Light My Fire
Sep 03, 2010

In classical antiquity, philosophers reflected on the same question, but often came up with a very different type of answer: the sun does not generate its own heat and light, but draws these from a cosmic ‘powerhouse’. A figurehead of the Pythagorean movement in his time, Philolaus of Croton (fifth century BCE), postulated 'that the sun receives its fiery and radiant nature from above, from the aethereal fire, and transmits the beams to us through certain pores …' According to him, 'the sun is transparent like glass, and … it receives the reflection of fire in the universe and transmits to us both light and warmth …' The Roman poet, Lucretius (±99-±55 BCE), similarly accounted for the remarkable ‘explosion’ of solar light from one source by comparison to a fountain, replenished from an external source:

'Another thing also need not excite wonder, how it can be that so small a sun emits so much light, enough to fill with its flood seas and all lands and the heavens, and to suffuse all with warm heat. For it is possible that from this place is opened one single fountain of the whole world, to splash its generous flood and to fling forth light, because the elements of heat gather together from all parts of the world in such a manner, and their assemblage flows together in such a manner, that the heat flows out here from one single source'.

The cult of the sun god rose to unprecedented prominence during the Roman Empire, spawning a rich and largely unexplored literature on the sun’s physical and spiritual nature. Against this background, the notion that this luminary collects 'elements of heat' from 'all parts of the world' fired the imagination of numerous authorities, who, in the footsteps of Pythagoras and Plato, regarded the sun and other celestial bodies as intelligent entities thriving on a constant influx of a mysterious concept dubbed ‘the good’, ‘the intelligible’ or ‘cosmic soul’ from the highest and outermost regions of the universe.

That such thinkers did not eschew metaphysical speculation of this kind is somewhat understandable considering that they did not have today’s accomplished chemistry and sophisticated tools for observation at their disposal. It should certainly not detract from the intellectual originality of the notion of an externally powered sun.

Writing in Egypt, the Jewish allegorist, Philo of Alexandria (20 BCE – 50 CE), reasoned that 'the sun and the moon, and all the other planets and fixed stars derive their due light, in proportion as each has power given to it', from 'that light, perceptible only by the intellect, which is the image of the divine reason' and of God, really 'a star above the heavens, the source of those stars which are perceptible by the external senses, and if any one were to call it universal light he would not be very wrong'.

The core text of the Hermetic movement (second or third century CE), also of Egyptian provenance, states in no uncertain terms that 'the sun, through the intelligible cosmos and the sensible as well, is supplied by god with the influx of good'. Setting the paradigm for Neo-Platonic thought, another Egyptian citizen, Plotinus (±205-270 CE), developed the idea of hierarchic chains – or ‘emanations’ – running through the cosmos, that convey certain qualities or energies from higher to lower levels of existence. The prime example was the transmission of ‘intelligence’ from a 'sun' in 'the divine realm' to 'soul' and on to the quotidian sun. Dressed in Plotinus’ typical recondite language:

'This soul gives the edge of itself which borders on this [visible] sun to this sun, and makes a connection of it to the divine realm through the medium of itself, and acts as an interpreter of what comes from this sun to the intelligible sun and from the intelligible sun to this sun, in so far as this sun does reach the intelligible sun through soul …'

The Roman grammarian and Neo-Platonist, Macrobius (5th century CE), whose writings epitomise the glorification of the solar deity, equated this ‘cosmic cable’ running through the sun with 'the golden chain of Homer': 'Accordingly, since Mind emanates from the Supreme God and Soul from Mind, and Mind, indeed, forms and suffuses all below with life, and since this is the one splendour lighting up everything and visible in all, like a countenance reflected in many mirrors arranged in a row, and since all follow on in continuous succession, degenerating step by step in their downward course, the close observer will find that from the Supreme God even to the bottommost dregs of the universe there is one tie, binding at every link and never broken. This is the golden chain of Homer which, he tells us, God ordered to hang down from the sky to the earth'.

This line of thought received its fullest elaboration in the work of Proclus Diadochus (412-485 CE), a vegetarian and lifelong bachelor heading the prestigious Academy that Plato had founded in Athens. Proclus’ cosmology boiled down to the idea that space is effectively light, as light pervades the entire cosmos. This underlying ‘power grid’ communicates itself to the smallest scales via channels Proclus called seirai or ‘cords’.

Chief among these was the ‘solar series’, which commences with the One Being or Kronos, which is the purest and invisible form of light, continues through the Demiurge of the world or Zeus and a ‘supracosmic’ sun personified by Apollo, and ends with the ordinary sun, Helios, which is visible to us in the sensory world. The Demiurge 'is the "king of the universe," bathed in and transmitting the light from the One, and kindling the sun with it; hence his title "source of the sun"'. Thus, in his Hymn to Helios, Proclus invoked the sun as a 'dispenser of light', who does 'channel off from above a rich stream of harmony into the material worlds'.

An invisible substance akin to light but more ‘ethereal’ that permeates the entire universe and kindles the sun and other stars – such an idea is obviously far out from the viewpoint of current astrophysics; a researcher who would only cast doubt on the accuracy of the nuclear fusion theory of stellar powering already runs the risk of being fired. Yet to plasma cosmologists, the arcane Neo-Platonic musings about ‘cosmic cords’ or ‘strings’ transmitting the sun’s essence sound far less abstruse. The Norwegian scientist and explorer, Kristian Birkeland (1867-1917 CE), was among the first to suspect that space is saturated with electrical currents: 'It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds'.

Electrons, of course, move in currents. The Swedish plasma physicist, Hannes Alfvén (1908-1995), further cemented the view that space is not a vacuum, punctuated by galaxies, but is 'filled with a network of currents which transfer energy and momentum over large or very large distances. The currents often pinch to filamentary or surface currents'.

Since then, writes another plasma physicist, Eric Lerner, 'the idea that space is alive with networks of electrical currents and magnetic fields filled with plasma filaments was confirmed by observation and gradually accepted … The universe, thus, forms a gigantic power grid, with huge electrical currents flowing along filamentary "wires" stretching across the cosmos'.

Could our own sun mark a ‘node’ on one of these immense, interstellar plasma cables known as ‘Birkeland currents’, glowing like one unit in a string light on a Christmas tree? Exactly that was the thought of no less a person than the English astronomer, Sir John Herschel (1792-1871), expressed in a letter composed in 1852. Writing to his compatriot, Michael Faraday (1791-1867), who had posited the existence of plasma in 1816, Herschel wondered if the sun could not owe its brightness to 'Cosmical electric currents traversing space':

'If all this be not premature we stand on the verge of a vast cosmical discovery such as nothing hitherto imagined can compare with. Confer what I have said about the exciting cause of the Solar light – referring it to Cosmical electric currents traversing space and finding in the upper regions of the Suns atmosphere matter in a fit state of tenuity to be auroralized by them …'

Although plasma cosmologists have not yet followed up on Herschel’s hunch, the Graeco-Roman thought experiments regarding the sun’s intermediate position on a cosmic power cable no longer sound outrageous on a paradigm that already envisions a universe alive with untold plasma wires stretching across vast distances. Lacking the requisite equipment used today – as if they themselves somehow received direct illumination from the interstellar circuit – these classical savants hit upon concepts eerily similar to the ones formulated in modern plasma cosmology on an independent and empirical basis. Should Herschel’s suspicion be confirmed one day, these prescient minds therefore rate a mention in the roll call of pioneers.

Contributed by Rens Van Der Sluijs

http://mythopedia.info

Books by Rens Van Der Sluijs:

The Mythology of the World Axis

The World Axis as an Atmospheric Phenomenon