Your conjecture reversed direction of both pressure and entropy. It is fine, when direction of time is also reverse. Otherwise, conjecture failed by both: 1) open a bottle of high(relative to ambient) pressure air = after period of time, pressure in bottle dropped; 2) wait a ridiculously long wait time, this bottle won't repressure/coalesce into high pressure by itself.
Pressure has similar tendency as entropy.
Entropy, by definition and verification(via known systems), is the tendency of re-arranging a system toward lower energy configuration. It is easy to agree because it makes common sense, plus qualifiable+ quantifiable+ repeatable.
Entropy describes affect/transformation of a system. Interaction of parts/components of this system CAUSE this transformation. When entropy observed is
impossible for a reverse engineered system, it meant - the reverse engineered system is
NOT the actual/matching causal system.
Gravity is one of those
impossible affect for all current existing(exclude mine) hypothesized/theorized systems. thus, wrong systems!
Let's go through an example. On earth surface, given a container/pond with 10km^3 volume of pure water and you saw cm^3 of ink dropped into the water. After a day... you see clearly inky-water volume contains inside a 4cm diameter volume. Well, this is impossible (statistically wise) unless the reverse engineered a system includes a 4cm diameter container/boundary (e.g. a flask). Gravity is the equivalent to coalescing all diluted ink back into a volume of pure ink. Okay, it is possible only when WORK put into this system. Since there isn't any work involved/introduced, hence gravity is another impossibility scenario in the current existing models/systems.
The RIGHT system (fundamentally) for everything must be closed and energy-conserved. 'closed' = a container with finite radius within xyz space (absolute emptiness volume in math sense). 'conserved' = system energy remains constant over time (for our purposed of understanding the universe, maybe galactic time scale is sufficient).
webolife wrote:Sorry, could you summarize how you would explain the beginnings of energy, momentum and the existence of objects that universally "hold together" versus fly apart a la your version of entropy?
You might have misunderstood and or my post wasn't clear. I asserted, our universe is sustain by RADIAL AND CENTROPIC pressures
at the same time in a closed energy-conserved system. I am working on a video to present this system - it will get done soon (hopefully *as it* rather moving the goal post to refine toward a *better than now* presentation).
Current physics models contained either Radial or Centropic = it is only half of the system! So, they need anti-world/another-dimension(s) fudge factors to balance the system energy for the corresponding equations.