recent years,
an interdisciplinary study of mythology and plasma physics
has suggested that highly uncommon electromagnetic events
observed in the earth's atmosphere and ionosphere could
successfully account for a large segment of the visual
content of ancient creation mythology. In view of this, it
may prove fruitful for future mythologists not to
concentrate so much on the individual 'biographies' of the
gods as on the 'bigger picture' of the mythical events
themselves, specifically on the visual templates suggested
by cross-cultural mythical archetypes.
Contributed by Rens Van der Sluijs
___________________________________________________________________________
Please visit our
Forum
The Electric Sky
and The Electric Universe
available now!