Jul 27, 2007
Rhea the Battered Ice Ball
Saturn's moon Rhea
exhibits a vast complex of craters. On closer examination
the craters pose repeated challenges to common theory.
Rhea is another of Saturn's moons that bears examination in light of
electrical theories. Rhea's mean diameter is 1528 kilometers, so it is
medium-sized in Saturn's
family of moons. Even though it is so small, the entire visible
surface of Rhea is
covered in craters. One large "impact
basin" is 360 kilometers across, which probably makes it the most
cataclysmic event in the moon's history, considering anything larger
would have blasted it to rubble.
One of the most interesting features of Rhea
is the large,
bright splotch that covers almost one entire hemisphere. Because it
resembles the
rayed structures found on Earth's moon, scientists have attributed
its formation to an asteroid explosively hurling subsurface debris
outward in long ejecta blankets. As previous
Thunderbolts Picture of the Day articles have noted, however, rayed
formations are more likely to be the result of electric arcs and not
impacts.
The rays surrounding the large
central crater are not deep but look more like a thin layer of dust
without the gradual sizing of the granules as they recede from the point
of impact. They were probably deposited by an "electric wind" as the
plasma arc reduced the surface rocks to fine powder and then floated it
away as ionized particles. The
bright rays on Rhea appear to have been created in the same way.
Cassini's initial flyby in 2004 discovered
two craters with unusual formations in their centers. Nearly all
craters on Rhea occur in multiples, the majority of the larger ones
are in pairs with many smaller craters distributed around them
non-randomly. A surprising aspect to their arrangement is that they are
found on the rims of the large craters, corresponding to what happens in
electric discharge machining (EDM) when a spark will "stick" to one spot
for a split second, carving small craters as the main discharge rotates
within the large one. The two peaks in the centers of the craters are
another example of EDM. It is highly unlikely that an impact of a space
rock could ever create such a formation. In fact the typical shallow,
flat floors of the craters, together with central bumps, provide a
perfect match with the pattern produced by plasma physicist C J Ransom
in his
laboratory arcing experiments.
Another eye catching feature on Rhea is an
oval-shaped crater approximately 115 kilometers on its longest axis.
The conventional explanation is that it was formed when a meteor at some
remote time, billions of years ago, struck the moon and scooped out the
crater along its direction of travel. If that explanation is accurate,
then where is the gouge that should be at the bottom? Why is the leading
rim not built up from the movement of rock and ice as the meteor
exploded through it at a shallow angle? And why is the crater -and
all the craters surrounding it - flat on the interior with sharp,
perpendicular walls? If they were made by meteor impacts, shouldn't they
be rounded and have raised lips?
These are only a few of many huge structures
that indicate
Rhea did not undergo a slow, steady formation out of a nebular
cloud, but probably moved through rapidly evolving conditions as
electric arcs tore its surface. What has been left behind is the record
of those conditions in the form of fractures, chaotic terrain and
gigantic caldera as big as the state of Oregon, but with no debris.
Despite what appears to be explosions large
enough to rock the planet, there are no fragments - no big boulders or
blocks of stone that would be expected from explosive impacts. If the
craters and rilles were formed by giant electric arcs, then the rock and
ice was probably vaporized or turned into tiny grains and thrown into
space.
By Stephen Smith
___________________________________________________________________________
Please visit our
Forum
The Electric Sky
and The Electric Universe
available now!