Earths Magnetic Field
- webolife
- Posts: 2539
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:01 pm
- Location: Seattle
Re: What is Electric Universe's take on Planets Pole Flippin
I will be waiting confirmation of that finding...
Maol, wouldn't it be fascinating to consider the possibility that magnetism on earth could be altered rather rapidly by the flipping of the the solar gyroscopic core?
Maol, wouldn't it be fascinating to consider the possibility that magnetism on earth could be altered rather rapidly by the flipping of the the solar gyroscopic core?
Truth extends beyond the border of self-limiting science. Free discourse among opposing viewpoints draws the open-minded away from the darkness of inevitable bias and nearer to the light of universal reality.
-
- Posts: 1111
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Contact:
Re: What is Electric Universe's take on Planets Pole Flippin
Nick,
to me there was a Birkeland 4 prong current of which 3 of the prongs carved out the Earth's oceans and the 4th prong went through the centre of the Earth. This is what magnetised the Earth and so now the Earth has a remanent magnetic field due to this. Thus this field is slowly decaying as measurements indicate.
Thus this field is not going to flip. There is no comparison with the Sun's field which would be due totally to electric currents with no remanent field at all. Basically if you have the oceans being carved out via EDM from Birkeland currents then you will have the Earth's magnetic field being the result of the same mechanism.
There may be forces we do not understand which define the tilt of the planets. Miles Mathis produced mathematics to show just this, which does not mean much but that has got to be a lot more likely than two stellar systems merging and retaining their tilts through what must have been untold interactions.
Anyhow there is a lot more evidence in the whole story which I am obviously not going into here.
Cheers,
Mo
to me there was a Birkeland 4 prong current of which 3 of the prongs carved out the Earth's oceans and the 4th prong went through the centre of the Earth. This is what magnetised the Earth and so now the Earth has a remanent magnetic field due to this. Thus this field is slowly decaying as measurements indicate.
Thus this field is not going to flip. There is no comparison with the Sun's field which would be due totally to electric currents with no remanent field at all. Basically if you have the oceans being carved out via EDM from Birkeland currents then you will have the Earth's magnetic field being the result of the same mechanism.
There may be forces we do not understand which define the tilt of the planets. Miles Mathis produced mathematics to show just this, which does not mean much but that has got to be a lot more likely than two stellar systems merging and retaining their tilts through what must have been untold interactions.
Anyhow there is a lot more evidence in the whole story which I am obviously not going into here.
Cheers,
Mo
-
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 6:16 am
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: What is Electric Universe's take on Planets Pole Flippin
Mo,moses wrote:Nick,
to me there was a Birkeland 4 prong current of which 3 of the prongs carved out the Earth's oceans and the 4th prong went through the centre of the Earth. This is what magnetised the Earth and so now the Earth has a remanent magnetic field due to this. Thus this field is slowly decaying as measurements indicate.
Thus this field is not going to flip. There is no comparison with the Sun's field which would be due totally to electric currents with no remanent field at all. Basically if you have the oceans being carved out via EDM from Birkeland currents then you will have the Earth's magnetic field being the result of the same mechanism.
There may be forces we do not understand which define the tilt of the planets. Miles Mathis produced mathematics to show just this, which does not mean much but that has got to be a lot more likely than two stellar systems merging and retaining their tilts through what must have been untold interactions.
Anyhow there is a lot more evidence in the whole story which I am obviously not going into here.
Cheers,
Mo
May I draw your attention to my post: Has the Earth’s Surface Been Shaped by Immense Tornadoes?
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=16703&start=30#p124391
Regards,
Robert
-
- Posts: 2815
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm
Re: Earths Magnetic Field
¶
Magnetosheric Plasma Sheath-Surface standing waves discovered:
http://www.sci-news.com/space/earths-ma ... 06902.html
Magnetosheric Plasma Sheath-Surface standing waves discovered:
It was proposed that plasma boundaries, including the dayside magnetopause, may be able to trap impulsively excited surface wave energy forming an eigenmode of the surface itself12. The magnetopause surface eigenmode (MSE) therefore constitutes a standing wave pattern of the dayside magnetopause formed by the interference of surface waves propagating both parallel and anti-parallel to the magnetospheric magnetic field which reflect at the northern and southern ionospheres.
As strong impulses strike the Earth’s magnetopause, the abrupt boundary between the planet’s magnetosphere and the surrounding plasma, ripples travel along its surface which then get reflected back when they approach the magnetic poles. The interference of the original and reflected waves leads to a standing wave pattern, in which specific points appear to be standing still while others vibrate back and forth. A drum resonates like this when struck in exactly the same way. A new study, published in the journal Nature Communications, describes the first time this effect has been observed after it was theoretically proposed 45 years ago.
... (Another type of wave, known as an Alfvén wave, resonates along magnetic field lines, just like string instruments’ vibrating strings.)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-08134-5“The waves likely penetrate far into the inner magnetosphere causing ultra-low frequency waves, which affect things like radiation belts, the aurora, and even the ionosphere,” said lead author Dr. Martin Archer, space physicist at Queen Mary University, UK.
http://www.sci-news.com/space/earths-ma ... 06902.html
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:02 pm
Re: Earths Magnetic Field
This is really far out. Plus it is very clear, the Earth system is in a plasma environment. Space is Plasma. 99.9%
I'm almost in tears how correctly they used "plasma".
Hey?! Can they check for counter rotating bands in the waving vibrations? ;]
To help with the general scale of this observation.
https://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/wmpause.html
Distances to the magnetosphere (The magnetic boundary) are often measured in Earth radii (RE), with one Earth radius amounting to 6371 km or 3960 miles.
In these units, the distance from the Earth's center to the "nose" of the magnetosphere is about 10.5 RE 41580 miles
and to the flanks abreast of the Earth about 15 RE, 59400 m
while the radius of the distant tail is 25-30 RE. 99000 - 118800 m
By way of comparison, the moon's average distance is about 60 RE
The inner Van Allen belt rises from the top of the atmosphere to a distance of about 4,000 miles. 1 RE
The outer belt extends from 8,000 - 26,000 miles above the planet. 2 - 6.6 RE
The Aurora is between 53 - 372 miles above the surface. .01 - .1 RE
I'm almost in tears how correctly they used "plasma".
Hey?! Can they check for counter rotating bands in the waving vibrations? ;]
To help with the general scale of this observation.
https://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/wmpause.html
Distances to the magnetosphere (The magnetic boundary) are often measured in Earth radii (RE), with one Earth radius amounting to 6371 km or 3960 miles.
In these units, the distance from the Earth's center to the "nose" of the magnetosphere is about 10.5 RE 41580 miles
and to the flanks abreast of the Earth about 15 RE, 59400 m
while the radius of the distant tail is 25-30 RE. 99000 - 118800 m
By way of comparison, the moon's average distance is about 60 RE
The inner Van Allen belt rises from the top of the atmosphere to a distance of about 4,000 miles. 1 RE
The outer belt extends from 8,000 - 26,000 miles above the planet. 2 - 6.6 RE
The Aurora is between 53 - 372 miles above the surface. .01 - .1 RE
interstellar filaments conducted electricity having currents as high as 10 thousand billion amperes
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:02 pm
Re: Magnetic Field Question
Since this thread is so old, I took a trip through the past, and found this post, which trailed to a really amazing picture of something.junglelord wrote:Secret World of Magnets by Howard Johnson, the Father of Spintronics
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34317/Spintro ... rd-Johnson
If you could read three books, this is one of them...the second one is Carver Meads Collective Electrodynamics, the third one but not the last one is the Electric Sky.
First though, the link quoted is no more
"content was removed at the request of Energetic Productions, Inc" and that would lead you to this
https://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2dtx0 ... ctions-inc and then
http://energyfromthevacuum.com/intro.htm
But if you go a little further, I found this
http://www.cheniere.org/misc/sweet.htm
interstellar filaments conducted electricity having currents as high as 10 thousand billion amperes
-
- Posts: 2815
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm
Re: Geocorona ans Aurasphere
`
EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE STRETCHES OUT TO THE MOON -- AND BEYOND
https://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshot/index.html/
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... na#p112656
also
Hence the root of the deeply flawed "dirty snowball" hypothesis.
At that those rates per second one would expect fairly rapid and total dissolution or,
another source of Hydrogen production.
Electric in nature?
EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE STRETCHES OUT TO THE MOON -- AND BEYOND
A recent discovery based on observations by the ESA/NASA Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, SOHO, shows that the gaseous layer that wraps around Earth reaches up to 630,000 km away, or 50 times the diameter of our planet. "The Moon flies through Earth's atmosphere," says Igor Baliukin of Russia's Space Research Institute, lead author of the paper presenting the results. "We were not aware of it until we dusted off observations made over two decades ago by the SOHO spacecraft."
SWAN detects emissions in the UV range.[/quote]Where our atmosphere merges into outer space, there is a cloud of hydrogen atoms called the geocorona. One of the spacecraft instruments, SWAN, ...
Cloud of Hydrogen
The Sun interacts with hydrogen atoms through a particular wavelength of ultraviolet light called Lyman-alpha, which the atoms can both absorb and emit. Since this type of light is absorbed by Earth's atmosphere, it can only be observed from space. Thanks to its hydrogen absorption cell, the SWAN instrument could selectively measure the Lyman-alpha light from the geocorona and discard hydrogen atoms further out in interplanetary space.
From the wake of the Solar Sweep ?The new study revealed that sunlight compresses hydrogen atoms in the geocorona on Earth's dayside, and also produces a region of enhanced density on the night side.
https://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshot/index.html/
http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum/phpB ... na#p112656
also
http://swan.projet.latmos.ipsl.frLyman-alpha intensity of Comet Hale-Bopp, recorded by the SWAN instrument on-board SOHO. It is directly proportionnal to the Hydrogen column along the line of sight. Since Hydrogen comes from the photodissociation of water molecules by solar UV radiation, one can derive easily from such a map the water production of this comet in tons per second. It is already 3 times more than Comet Halley at its best with more than 200 tons of water per second.
Hence the root of the deeply flawed "dirty snowball" hypothesis.
At that those rates per second one would expect fairly rapid and total dissolution or,
another source of Hydrogen production.
Electric in nature?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests