Oct 02,
2006
The "Iron Sun" Debate (1)
Nuclear Reactions at the
Solar Surface
Proponents of the
"Iron Sun", a theory widely represented on the Internet in
recent months, challenge the popular idea that the Sun is
powered by thermonuclear reactions at its core. And they
point to nuclear reactions on the Sun's surface,
something considered impossible under the standard model.
Scientists now
supporting a new approach to solar physics—the “Iron
Sun” — mention neither the Electric Universe nor
the “Electric Sun”. But their findings add powerful support
to the electric model of the Sun posited by Wallace
Thornhill, Donald Scott, and earlier pioneers beginning with
engineer
Ralph Juergens in the late 60's. It was the
electrical theorists who first suggested that surface
events, not a hidden nuclear furnace at the Sun’s center,
appear to be the source of neutrino production (the
subatomic signature of nuclear fusion).
In recent years
nuclear chemist Oliver Manuel and several of his
collaborators have attracted scientific attention for
proposing a radical alternative to the standard model of the
Sun. Manuel suggests that the Sun is the remnant of a
supernova, now holding in its core a “neutron star”
encased within an iron shell. In this model, most of the
radiant energy of the Sun comes from the neutron star’s slow
decay over long spans of time.
Manuel draws
attention to recent discoveries by solar scientists. He
finds compelling evidence that nuclear reactions occur at
the foot points of solar flares—hot spots associated with
prominent magnetic loops and intense electric fields. This
observation places the nuclear reactions far from where
conventional theorists locate them--at the Sun’s core.
To confirm these
surface events Iron Sun proponents point to the telltale
signatures of the “CNO cycle” first set forth in the work of
Hans Bethe. In 1939 Bethe proposed that the stable mass-12
isotope of Carbon catalyzes a series of atomic reactions in
the core of the Sun, resulting in the fusion of hydrogen
into helium. This nucleosynthesis, according to Bethe,
occurs through a “Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen (CNO) cycle,” as
helium is constructed from the nuclei of hydrogen
atoms—protons—at temperatures ranging from 14 million K to
20 million K.
For some time
now, solar scientists have observed the products expected
from the CNO cycle, but now they see a relationship of these
products’ abundances to sunspot activity. This
finding is crucial because the nuclear events that standard
theory envisions are separated from surface events by
hundreds of thousands of years as the heat from the core
slowly percolates through the Sun’s hypothetical “radiative
zone”. From this vantage point, a connection between the
hidden nuclear furnace and sunspot activity is
inconceivable.
Proponents of
the Iron Sun, therefore, have posed an issue that could be
fatal to the standard model. But as we shall attempt to
show, there is a good deal more room to add objections
within this question.
The Iron Sun
proponents are to be congratulated for their research
showing that the Sun does not shine because of nuclear
fusion in its core. It takes great courage to stake your
work and reputation against established dogma. If science
operated in the way it advertises, the search for the truth
in this essential matter would involve a concentration of
resources to confirm or deny the evidence amassed by the
Iron Sun proponents. The questions raised are crucial
whether or not the proposed model of the Sun is correct. Yet
there seems to be pressure on researchers to have a model at
hand to explain "anomalous" results. In the case of the
“Iron Sun”, the result is less than perfect because there is
a flaw at the very heart of popular cosmology:
All matter in
the universe is composed of electric charge. The
electric force between charges mediates all physical
interactions, irrespective of scale. It is the electric
force that energizes matter. By ignoring electricity,
cosmologists have committed an error so fundamental that the
mistake invariably propagates through any and all of their
theoretical excursions. The electrical theorists see this as
the overriding cause of the oft-noted “crisis in cosmology”,
and the effects on related disciplines—bound as they are by
the assumptions of cosmologists—have been nothing less than
catastrophic.
___________________________________________________________________________
Please visit our
Forum
The Electric Sky
and The Electric Universe
available now!